1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Oud Bruin Belgian Style Ale - Grand Teton Brewing Co.

Oud Bruin Belgian Style AleOud Bruin Belgian Style Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

104 Ratings
THE BROS
90
outstanding

(view ratings)
Ratings: 104
Reviews: 38
rAvg: 3.35
pDev: 17.91%


Brewed by:
Grand Teton Brewing Co. visit their website
Idaho, United States

Style | ABV
Flanders Oud Bruin |  6.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
Our Oud Bruin is firmly in the East Flanders tradition. We used American 2-row barley and German melanoidin malt (for red color) as well as maize (to lighten the body). The wort was simmered in the kettle for 24 hours and then hopped lightly with English Kent Goldings for balance.

We fermented with a Flemish blend of yeast and bacteria cultures, including lactobacillus, pediococcus, and brettanomyces. It took six months at cellar temperature for the culture to achieve the style’s characteristic quenching sourness. Finally, we bottle-conditioned the beer according to the “methode champenoise,” so it, too, can be laid down, to be brought out when it can be truly enjoyed.

(Beer added by: jwc215 on 06-16-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Oud Bruin Belgian Style Ale Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 104 | Reviews: 38 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

1.63/5  rDev -51.3%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

12 ounce bottle, not for retail sale sample. Very light in color, with a filmy head. Sweet fruits and pumpkin spice aroma, seems way off for the style. Flavor is absolutely nothing like an oud bruin. Where do I begin? Sweet beyond belief, not sour at all, no barrel character….was this even aged in wood?. The bacteria cultures just didn’t seem to work any magic. Really, really just awful and a drain pour for me. I sampled this next to Russian River Supplication and this beer absolutely tasted and smelled like nothing, when compared to the Supplication. I sampled what I believe was a non bottle conditioned sample, so if my score ends up being against that grain, I’ll pony up and by a Liter.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2007 06:52:49 | More by Crosling
Photo of vince4953529
vince4953529

California

2.16/5  rDev -35.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Should have check the review before buying this. I generally trust Grand Teton would release a good beer so I just buy them without question. But this is just isn't good.
Taste is sweet malted yeast. No acidity or sourness whatsoever. Way too sweet for an oud bruin. Taste like a brown ale brewed with Belgian yeast, which is not a good combination. I had a few gulps at this and poured the rest down the sink. Sorry, Grand Teton, love your beers but this one is a total misfire.

Serving type: bottle

06-23-2013 18:05:47 | More by vince4953529
Photo of sb3000
sb3000

South Carolina

2.26/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

2013 edition. Nice bottle presentation with a card tag that summarizes their brewing process, ingredients and the style. Date on card is April 2nd 2013.

Pours a medium amber. Very little head. No lacing. Typical of the style.

When I close my eyes and smell, I would swear this is an Octoberfest. Very bready, some banana and clove in the nose. Some medicinal notes.

Mouthfeel is very slick. Low carbonation. Thick and coating. Full bodied.

Taste is clean but buttery. Very sweet, no tartness to speak of. Caramel, malt and clove on the finish. Again, more Octoberfest. No hop bitterness or sour notes. A good amount of diacetyl is present.

Final thoughts...an average representation of the style. None of the slightly sour notes I'd hoped for or anticipated. I disliked the beer and was somewhat underwhelmed and confused. Almost seemed like Grand Teton should have allowed the Lacto and Brett to age out a few more months. That would have provided for a more sour and less sweet beer. Would not buy again or recommend. Sorry guys.

Serving type: bottle

10-24-2013 02:47:43 | More by sb3000
Photo of Beaver13
Beaver13

Colorado

2.28/5  rDev -31.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

1L bottle with waxed swing top, dated 4/11/2007. Pours a ruby red-brown with a very little head that quickly disappears.

The aroma is tart/sour fruits and oak with some smoky charcoal and leather.

The flavor is very washed out and watery. There is some cola and sweet and tart fruits, with a slight washed out bitterness at the end. The mouthfeel is pretty thick and slightly syrupy which is weird considering how watery it tastes. There is almost no carbonation.

Overall, it's a very washed out and watery flemish. Even if the flavors were bolder, I think they would not compare well to other sour beers. definitely not worth the $12. It's not offensive, there's just not much there.

Serving type: bottle

08-11-2007 04:36:55 | More by Beaver13
Photo of emerge077
emerge077

Illinois

2.58/5  rDev -23%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A sour brown ale that is neither sour nor brown... oh boy.

