1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Barrel-Aged Wake Up Dead - Left Hand Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Barrel-Aged Wake Up DeadBarrel-Aged Wake Up Dead

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

262 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 262
Reviews: 129
rAvg: 3.4
pDev: 21.76%
Wants: 20
Gots: 40 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Left Hand Brewing Company visit their website
Colorado, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial Stout |  10.20% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: mcallister on 08-02-2010)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 262 | Reviews: 129 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of emmasdad
3.2/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Received this one from one of my children for Christmas this year (cool labels always seem to end up under the tree). Poured a nice black color, with 3/4 of an inch of tan foam on top. Aromas of black licorice, sassafras and roasted malt. Medium bodied, with lots of licorice on the palate, along with a little oak, dark chocolate and real root beer. Not bad, but I preferred the older barrel aged imperial stout from Left Hand.

emmasdad, Jan 13, 2011
Photo of zeff80
3.98/5  rDev +17.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - Poured out an opaque, jet black color with a one-finger, tan head of bubbly foam. It had nice retention and left sudsy sheets of lace on the glass.

S - It smelled of bourbon, oak and vanilla - like a barrel aged beer should. Also a nice roasty aroma.

T - It tasted of bourbon, oak and vanilla. Good roasted malt taste with chocolate and toffee.

M - It was crisp, sharp and smooth. A full bodied stout that is dry.

D - This is a really good barrel aged imperial stout. It was worth the price.

zeff80, Jan 12, 2011
Photo of wyattshotmaker
3.2/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

this looks very very light for an imperial stout. more like a brown ale quite honestly.white head, decent lacing.

oaky and slightly tannic nose.

this is pretty middle of the road in terms of flavor. slightly roasty and nutty sweetness, touch of dark fruit, vanilla, tannic finish. just alright.

mouthfeel is medium bodied. with an imperial stout i'd expect a bit more in terms of mouthfeel. just on the whole kinda meh. the thinner mouthfeel makes it easier to drink.

in retrospect i wish i would have passed.

wyattshotmaker, Jan 12, 2011
Photo of BierGartenok
2.68/5  rDev -21.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Dark pour, thin head. Not much else

S- Smell was OK...has a weird hint of plastic and charcoal, also getting a slight chemical odor.

T- Taste was just as the smell. It was almost like it had some plastic taste up front. The finish was fine, just has a funky chemical flavor present.

M- Mouth feel was a little light. Not bad, just not what i was expecting from a barrel aged Imp stout

D- Um...not much for this one. Hopefully I got a bad batch, ugh that's just terrible. It was good to try, hopefully my next one is much better.

BierGartenok, Jan 11, 2011
Photo of bedbug003
1.45/5  rDev -57.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

A- Pours dark with little head, no shocker there

S- Smelled like latex, with hints of oats

T- Tasted like latex too! Seriously, I thought I was crazy or my glass was tainted. Tried two completely different glasses, let the beer sit to open up, no difference. It tasted like it was served from inside a balloon. Poured the last 1/3rd of the bottle down the drain.

M- If you turn off your taste buds the mouthfeel was ok, but the same could be said of rotten eggs if you couldn't taste them...

D- I am truly hoping I got a bad bottle but don't plan on trying another one to find out judging by some of the other reviews.

My example was bottled on 10/26/10, bought from a reputable store in early Dec, refridgerated for 3 weeks, drank on New Years after rising to ~45 degrees. Tried again much warmer, no help.

bedbug003, Jan 08, 2011
Photo of jera1350
3.35/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thinner body that is a very dark shade of brown that still lets some light through. Thin light brown head that has some staying power and some decent lacing.

A very light Cocoa Puffs cereal scent. Literally like a grainy cereal with a hint of chocolate, but very light overall. Getting a hint of smoked malt as well.

Cola, light dark fruit presence, some dark chocolate bitterness and lightly toasty malt. Some warm alcohol at the end. Where's the barrel??? Not a lot of anything going on and surely not reminiscent of a double/imperial stout and most definitely not a barrel aged beer. What gives? Still a good taste, but extremely underwhelming. Tastes like a regular stout.

