1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Dixie Jazz - Dixie Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Dixie JazzDixie Jazz

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
64
poor

89 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 89
Reviews: 62
rAvg: 2.6
pDev: 22.69%
Wants: 0
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Dixie Brewing Co.
Louisiana, United States

Style | ABV
Light Lager |  4.13% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Dogbrick on 11-05-2002)
View: Beers (3) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100  | next › last »
Ratings: 89 | Reviews: 62 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of beerthulhu
beerthulhu

New Jersey

3/5  rDev +15.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Brewed by Joseph Huber. Labeled as a American macro light lager.

A: The beer pours a very clear, bright orange hue with moderate-heavy carbonation and a very slight head that diminished rapidly.

S: The nose is very fruity with sweet caramel, apple cider, and oranges.

T: The flavor is very sweet overall, honey, melons, applesauce and cinnamon that combines with the sweet caramel to produce a spicy and fruity apple cider like spicing for a finish. The flavor ends very quickly off the tongue and clean and the heavy carbonation is detected in the swallow.

M: The mouthful is moderate, somewhat creamy with a nice caramel backing.

D: Overall a very sweet, fruity beer with some citrus and lots of carbonatation. a tweener or micro with training wheels.

Serving type: bottle

01-26-2008 18:15:06 | More by beerthulhu
Photo of acrawf6
acrawf6

Louisiana

2.08/5  rDev -20%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours out alight orange amber with a small white head.

Smell. Malty and sweet. I'm getting a grape fruitiness.

Taste. Is initially sweet and stays quite sweet. Has a fruitiness that is like strawberry or grape preserves.

Mouthfeel. body is thin and a bit empty.

Overall, not so good. reminds me of a low carb beer. I'd say pass on this one.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2008 02:16:55 | More by acrawf6
Photo of RblWthACoz
RblWthACoz

Pennsylvania

3.1/5  rDev +19.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a slightly fogged orange amber. A crème head forms and falls. Nose seems not that clean. Flavor matches with a not so smooth ride. Just seems to lack balance or a smooth flavor. Feel is nice, but who cares. This is one that you wouldn’t miss much if you passed on it.

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2008 07:07:49 | More by RblWthACoz
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

2.28/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Pours golden with a one-finger head that descends to a thin head.

The smell is of some light grain. Clean.

The taste is of some light grain with a touch of non-descript hops in the middle. Something akin to club soda comes through too powerfully. It has a fizzy, abrupt finish.

Rather like carbonated water, there is hardly any "beer" going on here. "Only 92 calories..." Whatever...They might as well add - and hardly any flavor. They need to "jazz" it up a bit...

Serving type: bottle

11-16-2007 21:28:28 | More by jwc215
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

2.7/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Doom on me for forgetting how this beer tastes. Not all impulse buys are good. At 92 calories I believe this is a light beer, but not gonna loose sleep over this one's classification & oh by the way it's made in Wisconsin, ugh (thought I was helping the Crescent City, wrong!

Pours a an effervescent bronze/apricot with 3+ fingers of pillowy pearl colored head. Above average lacing & average head retention

S: Corny, honey malt & some apricots & lemons in the background

T: Lemons, appleskins & some crackery notes up front. More cornyness & a bit of metallic taste as this warms. Finishes with some honey malt, caro-corn syrup sweetness & a bit more metallic hops. Just typical of the style, Upon further review (2nd bottle) way too cloying

MF: Thinnish with lively carbonation

Drinks a bit slow, too much cornyness. Very run of the mill, If you find it cheap & during summer you may like this better than I did

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2007 00:27:46 | More by russpowell
Photo of rowew
rowew

Colorado

2.35/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Presentation: 12 oz bottle, label has been updated since the attached picture. Indecipherable bottling code, ABV is marked.

Appearance: Clear orange, head fades immediately.

Smell: Slight metallic aroma, what smells like adjuncts, but could just be DMS? Meh.

Taste: Faint malt taste, just a bit of hops in the finish. Tastes better than it smells, but that isn't saying too much.

Overall impression: This is a very mediocre beer - not much in the way of flavor. I'll be drinking the rest of this six pack out of the bottle, and not thinking about it too much.

Serving type: bottle

11-04-2007 19:03:45 | More by rowew
Photo of Frozensoul327
Frozensoul327

Michigan

2.6/5  rDev 0%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours out to a darker orange amber color with a "Dr. Pepper" head of foam that dissipated very quickly. Aromas of malts and sweet corn and gran. Not bad. Taste is bland and unexciting, but really, expectations shouldn't be all that high; malt, grain, slight spice, a touch of hops. Mouthfeel was like water. Drinkability is nearly non-existant. Very boring.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2006 23:28:11 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of sopor
sopor

Oregon

2.13/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

You know, it's really a shame that I didn't like these couple of brews I've had from this historic brewery.