Pours an auburn-orange color, fairly hazy with a stray bubble or two rising upwards. A finger of tan foam rapidly fades to a thin laceless skim on the surface. Soon after there's no foam at all.

Smell is vague, nothing really stands out, there are some vaguely Belgian spice esters that would be more appropriate in a Dubbel or similar BSDA trappist style. Nutmeg or pumpkin pie spice seems to be out of place. Not offensive,though it just "ain't right".

Taste is similarly ill-defined, and more in line with a Dubbel or BSDA. Not sour, not even tart. Unfortunately 6 months of cellar conditioning has done very little. A vague tangy bitterness and some nutmeg, toasted malt. A little sweet at first then dry and oddly bitter in the aftertaste. Definitely hasn't seen a barrel or even oak chips. This beer was a waste of money and a sad, distant facsimile of an otherwise unique style. Out of my 40 Oud Bruin reviews, this appears to be the third worst (after Bourgone des Flanders and Rivertown Pestilence).

Serving type: bottle

06-26-2013 23:47:59 | More by emerge077
Photo of spoony
spoony

Colorado

2.73/5  rDev -18.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.75

From a 750 ml bottle (dated April 2, 2013) into a tulip.

A-An aggressive pour produces a flat-looking cranberry-colored brew. The one-finger head of tan foam drops immediately and leaves no lacing. The beer is clear and lighter in color than many of this style.

S-The smell has some cranberries, but very little sourness or tartness. In fact, it is a bit watery smelling, with only some prune-scented malts to provide any body.

T-The taste is just...off. There are some oxidized, dirty (as in dirt, literally) flavors, some prune, a touch of cranberry, and a saccharine bitterness instead of sweetness or vinous tartness.

M-The feel is close to normal for the style with soft carbonation and a moderate heft.

O-I was very disappointed in this beer. It lacked many of the sour, acidic, vinous characteristics that make an oud bruin an oud bruin. Instead, there is a mildly sweet prune flavor; some bitter, metallic tastes; and an earthiness that literally tastes like mud. I'm not sure if this batch was off or if I got a bad bottle, but I will not be looking for this brew again.

Serving type: bottle

08-22-2013 03:25:38 | More by spoony
Photo of MrBoz21
MrBoz21

Colorado

2.74/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pours with light white head that quickly dissipates. 50% opaque – caramel amber. Holds light, not cloudy.
Light aroma – fairly non-descript. Slight peat moss and plum.
Flat, leathery, tobacco, plum/raison. Not sour or tart that I can tell.
Overall: Meh, wouldn’t seek it out. Really sort of tastes like it is too young. Needs time to develop character.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2013 06:00:21 | More by MrBoz21
Photo of BeerTruth
BeerTruth

Connecticut

2.85/5  rDev -14.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Got this monster from younger35.

1 quart 1.8 fl. oz. waxed flip-top bottle poured into a snifter. Let's just say this was a bitch to open, let's hope it was worth it.

Pours a dark murky ruby hue with a big two finger khaki colored head that dies down to a thin bubble filled layer. Stickiness is pretty damn good, lacing all over the place. Smell is, well, different. Almost like a wild ale with sour fruits and an apple cider like aroma. Some wood like smells tingle the nose as well. Taste is weak, but some fruit like flavors are mostly present; apples, cherries, grapes. Aftertaste is a woody vanilla flavor. Not a whole lot more in terms of flavor, a bit one dimensional. Mouthfeel is a light to medium body with a good amount of carbonation. Drinkability is a bit tough for me because of the watery sugar flavors. This beer is just about all over the place, could use some balance. Maybe I just don't understand the style, but I didn't enjoy this beer. Gald I had the opportunity though.

Serving type: bottle

10-18-2007 01:03:30 | More by BeerTruth
Photo of Etan
Etan

Wisconsin

2.99/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

750ml into a tulip.

A: Pours a mild reddish brown with a large off-white head.

S: Strawberries, toasted grain, lightly bacterial.

T: Red grapes, caramel, light hop bitterness, bready.

M: Medium-bodied with active carbonation.

O: Malty without any acidity really. Grand Teton seems to have some major problems whenever they use souring yeast/bacteria, as the beers I've tried that are advertised as sour never are.