Very thin for the style. The carbonation offers some nice smoothness, but even that is a little lacking.

It drinks pretty well despite the alcohol presence, but this does not fit the style and surely does not fit the label of barrel aged. By no means a bad beer and I will enjoy it, but this just feels like a whole lot of false advertising here. A least it was only $6.49 for the bomber.

jera1350, Jan 08, 2011
Photo of gtgood
3/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This is an odd beer. Despite some of the negative reviews, I went ahead and picked up a bottle. (What can I say? I'm a sucker for labels.) If this beer were classified as a strong ale or an old ale, I don't think I would have a problem with it. As an imperial stout, however, it falls flat. Appearance: It doesn't look like any stout I've ever tried before. It's dark red and translucent. Smell: As of this review, I'm a bit under the weather, so I can't smell much. Taste: Boy is this one boozy. I can taste more barrel (a lot of wood and some smoke) than stout here. In fact, I can't taste any of the chocolate or coffee flavors that I normally expect from stouts (especially those of the imperial variety). I also get a hint of something like sweet cherries. It doesn't taste bad, necessarily, but it doesn't taste like a stout. It tastes like something else... Mouthfeel: Again, not bad, but quite thin for the style it claims to be. Drinkability: I kind of like it, but only when I don't think of it as a stout... Conclusion: Again, this is a confusing beer. I know they call it a Russian Imperial Stout on the bottle, but it doesn't look or taste like one at all...

gtgood, Jan 07, 2011
Photo of babaracas
2.4/5  rDev -29.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

See-thru dark reddish brown, thin khaki head, couple spots of lace. Smell: oak, milk chocolate, char, cherry. Taste: milk chocolate, slightly burnt caramel, earthy hopping, booze, artificial cherry coke. Mouthfeel: thin for the style which makes the carbonation come through more than it should. Left Hand's latest mid-80s thrash metal reference started off with a fantastic label and went downhill rapidly. This is pretty awful and should probably be labeled as an ASA.

babaracas, Jan 06, 2011
Photo of angelmonster
2.98/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours a half inch off white head. Body is an extremely dark brown. Head retention and lacing are pretty minimal.

Smell is of roasted caramel malts and caramelized brown sugar. I had read a review acouple days ago that said t here was a burnt plastic smell and I definitely get that mixed with raw alcohol. Not getting much from the barrel aging except for some slight booze.

Taste is not of typical Imperial stout. Its missing the chocolate/coffee roasted flavors that I love in stouts. The best way that I could explain it is an american strong ale with some off flavors of burnt plastic and booze. Hops are pretty muted.

Mouthfeel is probably the only quality of the beer that is above average. Carbonation level is good and body while by no means is rich, is somewhat syrupy. Unfortunately the head died halfway through the beer.

Drinkability of this beer was disappointing. I could drink the whole bomber but honestly I have about five other beers in the fridge that I'd rather drink right now. I have no idea what went wrong with this beer but if you're reading this save the 9 bucks or whatever it costs and buy some fade to black or even left hand's milk stout is way better than this one.

angelmonster, Jan 06, 2011
Photo of jds1469
3.78/5  rDev +11.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Pored two months after bottling into a sniffer glass. Let me start off by saying that I had high hopes for this beer. Knowing all of the work put into the brewing, I am disappointed with the outcome.

Appearance - Deep dark glossy black in color. Even held up to a light, it is so dark and cloudy you cant see thought the glass. The head starts a dark camel color and lightens a bit after a few seconds.

Smell - This smells like you cut through a maple 2x4. This is the low point for this beer. The smell almost turned me off from trying to take a drink.

Taste - The taste is pretty good here, the smokey flavor present here helps to mellow out the alcohol. You can taste the fruits in the brew.

Mouthfeel - Creamy and/or oily. This helps to enhance the taste of the beer as it sits on your tong longer to help the flavors mature a bit.