Crystal clear amber with thin white cap of lively frothy head that dies to a thin splotch of film. Smells of buttery notes and toasty malt and a hint of alcohol. Not exactly good smell.

Taste like a macro lager. Light slightly bready malt to some green apple (yech) flavor. Sweet malt (munich- or vienna-like) after the other and very delicate (IOW they were barely detectable) hops definitely does not satisfy my herbal craving!

Moderate to light body, not worth drinking again. Maybe a good one for bud light fans. In fact, I know who I can unload the other five bottles to now!

Serving type: bottle

09-24-2005 17:47:28 | More by sopor
Photo of WesWes
WesWes

New York

2.17/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The beer pours a nice amber color with a 1/2" offwhite head that fades to lacing. The aroma is average. It has a weak malty scent that boasts of pale malts, adjuncts, and light crystal malts. It has a sweet aroma with a musty character; not very appealing. The taste is awful. It is like drinking a glass of water with half a Killians dumped into it. It has little beer flavor. It goes down like water and finishes dry and metallic. The mouthfeel is terrible. It is an extremely low bodied beer with good carbonation. This beer was made for easy drinking. The problem is, it's too weak to be enjoyable. It doesn't even taste like beer. Two thumbs down.

Serving type: bottle

05-21-2005 22:54:20 | More by WesWes
Photo of walleye
walleye

Michigan

1.65/5  rDev -36.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

from the bottle poured amber wit off white head. aroma malts, caramel, molasses, grapes, apple, raisins just plain fruity. flavor weak caramel, metallic, hints of sour grapes, apples and some other strange flvor that I can not pin point. it did have a smooth mouth feel.

Serving type: bottle

12-07-2004 02:03:38 | More by walleye
Photo of chilidog
chilidog

Ohio

1.8/5  rDev -30.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

I picked up a couple of these from a friend who runs a cajan style bar and has family in Louisiana. We talked as Hurricane Ivan was at aim for New Orleans. I took home the beer till after Ivan turned, New Orleans made it, others didn't fair as well.
The beer didn't fair so well either. I've not bought or heard good things on Dixie, now I know why. The beer poured a hazy copper orange with a fizzy small white head that faded to nothing. The aroma was of sweet malt but not as bad as others thought. The taste was! Malted water. Sweet malt, no hop and alot of water in the taste and mouthfeel.
Im not sure whats Jazzy about this brew, they should of named it Storm Surge. It would of fit better!

Serving type: bottle

09-18-2004 17:29:49 | More by chilidog
Photo of Kwak
Kwak

New Jersey

2.08/5  rDev -20%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Head was small but thick creamy white color.
The aroma was almost sickening.
The taste had much to be desired, a light flavor almost water like with no malt or hops aftertaste.this is their attempt a a light .
I would not recommend even trying this one stay away!!.

Serving type: bottle

09-23-2003 18:55:06 | More by Kwak
Photo of Denali
Denali

Florida

2.17/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Package: 12-ounce bottle. Black label with silver trim and a picture of a hep-cat wearing sunglasses and playing a trumpet. No vintage date – hopefully that’s good enough for Jazz.

Appearance: Orange-amber with off-white thick head that laced nicely. When first poured, lots of effervescence was evident as a continuous stream of bubbles continued to rise up to the head.

Smell: Sickly sweet malt aroma. Aroma got worse as the beer warmed up.

Taste: Bitter taste up front, immediately followed by super strong horrible metallic taste. As the beer aired out and warmed up a bit, the metallic taste lessened more and more, allowing a slight malt flavor to come through. Nutty and grain-like aftertaste. Taste improved as the beer warmed up.

Mouthfeel: Thin (it’s a light beer) with moderate carbonation.

Drinkability: Did not make me want to have another. Heck, I didn’t even want to finish the one I had.

Comments: Not too good. I liked the appearance – nice color and the head lasted for the entire beer. Smell was horrid. Taste wasn’t too bad, once the metallic taste went away. Yet another lesson from schoolteacher and biruchan. Hmmm…where did they come up with their lesson plan?

Serving type: bottle

04-04-2003 17:53:40 | More by Denali
Photo of Dogbrick
Dogbrick

Ohio

2.48/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

This was a much prettier beer than I expected it to be. Copper/amber colored with a medium head that disappeared fast. It also blew the regular Dixie Beer to Hell, man that stuff was horrid. On to the negatives: It was not as good as the Crimson or Blackened Voodoo. While more flavorful and fuller bodied than most light beers, it was still a light beer and you can only squeeze so much out of that. Faint malt flavor and aroma was about all it had going for it.

Serving type: bottle

11-05-2002 10:12:05 | More by Dogbrick
« first ‹ prev | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100  | next › last »
Dixie Jazz from Dixie Brewing Co.
64 out of 100 based on 89 ratings.