1. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.

Whistler Imperial Pils - Karl Strauss Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Whistler Imperial PilsWhistler Imperial Pils

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

37 Ratings
THE BROS
87
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 37
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 14.76%
Wants: 5
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Karl Strauss Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Pilsner |  7.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: jjh19 on 06-19-2010)
View: Beers (47) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Whistler Imperial Pils Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 37 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of heresy22
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

Photo of t0rin0
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

Photo of Devinph
3.5/5  rDev -2.5%

Photo of lacqueredmouse
3.48/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Fizzes quite heavily on the pour, leaving a rather flat looking brew, deep golden in colour, with a lot of weight to the body and a lot of haze. Really looks disappointingly flat when held to critical appraisal, but the colour looks fine and the heft is appropriate; it looks chewy enough, but still flows smoothly.

Nose is deep and slightly sweet, with more heft and more booze than I expected. In some senses, it gets this slightly sweet-acidic orange note, which reminds me of an IPA, but the thickness and sweetness suggests something more like a dessert wine. There's certainly minimal crispness, which I'd like to see in an pilsener, even an imperial one.

Taste taste has a little more bitterness, but again, lacks crispness. Instead, the big body gives it a slick, gooey sweetness that only subsides when the onrush of boozy heat comes through on the back. This, in its way, is a type of crispness, in that it startles the palate in to wakefulness, but it's still not ideal.

I'll admit I've still never found an Imperial Pilsener that matches up with what I think the style should be like, and unfortunately, this follows the trend. I'd love more crispness, more directness, and sharper, brighter palate, but still bursting with enormous flavours

Some day....

Photo of Zorro
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Chill hazed dark gold colored beer with a small white head.

Sweet with no identifying malt type, sweet like corn syrup. Flowers and grass hop scent.

Starts out sweet with a wheat cracker and grass flavor. Gets a little spicy as you drink it. One of the milder flavored Imperial Pils I have tasted. The one word that pops in to my head as I drink this is "Soft" this is like a strong beer buffered to prevent anything offensive from hitting my tongue.

Mouthfeel is good.

Overall this is just an OK beer. It;s not bad but I really don't think I will buy another bottle.

Photo of womencantsail
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: The pour is a light orange color with a fluffy white head on it.

S: This is very sweet on the nose with a sugar character and a bit of bread. The hops are appropriate for a pilsner, floral and a bit of spice.

T: The flavor is incredibly short lived, absolutely unlike any other beer that I've come across. Sweet and bready with a hint of coconut and then...nothing.

M: Medium bodied with a smooth, medium carbonation.

D: Not a bad tasting beer, but the shortness of the flavor baffled me. I'm not sure what caused that, but it at least made this beer more interesting.

Photo of Thorpe429
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to a generous individual for getting this bottle out to me. Served in a tulip.

Pours a clear light apricot color with a thin white head that quickly falls down into a few bubbles. Thin collar throughout. The nose is lightly grainy without too much depth. Some bready malt and not much in the way of hops. The flavor is bready with some light grain in the background. Hop bitterness comes through on the backend, though isn't really present in the flavor. Medium body with high carbonation and a bit of an alcohol bite in the finish. Decent enough, though not my favorite.

Photo of srandycarter
3.25/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A - Clear Light honey, near white head, leaves fast to disk. Some spotty lace.

S - Not much. Some light lemon. Some light malt.

T - Solid simple malt, good bitter end. Nice.

M - Good carb, fair balance. Not terribly exciting.

D - Quaffable. For sure.

Photo of rand
3.15/5  rDev -12.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

From bottle to pilsner glass

A: Pours a light golden-tan which impedes little light. Carbonation seems moderate but a sudsy head forms leaving lots of lacing

S: The nose is sweet, bready malts, corn, and a touch of lemon in the distance. Nothing really stands out here; it almost smells like a decent macro lager with a more pronounced bouquet.

T: Improves on the smell some, but only a bit. The first part of the sip is the sweet, lightly toasted malts, followed by a very mildly bitter hop spice. The taste has a really sweet, biscuity flavor, like biscuits and honey. And that's about it, the flavors are balanced but rather unremarkable.

D: The beer may not be memorable but it goes down easy. Again, there's nothing wrong with the flavor, I've just had a lot more interesting double pils. The 7.5% ABV is barely noticable, so some points there.

