1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lost Continent Double IPA - Grand Teton Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Lost Continent Double IPALost Continent Double IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

412 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 412
Reviews: 218
rAvg: 3.83
pDev: 11.75%
Wants: 13
Gots: 13 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Grand Teton Brewing Co. visit their website
Idaho, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
Grand Teton’s Double IPA was born in our renowned Cellar Reserve program. Fans of our Double IPA and XX Sweetgrass demanded we brew the style on a regular basis. In response, we created Lost Continent in 2009 and updated it for 2010. This year's version is brewed with well over three pounds of hops per barrel in the kettle and another half-pound per barrel of “dry hops” in two additions during conditioning. A revised fermentation program has produced a more traditional Double IPA flavor profile--drier, less malty, more hoppy.

We use only American Pacific Northwest hops. Galena hops are added early in the boil for smooth, balanced bitterness. We add Columbus, Centennial and Amarillo later in the boil for flavor, and Columbus, Centennial and Simcoe in the whirlpool for aroma.

For even more aroma, we dry-hop with Summit, Columbus, Amarillo and Cascade hops in the conditioning tank, and dry-hop again right before bottling with whole-flower Cascade hops. The result is fruity, floral and complex, with notews of tangerine zest and fresh-squeezed grapefruit juice.

Idaho 2-Row Brewers’ Malt and German CaraHell and Vienna malts give this ale its lovely pale copper hue, with flavors of orange marmalade and dried apricots, supported by a strong backbone of hoppy bitterness.

90+ IBU

(Beer added by: illidurit on 05-09-2009)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 412 | Reviews: 218 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of madtappers
4.63/5  rDev +20.9%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Poured from a bottle into a imperial tulip glass.

Nice golden copper hazy color, with a awesome aroma of citrus hops. Two finger white head.

At first this beer seems to be sweeter than most IPAs than you get that nice citrus aroma both at the nose and tongue. With both great taste and aroma this beer is a must for all to try.

madtappers, Jan 27, 2010
Photo of coldmeat23
4.35/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

GLASS: Unibroue Tulip
TEMP: Cellared @ approx 50 degrees

This pours a fairly hazy, lightly golden, orange color. It has a two-finger head of clover-honey colored foam sitting on top. The retention is very good and the lacing is very sticky.

Big piney citrus notes come at me first. They are backed by strong hints of caramel malt sweetness. Light touches of orange blossom honey. Grapefruit, orange and pine notes are drizzled with golden brown sugar and light bits of caramel.

This is one of the better IIPA/DIPA's that I've ever had, as far as balance goes. The bitter and sweet notes coexist in perfect harmony, within this glass...and then, my mouth.
Good hops presence, brought forth by notes of grapefruit, pine, orange peel, and other citrus notes. They're side-by-side with a nice dose of sweet caramel malts. Nice touches of honey and vanilla are detected. A mild hint of yeast presence supports it all.

This has a nice full body. It has a mild-to-medium level of carbonation, which keeps it active and interesting, but doesn't overpower.

The 8.0%abv is fairly well-hidden, helping to make this a nicely drinkable beer. The level of balance here is a highlight, but hopheads will find it less than stellar, I'd think. Oh well, I think that Grand Teton has made a tasty, drinkable beer.

coldmeat23, Jan 21, 2010
Photo of OlRasputin989
3.2/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into New Belgium Snifter

A: Hazy orange brew with a slow forming 1/2 finger head. leaves very little to no lacing at all.

S: Honey-like malts, orange peel, and candied grapefruit. slight hint of piney aromas. Also boozy and soapy

T: upfront caramel malts and oranges, fades to slight spice, pine sap and grapefruit. The taste is also somewhat soapy

M: medium full body with a very slicky, almost flat mouthfeel. doesn't really help to bring out the hop flavors

Overall, The first thing that caught my eye upon purchase of this 4 pk was the 90 IBUs denoted on the side of the packaging. However, I can't seem to find this in the beer. Seems flat and lacking a crispiness in the mouthfeel.

OlRasputin989, Jan 12, 2010
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
3.08/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured into a Cigar City snifter. Bottling date unknown.

Appearance: A small, fluffy, white head takes awhile to form atop a cloudy, peach-colored body. Upon closer examination, I notice that the body is littered with white floaties. Head retention is pretty minimal. Nice lacing.

Smell: Caramel malt and pine resin with a touch of grapefruit. That's about it.

