1. Extreme Beer Fest tickets go on sale Sat, Sep 27 @ Noon EDT.
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pale Ale - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Pale AlePale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

879 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 879
Reviews: 386
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 12.81%
Wants: 9
Gots: 52 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Boulevard Pale Ale is a smooth, fruity, well-balanced beer with year-round appeal. A variety of caramel malts impart a rich flavor and amber color, while liberal use of whole hops adds zest and aroma. Pale Ale is the first beer we brewed, and continues to be a perennial favorite.

30 IBU

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-19-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 879 | Reviews: 386 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Miami66
1/5  rDev -72.1%

Miami66, Mar 19, 2013
Photo of MortarPestle
1/5  rDev -72.1%

MortarPestle, Jun 28, 2012
Photo of tjthresh
1.8/5  rDev -49.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle. Best Before 10/02/05. Yellow gold with continual CO2 rising woth a off white, longstanding head. Very thinck lacing. Some hazy. Grainy straw and horsey aromas. Very little hops aroma. Maybe some spice. Estery. Estersy come thru in the flavor also. Bready. Mild hop flavor. Med-full bodied and prickly carb. Flavor does not linger. BLVD Pale Ale used to be so much better before they started brewing for dollars.

tjthresh, Aug 31, 2005
Photo of JIMTRK16
2/5  rDev -44.3%

JIMTRK16, Feb 26, 2014
Photo of KarlHungus
2/5  rDev -44.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

This brew pours a semi-clear pale orangish-red color with a huge fluffy white head. The aroma is quite faint. After a thorough inspection of the nose, I can detect some malt and citric hop aromas. The taste is as thin as the aroma is faint. Seriously, this beer has almost no flavor. There is a sort of bitter flavor in the aftertaste (if it can be called an aftertaste when their was no taste for it to come after). The mouthfeel is sickly thin and watery. Overall, this is a bad beer. Not bad because its character doesn't agree with me, but because it has no character.

KarlHungus, Sep 20, 2005
Photo of pixieskid
2/5  rDev -44.3%

pixieskid, Jun 17, 2012
Photo of bucko
2.2/5  rDev -38.7%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This beer pours a pale golden color with a small, fluffy white head. Almost no lacing. The aroma is nice... citrusy, earthy, slightly sweet and inviting. The flavor is subtle... not so much watered-down, but not terribly pronounced, either. Slight citrus from the hops, a bit of malt and a background that reminds me of clover honey. The mouthfeel is thin and light. Overall, fairly drinkable but not terribly exciting... reminds me more of a cream ale than a pale ale. I want more hops! Free the hops!

bucko, Jun 09, 2006
Photo of BeerHunter76
2.25/5  rDev -37.3%

BeerHunter76, May 22, 2012
Photo of Ejayz
2.25/5  rDev -37.3%

Ejayz, Aug 05, 2014
Photo of drpimento
2.25/5  rDev -37.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured with an off-white head and almost no lace. Looks and tastes force carbonated. I'm prejudiced against the beer as the hops give the beer a grapefruit character that I don't like. Do pick up some malt in there and that helps. Proly not bad if you like the grapefruit thing.

drpimento, Apr 22, 2009
Photo of swamiswamu
2.35/5  rDev -34.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Where's the hops? Maybe I'm missing something but this seems to have a weirdly cloying sweet taste with not a lot to back it. It looks fine, decent head and lacing and clear orangish-golden color, it isn't worth your time. Nearly as ubiqious as the wheat, but not as good. Not worth your time.

swamiswamu, Jan 12, 2005
Photo of schanker21
2.4/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

A- Amber color with a very small white head that lasts and leaves good lacing.

S- Hops and bread

T/M- Almost nothing. Very, very subdued cascade (I think) hops and little malty presence at all. No carbonation whatsoever. Like drinking a can of pop that was opened and left in the fridge for a month. I'm guessing that this was a very, very old keg because it just did not seem fresh. I will have to try it again sometime in a bottle that I'm sure is fresh.

schanker21, Sep 14, 2008
Photo of Jishguy
2.4/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A- Poured a slightly hazy amber color. Head diminishes very quickly, and leaves almost no lacing on the glass.

S- Relatively bland. Bread-like malt aroma with a slightly earthy, piney hop background.

T- Similar to aroma. Not much going on here. Bread or cracker-like malts, a hint of caramel, and a tiny hint of earthy hop flavors. A biscuit-like flavor dominates the aftertaste. Not very bitter.

M- Carbonation is a bit high. Fells very thin, and slightly watery.

D- Due to the light body of this beer, I could drink a lot.

Overall, this isn't a terrible beer. It's just under flavored and bland.

Jishguy, Jul 07, 2011
Photo of jonnylieberman
2.42/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured gorgeous out of the bottle. A perfect head and a beautiful orange-copper type color--clear, but not crystal. Very nice to look at.

Um, not too much to smell. There's like a little bit of hop scent, and maybe a third as much malt.

Compared to a brew like Sierra Nevada Pale Ale, this beer wears the dunce cap. Flavors are not forthcoming. They are in there, just buried. Definitely needs some more hops to balance out the malt. Unfortunately, the malt that is there really doesn't taste so great. Not fruity enough at all. This is a very conservative pale ale.

