1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Henninger Premium Lager - Henninger Bräu AG

Not Rated.
Henninger Premium LagerHenninger Premium Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

159 Ratings
THE BROS
73
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 159
Reviews: 118
rAvg: 2.94
pDev: 19.05%
Wants: 2
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Henninger Bräu AG visit their website
Germany

Style | ABV
Munich Helles Lager |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: OldFrothingSlosh on 04-03-2003)
View: Beers (4) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Henninger Premium Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 159 | Reviews: 118 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Ricochet
Ricochet

Ohio

3.7/5  rDev +25.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Got this at Trader Joes. Had it in the back of the fridge for a month, awaiting a review. It's a import, yellow, fizzy beer, but wait, there's flavor.

A: Yellow, fizzy, small lace, good head that went away slowly.

S:Candy like. Sweet, and the can were the stongest smells. Actually, I've smelled plenty of imports like this, so average.

M: Foam at the end, thin in profile, nice tangy hops burn at the end.

T: Actually, very suprising. Very dry, very refresing, good hops bitterness, there was no can flavor. I could see enjoying a big ol Bluto Blutarski fishbowl of this at a party. The alcohol was minimal, with hops being the dominant character.

A decent import and it's not sweet or skunky, I could drink this all night when everyone else at the party drinks BMC swill. I think this would be best as a lawnmower/grilling/hot weather refresher.

Serving type: can

01-23-2007 05:17:54 | More by Ricochet
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
brewdlyhooked13

Ohio

3.93/5  rDev +33.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

I have the opportunity to give the canned version another go as it is part of a set of beers I received as a Christmas present from a most thoughtful bro-in-law, Esq.

Appearance - poured into a half-liter glass, two fingers of pillowy foam form up. Pretty basic yellow/straw color. Tiny dotted clumps of lace are left behind as the head melts down.

Aroma - decent pilsner-style grain, mild but on target, far better than my last encounter with this one.

Taste - a much better flavor this time around. A brief bit of metal, but by and large the sweet grain and robust hopping stand out. Despite this being a non-pilsner, it reminds me of the Jever pils I had at a local Oktoberfest a few months back. The balance between the initial sweetness and the bold bitterness on the swallow is very good. Finishes dry with a slight lingering bitterness.

Mouthfeel - medium to light but quite crisp and refreshing.

Drinkability - great summer session brew, for a can no less. Might even need to pit this against Bitburger in a head-to-head 'can-off'.

After examining the bottom of the can, I see that Henninger's shelf life is marked for a year after production. My first can was 11 months old and well past its prime. This 2nd can I'm sampling is not quite 6 months old and tastes good. The storage no doubt was at least a little different for the two cans but ceteris paribus, 11 months may be asking a bit much for this import. If I see these this summer, I'll definitely check the stamped date on the bottom first.

Serving type: can

01-20-2007 04:58:50 | More by brewdlyhooked13
Photo of Westsidethreat
Westsidethreat

California

2.9/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Hay colored body, very clear with bubbles meandering to and fro. Head is stark white, medium sized bubbles forming a nice film across the roof of the beer.

S: Lots of metal on the nose, wet grass and corn pops.

T: Right up front limestone like mineral taste is the primary component to this beer. Tart tin taste with some minor pear moves in next. Finishes lightly bitter with subdued sweet grain

M: Thin body with a medium mouthfeel. Cabonation only slightly prickly

D: Well, this is a straight forward and boring beer. Nothing to see here....move on.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2006 02:23:47 | More by Westsidethreat
Photo of kmcnair
kmcnair

California

3.73/5  rDev +26.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Purchased a 6 pack of 16oz cans at Trader Joe's for $4.99

Aroma - Hint of grassy hop aroma, straw-like grains, clean, slightly sweet

Appearance - Straw in color, good head retention, frothy white head.

Flavor - Malty sweetness, grainy, slight corn, subtle hop bitterness and grassy noble hop flavors, fairly clean, no diacetyl.

Mouthfeel - Light-medium body, medium carbonation, smooth, creamy texture on the palate. Dry finish.

Overall Impression - Crisp, dry & refreshing. This is a nice example of a Munich Helles. A very malt forward light lager that I think could be a bit cleaner in profile with a bit more body and a bit less DMS character. For $4.99 a 6 pack, you really can't go wrong, this is much better than macro swill.

Serving type: can

12-13-2006 04:03:11 | More by kmcnair
Photo of bluejacket74
bluejacket74

Ohio

2.1/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The beer pours a clear golden yellow with about an inch or so white head. It smells like grain, grassy hops and a bit of malt. The aroma isn't strong at all. It's not a bad aroma, but it's not strong. It tastes the same way, except it has a weird metallic bitter/sour taste to it too. And it's weird in a bad way. The mouthfeel is on the watery side, with a moderate amount of carbonation. The drinkability would be OK except for the weird taste. I don't think this is good at all, it's one of the worst beers I've tried. I'll have to try it again at some point to see if another batch is this bad or not. A typical Bud/Miller/Coors tastes good compared to this.