Drinkability - The smell coming from the glassware makes this beer a little rough to drink.

Decent taste, but should be better.

jds1469, Jan 02, 2011
Photo of flexabull
3.58/5  rDev +5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Very cool label.

Pours a deep dark black color with a thin white head.

Aromas are of chocolates, coffee, and light barrel aromas.

Taste is very cola like up front. Dark cocoa, coffee, light bakers chocolate. Decent barrel flavors and light bitterness on the finish.

Mouthfeel is ok, but too thin for this style.

Drinkability is good, it doesn't match up to others in the style . Still a pretty good beer though.

flexabull, Jan 02, 2011
Photo of JohnQVegas
3.88/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottle into The Bruery tulip; served at room temperature.

Pours deep brown venturing into black; initial fluffy tan head of about an inch settles fairly quickly into a thin ring.

Nose is nice, with the barrel being fairly reserved - roasty, a bit earthy, smooth, with a subtle bourbon character that doesn't really emerge from the roastiness.

Taste is a bit sweet; roasty malt mixed with a dash of burnt sugar, earthy tobacco offsets a fruity, brown sugar sweetness that lingers alongside the light residual burnt character from the sugar. Light alcohol notes as well. Barrel character is very subtle, light, oaky, spicy bourbon character peeking out in the commotion.

Mouthfeel is light, soft, fluffy carbonation over a medium-full body. Very easy to drink.

Enjoyable, to me. Not a world beater, certainly no Bourbon County, but I'm a fan. Heavy on the big roastiness, but balanced well.

JohnQVegas, Jan 01, 2011
Photo of Pencible
3.83/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: This poured a nearly opaque blackish brown with a little light tan head.
S: It smelled like fresh roasted coffee and sweet milk chocolate, with some brown sugar and a bit of earthy oak and alcohol.
T: It tasted like dry cocoa powder and bitter coffee, with molasses and earthy brown sugar and a bit of oak and alcohol. It had a mostly bitter and clean aftertaste that wasn't too sharp.
M: It was slightly thick with a bit of carbonation, and had some alcohol warming.
D: This started out a great stout, but the scent and taste got more harsh as it opened. Then, it mellowed out again as it warmed. Weird. The body was kind of weak, and the alcohol was pretty noticeable, so it wasn't super easy to drink. The bourbon and oak notes were barely there, which was disappointing too. Age may help, but I wasn't very impressed with this beer fresh.

Pencible, Dec 31, 2010
Photo of Pellinore1
3.53/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours deep brown, producing a finger of light tan head that dissipates fairly quickly.

Smells of dark fruit, perhaps vanilla and some oak in the background. A bit boozy.

Big malt presence, but not the roastiness I would expect from an imperial stout. This is sweet and fruity, with a bit of oak and smokiness shining through as well.

This is medium bodied, and smooth, even creamy in the mouth. Alcohol is clearly present, but not overwhelming.

I'm glad I tried this beer, but it isn't one I will seek out again. I'll sit on the other bottle I purchased, and see if/how it develops with time.

Pellinore1, Dec 30, 2010
Photo of Thorpe429
3.15/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle picked up at Rick's in Alexandria. Served in a snifter.

Pours black with a short tan head and a very thin collar as the beer goes down. The nose brings forward a really strong whiskey character along with a hefty dose of booze. There is some chocolate lingering in the background but this one is all about the barrel. The taste follows the same path with just a bunch of booze and whiskey. There's also a light chalky character present as well. The body is medium and boozy with a slightly-astringent dry finish. Overall, not a fan of this. Not sure if it needs more time or what.

Thorpe429, Dec 29, 2010
Photo of elgiacomo
3.88/5  rDev +14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

22oz bottled Oct 26, 2010.

Pours thin brown with a one finger tan head that leaves some spotty lacing and holds a small cap.

Aroma is some sweet dark fruits, cherries, raisins, anise, some vanilla, oak, brown sugar, caramel, a bit of chocolate and roasted malts, some alcohol. Moderate to good strength.