Taste: Pine resin, orange, caramel, and grains. Very malt forward and certainly lacking in hop flavor. The bitterness is there though (it's a little lighter than I'd like), which makes me think that this beer is old. I'm not too impressed.

Mouthfeel: Malty, oily, lightly carbonated, and full-bodied for an imperial IPA. Good mouth-coating. Finishes a tad dry and prickly - just a tad.

Drinkability: This is not a bad beer on the whole, but as far as style goes I'm not a fan. This reminds me of the stereotypical east coast IPA, but without any malt (or hop) complexity. An easy, but boring, drink.

ThreeWiseMen, Jan 06, 2010
Photo of brow1901
3.88/5  rDev +1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A- Bright but cloudy orange in color with a thin white head. Not much retention but fair lacing.

S- The smell grows on you, it's not typicall of a DIPA. Much less hop foward and the malts are very fruity and less toasty. Slight alcohol smell.

T- Has a nice hop bite, very well balanced. Though with that in mind it is much less hoppy than most DIPAs one comes across. So it's not my favorite flavor, the alcohol is really the only thing that seems to make it "double". Has the same hop content as a normal IPA, this doesn't make it taste bad but what I come to expect is big hop flavors (partially because I paid for that taste).

M- Kinda slick but enjoyable, pretty heavy on the tounge. Typical

D- Decent drinkabliity, because it is much more balanced that other DIPAs it doesn't ruin your taste.

brow1901, Jan 04, 2010
Photo of portia99
3.63/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle received as an extra in a trade with grgas. Thanks! Poured into a Brooklyn snifter.

A - Pours a hazy, yeasty pale orange. No head to speak of...just a couple small islands of bubbles and a very thin collar of white.

S - Very fruity with some citrus notes - oranges and lemons mixed in. Lots of malt too - has a thick, sugary and caramel sweetness to it. Smells pretty nice...definitely with a malt bias.

T - Malt is the story here. Really not much bitterness at all. Sweet and citrusy fruit...lemons mixed in with syrupy caramel malt. Alcohol not detectable in the taste. Interesting...hard to think of this as an Imperial IPA, more like a light barley wine. Not unpleasant tasting, just not a DIPA.

M - Thick and full bodied. Low carbonation that gives just enough tingle to let you know it isn't flat. Again, not quite what I'd expect for a DIPA.

D - A bit on the sweet and malty side for me for have a high drinkability. Has an enjoyable flavor, but sweetness makes it a quick sipper, if that makes any sense...can't really down it too fast, but not a super slow drinker either.

portia99, Jan 02, 2010
Photo of bret27
2.88/5  rDev -24.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Local bottle

S: bittery, sugar, malt, little off smell. maybe vegetal or older hops?

A: Deep amber w/good head retention

T: Super weak, with malt dominating. Maybe a little pine and bitterness at the end of the palate

M: average

D: No etoh presence so good, but also too much body and thick/sweet/malty to be too drinkable. Not too mention it just doesn't taste very good.

Overall: Totally off-style even for a single ipa, I really am not even sure whey they would make this.

bret27, Dec 27, 2009
Photo of Beerandraiderfan
3.35/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

What a beautiful orangey amber pour, hazy in the good way. Smell is dominated by a mildly turn off whif of alcohol. Boy, now I have mixed thoughts.

Taste is fruity and bitter, the hops take back seat in this double ipa, which is a little strange. Very much English double ipa inspired I would say. Midway through, the bitterness settles down. Not suggesting more than one in a sitting. No desire for another immediate beer.

Beerandraiderfan, Dec 26, 2009
Photo of Mebuzzard
4.33/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

This is a murky golden pour that puts out a nice, rocky head. I only bought one bottle, wish I had bought the pack.
Quickly the aroma of citric hops and oils come forth. I can smell it two feet away.
Taste is loaded with hops, yet without a whole lot of dryness. Heavy on the citrus, orange peel and tangelo flavors without the acidity. Some sweetness comes into play and just when I think it will ruin the beer, it fades into a nice light malt presence.
Again, not a very dry feeling beer. Yet the alpha oils do come through. Slick. A quick burst of alcohol warms things up. Slight pine finish.
Overall this is a very nice beer. I knock it on bite, and the sweetness almost comes too big.

Mebuzzard, Dec 14, 2009
Photo of StJamesGate
3.63/5  rDev -5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours a glowing apricot with some sediment and a dense white head that fades to a high ring of foam and tracers of lace. Nose is deep caramel and tangerine. Jammy mixed fruit malts with pine and red grapefruit juice end. Ting of dry finish. Medium body. No burn.