Serving type: can

11-12-2006 02:55:24 | More by bluejacket74
Photo of mghotbi
mghotbi

California

1.9/5  rDev -35.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

16 oz can came in a Trader Joe's "mystery six pack" for $4. Poured a clear yellow with abundant tight white head and a bit of lacing.

Smells pleasant enough - no skunking, no off scents.

Prominent lingering bitterness that seems artificial - like dissolving an aspirin tablet on the tongue. The lack of balancing malt sweetness or floral hop scent and the long lingering bitterness make this an unpleasant experience overall. Mouthfeel is watery and dominated by seltzery carbonation.

I generally like European lagers as long as they're fresh and cold, but I'll avoid this one in the future.

Serving type: can

10-20-2006 20:38:40 | More by mghotbi
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

2.23/5  rDev -24.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pale gold topped by a decent looking cap of off-white that has multitudes of fine bubbles piled atop its sinking surface. An acceptable smattering of lace finds its way to the glass. A pretty generic look overall with nothing leading me to think either good or ill (so far at least) of Henninger Premium Lager. That 'Premium' isn't a good sign, though.

The green bottle, noble hop skunkiness that greeted me on crown cracking hasn't entirely gone by the wayside. Yet another casuality of the pervasive impression among the European breweries that green-bottled beer is an image enhancer; for the brewery and for those who drink it, presumably. Who wants their beer to smell and taste like Heineken? Stale, musky, musty hops and... that's it.

Ditto the flavor. Actually, the beer is even less accomplished on the palate. It's roughly bittered and doesn't hang together well at all. No surprise then that I spotted 'hop extract' among the ingredients. I'm sure that somebody has the talent to brew a tasty hop-extract beer, but this isn't one of the success stories.

There's a barely satisfactory amount of pale malt holding down the bottom end, but it doesn't contribute nearly enough flavor or sweetness to save this sinking ship of a beer. I thought that Munich Helles Lagers were supposed to taste bright. This one is as dishwater dull as they come. Munich Dulles Lager is more like it.

The body/mouthfeel isn't outstanding by any means. It doesn't, however, disappoint to the degree that the flavor does. Somewhere between light and medium, it holds on long enough and is bubbled enough to be a non-factor. I still can't pull the 'average' trigger, though. Probably because each mouthful is such a disagreeable experience.

Beware of any beer with the word 'Premium' in its name. Ninety nine times out of one hundred, you'll find that the beer is anything but. Henninger Premium Lager is nothing more than a poor man's Heineken Lager; something that the beer world could definitely do without.

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2006 12:51:23 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of goschool
goschool

California

3.5/5  rDev +19%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Beer number four out of my Trader Joe's five-pack of beers I've never tried. 16 ounce can.

It pours a sharp gold color with a creamy white head. The nose has grains and grassy hops. There's more grain aroma than hops. That changes in the taste when the grassy hops surpass the dry grains and just barely sweet malts. The mouthfeel is medium bodied and crisp. Nice quaffable lager.

Serving type: can

08-29-2006 07:40:27 | More by goschool
Photo of WMBierguy
WMBierguy

Maryland

3.3/5  rDev +12.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured a very clear, golden dark yellow, with a half inch thick white head. Maltiness was the dominant characteristic of the flavor, with little to no trace of hops. Though malty, this beer did not leave a cloying aftertaste, and had a crisp and enjoyable finish. This was a tasy beer, if simple. I'd try it again.

Serving type: on-tap

08-27-2006 15:52:13 | More by WMBierguy
Photo of biergeniesser
biergeniesser

Minnesota

3.65/5  rDev +24.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

This .5l can of Henninger Premium poured a crystal clear gold color and had a thick fluffy white head that dissipated slowly leaving a slight lacing. Tiny bubbles evolved slowly from the bottom of the glass.

The aroma of this beer was dominated by the malt Most notable were the bready and sweet clovery hay notes. A slight noble hop aroma was also evident.

Henninger Premium has a light, crisp flavor dominated by bready malt that finishes with a slight sweetness. A good moderate hop bitterness and spicy noble hop flavor balance out the malt nicely.

The body of this beer was light to medium with a nice mouth coat and a light degree of carbonation.

All things considered Henninger Premium is a good beer if you are looking for a nice clean well balanced Helles.