Flavor is on the sweet side for an IS, more dark fruits, some chocolate, caramel, brown sugar, molasses, some oak and vanilla, anise, touch of bourbon, touch of hops. Lingering sweet finish. Minimal alcohol considering the ABV.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied, creamy, low to medium carbonation.

A unique Imperial Stout, not very roasted, definitely more on the fruity side and rather sweet. Far from the greatest IS I've ever had but still an enjoyable brew and I'm not quite getting all the hate on this one.

elgiacomo, Dec 29, 2010
Photo of KeefD
1.33/5  rDev -60.9%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1

Pours a somewhat dark brown color that's pretty much see-through, with a small white head. WTF? This smells like burnt plastic. That's it. Burnt plastic. Awful. Taste isn't much better. All I'm getting out of the flavor is this odd chemical flavor with a hint of chocolate and roast, and a touch of barrel/wood, but there's really nothing good about this beer in any way, shape, or form. Mouthfeel is thin, vapid, and flat. This is just god awful. I drank maybe 5 ounces out of this bomber and dumped the rest. I'm sorry for doing that to you, drain, but that's the only place this beer belongs.

Too all the tickers that say -bal aging makes beers better, try this one. Ughghghghhhh...

Horrible, wretched stuff. How this has a B- is beyond me. Left Hand should refund my $9!

KeefD, Dec 29, 2010
Photo of emerge077
3.05/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Weak skim across the top, with a clustered ring of larger bubbles on the outer rim of the tulip glass. Body looks to be black, but shows some high clarity crimson red when backlit.

Really hard to pull out much from the aroma, even as it warms. After a sustained swirl there's a boozy note, sort of oddly phenolic. Some traces of dry roast at room temp, but nothing approaching Imperial Stout.

Fairly thin bodied, slightly creamy, dry, bitter, and very mildly tannic. Some astringent char in the aftertaste, very little barrel character or overall depth. Alcohol is perceptible. Fairly average and inoffensive overall. Not something i'd pick up again.

emerge077, Dec 28, 2010
Photo of kiddynamite920
3.65/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Bottled 10-26-10, fairly fresh.

A: Pours a dark brown with a pretty thin and foamy beige head. Poured more like a darker brown ale.

S: Sweet, woody notes with plum and raisin like aromas. Deep and malty, but not necessarily roasty. More of a barleywine type malt base. Some sweet alcohol and a very faint vanilla aroma. Guessing this one is showcasing more of what the barrel lends to the beer, than the base beer itself.

T: Some roast comes through with an almost whisky, peat like flavor. Definitely woody with sweet, boozy dark fruits. I find some sweeter fruits in here as well like apples and pears. Definitely a great example of what a barrel can do for a beer, yet the base beer just doesn't have Imp. Stout characteristics.

M: Carbonation is on point and lasting. The body of the beer is pretty slick and medium in weight. Has a similar mouthfeel of some of Southern Tiers offerings. Nice, creamy mouthfeel.

D: Alcohol is only a smidgen hot and noticeable towards the end, but this one really drinks quite easily. If you are looking for a barrel aged Imperial Stout, you might not want to shell out the cash for this one. Definitely on the sweeter side, closer to a barleywine.

kiddynamite920, Dec 25, 2010
Photo of bort11
3.15/5  rDev -7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

22 0z bottle poured into a Corsendonk Christmas Ale tulip glass. A thin khaki colored head drops down quickly, only spotty lacing. This is not completely out of line for a barrel aged beer, but is a little disappointing. The body color is a light black with a reddish hue. I see a lot of highlights that come through the center.

The smell is a straight up stout. Lots of dark roasted notes, mostly coffee and dark bread. I do not get any of the char flavors that usually come with a barrel aged beer. Taste does recover the char flavoring, but it is still very light.

