1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Stoudt's Fat Dog Stout - Stoudts Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Stoudt's Fat Dog StoutStoudt's Fat Dog Stout

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
87
very good

72 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 72
Reviews: 63
rAvg: 3.88
pDev: 11.34%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Stoudts Brewing Co. visit their website
Pennsylvania, United States

Style | ABV
American Stout |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Original Fat Dog Stout. No longer brewed.

To review the current version, go here:  http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profi ... /394/20539 

(Beer added by: UncleJimbo on 12-20-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 72 | Reviews: 63 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of rprinz22
2.5/5  rDev -35.6%

rprinz22, Jan 15, 2012
Photo of apocalypsezombie
2.75/5  rDev -29.1%

apocalypsezombie, Oct 09, 2012
Photo of rembrant
2.98/5  rDev -23.2%

look I could see a garnet purple in the pouring but in the glass,black Thin tan head does not last long. Leaves sip rings.

Aroma, dark malt,a "sort of" bitter chocolate,some dark sweet bread and some sort of fruity tang like peaches and raisins soaked in rum.

Flavor Starts okay with approximate coffee/chocolate stouty tastes,and there's some odd thing,like a fruitcake made with a lot of overcooked canned beaches,some sour cherries and some booze. I've tasted that combo in Brandywines and Belgians,but it's the opposite of what's usual in Oat Stout.

In the aftertaste,the bitter is rather wooden with a little metallic and finishes with some sour that's not welcome. I tend to be a sucker for a good oatmeal stout...this one I don't care for.
It's ragged,it's not true to style. The good parts get buried by an odd mix of cloying old fruit,a sourness,and a bit of booziness that with the fruity effects and sour reminds me way too much of a jug wine.

Mouth, A tad thin. Carbonation is fine. The aftertaste is a wreck. I got a sip that was a bit like a cherry flavor cough syrup. Then it went sour from there. WTF ?

Drinkable? Not real good. The many flaws are not,individually overwhelming but they sure add up. Someone who loves a Dubbel might like this more.

This is not drainpour but of the many Oatmeal Stouts I have had...this is in last place.

Looking at reviews....It seems this stuff is pretty variable and the impressions mostly don't describe THIS one...though some DO.

rembrant, Oct 20, 2010
Photo of plaid75
3/5  rDev -22.7%

Poured a motor oil black hue with no head to speak of.

The smell was hot fudge with a faint alcohol aroma.

The taste was chocolate and toasted malt. There was a very sweet finish. A bit of an alcohol flavor.

The mouthfeel was full, with a little bite at the end.

A relatively low ABV for an American stout. Not enough toasted grain flavor to keep me interested.

plaid75, May 31, 2006
Photo of brez8791
3/5  rDev -22.7%

brez8791, Nov 23, 2012
Photo of DarkerTheBetter
3.1/5  rDev -20.1%

This beer poured a dark black with no head what so ever. A little bit of light came through the edges of my glass reveling some browns and purples.

Smelled slightly sour, or red licorice and a bit of roasted malt.

Tasted like candy-like medicinal syrupy roasted malts. Not so hot.

Mouth feel was medium with very little carbonation, to the point of seeming flat.

Bleh.

DarkerTheBetter, Jan 06, 2006
Photo of adammills
3.2/5  rDev -17.5%

I poured this stout into a pint glass. Dark almost black with a nice tannish head. Both in smell and taste the beer is well toasted with some carmel, not terrific. The alcohol kick is out of balance with the style, and it turns this beer into a sipper, which in my opinion it shouldnt be. The mouthfeel is fine, and average stout at best.

adammills, Nov 18, 2006
Photo of BeerResearcher
3.23/5  rDev -16.8%

It pours a tar pitch black with a big fizzy head and almost no lace. The aroma, unlike most stouts, is yeasty, hoppy with a whiff of fresh bread. Smoky and a bit watery, the malt holds some coffee and dark chocolate qualities. The hop flavors are difficult to identify, due to an overwhelmingly spritzy effervescence. There is some citrus bitterness and a bit of metallic tang, I think. Maybe bottle-conditioned stouts aren't such a good idea, unless steps are taken to reduce the seltzer effect.

