1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Brick Waterloo Traditional IPA - Brick Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Brick Waterloo Traditional IPABrick Waterloo Traditional IPA

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

43 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 43
Reviews: 15
rAvg: 2.86
pDev: 13.29%
Wants: 0
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brick Brewing Co. visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
English India Pale Ale (IPA) |  5.20% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: hopsolutely on 04-27-2012)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 43 | Reviews: 15 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of beerhunter13
3.75/5  rDev +31.1%

beerhunter13, Sep 13, 2012
Photo of kupracz
3.75/5  rDev +31.1%

kupracz, Aug 10, 2014
Photo of dumarrm
3.5/5  rDev +22.4%

dumarrm, Nov 01, 2013
Photo of rmarks9
3.5/5  rDev +22.4%

rmarks9, Jan 27, 2013
Photo of hopsolutely
3.33/5  rDev +16.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I really, really, really wanted to like this beer, but unfortunately - in my opinion, at least - it just does not stand up to either the British or American style IPA's being brewed elsewhere in Ontario.

Pours a clear and very bright copper colour with limited head, no lacing. Very few visible bubbles after the initial pour. Mouthfeel is thinner than I would expect from the style, but although carbonation level is low, it is by no means flat.

Aroma is of grains, very malt-forward. Unfortunately there is no ingredient label on the can, as (perhaps incorrectly) I would have guessed this to be an adjunct ale. One-dimensional flavour of caramelized grains with British bittering hops in the finish. Taste profile / elements common to many "macros".

I respect The Brick's history and would love to support their product(s) - and this is a launch I have been eagerly awaiting - but unfortunately this is not a beer I'll purchase again.

hopsolutely, Apr 27, 2012
Photo of CurtisD
3.25/5  rDev +13.6%

CurtisD, Aug 20, 2012
Photo of biboergosum
3.08/5  rDev +7.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

473ml can. "Handmade by Brewmasters'. Ok, good to know, at least it wasn't those ladder-climbing stable boys.

This beer pours a hazy medium yellow amber colour, with two fingers of fine puffy, foamy off-white head, which leaves a decent array of sudsy striated lace around the glass as it lazily abates.

It smells of somewhat biscuity grainy malt, lemon peel - a la Mr. Clean - those apples you forgot in the crisper, and underwhelming grassy, floral hops. The taste is more past-due apple and subtle citrus fruitiness, innocuous grainy, kind of corn-fed malt, and musty, leafy hops.

The bubbles are meekly present, accounted for, and nothing more; the body medium-light in weight, and generally smooth, with just a wee pithiness to put that pea in your mattress. It finishes off-dry, the day-old breadiness of the malt retaining the most, um, fervour, as the hops seem to have blown their laughable wad.

Not as overtly off-putting as the other Waterloo 'craft' offerings I've endured, but disappointing just the same - nothing all that wrong, the nothing particularly right, either.

biboergosum, Aug 30, 2012
Photo of H8B8
3/5  rDev +4.9%

H8B8, Apr 04, 2013
Photo of JohnnyBarman
3/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

473mL can from the brewery, as part of a sampler six pack of cans along with the Amber and Dark. The label sports a "Waterloo Brewing Co." emblem, which represents the brewery's eventual desire to do away with the Brick name in all its products.

Poured into a nonic. Copper golden in hue, slightly opaque. A half inch of head quickly fizzles into a fine ring. Lots of visible carbonation.

Nose is sweet malt - almost adjuncty - butter (diacetyl?), caramel, maybe a bit of bittering English hops.

The first can was nearly a drain pour, but fortunately the second can proved to be a bit better. Sweet, malty, finishes with bittering English hops. No depth to this at all, though it is drinkable. Hops don't add much in terms of flavor. Thin bodied, high carbonation.

It's not that bad, it just is such a far cry from other Ontario IPAs, hell, even Ontario red ales, to be worth trying again. Feels like a minimal effort beer.

JohnnyBarman, Jun 07, 2012
Photo of MJ63
3/5  rDev +4.9%

MJ63, Oct 26, 2013
Photo of buschbeer
3/5  rDev +4.9%

buschbeer, Jul 18, 2013
Photo of cfalovo97
3/5  rDev +4.9%

cfalovo97, Sep 10, 2013
Photo of DenisKolkin
3/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3

473 ml can served cold into a pint glass. Less than impressed with this brewery so far, but lets see how the IPA goes.

Appearance - So far so good. 2 plus fingers of dense white head rest on top of a rich and clear copper color. Some lacing is left behind after a moderate retention time.

Smell - Mild ale aromas, some grainy aromas and light floral background. Not much to distinguish it from others but certainly passable.

Taste - Metallic, some mild malty flavors and some grains in there too, but the moderate metallicness is a bit too much.

Mouthfeel - High carbonation and a good crisp mouthfeel and medium bodied. A bit gassy for my likking but respectable.

Overall - Flavors are a bit of let down, but definitely a beginners IPA, for those wanting to expand their horizons a bit, but aren't ready to fully jump into craft. The rest of the beer is fine, albeit not spectacular, but if the flavors were less metallic I would consider picking this up again, although better options are available locally.

DenisKolkin, Mar 15, 2014
Photo of MasterOfArgos39
3/5  rDev +4.9%

MasterOfArgos39, Jul 03, 2014
Photo of leaddog
3/5  rDev +4.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance- Pours an amber with a finger width of foamy bubbly head.

Smell- Sweet apples, grass, lemon zest, minimal hint of floral hops.

Taste- Pretty much mimics the smell. You get a little bitterness from the floral hops.

Mouthfeel- Light to medium bodied with light carbonation. A tad watery.

