1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pale Ale - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Pale AlePale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

873 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 873
Reviews: 386
rAvg: 3.59
pDev: 12.81%
Wants: 9
Gots: 51 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Boulevard Pale Ale is a smooth, fruity, well-balanced beer with year-round appeal. A variety of caramel malts impart a rich flavor and amber color, while liberal use of whole hops adds zest and aroma. Pale Ale is the first beer we brewed, and continues to be a perennial favorite.

30 IBU

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-19-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 873 | Reviews: 386 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Spineypanda
4.33/5  rDev +20.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Boulevards pale is amazing!

Has a golden color, with a head that doesnt last.
Smells great, none of the super sweetness and candy smells that pale ales have been moving towards.
Tastes good! Has a nice old pale ale taste to it that is only bitter enough to make it classify as a pale ale. Not underly bitter though.

I love it!

Spineypanda, Nov 02, 2009
Photo of climax
3.98/5  rDev +10.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured a murky bright amber color, nice vibrant orange to the light. Head was decent and faded slowly and evenly.

The smell was very nice and well balanced. The hop profile was very smooth and citrusy. As the beer sat the malt began to balance warm and toasty from the pale malt.

Taste was very good as well. Good hit of hops at the beginning, more than I was expecting after the smell. Still more citrus than anything, the malt came in to balance without stealing the show at the end.

Good body to the beer, nice bite with a slick oily feel. Aftertaste lingered for a good amount of time. Low ABV make it sessionable and good flavor make this a good solid beer.

climax, Oct 26, 2009
Photo of HeroJH
3.9/5  rDev +8.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

nice example of a standard american pale ale. Good variety pack to share with friends new to beer to show them standards of each style.

A - hazy gold, big white foamy head
S - light malt, bitter hop
T - crisp clean and quenching
M - quenching, dry finish
D - good, could have a couple.

HeroJH, Oct 15, 2009
Photo of Kraken
3.83/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Reviewed from notes. Consumed 08/08/09

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a smallish water glass. Firm pour calls fourth a 1/4 inch of white head. Head falls quickly and leaves a nice lace. Color is a deep caramel.

Nose- Slightly citric lemon and orange zest. Lots of intense caramel notes.

Pallate- Very nice, lots of citric hops, orange, lemon, nice floral notes. Balanced with plenty of caramel.

Mouthfeel- Active dry, maybe a bit thin.

Drinkability- Good.

Kraken, Oct 08, 2009
Photo of Beaver13
3.28/5  rDev -8.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle, best by 10/10/09. Pours a hazy golden amber with a big creamy white head that retains well and laces the glass.

The aroma is sweet fruity caramel malts with some subdued hops.

The flavor is bready caramel malts, tea, and some fruits with a pretty mild bitter finish. The mouthfeel is medium to full with creamy carbonation.

Overall, a pretty good pale ale. It's a bit mild in the hops for me.

Beaver13, Oct 04, 2009
Photo of JoEBoBpr
3.45/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a Pint glass.

A - Nice Strong copper color with some orange hues. ! finger head that goes by quickly.

S - Faint malt sweetness followed by some hop piney but everything is very faint.

T - Nice maltiness up front with bread and nut notes. Hops are subdued but add a final hop bitterness and dryness at the end. The taste and nose both leave a little to be desired.

M - Low CO2 crispness, medium-low body.

D - Refreshing but not that flavorful.

JoEBoBpr, Sep 10, 2009
Photo of srandycarter
3.73/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A - Clear orange with off white head. Leaves fast to ring. Some cling lace.

S - Not much. Malt, a little funk.

T - Nice benign malt presence. Bittering is subtle. Small amount of lingering sugar at finish.

M - Creamy, good carb, well balance, a little watery.

D - Oh, considering the ABV and the over easy drinking, heck ya.

srandycarter, Sep 09, 2009
Photo of Ottertude
4.08/5  rDev +13.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This brew poured into my pint glass a slightly hazy amber color. There was about an inch of off-white foam that left lots of nice lacing on my glass. There was not a lot of smell, maybe a hint of citrus.

I did like the taste. Some biscuity malt along with hops that were citrus like. Overall a good balance between malt and hop flavors with none really dominating.

It had a nice creamy mouthfeel and was really easy to drink. I could have several of these. I could see this as a go-to ale if I lived in KC.

If you like your pale ales to be loaded with hops, you might take a pass on this ale. If you enjoy well balanced ales that are not too complex, this one is well worth a try. I liked it.