Serving type: bottle

07-26-2013 04:00:22 | More by Etan
Photo of StonedTrippin
StonedTrippin

Colorado

3.03/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

the worst grand teton beer out there, at least the 2013 batch, that ive had, and its not close. this is not an oud bruin, a far cry from it really. no sourness whatsoever, no lactic tartness or even funk. i dont know what went wrong here, and if it didnt taste okay, i would score it far lower. as a belgian brown, its okay, as an oud bruin its an utter embarrassment. hazy light brown amber liquid with some density and a patchy airy half inch of tan head. it smells fruity like apples, esters from a funny belgian yeast dominate, stale brown ale malts, a touch of chocolate, and caramel grains all bounce around. nowhere is wild fermentation, nowhere is funky yeast, and nowhere is any sign of the beer this claims to be. grand teton is an awesome brewery, they make nothing but unique and well crafted beers, all of them, but this is an abomination. sweet fruit, rotting apples, caramel malt, and stale belgian yeast all collide in a beer i dont care to ever taste again. ive heard a lot of different takes on what the deal is with this, but i can only gather its a mistake that should have never been released. an okay brown ale, not an oud bruin, avoid this one at all cost.

Serving type: bottle

02-24-2014 04:57:27 | More by StonedTrippin
Photo of chugalug06
chugalug06

Colorado

3.04/5  rDev -9.3%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Hazy red-brown brew with mild fast moving soapy tan-yellow head. No lacing.

Apple, brown sugar, grape/raisin, slightly musty. Slight lemongrass.

No tartness, at all. Lots of heavy sugary malt. Light carbonation, nearly harsh sweetness, zero bitterness.

Kinda of disappointing, hard to review... Far from fitting the style, not sure if it just needs more time or what, but it doesn't fit the category, much more of a Belgian... A good brew, but just not close to what I was expecting.

Serving type: bottle

05-31-2013 01:12:21 | More by chugalug06
Photo of vette2006c5r
vette2006c5r

Minnesota

3.06/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Oud Bruin pours a reddish color with no head. Their is a nice mellow fruity and sour aroma. The taste is slightly fruity and sweet, a bit sour, and has a nice yeasty undertone. Full flavor, but the carbonation is a too light. Overall its an enjoyable beer, and a rather average one at that.

Serving type: on-tap

07-03-2013 04:05:54 | More by vette2006c5r
Photo of mactrail
mactrail

California

3.06/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.75

Handsome dark hazy amber in the New Belgium snifter. Enough foam and a tangy carbonation. Some lacing and swirls of foam as you slop the glass around. A little beery and woody aroma, but not much. Light and watery.

I don't taste much Brett or any hint of sourness. Bottled on date is not quite legible, but 2013 sometime. A hint of fruit that makes me think of the cheap passion fruit juice in the supermarket cooler. A touch of butter. Just enough bitterness and dark nastiness to keep it from being a good soda pop. This just seems like a lot of trouble for a sweet, soupy brew. From the 22 oz bottle bought for $10.25 at Bottlecraft in San Diego. At least they had the decency to put a cap on it instead of the cork nonsense.

Serving type: bottle

07-20-2013 05:08:03 | More by mactrail
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

3.08/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

Thanks to wethorseblanket for sharing this one at drewone's tasting.

Bottled 4/1/13.

Pours a murky dark orange-red with a foamy bone head that settles to wisps of film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is slightly sour and tart with malt, grain, and fruity aromas. Taste is much the same with slight sour fruit and caramel flavors on the finish. There is a mild amount of bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is an average beer that is pretty disappointing for the style.

Serving type: bottle

06-11-2013 16:52:58 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of nickfl
nickfl

Florida

3.2/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

A - Pours with a small head of white foam on top of a hazy, amber body. The head settles quickly and leaves little lace.

S - Caramel, brown sugar, and balsamic vinegar.

T - Sweet, sugary malt up front with notes of brown sugar and molasses. More of the same in the middle with a slightly acidic finish and lingering toasted grain character.

M - moderately thick body, average carbonation, and a slightly sweet finish.

D - This isn't a bad beer, but it thoroughly fails to live up to its stylistic description. There is almost no acidity and while there is a little funk in the aroma it tastes like a sort of imperial brown ale. Not something I would drink again and a bit ofa disappointment.

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2013 02:38:22 | More by nickfl
Photo of LambicPentameter
LambicPentameter

Kansas

3.23/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Enjoyed on tap from Swagger. Served in a Boulevard tulip glass.

Appearance - Pretty much to style. Body is chestnut brown with reddish clay highlights. Half-finger of bubbly head that dissipates pretty quickly leaving a rim of bubbles around the edge of the glass for the remainder.

Smell - Barely a hint of tart along with notes of dried fruit--specifically raisin, maybe cranberry--and some hints of malty sweetness.

Taste - Where is the sour? All I get from this is mostly malt, almost like an American brown ale more than a Flanders Oud Bruin. The main thing differentiating it from an American red, to me, is the lack of any kind of hop presence, which is normal for the Flanders style. However, I prefer my sour browns to have more, no actually SOME tartness.