BeerResearcher, Dec 08, 2003
Photo of Gasp100
3.25/5  rDev -16.2%

I was excited to find a 750ml of Stoudt's because I have been unimpressed with the 12oz bottling and was told that the 750's were the way to go. Well, it's just not for me I guess. I'm just really getting into Stout's and maybe I don't have the experience in tasting these but this one just didn't work for me ---- the color was your typical coal black, with a slight dark brown tinge and a medium tan head which dissipated quickly and left little lacing. The smell had hints of Chocolate and dark ripe fruit, but nothing outstanding or memorable. The taste was dry, a bit bland and watery with little to no carbonation ---- it could have used more to add some life to the drink. The mouthfeel was forgettable and I had to move on to something else quickly after giving this a shot. Like I said, I'm new to Stout's but this doesn't come close to Storm King or even Love Stout which I see as a standard, very drinkable decent stout. The "born on date" was unreadable so I'm thinking maybe I had a batch that was too old (or too young) but I don't think I'll spend any more money on Stoudt's until I can drink it at their brewery --- something's going on with their bottling and I really want to give them a chance, but I'm not impressed so far.

Gasp100, Jan 23, 2004
Photo of BitteBier
3.28/5  rDev -15.5%

A beautiful beer on the pour--jet black with a huge, frothy, tan head that lasts and laces pretty well. Some ruby highlights appear when the glass is held to the light. The nose is dominated by sweet malts with only minimal roasted or dark notes. Taste is quite the same--more sweet than dark. Worst of all is the watery quality that even by beer-loathing wife was struck by. As a mainstream ale this would be OK; as a stout it's a disappointment. Drinkable, but not for the right reasons.

BitteBier, Dec 06, 2003
Photo of clvand0
3.35/5  rDev -13.7%

This beer pours a black color with a moderately sized tan head and leaves very little lacing on the glass. The aroma isn't very strong, but there is some chocolate, coffee, and malt in there. The flavor was very common for a stout - chocolate with coffee and dark malts, but had a small bit of hops too. Pretty good stout.

clvand0, Jan 27, 2004
Photo of mixed_master7
3.5/5  rDev -9.8%

mixed_master7, Jan 03, 2013
Photo of lccrunchy
3.5/5  rDev -9.8%

lccrunchy, Jan 11, 2012
Photo of BierReise
3.58/5  rDev -7.7%

765ml capped bottle. Vintage Date 4/3/03Pour was overcarbonated. Almost all foam in the first glass. This happened with the IPA as I recall also. Once it settled down it left a normal size tan head on top of adark black body. Aroma is chocolate and soft with a detectable hop presence and a seltzer like note from the carbonation I guess. Body was medium to full and creamy but overcarbonated. Flavor has good chocolate notes but not much else outstanding. Finish is slightly dry. I'd like to try a better sample one day.

BierReise, Feb 03, 2004
Photo of Dogbrick
3.6/5  rDev -7.2%

Vintage Jun 2002: Big, big bottle, and like the Pale I like the cool label. Dark mahogany color and a medium milk chocolate brown head. Some lacing was also evident. Strong roasted coffee/chocolate aroma. Flavor was rich in coffee and malt with a chocolatey finish. There was a slightly metallic, tinny aftertaste that I think was a result of the stout being bottle-conditioned, but who knows. I think a stronger hops presence may have helped in that regard. It made the beer seem thinner than it should have, but overall this is a good Stout.

Dogbrick, Nov 12, 2002
Photo of benmiliron
3.65/5  rDev -5.9%

$5.99 for a 750 mL bottle.

This is your very standard stout. Very pretty in the glass, with a large tan head on top of ruby-hinted blackness. Not a very heavy mouthfeel, very bitter. Chocolate, coffee and charcoal in the taste. Very little sweetness, very little hops. Pretty much what a stout should be. I liked it quite a bit, but wouldn't get it again.

benmiliron, Apr 02, 2004
Photo of Gusler
3.65/5  rDev -5.9%

The pour a deep brown to black color, moderate head, sheets of lace, both chocolate brown in color, and they settle quite quickly. Malt nose, toasted grains, hints of coffee and caramel, also somewhat sweet. Start is malt and lightly sweet, the top skimpy, middling carbonation, decent hop presence, with malt dry long lasting aftertaste. A good stout, not overly robust, so might appeal to those that don't care for the heavier stouts, and well worth the try.

Gusler, Nov 13, 2002
Photo of CRJMellor
3.73/5  rDev -3.9%

Pours a deep chestnut brown with maroon and black streaks and an enormous tan head that leaves spotty chunks of foam on the pint.
Aroma is sweet milk chocolate, touch of roasted coffee and a raosted barley note.
Flavors of sweet chocolate, roasted coffee and barley were noted along with some wheat bread and a biscuit twinge. Finishes with a bitter, burnt and oliy hop note.
Mouthfeel is a little thin for a stout but stars sweet and moves to a roasty, charcoal and finishes with a moderate dose of bitterness.
Drinkability is godd. As I stated, maybe a tad too thin for style. May actually qualify as a Porter but pretty tasty either way.