Overall- An average EIPA by Waterloo Brewing. It is slightly better than a mass produced Alexander Keiths. There really isn't anything that makes it stand out but it would be good as a quick pint at a pub with friends/family.

leaddog, Aug 15, 2012
Photo of WeissBoy
3/5  rDev +4.9%

WeissBoy, Sep 19, 2012
Photo of Cycle69
3/5  rDev +4.9%

Cycle69, Apr 26, 2014
Photo of kelvarnsen
3/5  rDev +4.9%

kelvarnsen, Dec 30, 2013
Photo of TerryW
3/5  rDev +4.9%

TerryW, Jun 25, 2014
Photo of Olek4374
2.92/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

The second of my Waterloo sample pack, and this one is a little dissapointing.

I poured this into my Stella Chalice. The colour is just... not good. It, quite honestly, looks like diarrhea. The smell is decent enough, but not as flowery or fruity as some other craft IPAs. The taste is VERY weak compared to other IPAs in its class. There is your basic hoppy IPA flavour, but it just doesn't have any complexity to it, it's such a shame. The aftertaste is just a lingering bitteress without much fruity or otherwise complex flavour to it... certainly a lot of room for improvement. The feel has a little body to it, and a restrained amount of carbonation certainly helps the case. Still overall, this IPA falls to the wayside when compared to other ones.

Olek4374, Jun 02, 2013
Photo of andrenaline
2.88/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A can from their sampler pack...

A - Pours a clear golden colour, thumb of head with some retention and sporadic lacing.

S - Mild on the nose, sweet citrus, sour apples and musty cardboard.

T - Quite bland, some leafy green hops come through alongside a bready caramel note, little flavor lingers on the palette. Some mustiness is present to remind you of the English pale ale style, but rather disappointing.

M - A tad thin, smooth and wet.

O - Not terrible, but nothing spectacular or worthwhile seeking out here. I wouldn't turn one down, but I wouldn't buy it again. A bit more flavor is required to boost the scores on this one.

andrenaline, Jul 07, 2012
Photo of djoprahwinfrey
2.84/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A : clear copper, 2 fingers of thick, tan, chunky head, slow dissipation, leaving okay lacing throughout

S : i found this quite potent of malts, bready, some toast, some very minor sweet notes afterwards

T : very grassy, strong malt, bready, grainy, a bit spicy in the middle, slightly bitter hang on the finish

M : medium body, higher carbonation,a tad heavy

O : I was a bit disappointed in this one, it seems like the more i drank the less i enjoyed this. I found it tasted very grassy and malty with a similar potent aroma which was not that pleasant and kind of boring. This was okay.

djoprahwinfrey, Oct 09, 2013
Photo of slitherySOB
2.83/5  rDev -1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Pours a kind of light amber colour with not even a fingers worth of head. Smells of grass, lemons and floral hops. Tastes pretty much like it smells, though a little more grassy. Mouthfeel is thin and watery. Overall, not good, but not bad either. I won't be buying it again.

slitherySOB, Apr 02, 2013
Photo of thehyperduck
2.81/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.75

473 mL can from a sampler pack picked up at the LCBO; coded E31312. Served slightly chilled. Apparently this was released with very little fanfare about a year or two ago, but I've never heard of it or even seen it until now.

Pours a light, clear golden-amber colour, producing just over a finger's worth of foamy, frothy white head. It leaves behind a delicate doily pattern of lacing on the sides of the glass as it shrinks over the next few minutes, eventually reduced to a dense cap and collar. Looks great to me, but the aroma offers nothing interesting or even particularly enticing - lemony citrus, light earthiness, some floral tones and caramel maltiness are all detectable, combining to form a relatively bland bouquet with an aire of rusty dish soap.

Unfortunately it really doesn't get much better from there. Grainy malts and caramel provide a weak malt backbone and some light sweetness, with the uninspired hop bill offering a mixture of grass, lemon and floral notes. The finish is this one's saving grace and the only thing that makes the beer halfway tolerable - its light bitterness and slight metallicity reminds me of some actual (lower-end) English-made IPAs. Either way, it doesn't linger on the palate long. On the lighter side of medium-bodied, with moderate carbonation and a smooth mouthfeel; one of the better aspects of this beer overall. This is easy to drink quickly because of its mild flavour and low abv, and indeed, the mild bitterness in the aftertaste encourages rapid sips.

Final Grade: 2.81, a forgettable C grade. Waterloo Traditional IPA isn't a particularly good ale, and frankly I'm not sure what market Brick is aiming for here. It's obviously not the American IPA fans, but even proponents of the milder English style are unlikely to be enthralled with this tepid, relatively bland offering. Like most of Brick's beers under the Waterloo label, this is a weak effort and not something I'd return to regularly - reminds me of a knock-off of Wells IPA, except this stuff probably costs more. This has potential as a gateway beer (to show Keith's drinkers the bare minimum of what constitutes an IPA), but other than that... pass.

thehyperduck, Dec 13, 2013
Photo of tbeckett
2.81/5  rDev -1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

Not sure why I bought a can of this, but I did.

A - Pours golden to deep golden. Bright with good carbonation. Two fingers of creamy off white head. No real lace, half finger retention.

S - Metallic, earthy, mild stone fruit. A bit boring.

T - Metallic, smokey, weird stone fruit. Not good.

M - Good carbonation, medium body, a weird bitterness.

O/D - Not the best example of the style. This one is definitely skippable. A very ordinary attempt at the style.

tbeckett, Feb 15, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Brick Waterloo Traditional IPA from Brick Brewing Co.
70 out of 100 based on 43 ratings.