1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Baltika #7 Export - Baltika Breweries

Not Rated.
Baltika #7 ExportBaltika #7 Export

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

296 Ratings
THE BROS
70
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 296
Reviews: 164
rAvg: 3.02
pDev: 19.21%
Wants: 4
Gots: 14 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Baltika Breweries visit their website
Russian Federation

Style | ABV
Dortmunder / Export Lager |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 05-26-2003)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Baltika #7 Export Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 296 | Reviews: 164 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Sammy
Sammy

Ontario (Canada)

1.85/5  rDev -38.7%

I did not like this beer. It was fresh, part of the LCBO gift pack. No direct sunlight, though you cannot stop the less disasterous flourescent lighting in the store. The beer had a light yellow colour to it, carbonation bubbleswere apparent, and there was a big cheesy head. The horse and cheese aromas made it unapproachable. Boozy and sugary.Watery.

12-30-2010 18:44:28 | More by Sammy
Photo of t0rin0
t0rin0

California

3.75/5  rDev +24.2%

12-08-2012 22:18:27 | More by t0rin0
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

2.63/5  rDev -12.9%

Bottled 6/22/12. Best before 6/22/13.

Pours a clear golden yellow with a foamy white head that settles to a small cap on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of malt, grain, and a slightly skunky aroma. Taste is mainly of malt and grain with a mild corn flake flavor on the finish. There is a mild bitterness on the palate after each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer that doesn't smell or taste very good.

11-01-2012 01:57:02 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of djrn2
djrn2

New Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -17.2%

02-24-2013 16:08:20 | More by djrn2
Photo of metter98
metter98

New York

3.03/5  rDev +0.3%

A: The beer is clear straw yellow in color and has a light amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a half finger high bright white head that died down but consistently left a thin layer of bubbles covering the surface and a thick ring around the edge of the glass.
S: There are faint aromas of sweet malt in the nose.
T: The taste is similar to the smell but is stronger with flavors of biscuit malts, corn and malty sweetness.
M: It feels light-bodied on the palate and has a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This beer is easy to drink and goes down easily. I would have no problem knocking back a few of these.

04-05-2012 22:24:15 | More by metter98
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.5/5  rDev +15.9%

Sallow amber with a sparse cloud of fine particulates and the occasional bubble journeying up to a nice looking cap of bright white foam. The head looks a great deal like meringue since it's soft and firm at once. There isn't a huge amount of lace, but it's no slouch in that department either.

The aroma follows the appearance in that it's simple and effective without being a standout. Although there's nothing here that hasn't been smelled countless times in countless versions of this style, Pivzavod Baltika usually manages to eliminate the nastier tendencies of most Euro lagers. I can appreciate musty/musky hops on a pale malt base.

The brewery describes #7 as a higher alcohol, lower hop version of their other lagers. After all this time I don't recall how #3 and #4 tasted, but after a few mouthfuls of this one, that seems pretty accurate to me. Untoasted pale malt is able to contribute a modicum of sweetness due to the laid back nature of the noble hops.

This isn't outstanding beer, but it does seem to be a worthwhile variation on the brewery's other pale offerings. As a lightly sweet, non-palate fatiguing, easy drinking lager to imbibe while contemplating the mess that Putin has made of your country, it ain't half bad.

The mouthfeel is decent too. Despite all my prodding and probing, I really can't find much to fault. If anything, there's a bit more substance than in most EPLs. Yeah, I know it's technically a Dortmunder/Export Lager, but it's European, pale and a lager, so...

Other than the exceptional #8 (Wheat) and the very good #4 (Porter), most of the beer from this brewery is merely above average. That's pretty much where #7 settles out as well. In a region of the world where good beer is pretty hard to come by, that's nothing to sneeze at.

05-04-2006 12:51:02 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of kjkinsey
kjkinsey

Texas

3/5  rDev -0.7%

12-19-2011 21:18:29 | More by kjkinsey
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

3.43/5  rDev +13.6%

I have an itch that only Baltika can scratch! Now, mind you, these are in a can; the only way to enjoy a Baltika brew. A label on the can reads "Premium Ale, crafted with the finest ingredients, is brewed to meet the standards of the most discerning ale enthusiasts." I thought we're dealing with a lager here. Someone needs to get their shit straight.

Appearance: Pours a yellow body with a small, fizzy, white head. Splotchy, sporadic lacing throughout.

Smell: Much like the Baltika 5 which I'm enjoying side-by-side, it's a sweet-smelling aroma with light florals.