Mouthfeel is a lot thinner than what I would expect of an Imperial Stout. It drinks very smooth, I do not get the feeling that this is a beer over 10% ABV. This is not a bad beer in general, but I don't think it lives up to the expectations of a barrel aged Imperial Stout. I think I am more impressed with the label than the beer.

bort11, Dec 24, 2010
Photo of ColdPoncho
3.33/5  rDev -2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

A - For an imperial stout, this is surprisingly light in color, being a translucent reddish-brown. There's a small ring of tan head around the edge of the glass.

S - There's a big roasty malt aroma, coupled with an astringent alcohol/woody mix and a bit of rawhide.

T - The biggest taste here is the booze, with a light smoked malt backbone. There is some coffee and chocolate afterwards, and some woody notes, which come out more as the beer warms.

M - Pretty good medium-full body, that's verging on creamy.

D - It's not difficult to drink, not heavy, and not unpleasant, but being as it's not particularly tasty, it's not particularly drinkable.

ColdPoncho, Dec 24, 2010
Photo of caskstrength
1.05/5  rDev -69.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

Bomber bottled 10/26/10. Cool label, I must say. Ran into this randomly when visiting my local dealer, never heard of it before. Gave it a try, about 10 bucks.

Looked it up, Heaven Hill brandy barrel blended imperial stout. sounds great.

Pours dark brown, easy to see through. Limited carbonation, but still a thin head that quickly forms a ring.

Some spicy stale coffee smells, cinnamon for the spice. Roasted malts, but muted. Maybe some fruit, I don't know. Nothing interesting, really. I kept smelling and kept finding nothing.

I think the flavor died in this beer. There is nothing to be found, it's a shell of a barrel aged stout. Maybe some coffee grounds that have been used twice. Some roasted carmel malts? Everything is thin and superficial.

A terrible beer. There is no life here, so at least the name fits.

caskstrength, Dec 24, 2010
Photo of aasher
1/5  rDev -70.6%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1

I had higher hopes for this one. When a bottle says barrel aged Imperial stout it should mean something. It poured a watery, thin and translucent raisin brown in color with no head. It looks like dip spit or even muddy mop water. It doesn't resemble a stout of any kind. The smell was very sweet, too sweet, and of caramelized brown sugar. That was it, no other characteristics and completely one dimensional. The taste was far too sweet as well. It tasted of brown sugar, raisins, and figs. Far too much fruit for an Imperial stout. Where's the coffee? Where's the roasted notes? Nowhere to be found! It was very, very thin. It didn't even coat the sides of the glass. It was like dirty water. This beer is an imposter. It is not imperial stout. It's a sugary sweet brown ale. Avoid! I deserve an apology and refund. This beer killed this brewery for me. I'll never go back again.

aasher, Dec 23, 2010
Photo of scifan
1.4/5  rDev -58.8%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5

Pours a a dark brown with a khaki head leaving some lacing along the glass. Its very thin looking you can almost see through it when held to the light.
Not much on the nose. Just a little bit of roasty malts and a hint of oaky woodiness. Also a strange plastic/rubber smell as well. I was hoping for alot more out of this one.
The taste isn't any better in fact I think its worse. Just some roasted malts and hints of the bourbon barrel aging. I thought the label said it spent a year in the barrel. Unfortunatley the most prominant flavor is this plastic/rubber flavor that lingers long after its gone.
Mouthfeel is very thin. You would think that this was a 5% porter not a 10% Imperial Stout, it has no backbone at all.
All in all a terrible beer. Maybe I got a bad bottle but I'm not spending another 9 bucks to find out.

scifan, Dec 23, 2010
Photo of wisrarebeer
2.78/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottled 26 Oct 10.

A: deep copper color, very little head
S: very mild, roasted malt with EtOH, pretty one-dimesional
T: from the label I was expected a lot more, roasted malt, strong bitter finish, no really noticeable good barrel qualities, needed more malt
M: OK but too bitter finish
D: drinkable but one dimensional

wisrarebeer, Dec 20, 2010
Barrel-Aged Wake Up Dead from Left Hand Brewing Company
78 out of 100 based on 262 ratings.