Serving type: can

07-18-2006 22:25:46 | More by biergeniesser
Photo of tugdriver7
tugdriver7

Maryland

3.05/5  rDev +3.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Frankly, a pleasant surprise here. Hadn't seen it before, and it was cheap. Doesn't really do the "Munich Helles Lager" category justice; but an easily drinkable, lighter-bodied, mild-flavored offering just the same. Green bottle, but no skunk (especially for an import, this surprised me). Nice (very mild) hop smell and a decently balanced (though very light), slightly sweet malt taste. Huge head (in fact the bottle poured foam when I first opened it) that disappated fairly quickly, but left a nice lace on the glass. Not much to write home about, but I may have found my perfect "lawn mower" beer. The price is right. I may buy this again.

Serving type: bottle

07-13-2006 02:46:45 | More by tugdriver7
Photo of neenerzig
neenerzig

Ohio

3.98/5  rDev +35.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Got one of these as part of a 12 pack "Beers of The World" from World Market as a Christmas present from my cousins. A very decent German Lager, but I have had better. pours a clear golden color with an inially big white head that is gone rather quickly and leaves little lacing. Upon pouring there are lots of littls bubbles rising up, which might make one think that this beer is highly carbonated. Smells of some malt, hops, lemon, perhaps bread, and maybe some grains as well. taste is sort of sweet with malt, grains or oats, and some mild hops. Aftertaste is a bit dry. Nice mouthfeel. Crisp and smooth at the same time. Moderate to high carbonation. Very drinkable. Finishes clean. Worth a few tries. Nothing great, but not bad at all either.

Eric

Serving type: bottle

06-15-2006 02:33:03 | More by neenerzig
Photo of Frozensoul327
Frozensoul327

Michigan

3.83/5  rDev +30.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A really nice Helles Lager. Pours out to a clear golden yellow color with a big head of white foam. Lots of lace, and a medium level of carbonation. Aromas of malt and yeasty bread fill the nose, with hints of hops and grass lingering in the background. Taste was medium bodied and quite enjoyable; flavors of malt, mild grass, oats, cereal, some hops. Nice. Mouthfeel was crisp and refreshing, making me think this would be a great summer brew. Drinkability is good. I will look for this again. A nice crossover brew for boring beer drinkers who stick to BMC products. Recommended.

Serving type: can

05-08-2006 19:32:38 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of mdagnew
mdagnew

United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)

3.03/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle bought from Winemark...

Poured a light golden yellow colour... White head poured quite foamy and faded to thin layer...

Aroma - Very light maltiness. Some sweetness, metallic notes, salty, corn, some lemon hints...

Taste – Light crisp hopiness, some sweetness, faint maltiness... Some citrusy notes...

Feel - Quite smooth with some sharpness underneath. Light bodied. Pretty drinkable...

Overall - An average beer... worth a try maybe once....

Serving type: bottle

05-02-2006 08:50:00 | More by mdagnew
Photo of clickpush
clickpush

Pennsylvania

2.35/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 2.5

Pour: 12oz bottle to pint glass. Bottle comes away to reveal a thin white head and a pale, honey colored beer. Small amount of carbonation seen as a few streams of bubbles coming from the bottom.

Nose: Overpowering aroma of grains and corn.

Mouth: I loved the crisp, strong carbonation that normally indicates a refreshing, summery lager. It carried a slightly bitter swallow with a strange, vomit-like exhale flavor/scent. After being swallowed, this beer reminded me of the smell of a bar at 2am.

Serving type: bottle

05-01-2006 17:36:29 | More by clickpush
Photo of granger10
granger10

Wisconsin

3.48/5  rDev +18.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I got this for like $.50 at Trader Joe's. I wasn't expecting much so I was pleasantly surprised by the flavors of this beer. Pours a brilliant golden color with a large creamy white head. Head has great retention. Decent lacing. Aroma has a cereal quality to it with notes of oats and whole grains. A skunky grassy hop rides in there with the cereal. As I sip I get some malts but they're weaker and not sweet at all. A dry grain flavor which is soon washed out by the grassy hop flavor. The medium bitter hops ride out to the crisp finish. Smooth but maybe a bit watery and lacking complexity. No care, I'm happy with this one.

Serving type: can

02-08-2006 14:09:02 | More by granger10
Photo of longarm
longarm

Maryland

3.1/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Excellent color, clear yellow with nice fluffy carbonation. Tiny bubbles remind me of a classic style pilsner. No complaints at first, but the carbonation fades a little too quickly.

Initially after the pour, very little happening with the aroma, but it sweetens as it warms. The mildly detected hops have are slightly floral, but nice. Maybe a little on the weak side, the aroma isn't too bad.

Flavor dominated by sweet malt up front and not much else. Hops present on the finish balance things decently. Slightly phenolic aftertaste.

Mouthfeel is ok. Finish helped by the hops, still isn't crisp enough for my likings or expectations given the style. Maybe a little on the watery side of things as well doesn't help.