Taste: Pale malts with a medium sweetness -- a far cry less sweet than the previous Baltika 5. One drop of clover honey. Very, very slight sour grain taste. Touch of spicy, floral hops along wtih an equally light bitterness. Semi-sweet finish that, like the #5, gets a touch watery near the end.

Mouthfeel: Medium-thin body. Medium-high carbonation.

Drinkability: Just another simple European lager. Similar to the #5, except with a dialed down sweetness.

09-02-2008 01:51:30 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

3.25/5  rDev +7.6%

07-25-2014 00:34:12 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.3/5  rDev -23.8%

One of the first Russian beers I had ever had. This brew reminded me of a Becks. The color was a yellowish gold, the aroma wasa little grassy and had a but of a funk to it. The taste was bitter in the same ways as the aroma. The brew seemed to be much like a German Lager and not so much of a Russian one.

03-27-2011 20:25:00 | More by Knapp85
Photo of TMoney2591
TMoney2591

Illinois

3/5  rDev -0.7%

Served in a shaker pint glass.

After being told about this whole Baltika line by a former co-worker, I was relatively jazzed to find a few at my local Caputo's. This one pours a clear pale golden-straw topped by a finger of relatively short-lived white foam. The nose comprises wild rice, generic grain, light flowers, very light grass, and a splash of hard water. The taste brings in more of the same, though a firm semi-biscuit backbone is evident, and the flowers provide a cleaner hop thrust than before. Still, everything just kinda lies there, mostly lifeless, certainly character-less. The body is a light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a slickly watery feel. Overall, this is just a boring, unassuming, little guy, something I'd likely confuse with any other bland Euro lager. It's not bad, per se, just nothing I'd ever really wanna drink again.

07-29-2013 17:28:40 | More by TMoney2591
Photo of zeff80
zeff80

Missouri

3.4/5  rDev +12.6%

A - Poured out a clear, golden yellow color with a fluffy, pillowy, white, three-finger head. It left some nice sheets of sticky lace.

S - It smelled of caramel malt and some floral notes.

T - It tasted of corn, caramel malt and some spicy bitter hops. The hops were fairly light but provided some nice balance.

M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A light to medium-bodied beer.

D - Compared side by side with #3, this our is so much better. More flavorful and with a light hop kick.

11-16-2008 13:06:51 | More by zeff80
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.53/5  rDev +16.9%

500ml bottle. Strange peel-off enclosure, which combines a traditional cap with a pop-top pull tab, to create a weirdly easy-to-use hybrid, if you can grok that particular twist of the wrist, that is.

This beer pours a crystal clear pale golden colour, with a teeming amount of foamy, webbed, cushioned white head, which leaves a broad Pangaea-scope of lace around the glass as it lazily sinks away.

It smells of barley graininess, some earthy yeastiness, a bit of muddled lemon oil, and musty grassy hops. The taste is browned apples, bready, yeasty pale malt, musty field honey, some slight drupe fruitiness, and a less than subtle weedy, leafy hoppiness.

The carbonation is average, if a wee bit frothy, the body a decent medium-light weight, with nothing getting in the way of a certain abject smoothness - kind of like there's a KGB or Russian mafia diktat for suggesting otherwise. It finishes off-dry, the bready, yeasty sweetness persisting, with just a bit of fruit and weakly earthy hops joining in this particular end game.

Well, I was expecting a metric-tonne shitload's worth of Euro-skank, given the clear green bottle, and other unjust prejudices. Turns out, one should not judge a book by its cover, as this is a decently malty, softly-tinged hoppy Euro-lager. Maybe not up to the stringent standards of the Teutonic style source, but still agreeable enough - mea culpa, tovarisch.

12-30-2011 03:43:34 | More by biboergosum
Photo of NeroFiddled
NeroFiddled

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -0.7%

The Baltika #7 is really not much different that the other golden Baltika beers in appearance, aroma, or taste. The only thing that seems to vary is the strength. It pours a clear golden body with yellow highlights and a full and foamy bright-white head that dissipates quickly. It keeps a decent collar through most of the glass, and even leaves some lace. The aroma displays some semi-grainy malt with a light sweetness. The body is medium with a soft carbonation that helps to give the impression of a fuller body than actually exists. The flavor is as the nose suggests, with an adjunct laden but still mildly grainy maltiness. The bitterness is restrained, and it finishes with some gently lingering sweetness. Overall, it's not a bad beer, but if I want an overly sweet adjunct lager I think I'll just stay domestic and have a Pabst Blue Ribbon!