Overall, not a beer I'd pass up, it's fairly pleasant, but I'll probably forget all about it during my next brew.

Photo of rawfish
3.13/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours very dark for a pilsner, apple juice gold with a substantial chill haze. Dense cap of off white froth that maxes out at 1 inch but stays through the drink depositing curtains of lacing.

Sweet malt, doughy with honey and a white grape and apricot fruitiness. Some grassy Saaz in there too. Had to get my nose in there and those fruit aromas are not typical for a lager.

Pale malt that follows the nose with a steady does of doughy malt and overly sweet with honey, apricot and peach puree and white grape to follow. Hops push back a bit with some pine and straw but just can't over come the sweet malt that sticks around in the after taste, some grain and adjuncts appear as the beer warms. Odd for a lager, but this profile would be great for a blonde ale.

Thick gooey viscous over the palate, perhaps under carbonated and sticky rather than crisp, all completely the opposite of what I look for in a lager. But to say that the beer is not drinkable for a 7.5% abv would be a flat out lie.

Much too sweet and sticky for a lager even if it is an imperial beer. The color alone was telling of how much malt was laid down in this beer. Rather easy to drink once you dismiss this as a lager.

Photo of AWolfAtTheDoor
3.08/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

This was 50% off at my local supermarket, so I figured why not?

1cm white head on top of a slighty hazy yellow body. Loopy sporadic lacing.

Smells sweet, corn? Little bit of cereal malts too.

Icky, overly sweet on the palate. Alcohol bite sneaks up on you at the end, and is not pleasant. Did this beer ferment out completely?

Carbonation is adequate. Beer hangs around on the palate though. I think a crisper finish would help it out.

Definitely won't be trying this beer again.

Photo of JustinQ
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of nmann08
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of elos
3/5  rDev -16.4%

Photo of RoyalT
2.8/5  rDev -22%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Appearance - This poured an eerie-looking florescent orange in color with a puffy white head that showed zilch retention.

Smell - The nose is very light for the style. There are some grassy, semi-European hops and an uncharacteristic caramel malt base but really this nose is quite blah.

Taste - Yeah, I don't get this at all. The flavor is sharp, sugary malt that has more the characteristic of a red or amber ale than a pils. The hops are overran on all counts and consist of some light, leafy notes.

Mouthfeel - This is medium-bodied and again uncharacteristically bitter at the end. The middle is sweet, sugary malt.

Drinkability - I have only one good thing to say about this beer: I couldn't stop drinking it - hahaha! When I pick it apart it's hard to find one positive quality and Lord knows it has nothing to do with style but the hell with all that for some strange reason it hit the spot.

Photo of mdfb79
2.68/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

From 10/28/11 notes. Thanks to nmann08 for sharing this one. Poured from a 22 oz. bottle into a tulip.

a - Pours a clear straw yellow color with two inches of fluffy white head and mdoerate carbonation evident. Some spotty lacing left on the glass.

s - Smells of sweet corn, biscuity malts, and bready malts. A little bit adjunct-lager-like and bland, not the best.

t - Tastes of corn, grain, biscuit malts, wheat, lightly sweet. A slight step up from the nose, but again, not that great.

m - Medium body and moderate carbonation. Pretty easy to drink but the sweet corn takes a little bit away from it.

o - Overall a below average pilsner. Somewhat bland and reminded me a little bit of an American Adjunct Lager, wouldn't really seek it out again.

Photo of Halcyondays
2.45/5  rDev -31.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

22 oz. bomber,

A: Pours orange with a creamy moderate white head, good lace.

S: Definite Saaz character which I'm always a sucker for, sourdough bread.

T: Good bready malt flavour, with a big earthy, grungy hop flavour. I've tasted this before, and it's not very nice. The malt needs to be bigger to contain this.

M: Medium-bodied, smooth, creamy, good heft. Nowhere as close to as clean as this style needs to be.

D: This is OK. Pils can't hide the problems, and this has its fair share. A good Impy Pils has the strong hop character checked by the malt, everything is in a balance. I don't see a balance here and the flavours aren't particularly good.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Whistler Imperial Pils from Karl Strauss Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 37 ratings.