Woodie Gold - Karl Strauss Brewing Company
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 63 | Reviews: 43 | Display Reviews Only:
2.73/5 rDev -18.8%
pours a clear golden yellow with a small white head, and some lacing.
smell is of wheat, citrus, some nuts, a little corn, and some spice in the back.
taste is weak, wheat, corn, and some lemon, ends a little tangy.
overall for a pilsner it was not that bad, but as a beer it was just average.
01-09-2010 04:15:30 | More by froghop
3.18/5 rDev -5.4%
Not many reviews for this one...which I though was odd. I must've seen it on tap in nearly every hotel or restaurant I saw in the San Diego gaslamp area.
Comes a light golden color. It looks like a Pils, although maybe a little more amber than a bright yellow. Head's more pronounced than the KS Amber, which is nice.
Smells like a fresh euro macro to me. No skunkiness, but then again nothing really special either. Reminds me of a Heineken straight from the brewery.
Taste is crisp. For a double pils, this was pretty subdued. There's a little hoppy bitterness and some huskiness, but I was expecting something stronger. Again, it reminds me of a euro lager that has no skunkiness. If you like those but hate how it's tough to get a "good" one - this is your brew.
Mouthfeel is a little thicker than you'd expect. I'm used to the more "soda-style" carbonation from the euro pils brews, but this one is thicker and reminds me a little of a british ale in texture.
It could be a decent quencher, but I like the Amber much more. Not a bad brew, but nothing wonderful either.
06-14-2006 23:36:41 | More by Domingo
3.4/5 rDev +1.2%
12 oz bottle from a sixer brought by a friend to my wife's birthday party in July 2006. He brought it because he liked the label (see attached photo).
Double Pilsner? What is that? Never heard of it. Based on the style guidelines (more malt backbone and intense bitterness), this gets one out of two right. Full rich malt, sweet but not cloying, very very drinkable on a hot day, but I can find absolutely no bitterness. As aonther reviewer mentioned, creamy. Not a bad thing, just not what the description says. Hmm.
I kinda like it, but it is literally 110 degrees at 5:30 PM, so most cold beers will be good. Seriously, I can drink this, but it is more of a one-off for me.
07-25-2006 00:26:02 | More by Dukeofearl
2.95/5 rDev -12.2%
Sampled this on-tap at a Karl Strauss outpost in the San Diego International Airport.
Served in a 20oz. imperial pint glass.
Appearance: Upon arrival, this beer sported a half inch of white fluff, though that quickly decayed to a splotchy film, leaving blankets of lacing in its wake. Body is golden and lightly hazed. Decent head retention and lacing. Not bright nor crystal clear though.
Smell: Leafy Noble hops come through as dew-covered vegetation. Smells sweeter than anticipated. A more subtle lager yeast aroma also makes its way into the mix. Not a whole lot of complexity here. Hops definitely reign supreme.
Taste: Once again, those leafy Noble hops are the main players. Lager yeast adds some pleasant bitterness/sourness (I never know which word to use when describing this), though the flavor profile is decidedly blunt and hop-centric. I also get a touch of salt, which occasionally comes through as an oat-y flavor. The finish is sweet and resinous with lots of lingering bitterness.
Mouthfeel: Light-to-medium in body, moderate-to-high in carbonation, and resinous/sticky. No clean finish here folks! The feel isn't disruptive or unpleasant, but it certainly misses the mark style-wise.
Overall: A bold, American interpretation of a delicate German beer. I can see what Karl Strauss was going for here - a light-bodied, hop-forward lager for the SoCal masses - but I'm just not that into it.
08-03-2011 16:25:13 | More by ThreeWiseMen
2.45/5 rDev -27.1%
12 oz. bottle poured into a mug.
I had some of this a couple weeks ago from a growler, and thought I'd try it again.
Appearance: Clear, yellow-gold color. White head that laces the glass a bit.
Smell: Smells of mild malts, mild grains, and mild hops. Nothing special.