Where's the kick? Everything from name to nose is leading me to expect a hop attack, but it just never comes. No date on the label, thus can't say if it lost some bite over time, but all the other flavors are in place so I think not. Nicely malty, but enough to almost be off style.

Goes down nice, but that's because it's drinking like an APA.

StJamesGate, Dec 05, 2009
Photo of DogFood11
2.8/5  rDev -26.9%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

This brew requires an aggressive pour for the desired appearance. Cloudy orange/tan body with islands of froth sitting on top. It has occasional ring lace. The smell has me curious. Loads of caramel malts fill the air.

This is a unique DIPA. It has such a huge candied caramel presence contrary to what we desire in hop bombs. This delivers more of a blend. I find it too candied for my taste. All I can think of tasting this is those small caramel chewy squares.

Notes: Ehhhh... not for me. I like my DIPA's almost completely one sided. Way too much sweetness. As the beer warmed up it showed some citrus hop that made it worth the purchase.

DogFood11, Dec 05, 2009
Photo of arizcards
3.98/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Picked up a 4 pack at BevMo back in August for $9.99.

Beer poured amber orange with minimal head. Nose is quite nice, citrusy hops dominate which mixes nicely with the malts. Taste is good, beer is extremely well balanced between the citrus hops and the malt backbone. Mouthfeel is medium bodied but there is a lack of liveliness on the palate. Drinkability is OK, this is a very well balanced beer that has potential to be a darn good beer if it can be more carbonated.

arizcards, Dec 05, 2009
Photo of Schmaltzy
3.35/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 12oz bottle into Chimay Glassware.

A- Slightly hazy amber color with slight head retention and lacing.

S- Nose not as much as I expected. Heavy caramel malt component with like an orange pine hop smell, but way too much malt for my taste.

T- Well taste starts as that caramel malt flavor, which I really don't like in a double IPA, then transitions to a orange pine and definate dry pine on the back end.

M- Not as crisp as any IPA, very malty with little carbonation. Don't understand why this is so malty, I know its a double and needs the malt but this is like brown shugga mixed with blind pig.

D- Yes I could drink this, but I don't consider this a DIPA, it doesn't have enough hops or carbonation, way too sweet for me. 8% is virtually unnoticable though.

Schmaltzy, Dec 03, 2009
Photo of RedBrewer83
3.73/5  rDev -2.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from 12oz bottle into pint glass...

A: Hazy golden yellow hue with hints of amber in the light. Head is very creamy with decent retention and nice lacing.

S: Nice nose, well rounded with lots of pine and citrus and toasted caramel malt in the background. Not super complex but nice.

T: Very malty as expected from a double, but would have liked more hop to crisp things up...that said it is pretty good. Starts off with a citrus caramel flavor that has a decent amount of bready yeast as well. Pine hop notes kick in the finish and then the malt comes back heavy and leaves you wishing for more hops....

M: Heavy medium body with a faint amount of carbonation...needs a little more carbonation and hop to crisp things up and make it a little more refreshing.

D: As stated, needs more hop and carbonation to make it more smooth and drinkable...decent though for 8^, the abv goes unnoticed.

RedBrewer83, Dec 02, 2009
Photo of emerge077
3.58/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Single bottle from Breeze-Thru in Milwaukee.

Pours into a Bells tulip with a sticky, poofy head that clings nicely, leaving a halo on the rim. Color is a rusty copper-orange that becomes opaque with floating chunks. Can't say that looks great, but it's otherwise nice despite the snow-globe look towards the bottom.

Aroma is ok, lightly floral, sweet caramel with a slight citrus edge. Sweet candied citrus peel and caramel flavors dominate. It shows its age a little, but still packs a punch. There's a good level of residual hop bitterness and flavor, so all is not lost. The body is full and robust with an easy, drying finish. Overall it drinks well, and i'd look for it again if I was sure of the freshness.

emerge077, Nov 30, 2009
Photo of BedetheVenerable
3.8/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: Snifter, poured on-tap

Appearance: Hazy burnt orange beer with a really impressive cream colored cap with great retention

Smell: Tons of bright piney goodness, with a touch of grapefruit in the background....just a hint of toasty caramel malt in the very back

Taste: More balanced than expected...there's lots of piney hop character, with some sweet candied citrus as well...there's a heavy hit of sweet candy-caramel to balance out the hops however. There's a medium juicy bitterness on the finish. This is not nearly as crazy as I thought it would be; indeed, it's quite tame for a IIPA.