Mouthfeel - Thin and fleeting. Light-bodied and just enough carbonation to give it a little texture.

Overall, a disappointing beer to say the least. That being said, I like sour beers, so when I have a style that's intended to be sour, or at least a little tart, with almost zero pucker factor, I'm going to be disappointed. I would recommend to people who have a hard time getting into sours, but this really isn't going to be very representative of good versions of the style, unfortunately.

Maybe I will buy a bottle and let it age for awhile to let the various cultures work their souring magic on this beer.

Serving type: on-tap

06-09-2013 15:25:51 | More by LambicPentameter
Photo of Domingo
Domingo

Colorado

3.28/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Picked this up at Liquor Max. Comes in a huge bottle with a wax covered flip-top. I like the GT brews I've had thus far, so this is promising!
Pours a pretty standard rediish brown color. There's a little head on the top of it, but not much. Future pours are more aggressive and give a little more head.
Smells of yeast, brown sugar, dates, and black pepper.
Taste starts off nice with the sweet dried fruit flavors, but then it just trails off into nothing. The yeast that's present in the smell isn't really there for the taste. Something's really just missing or is watered down. GT mentions it uses "maize" to lighten the body (which sounds better than corn), so maybe that's the culprit. Anyway, the flavor's missing something.
Mouthfeel is normal per the style. It's a little watery, but not too much so.
I split this bottle with my wife and it was more than enough for both of us. I'd take another one if I was given one, but at $12, I won't go looking for it.
GT's a fine brewer, but this one's a miss for me. It feels like we missed out on something because it's not flavorful enough...yet there's a good flavor buried in there.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2007 13:49:00 | More by Domingo
Photo of Murrhey
Murrhey

Montana

3.28/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

Poured from large standard pressure-cap bottle into a tulip glass. Reviewed live in high elevation Kalispell, Mont.

A- One-finger khaki colored head with large bubbles. Low retention. Hazy, orange-brown color, very little light breaks through.

S- Slight funkiness, wooden notes. Not as sour as the style usually prepares me for.

T- Wood. Slight funk, but not sour. Not great.

M- Like whiskey, thick and alcoholic.

O- Not a great beer. I don't enjoy this very much.

Serving type: bottle

08-30-2013 02:17:10 | More by Murrhey
Photo of tayner
tayner

Arizona

3.35/5  rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

1 liter flip top waxed bottle courtesy of bitterbill as an extra. Stamped on label 4-11-07

This one was way carbonated, even served cold it poured a huge foamy head into my tulip glass. It was a medium brown color with lots of bubbles. Attractive to look at when first poured. After sitting to warm up a bit the head dissipated to just a scant ring.

The smell was just barely tart/vinegary and then you could smell some banana and spice. It was a bit confusing for me to wrap my head around.

The taste was also confusing. When i saw oud bruin on the bottle, and this is classified as a flanders oud bruin, i was expecting sour. What i got was different. Up front there was just a hint of it trying to be sour. Just a slight hint of tartness that faded very quickly. Midpalate I began to get some belgian yeast breadiness with a biscuit like malt presence, a typical belgian pale, and then on the finish i began to get some mashed banana flavors, almost a wheat beer flavor. It was a very odd combination of tastes. It was almost like I had consumed a flanders oud bruin in the glass, then without washing it poured in a belgian pale ale and drank it while eating an overripe banana.

The mouthfeel was good and was not hurt by the massive carbonation which i assume was from aging a bottle-conditioned beer.

The drinkability was unique. I drank it, and I kept coming back for more, not so much because I loved it but because I kept wanting to figure it out. My brain and tongue were confused. It is a cross between two styles I like, so I finished off the bottle, but I am not so sure I would rush to drink more.

Serving type: bottle

06-12-2008 11:22:34 | More by tayner
Photo of garymuchow
garymuchow

Minnesota

3.4/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Sat on this for a couple of years. I guess now is the time.
Thanks Linda.
Opened with immediate carbonation (boy beer) coming out of the bottle. Holiding a potent tart and sour sweet malt aroma even before pouring. A bit of the barnyard too. Pretty consistent throughout.
Cloudy amber of slight orange brown and red. Thinnish head after pouring holds it status very well throughout.
Just a touch of cinnamon before the more traditional flavors come on. Qiute tart, but something isn't quit right. The flavors underneath the sour don't sit well. The malt seems a little shallow. flat and uninspiring, and compared to others I find the fruit difficult to discern. Some sour apple and as it warms can start to pick up a few more flavors, but still limited.
Fully carbonated with a 1/2 glass filling me up with bubbles. Reasonably thin and the carbonation is soft.
Especially as it warmed some, became a more drinkable beer, but that does not take away from its deficits.