Taste: Fairly boring taste. A bland amalgam of grains, hops, and malts -- no complexity, and it has a somewhat nasty bitter aftertaste.
Mouthfeel: Fairly light-bodied, smooth, a bit of carbonation. As with most other elements here, it's average.
Drinkability: Alcohol-wise, it's very drinkable. But the taste is just so annoying, and the beer is really tedious.
I'm not impressed -- taste isn't good and the rest is just average. No reason to get this again. And I probably won't have it again from a growler. As usual, not impressed with Karl Strauss beers.
07-28-2006 04:52:24 | More by mithrascruor
2.85/5 rDev -15.2%
Had this one at my folks house last night. Somewhat perplexed, I bought a single 12oz to add and review. The brown bottle has a lable that depicts a San Diego beach scene at sunset with the classic old "Woodie" as the theme of the label. The neck label classifies this brew as a "Coastal-Style Classic Blonde Pilsener"... whatever...the closest style listed I figured would be the American Dbl. Pilsner, so I went with it.
It pours a straw pale gold with a two finger pure white bubbly head that dies quickly. Lacing, well a few dots and a dab, although the carbonation produces a steady flow of bubbles from the bottom.
Smells of light wheat, weak malt and a hint of lemony hops. It smells like a wheat beer to me.
Tastes sweet at first with a watery, fizzy, light malt (more like wheat) to a weak hop (bitter defeated by sweet) dry finish. Notes of lemon peel and sweet-n-low with no sign of alcohol, must be low in ABV (not listed)
Fizzy, creamy like mouthfeel leaves the mouth dry and has very little aftertaste as it just tastes weak. You could probably drink gallons of it, but why bother ?
03-20-2006 03:58:57 | More by scottoale
3.38/5 rDev +0.6%
This was a pretty good beer.
Appearance- golden color, nice head
Taste- smooth, bit of hops
Mouthfeel- smooth, light
Drinkability- pretty drinkable, I would drink it again. It's a pretty good summer beer, good for outside working on a hot day.
06-21-2009 20:24:45 | More by jeffjeff1
2.93/5 rDev -12.8%
Appearance: Straight pour into a pint glass. The color is a clean, clear light gold. It's a little darker than straw. Two fingers of foamy white head developed and dissipated quickly to leave a spotted lacing and ring around the edge.
Smell: Much like Karl's Amber Lager, though there's not as much caramel. Bready corn malts that are toasted a touch. Honey and a little butterscotch.
Taste: Not as good as the smell. Buttery and bready smooth. Mostly adjunct corn -- though higher quality than the usual macro fare -- and a very awkward hop bite. It's not the usual, crisp pilsner bite, but something more sour that tickles the cheeks.
Drinkability: It's okay. Karl wanted to make something drinkable for all of SoCal's elevations. It did so, but the result is nothing memorable.
06-13-2010 05:39:09 | More by TheQuietMan22
4.47/5 rDev +33%
Appearance- The body is light, clear gold with a foamy white head. Some head retention. Very little lacing.
Aroma- Very nice balnace between a soft malt sweetness, subdued graininess, and a tiny hint of lemon and floral hops. Also get a very subtle, sweet smelling wood aroma.
Taste- This is one of Karl's better beers. Is has a very nice mix of malt sweetness, a subdued graininess and just enough hop bitterness to let you know it's beer.
Mouthfeel- Mouthfeel is also very nice. Medium to slightly heavy body with just the right level of carbonation. Just sticky enough to coat your mouth and give you an excellent after-taste.
Drinkability- Very nice. Good for day-time drinking or relxing with. I am really impressed.
05-24-2007 02:29:07 | More by theopholis
3.25/5 rDev -3.3%
A - Very clear straw yellow with a short, long lasting fizzy whitish head. Very little lacing.
S - Light grainy, bready malts. Subtle floral hops. Otherwise clean. Not much going on.