Mouthfeel: Medium-full bodied

Drinkability: Pretty high for the abv/style

Conclusion: This was not a bad beer by any means, and was one of the more balanced IIPAs I've ever had...I think that was my problem with it. It was almost too balanced; I love my IPA's to be nicely balanced; IIPAs should (IMO) kind of be a sucker punch to the gut. This one just didn't do it for me. Perhaps this would be a good introduction/way to ease into the style.

BedetheVenerable, Nov 29, 2009
Photo of drpimento
3.18/5  rDev -17%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured wth a big, off white, foamy, frothy, soap bubble head and some lace. Color is a slightly hazy amber. Aroma is of course hoppy, Fresh qualities in the nose too. Flavor is bigger with some of grapefruit qualities that personally, I'm not too big on. Body is quite good and so is carbonation. The piquant grapefruit thing is overdominant for me, but technically very well done. Finish is the same.

drpimento, Nov 26, 2009
Photo of ArrogantB
3.05/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I bought a four pack for $9 which seemed like a good price...Bright orange color with lots of lace and a foamy head. It smells syrupy, some hops, uh....It tastes like its got a lot of hops but it is also very syrup-like and the mouthfeel is astringent. Maybe I have been spoiled by having access to Pliny and I'm biased but this was a very average double IPA.

ArrogantB, Nov 19, 2009
Photo of GarrisWH
3.58/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A - Pours a hazy orange-amber color with an off-white, creamy looking head. The head is a bit short, but retains a decent enough cap, and leaves substantial lacing behind.

S - Caramel malt hits the nose first, leading into some nice tropical fruit aromas. Piney, citric, slightly floral hoppiness then makes an appearance. A fairly sweet aroma, but balanced enough with the ample hops coming through.

T - A very sweet caramel malt hits the tongue first, and carries through. Some nice hop flavors do come through, with a grapefruit, tropical fruit, and pine quality. Decent bitterness in the finish, with ample sweetness matching it and carrying into the aftertaste. Perhaps a bit too sugary sweet overall, still tasty enough though.

M - Medium-full bodied with a fairly rich mouthfeel. Soft carbonation that doesn't make it seem any lighter. A fairly hefty brew.

D - Definitely not a prime example of a DIPA, but a pretty decent brew nonetheless. It is very sweet and sugary, which detracts a bit from the drinkability for me personally. One is a nice treat though, and I wouldn't turn this one down if offered again.

GarrisWH, Nov 18, 2009
Photo of rayjay
3.78/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Got a 4-pack today at Ray's in Paradise, CA

Nice looking beer with a confident head. Don't mind a hazy beer but this has some big chunks of trub floating around, so I'd clean that up a bit. At the bottom of the bottle resides some serious chunk-age so I'd avoid that all together.

Floral hoppy nose with lots of white grapefruit juice and pine. Can also detect a carmel malt base as well.

Flavors come together nicely. Great pungent hop flavors with aroma that goes right up your nose. Can't see much carmel malt but I can taste it. It's a big beer but everything is well balanced. Malts add lots of sweetness but the hop bitterness keeps it at bay. Like wonderbread with hop jelly.

Lightly carbed, with a touch of notble viscosity, that otherwise goes down like a refreshing IPA.

Good drinkability. Enjoyable and well-crafted. Cheers!

rayjay, Nov 10, 2009
Photo of pwoods
3.9/5  rDev +1.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thanks to tedpeer for the extra.

12oz. foil topped brown bottle poured into a snifter.

A: Pours a rich orangish firey amber. Good head on the pour with good retention and decent lacing.

S: Pretty balanced overall. Plenty of piny, resinous hops with sharp citrus. Sweet, thick, rich malts to balance but they don't seem overdone.

T/M: Bitterness is there but I think it's a little on the weak side. More of the hops, again, piny, resinous, with plenty of citrus bite. Malts are sweet and biscuity. Rich but not too heavy. Body is medium full but not heavy or syrupy and it has pretty good carbonation.

D: Lower ABV for a DIPA and drinks easy enough. Bitterness is a bit weak and nothing really stands out and shines, but a solid DIPA nonetheless.

pwoods, Nov 06, 2009
Photo of cswhitehorse
3.38/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The Lost Continent Double poured a light orange yellowish color with a 1/2 inch foam head and some residual head that dissipated quickly with big bubbles.