CRJMellor, Sep 27, 2004
Photo of WesWes
3.73/5  rDev -3.9%

The beer pours a deep dark black color with a thick frothy brown head that slowly fades. The aroma is good. It has a nice dark malt scent that boasts of black and chocolate malts. It is dry, but very creamy. The taste is decent. It has a smooth and rich chocolate malt flavor with a dry, warm finish. It has complexity, but I'm not sure I'm in love with the flavor. The mouthfeel is decent also. It is a medium/full bodied beer with adequate carbonation. This could use some extra body . This is a good stout, but it needs more body and less chocolate malts. It still drinks well.

WesWes, Jul 16, 2004
Photo of JackTheRipper
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

A: Very deep blackish-brown in color. Thin little head with no real lacing to be seen.

S: Strong coffee, darkly roasted malts, some nice hints of chocolate.

T: Bitter coffee taste is the first thing I notice. After that taste comes a nice roasted malty taste that lingers. There's a nice bit of sweetness to this.

M: Slick, a bit mouth-coating. Carbonation is just right, and the alcohol is barely noticeable.

D&N: As I have yet to develop a taste for an imperial stout, this beer is quite nicely suited to what I like at this time. This is a big bodied beer that's quite nicely done.

JackTheRipper, May 12, 2004
Photo of Boto
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

The beer is a very, very dark red. There is a little bit of a tan head. Some lacing down the glass. There is a rich aroma of chocolate and roasted malt. Very similar tastes to the aroma. It is more along the lines of a Dry Stout as opposed to an Imperial (as they claim on their web-site), but very good none the less.

Boto, Jul 06, 2003
Photo of maxpower
3.75/5  rDev -3.4%

Pours black, nice creamy tan head. Aroma of burnt black coffee, sweet roasty coffee tasting, some bitterness in the end, starts sweet and finishes a little dry, medium body and a creamy mouthfeel, a decent oatmeal-sweet stout.

maxpower, Dec 05, 2002
Photo of PorterLambic
3.8/5  rDev -2.1%

Pours pitch black with a dark tan head, a small one, that leaves no lace at alll.
Smell is light but balanced and includes malt, dark chocolate, hops and smoke.
Taste is better with malt, yeast,hops, smoke, dark chocolate, cane sugar, alcohol and vanilla detected. A fairly good balance to go with this complex flavor.
Chewy, full-bodied, warms the throat gently. Drinks heavily but very smooth. A really good beer that could use a bit more nose.

PorterLambic, Sep 24, 2006
Photo of NearerMyBeerToMe
3.83/5  rDev -1.3%

Tasted 12/23/03 from a bottle labeled "Bottled 12/23/02." We'll see what a year in the bottle has done to this conditioned stout. Pours india-ink black with no highlights. Small head less than one finger deep fades to pretty much nothing; only a viscous deep beige film stretches over top of beer. Aroma is light and bordering on thinnish; includes medium-bodied coffee and chocolate malt in the main body with overtones of burnt popcorn or toast, and a bit of hop sharpness hinting at tree bark... even soy sauce, but not unpleasantly so. Deep roasty, husky taste; smoke flavor more comparable to tobacco or leather than peat. Slight, dusty hop/yeast kick at edges of mouth with a dash of pepper suggesting more cocoa than chocolate. Very lingering bitter coffee flavor with very faint cola flavors in back palate. The flavors are enjoyable in and of themselves, however, I feel they lack the dynamics of a more assertive (esp. "Imperial") stout. Mouthfeel is a bit thin methinks. Flavor lingers; mid-drink is smooth but again, I would prefer for the flavors to extend further, well-melded as they are. Still, I find this to be more of a sippin' beer than a real drinker. Hmm. I might buy again.

NearerMyBeerToMe, Dec 30, 2003
Photo of dave750
3.83/5  rDev -1.3%

A very dark beer, black and opaque. A huge, thick, rocky brown head lasts forever and leaves a spotty, fine lace.The initial aroma is of a sharp tart lime that changes to melon and fades with a deep mocha and coffee smell.
First taste is of rich caramel that's quickly joined by toffee. Bitter hops and spearmint emerge at mid-taste. Fades as burnt toast and powered cocoa join in. Occasional hints of orange fade in and out. Medium body. Carbonation was a bit too high, masking some of the flavor for the first few sips.
A good beer with some interesting qualities.

dave750, Jul 24, 2004
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Stoudt's Fat Dog Stout from Stoudts Brewing Co.
87 out of 100 based on 72 ratings.