05-21-2005 22:51:25 | More by NeroFiddled
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

2.93/5  rDev -3%

A - One finger of white head settles quickly and leaves no lace. Light yellow body with good clarity.

S - Malty with little to no hop character.

T - Sweet and malty with low bitterness, otherwise clean.

M - Medium high carbonation, medium body, and a dry finish.

D - Very light. Nothing offensive about it, but not a particularly enjoyable beer.

09-23-2008 18:29:08 | More by nickfl
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

2.65/5  rDev -12.3%

Pours light yellow with a 3 finger plus white bubbly head that drops to a film. Bubbles continously rise from the bottom of my glass. Some head retention and lacing

Smell: Graininess and faint hops aroma

Taste: Graininess and sweetness with slight fruitiness in the finish

MF: To sweet and cloying, but good carbonation level

Easy drinking, but also easy to forget, I've certainally had worse

02-12-2006 03:52:30 | More by russpowell
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

3.75/5  rDev +24.2%

The beer pours a pale gold color with a thick frothy white head that slowly fades to lacing. The aroma is good. It has a clean, crisp lager malt scent along with German style hops and yeast. The taste is decent. It has a pale malt flavor that goes down easy and finishes dry, yet surprisingly malty for a lager. It is lightly hopped and clean tasting. The mouthfeel is fine. It is a low bodied beer with good carbonation. This is a good export lager. It's light and easy drinking with a maltier approach than some.

01-12-2006 23:57:27 | More by WesWes
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3.45/5  rDev +14.2%

The beer pours a light yellow color with a white head. The aroma is grassy hops, lemon, grain and wheat. The flavor is lemons, wheat and grain. Not too much in the flavor, but it is not skunky like so many green-bottled beers. Overall, the beer is better than I expected. Easy drinking, light mouthfeel and medium carbonation.

08-08-2010 04:19:53 | More by Mora2000
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

4/5  rDev +32.5%

Pours pale straw golden yellow with a large foamy, going to rocky, head that leaves lacing.

The smell is grainy with some lime and sulfur. A nice amount of subtle floral notes come through.

The taste is sweet grain (slightly caramelish) with a touch of lime. An underlying floral bitterness gives the sweet graininess a nice balance. Finishes refreshingly dry.

The feel is towards full for the style, but lands appropriately in light-to-medium bodied. Crisp.

Thirst-quenching, refreshing, easy-to-drink with a nice taste, I could easily "session" this. One of the better export lagers out there, IMO.

06-14-2008 12:03:09 | More by jwc215
Photo of smcolw
smcolw

Massachusetts

3.33/5  rDev +10.3%

Good starting eggshell white head. Settles on the slow side, leaving some streaky lace. The beer is crystal clear. Darker straw color.

Mild hop aroma with an unmalty, grainy touch. I also notice some alcohol to the nose.

Tastes like the except sweeter, almost as if some maple syrup was added. A little distracting. Good body with a higher level of carbonation. Very short aftertaste--mostly grainy malt.

07-17-2011 22:44:30 | More by smcolw
Photo of Halcyondays
Halcyondays

California

3.13/5  rDev +3.6%

16.9 oz. bottle,

A: Pours a pale yellow with a medium soapy white head, good retention, no lacing.

S: Smell is bready, pasta, with a bit of hops.

T: Taste is very light. Malt is on the sweeter side than I expect in Dortmunder. Hops add an grassy element, needs a fuller flavour for sure.

M: Light carbonation, soapy, more body than a light lager, but for this style it is lacking.

D: Pretty easy to drink beer from Russia. Cheap for an imported beer, I could see myself drinking this again for the price, but wouldn't seek it out.

06-25-2008 06:20:01 | More by Halcyondays
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

2.83/5  rDev -6.3%

Green 500ml rip top bottle (5.5% ABV) obtained from my local Aldi supermarket. Brewed 17 Aug 2010, best before 17 Aug 2011, reviewed and drank 12 Dec 2010.

Looked fine in a 'Corsendonk' stemmed tulip glass. Good large snowy white head of tight bubbles. Very light golden body, typical clear and clean look this style is renouned for.

No smell, some cereal esters if you sniff hard enough, along with dried hay.

Refreashing and thirst quenching, but not really tastey in any way. Dry rather than sweet, but again not really dry either.

12-12-2010 17:55:58 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.42/5  rDev -19.9%

Peel-top green bottle into Williams Bros. Brewing pint glass in low altitude Galway, Ireland. Bottle acquired in Ennis, Ireland, though I've also seen it at the Porterhouse(s) in Dublin.