Ottertude, Aug 25, 2009
Photo of simmons
3.13/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Golden copper bright beer with thin white lace lasting a good while. no bubbles to be seen.
Aroma: Surprising there is not much of anything.
Flavor: No malt at all. As for the hops, moderate hop profile. There isn't much hop bitterness but has a nice floral flavor
Mouthfeel: medium body, average carbonation for a pale. as for balance the malt could have been a little stronger in my opinion
Overall: Although I feel this beer could use a bit more work with the malt, overall I did enjoy this beer. The hop profile was unique.

simmons, Aug 23, 2009
Photo of philipquarles
4.38/5  rDev +22%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 5

12oz bottle, BBD of 10/24/09. Pours clear amber-gold with a nice white head that doesn't die very quickly. Good lacing. Nice aroma of floral, citric hops and malt. Tastes equally pleasant, with nice aromatic hop character, pale (and a hint of caramel) malts. Interesting, slightly bubbelgum-like notes thanks to the yeast. Citric and fruity. Very well-rounded. Light-medium body. A nicely balanced, flavorful pale ale that you could drink all day long.

philipquarles, Aug 18, 2009
Photo of ThickestHead
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured into a chilled pint glass.
Slightly hazed dark golden color with a little fizzy white head.
Smells sweet and acidic.
Smells and tastes bisquity, with toasted pale malt with floral and citric American hops.
Well carbonated, smooth and crisp.
Super easy to drink notwithstanding the basically mediocre components. Won't go out of my way to get this one again but the brew is not disappointing, it is what it is.

ThickestHead, Aug 05, 2009
Photo of Docer
3.3/5  rDev -8.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Got a bottle of this in a trade... cant tell if its a best by 12/11/03, or 08, or 09...

- Nice slightly cloudy copper penny pale.. minimal head.. light lacing.. bubbles nicely.

- Light grain scent.. bit of a zesty sour note, some bitterness... wakes the nose up.. light sweetness and caramel.

- Bright zesty note, slight sourness... bitter hop zing.. and sweet caramel....

- Little sour.. tastes fresh though... think it's meant to be that way... not very chewy or dry, rather refreshing...

- A decent pale, but the flavors don't do it for me.. bit to bright and zesty... not enough hop.

Docer, Jul 30, 2009
Photo of bfields4
3.48/5  rDev -3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

A hazy but somewhat transparent pale golden body. An average head that dissipates to a thin lace.

Not very big in the smell department a light hops maybe a bit of citrus zest just a hint though.

Lemony zest hit with mild bitterness from the hops. There is also a fairly bland malt presence.

A little high on the carbonation. Very easy to drink though.

Another very sessionable beer from Boulevard's standard line up. I could switch back and forth from their wheat and this guy all day long. (I'm a much bigger fan of their dry stout and porter though)

bfields4, Jul 29, 2009
Photo of NODAK
4.05/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

Aroma is mostly of citrusy hops, although not as strong as many beers of this style...more subdued than most.

The taste....really a total surprise. Mouthfeel feels a bit thicker than expected. I get a bit of a sweet malt backbone upfront...fading into a finish that has the citrusy hops as found on the nose but nowhere near the power that one may expect in a typical APA. There's also a bit of creaminess in the taste on the finish, probably from the malt.

In fact, among APA's, I'm not sure if I've ever had one that held the hops back as much as this.

Insanely drinkable for style...for me, anyway. Some may be disappointed with the lack of punch, but I find the balance to be wonderful...and the creamy mouthfeel with the creaminess on the finish are great touches.

NODAK, Jul 15, 2009
Photo of tr4nc3d
2.95/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured into my pint glass from a 12fl oz bottle

Pours a medium copper color with a two and a half inch white head. Good head retention with small amounts of soapy lacing left sticking to the sides of my glass.

Smell is of grass and pine like hops. Dried fruit like pears come to mind.

Taste is mainly considered of sweet malts and the hops have faded quite a bit. Slight grass and floral type hops are noticeable but not by much.

Mouthfeel is thin and low to medium carbonation.

Overall pretty disappointed with this beer.

tr4nc3d, Jul 13, 2009
Photo of portia99
4.05/5  rDev +12.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a Sam Summer tumbler.

A - Pours a bright orangey copper color with a small white head that fades quickly but leaves some nice lacing behind. Quite a bit of sediment floating in the glass - didn't pour with great care, but certainly wasn't a vigorous pour.

S - Right out of the bottle this smells strongly of citrusy hops, mainly fresh, sweet oranges - blends with the malt to give an overall orange blossom honey effect. This smells amazing - most distinct orangey smell I've gotten from any beer...can't wait to taste this one.

T - Orangey flavors come through with a touch of sweetness and a good crisp bitterness. Very clean taste. Doesn't quite live up to the aroma, but still very good.

M - Lots of carbonation, fills the mouth with prickly bubbles. Medium body.

D - Good medium bodied beer and lower in alcohol content. Feels a little on the heavy side for a pale ale, which limits drinkability, but not much. I could see myself having a few of these in a session and being quite happy.

portia99, Jul 04, 2009
Photo of Misfit138
3.8/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

poured from bottle into Yazoo pint glass

A- Nice dark orange color which is somewhat cloudy and a small white head that went away quickly

S- Sweet malts and a hint of citrus.

T- Much like the nose, initially sweet malt followed by some citrus bitterness.

M- Fairly light with only moderate carbonation

D- An easy drinking Pale Ale, not as much bite as most I drink but good. Nothing to complain about with it.

Misfit138, Jun 30, 2009
Photo of Soneast
4/5  rDev +11.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear, pale copper color with a 1 inch, white, bubbly head that recedes to a dense, creamy layer.

Hops are the dominate aroma that I pick up initially, citrus and fruit with some sweetness intermingled a little bit of tartness too. Clean and fresh.