While visiting family in Arizona, this has been the back-up beer always in the fridge and isn't too bad.

Serving type: bottle

12-27-2005 20:12:39 | More by longarm
Photo of AltBock
AltBock

Ohio

2.68/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A 16oz. can that I found at my local Trader Joe's for only .84. Since it was so cheap and German I thought I might give it a try.

Poured a pale golden color with a nice haed of white foam that was about 2 inches in height. After the pour, I saw all those carbonation bubbles racing to the top of the pilsener glass. The aroma was that of only bitter hops. I thought there was suppose to be some malt in there, but no. The taste was about average, it was crisp with a slight bitter aftertaste. The mouthfeel was very carbonated and light with that slight bitterness at the end. I didn't expect much for .84 except for a decent lager and I was right. Worth try for that price, but not much more.

Serving type: can

11-17-2005 20:19:04 | More by AltBock
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

2.63/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

I was a little disapointed in this one. No comment on the appearance--I drank it straight from the can (despirate times call for despirate measures.) The aromas and flavors are quite grainy and thin. Low apples, pears, and body. Thinness brought about a metalic like flavor. Hop flavor and bittering is the only thing that saved the beer although it did leave it dry and grassy. I want to give it another try. Maybe then I'll pour it into a styrofoam cup.

Serving type: can

09-01-2005 18:12:31 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of Padron4KM
Padron4KM

Arizona

2.15/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz green bottle. Pours out dark golden with a smallish eggshell white head. Head evaporated quickly and left no lacing.
aroma was lightly malty
Flavor was almost nonexistent. lightly sweet with a slight hop tingle. and I do mean slight. It lasted about 7 seconds.
Germany’s version of miller lite? At least it was a new shipment so it wasn’t skunked yet. Give it a week it will be.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2005 06:32:38 | More by Padron4KM
Photo of tgbljb
tgbljb

Pennsylvania

3.1/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

poured a pale amber color. Smell is slightly of malt, with a moderate sweetness. Taste is clean with a light sweetness. Mouthfeel is mildly of malt but nothing overpowering. An easy drinking beer, but doesn't differentiate itself from any other lagers

Serving type: bottle

07-09-2005 00:29:06 | More by tgbljb
Photo of GClarkage
GClarkage

California

2.88/5  rDev -2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

07/07/05- Had at a friends house. Part of a 12pk of the world beer collection.

Presentation- 12oz undated bottle. Poured into my Duvel tulip.

Appearance- Half inch large bubbled foamy head. Quickly evaporates. Golden, almost approaching orange colored. Not sure what kinda yeast chunks we have here. Almost like the Kwak I had a few months ago. Like little globules. Kinda scary looking. Decent lacing though.

Smell- Typical grainy scent. Maybe a few hops and maybe heading for the skunky side.

Taste- Has this funky kinda apricot flavor. Also has a few hops as well as a bit of a sweet malt flavor. Not good, but not horrible. I guess just tolerable.

Mouthfeel- Fairly carbonated and a touch cloying, suprisingly.

Drinkability- Won't knock myself out to look for this one again, but there are worse out there. Maybe I even got a bad one?

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2005 21:27:23 | More by GClarkage
Photo of crookedhalo
crookedhalo

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev +2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a standard straw pils color with a fluffy white head. Aromas of bready malts a hint of cookie dough and some low-alphs German hops make up the aroma. Crisp, relatively light and entirely drinkable. A bit of sweetness from the pale malts and carapils. Hopping is light to medium with some herbal, hay-like spiciness; rather tame. A pretty decent helles, but there are better ones out there. I'm not so sure I'd have this one again, unless I was in Frankfurt.

Serving type: bottle

01-12-2005 06:16:55 | More by crookedhalo
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

3.08/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pale golden straw white head laeves even lightly coated even lacing. Aroma: Pale malts touch of noble hops and sweet biscuit malt undertones. Taste: Sweet graininess with hops providing a nice bite finishes pretty clean not trying to reinvent the wheel with this brew just a good German lager. Mouthfeel: Light bodied probably consumed by the masses in the city it originates in. Drinkability: Not bad at all refreshing and enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2004 23:04:12 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of DFN
DFN

Arizona

2.9/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

An average beer, often available at a bargain price. Appearance is ordinary: fairly dark gold with a smallish but long-lasting head. Not much odor. Taste is a bit on the light side, reasonably balanced between malty and hoppy. At 4.8% alcohol content, a 16-ounce can provides a bit of a buzz, and one is probably all you'll want. Not bad, but kind of forgettable.

Serving type: can

10-21-2004 00:16:56 | More by DFN
Henninger Premium Lager from Henninger Bräu AG
69 out of 100 based on 159 ratings.