F/M - Again, light bready malts, somewhat grainy and a little sweet. Floral, earthy hops with a medium bitterness. Clean and dry finish with a lingering sweet corn-like grainy malt flavor. Medium light bodied with moderate carbonation.
D - Quite easy drinking. Light, dry, clean and refreshing, the least they could do is can it so I can take it along with me on our mountain bike rides.
02-21-2011 05:49:32 | More by domtronzero
3.08/5 rDev -8.3%
No offense Scottale, but this is not a double pilsner.
I bought a sixer at Von's, because they didn't have Stone and I know that Karl recently passed away. He really did a lot for the craft brewing community. Hear hear Brewmaster!
Appearance: The pour is light gold with a foamy white head.
Smell: Soft malts, doughy malts, lager yeast, and a tiny hint of lemon and floral hops.
Taste: Nobody gives Karl the credit he deserves for his contribution in creating the double IPA, but I think he did quite a bit. He used almost no hops in any of his beers, leaving more for Vinnie Cilurzo to experiment with. There are plenty of grainy and doughy malts, but very little saaz hop flavor or bitterness.
Mouthfeel: Light to medium-bodied with plenty of carbonation. Good for the style.
Drinkability: This should be a good pilsner to ween macro drinkers off swill with. All Karl Strauss beers are useful in that department and I salute them for it. It's easy drinking, but it's so bland, I have no desire to drink more.
01-06-2007 07:44:56 | More by goschool
3.18/5 rDev -5.4%
A: Medium golden color w/ less than half finger of head.
S: Lots of light wheat. Some good hints of banana aroma
T: Lager yeasts adds nice banana flavor. Very light/crisp malt. Very light bread taste. Little bit of hops at end but not that much.
M: Low in carb, disappointing
O: Its just alright. Had some highlights and lowlights. Wouldn't be the first of its type I'd grab, but also not the last either.
10-28-2011 05:24:35 | More by gregshead
3.9/5 rDev +16.1%
Had this on tap at several locations in San Diego.
Pours a fairly solid straw color w/a decent amount of head. The taste is mostly a good dose of sweet malt with just a bit of hop bitterness there. I see it classified as a German Pils", but I would probably say it's more like a Helles with a little more hop punch. Lots of bready flavors in there. Nothing awesome, but very highly drinkable and somewhat interesting for a good session brew.
08-08-2007 02:57:37 | More by AustinBeerLvr
3.15/5 rDev -6.3%
Had on tap at the San Diego Airport's Karl Strauss.
Beer pours a nice golden color without much head at all.
No real smells to detect other than a slight bit of bready yeast.
Beer has a very crisp flavor with a bit of hop bitterness, but not very much.
Very crisp and full of carbonation flavor.
01-24-2012 03:12:30 | More by Merkur
3.38/5 rDev +0.6%
I bought a six pack of the karl strauss woodie gold at my local vons. Poured into a tasting glass. It has a golden yellow color, the head diminishes to a very thin broken lace. It looks like what you would expect for the style. The nose leads me to believe that this bottle is skunky, but I guess hoppy with slighty cabbage like smell. This beer has a slightly more viscious and heavier body than what I would expect in a pilsner. It has a fuller more complex taste than most american pilsners and a great drinkablility, I could drink a few in a setting.
12-03-2006 01:46:20 | More by aquaderek
2.8/5 rDev -16.7%
Poured from a 12 oz brown bottle.
Pours a nice clear golden straw color. White foamy head that dissipates quickly. A little lacing.
Smells of breed and a little hops, perhaps a hint of corn.
Hop notes up front, some metallic hints, finishes dry with a little metallic after taste.
Mouthfeel is good. Has some dry sides to it after the hops blast.
I'd heard some good things about Karl Strauss, but compared to the many German Pils I've had, this one disappointed me.
09-11-2009 20:27:22 | More by fsimcox
Woodie Gold from Karl Strauss Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 63 ratings.