Serving type: bottle

12-04-2009 03:35:47 | More by garymuchow
Photo of Beerswag
Beerswag

California

3.44/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

On tap extreme pizza poured into stemmed glass.
Looks hazy,medium-dark brown close to a amber yet more tones walnut..smell is subdued malt and some fruity essence such as strawberry, raspberry and lil chocolate in there too..taste is much more complex than the smell. Taste is funky, and definate complex malt profile, medium sour notes, light, refreshing..some carmel and chocolate undertoneszzvery low hop character, yet slight presence. Funky, yet not too spicy..pair great with pizza, brie in puff- pastry, and this beer shall compliment dishes that are bready (pizza, pasta).. This beer needs a heavier or chewy-er food to compliment it's lightness and juicy/funky character..muscles with this beer in the stock..butter, cheese, or bread with this one should do..

Serving type: on-tap

03-06-2014 02:00:23 | More by Beerswag
Photo of ZoomanCru
ZoomanCru

Colorado

3.48/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Oud Bruin – Flanders Brown Ale (6%) - Grand Teton Brewing Co. (Idaho)
☆☆☆½

App: Deep ruby-brown color. Clear, but for a swirl of yeast. One and a half finger tan head that settles moderately quickly but leaves a ring of bubbly head which eventually goes thin. No lacing noted.

Smell: Chalky and slightly fusel. Some sourness high, subtle notes of cherry and champagne dryness. Light malt sweetness. Bouquet is moderate and slightly acetic. Some dark fruit.

Taste: Assertively sweet on the foretaste, gradually becoming sour on the palate almost like green tomato or gooseberry. Green grape. Some alcohol. Nice caramelized, almost crème brulee. Dark fruit mild but pleasant.

Mouth: Medium to medium low body. Moderate carb with noticeable dryness on the finish.

Home tasting, 22oz into Tulip. 2/20/14.

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2014 20:05:27 | More by ZoomanCru
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

3.49/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

On tap at Closed For Business.

A: Pours a dark garnet, ruby red color. A two finger beige head forms, and recedes in a second. Light lace is left behind.
S: Tart, vinegary dark fruits up front. Thought the tartness is not in your face. Sweet malt, then nothing. Nothing lingers.
T: Follows the nose with vinegary fruits. Lightly tart, almost no acidity, and sweet malts. Again, nothing lingers hear.
M/D: A medium body and lower carbonation. Fairly thin and watery. Not hard to drink. I finished this with ease.

This is not bad. Just fairly tame. I like in your face vinegary, acidity. Probably the only style that I enjoy over balance. I don't want to say disappointed, but not exactly what I look for in the style.

Serving type: on-tap

06-21-2013 14:57:02 | More by champ103
Photo of kylehay2004
kylehay2004

Florida

3.5/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: no head really on a clear amber with relatively clear orange and golden hues body.

S: very fruity with both dark fruits and tropical fruits including red apple, fig, sour cherry, mango, tangerine with cinnamon notes.

T: fairly malty with sour and caramel malts, breads, wood, booze, fruits including fig, grape and red apple although not very sweet, more tart and sour. Belgian yeast throughout.

M: medium body and moderate carbonation. coats the palate.

Overall: fairly boozy and sour with a nice belgian yeast presence. I havent had too many of these but this one seems to have many elements making it complex.

Serving type: bottle

06-14-2013 02:36:07 | More by kylehay2004
Photo of Georgiabeer
Georgiabeer

Georgia

3.65/5  rDev +9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a hazy brown with a short head. The aroma has a bit of band-aid to it, and then transitions into some acetic sour and funky barnyard smells. Right on the edge of being too much, and the band-aid is already pushing it over the brink. Thankfully, all of this mellows a bit in the mouth. The taste has some nice, more restrained barnyard elements and there is a touch of sweetness. A bit of rubberband creeps in, but its not overbearing and doesn't detract as much as it distracts. A bit much overall and a little rough in the mouth. I wouldn't say they have this style down pat, but I love the fact that more breweries are producing beers like this and taking up the challenge.

Serving type: bottle

02-13-2009 02:48:12 | More by Georgiabeer
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Oud Bruin Belgian Style Ale from Grand Teton Brewing Co.
77 out of 100 based on 104 ratings.