Thick mouthfeel, nearly identical to their dry stout. However, it is almost course, and for an ale much too dry.

You could slug these back without too much trouble, as long as you are thinking about something else.

jonnylieberman, Feb 20, 2004
Photo of rlshep
2.42/5  rDev -32.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Best by 3/5/11

Aroma: Slight sourness. Some apricot fruit. Sweet resinous smell. A fair amount of esters.

Appearance: Pours thick 3 finger off chunky off-white head. Slow to dissipate. Heavy lacing. Orangish amber color. Very clear.

Flavor: Astringent, soapy flavor. Light caramel. A lot of earthy/minerally flavors. High bitterness.

Mouthfeel: Very dry. High carbonation, but overall thin mouthfeel. Alcohol present.

Overall: Something is suspect with this beer. I can't get over the soapiness of it to give a better review (Yes it was a clean glass). I've had this beer last year and it tasted a lot better, well balanced with a lot of malt character. However, this beer is a drain pour. I would try again with caution.

rlshep, Mar 04, 2011
Photo of seeswo
2.45/5  rDev -31.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from 12 oz. bottle into Bruery snifter into the sink. Pour is copper with some off-white head. The nose is bready malt/yeast with big perfume and grassy hops. Does not smell very good, actually. The taste is...not good. Again, perfumy, acidic, grassy, herbal, flowery, bready and all coming together in a poor way. The hoppiness is harsh, but not in a good way. There is an off-flavor that I am not ciceroney enough to identify (vegetal?). Mouthfeel is mostly fine. Carbonation is good, body is ok. Not an easy drinker for a pale ale, which is all wrong. Overall, had maybe 1/3 of a bottle then moved on.

seeswo, Aug 05, 2011
Photo of rgrholmes168
2.48/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle with a best by 3/29/09.

I poured a pretty decent one a half finger head. I was a little bit disappointed by how quickly is disappated and there was not lace left. The color is a farily murky orange and the color gets lighter as you get closer to the bottom of the glass.

I got absolutely nothing from smelling this beer. I did not get any hops breaking through the beer and I was a little bit disappointed. I was not very impressed by the smell.

The taste of the beer was not much better than a Bud. It seemed fairly watered down and a little bit thick on the tongue. I got a slight banana taste from the beer which is unexpected and it almost seemed a little bit skunky.

I did not like this beer at all. The best aspect was the appearance and the beer did not live up to this at all.

rgrholmes168, Nov 25, 2008
Photo of crobinso
2.5/5  rDev -30.4%

crobinso, Jun 02, 2012
Photo of Adambeerdude22
2.5/5  rDev -30.4%

Adambeerdude22, Mar 11, 2013
Photo of Twpsyn
2.5/5  rDev -30.4%

Twpsyn, May 08, 2014
Photo of Kyrojack
2.5/5  rDev -30.4%

Kyrojack, Jan 16, 2013
Photo of thaichile
2.63/5  rDev -26.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light, clear amber with a short head. Nose is quite muted, with fruit and hops straining to poke their heads out however unsucessfully. Flavors are light-bodied and thin, might be a session brew as it was not unpleasent, just not robust enough. It makes Pale make total sense. Thanks jhammerly for the bottle.

thaichile, May 20, 2006
Photo of cameraman
2.65/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A deep amber color is poured into the glass, with a light beige colored head forming on top. The head is about a quarter inch thick that dissolves away gradually. A grassy fragrance hits the nose at first that is followed by light citrus scent. It finishes with bread fragrance and followed by a touch of cracked grain. The taste comes forward with the malt, bringing bread and biscuit flavors that seemingly dominate each taste. The hops do make a feint appearance at the backend, with grass and citrus flavors. The texture starts a bit watery then grows to become more medium bodied. It then starts to fade to as reaches the back of the palate. The growing carbonation crashes on the back of the palate like a wave. This is an easy to drink ale, if I were drinking a mild ale. This says pale ale. Though it has a strong color and look, with a descent aroma, but the taste is lackluster and the feel is below average, makes this beer a little disappointing.

cameraman, Mar 03, 2010
Photo of jar2574
2.65/5  rDev -26.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Out of the bottle. Golden orange color. Very little carbonation. Head dissipates very quickly. Nothing special about the appearance.

Typical hoppy IPA smell, but it's not a great IPA. Not terrible, not too sharp, but somehow bitter without purpose or flavor. It has a decent mouthfeel: carbonation, not too watery, decent feel. There is too much acidity in the aftertaste. And since it's not that enjoyable to drink, it's not that drinkable.

jar2574, Aug 07, 2007
Photo of rowew
2.68/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Presentation: 12 oz short bottle, best by date on the neck (this is a little past due, but just purchased this week - damn Wyoming liquor stores).

Appearance: Reddish orange and cloud, average sized head, just a bit off of white.

Smell: A bit of floral hops and some malt smell that reminds me of the twang from extract home brews.

Taste: This one tastes just like it smells.

Overall impression: This one is mediocre at best. From the Boulevard offerings I have tried, I would say stick to the dark beers.

rowew, Jun 20, 2007
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Pale Ale from Boulevard Brewing Co.
81 out of 100 based on 879 ratings.