A: Pours a four finger head of no cream, decent thickness, and generally favorable retention. Colour is a light clear yellow. Carbonation appears below normal; no bubbles are present.

Sm: Very light simple scent of clean barley.

T: Clear medium body of barley with cream overtones that feel somewhat artificial. I admit I'm new to the style, but it's not a style that seems to have a tough learning curve. It's not a great beer. The cream on the finish is nice, but the barley sharpens at the same time, negatively impacting the balance; I've noted this feature specifically in other beers from the same brewery, so it's not a matter of style adaptation. I can't adequately comment on the build in terms of the style, but it's built badly inasmuch as good beer is concerned.

Mf: Smooth in the first act, but gets much coarseness as the beer continues, progressing to an unnatural artifical coarseness and dryness by and through the climax. It's nicely wet in the first act elsewise.

Dr: In spite of its balance issues, it does maintain a certain perverted refreshment capability in its first half. I wish they'd clean up the latter bit, but it does have some value. It isn't worth its price in Ireland, but is likely worth it in other locations if you're looking strictly to get bollocksed. In general, I think it's a beer to be avoided if you're a serious beer fanatic.

05-20-2011 00:06:32 | More by kojevergas
Photo of woodychandler
woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.53/5  rDev +16.9%

The CANQuest (TM) is headed eastward for a spell, to Russia, thanks to a great website (https://russianfooddirect.com) that may be a new source for many. If you CAN't get behind this newest idea, toughski shitski, kamarad!

I used to put away Baltika in its many numbers, in bottle form, with the late Stosh, owner of Pittsburgh's Bloomfield Bridge Tavern and our fave was # 9, the Baltic Porter. RIP, bro! This review is for you.

I have to rebut KittyKat's taking them to task for a sticker mis-identifying it as an "ale". That was placed on there by the importer/exporter who probably knew about as much about beer as I do about subatomic physics. The CAN itself is pretty explicit about it being an "Export Lager Beer". Actually, if I CAN peel said sticker off, there is some pretty cool looking Cyrillic lettering underneath.

Ahh, the Crack & Glug, sometimes the best part of a CAN of beer. I have come to really appreciate the auditory nature of CANs. I achieved a finger of rocky, bone-white head with very limited retention. The color was a beautiful sunshine-yellow with NE-plus clarity, allowing me to peer through the wall into the neighbor's kitchen. Nose had a characteristic lager sweetness, free of adjuncts. I am in lust! I am so sick of AALs in a CAN that I could scream! I may have to order up some more of this, now that I have a source identified. Mouthfeel was tending towards thin and it had a very dry taste to it, very little sweetness of which to speak. Instead, it kind of reminded me of a better-made Minhas, with a light cotton candy flavor and no plastics factory. Hmm. Finish was likewise dry and refreshing. I would put this in the cooler for a day at the beach, definitely. Howzabout Brighton Beach? Maybe I could latch onto one of those Russian expat honey honeys ... maybe I'd just best leave well enough alone.

03-04-2011 00:36:37 | More by woodychandler
Photo of wl0307
wl0307

United Kingdom (England)

2.68/5  rDev -11.3%

At 5.5%abv., coming in a 500ml green bottle; BB 24/03/2012, served chilled in a pint-size pilsner glass.

A: pours a dark straw hue, coming with mild carbonation mixed of large and tiny bubbles; the white foamy head retreats very fast to a rim on the top.
S: notes of German hop varieties come with a restrained aroma of sweet lager malts and powdered grains, not very sweet overall, leaving but a weak trace of syrup. Given a good swirl, only the floral hints of hops come more assertive. Pretty timid overall, for a strong lager.
T: the neutral-flavoured swallow of sweet malts is backed by none other than plastic graininess, rather weak hop bitterness, and residual touches of syrupy malts, leaving an otherwise pleasant aftertaste of… nothingness… Calling it clean on the palate, perhaps, would do some justice, but just before my tongue picked up a syrupy kick-back feel at the rear.
M&D: lightly effervescent, medium-minus bodied, a lacklustre interpretation of this beer style. I can’t find anything bad about this beer, apart from the fact that nothing stands out, either. At any rate, my palate agrees that alc. is hidden pretty well.

06-09-2011 12:08:47 | More by wl0307
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Baltika #7 Export from Baltika Breweries
70 out of 100 based on 296 ratings.