The flavor also consists primarily of hop freshness, maybe a bit more on the piney side. A crisp flavor throughout, with just enough bitterness at the end to help balance the pale malts.

A fairly light beer, maybe more medium bodied. Low ABV and lots of flavor. All in all a pretty decent representation of the style, crisp and refreshing, well balanced.

Soneast, Jun 12, 2009
Photo of glid02
3.65/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Had on-tap at Quinton's in Columbia, MO.

Pours a slightly hazy copper color with a one-finger slightly off-white head. The head dissipates into a wispy layer on top leaving light lacing.

Smells of light citrus hops with a good bit of pale malt aromas in the background.

Tastes similar to how it smells. Pale malt flavors up front are joined by light citrus flavors midway through the sip and both flavors carry through to a light bitterness.

Mouthfeel is good. It's got a nice thickness with moderate carbonation.

Drinkability is good. I didn't have a problem finishing one glass and could have a few of these.

Overall this is nothing to write home about but it remains a solid APA. Worth a shot.

glid02, Jun 04, 2009
Photo of wheatyweiss
4.65/5  rDev +29.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Poured from a bottle into a nonic

Pours a medium honey to light amber with a nice thick, foamy head that is quite persistant and laces nicely.

Aroma is of antispetic and phenolic hops. Malt does not show itself on the nose. Hops smell bitter and earthy.

Flavor opens with an iced tea flavor. The hops come out in the middle but are trumped by the malt, which is not bad by any means. The middle is also highly supported by a tannic acid flavor, like an English Pale. The finish is dry and bitter hops. Caramel flavors, which some don't like or support, give the malt profile a weapon to take to the fight.

Mouthfeel is a bit thin, but crisp, carbonation is adequate and soft edged.

This is a perfect session pale. Seriously don't know of any other pale's with this much flavor, at this low of an ABV.

Low ABV, plenty of flavor, what else could you ask for?

wheatyweiss, Jun 03, 2009
Photo of gunnerman
3.75/5  rDev +4.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured this into a pint glass pours a nice copper color with foamy head that leaves a bit of lace. Smell is of slight citrus with more of a wheat type of smell. Taste is heavy carbonation with a faint hop bitterness, citrus, bubblegum, orange peel. Overall this is a nice session beer and goes down smooth.

gunnerman, Jun 02, 2009
Photo of Rayek
3.6/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A: Orange tinged amber with nice clarity for a bottle conditioned beer. The orange tinged cap starts out strong with a pronounced soapiness. Head retention is average, and bits of lace are left behind.

S: Subdued, but pleasant describes the nose. It's mostly a mix of lemony hops and toasted grains. Maybe a hint of butterscotch.

T: Nice, but nondescript. Starts out with a caramel infused toast flavor. Hops come on with a lemony bitterness that's just high enough to balance the malty sweetness. Finishes with lingering lemon and bread flavors.

M: Medium light body is slightly slick and has about the right amount of carbonation.

D: This beer is pretty drinkable thanks to the low ABV. For me; however, the flavor could use more depth and complexity. As it stands, this is a nice session brew for times when the beer isn't the center of activity.

Rayek, May 27, 2009
Photo of thirdeye11
3.9/5  rDev +8.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5

Presentation: Poured from 12oz bottle into Duvel tulip.

A: Pours a great 2 finger head, color is appropriate for the style, lacing is nice. Couldn't be improved much, maybe make it slightly more orange.

S: Not a lot of special things going on here. Some fresh fruity hops in the nose, nice and clean. Aroma is about the same whether cold or warmer. Nice for the style.

T: Taste could use more hops even for a pale ale, but I thought it was quite solid overall. Not a lot of bitter aftertaste here, very smooth and drinkable.

M: I think SNPA is the standard by which all others should be judged, and this one comes very close. The weight, carbonation are just right. The oiliness in SNPA is missing here, and could use a bit more creaminess but really VERY solid. I was impressed.

D: I could drink them all night and never be upset about it. I had 3 in a short period of time and it was great all the way through. One of the most drinkable beers I've had in a while.

Nice start for anyone trying to get into hops. It's not overpowering in any way, and quite well done. A little mild for the style maybe, but extremely approachable.

thirdeye11, May 18, 2009
Photo of drpimento
2.25/5  rDev -37.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured with an off-white head and almost no lace. Looks and tastes force carbonated. I'm prejudiced against the beer as the hops give the beer a grapefruit character that I don't like. Do pick up some malt in there and that helps. Proly not bad if you like the grapefruit thing.

drpimento, Apr 22, 2009
Photo of ArrogantB
3.68/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

12oz bottle, I think I paid $8 for the sixer. Interesting that this is bottle conditioned as well as made with whole hop cones juts like another certain pale ale. Color was golden, clear, good head. The smell was well, nondescript to say the least. The taste was very balanced between malts and hops and not what I would call hoppy at all. It was however amazingly easy to drink. I could see myself purchasing this with some regularity if only it were cheaper than SNPA.

ArrogantB, Apr 21, 2009
Pale Ale from Boulevard Brewing Co.
81 out of 100 based on 873 ratings.