The aroma was citrusy and fruity. The taste was a little un-balanced due to the fact that it was sweeter than I would like. The hop bitterness seems to be lost on this one. In the mouth it felt a little cloying and 8 percent makes itself known on the back end. Overall I wasn't overly impressed with this double.

cswhitehorse, Oct 28, 2009
Photo of woemad
3.78/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz foil-wrapped bottle. No freshness date. Purchased at Huckleberry's in Spokane for $2.99.

Poured a hazy amber-orange color. Modest, beige head that didn't amount to much but never completely disappeared. Occaisional, spotty lace.

Citrus hops in the nose, along with a surprising amount of malt. I think this is one of those DIPAs that take a booze-bomb approach.

A little more balanced that the nose led me to believe it would be, it was nevertheless what I expected in character. Citrus hops are up front, along with a more restrained, earthy maltiness and a big warming alcohol sensation that seemed beyond 8%.

Medium bodied, with a fairly oily mouthfeel. Pretty much what I've come to expect for the style.

A decent DIPA that took the edge off the excercise in furstration-management that is my current job. It's by no means my favorite of the style, being a bit too boozy and malty for my taste, but not bad for the price, which was pretty reasonable considering what a DIPA goes for these days.

woemad, Oct 19, 2009
Photo of ffejherb
3.53/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12oz. bottle into goblet on 10/8/09.

A - Poured a hazy, gritty-looking orange color with lots of yeast chunks suspended throughout the body. Almost reminds me of an orange Slush Puppy. A finger's worth of bubbly off-white quickly diminished to a flimsy veil and left a few thin strands of lace around the glass.

S - Equal parts sweet caramel malt, citrusy hops and booze convene together in the initial aroma. An underlying spicy yeast character counters the sweetness a bit, but the nose is quite sweet and citrusy overall.

T - Initial flavor is sweet and malty with quite a bit of citrusy hop character and a hint of piney, resiny bitterness in the background. A hint of toasted grains appear in the finish to complement the thick, syrupy caramel malt character and citrus hop presence. The alcohol notes became more and more apparent as the liquid approached room temperature.

M - Medium to full bodied with a thick, syrupy texture and bristly carbonation. There's also quite a bit of alcohol warmth on the palate. Finish is semi-dry with lingering bitterness and a dose of residual sweetness left behind on the back of the tongue.

D - Lost Continent is a decent DIPA overall. Alcohol presence is a bit beefy, especially for an 8% brew. The hops don't really jump out to me. Sure there's bitterness, but the flavor misses the mark just a little.

ffejherb, Oct 08, 2009
Photo of BuckeyeNation
4.03/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Tropical sunset tangerine with a spreading cloud of blurry yeastiness as all twelve ounces entered the glass on the initial pour. The outstanding looking head is a treat for the eyes. It's equal parts ivory, pale orange and ecru, with a tight-bubbled texture that is incredibly sticky. Thick sheets of finely stippled frosting are beginning to cover every bit of the pint glass that is available.

If you love lightly caramel-malted DIPAs with what smells like a ton of American hops (and who doesn't?), then you'll love this beer. Classic aromas of candied grapefruit and orange rind most likely mean that at least one of the C-hops and Amarillo were used. Whole flower Nugget were used for dry-hopping, but I was unable to determine what bittering hop(s) were used.

Lost Continent Double IPA doesn't taste quite as good as it smells, but it's still good enough to earn the above flavor score. Nearly six months in the bottle has to have taken a toll on the bitterness, so that must be taken into consideration. Still, 90+ IBUs was a pretty hefty place to start... and most of them are probably still present.

What tastes like melted caramel/toffee is actually German CaraHell and Vienna. This is still a predominantly pale-malted beer, which is a point in its favor. It's also sweeter than most, which makes me wonder if candi sugar was added. The hops are fruity (with a hint of pine) and don't have the brightness or the explosiveness that is present in the best DIPAs.

All those sugars result in a body/mouthfeel that is closer to full than medium. The beer sort of oozes through the mouth and over the tongue, an impression heightened by soft and smooth-edged carbonation. I tend to like gooey mouthfeels more often than not.

Lost Continent Double IPA is right up there with Bitch Creek ESB and Sweetgrass IPA as Grand Teton's best beers. It doesn't do anything new or different, but it's a solid version that delivers the goods in the end.

BuckeyeNation, Oct 08, 2009
Lost Continent Double IPA from Grand Teton Brewing Co.
86 out of 100 based on 412 ratings.