1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Lunar Ale - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Lunar AleLunar Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

233 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 233
Reviews: 188
rAvg: 3.43
pDev: 13.41%
Wants: 12
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Dark Wheat Ale |  5.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

Our first new year-round beer since 1996, Lunar Ale is in a category all its own. Brewed using a unique aromatic yeast, this refreshing variety is best described as a cloudy brown ale with a complex, malty aroma and flavor, and a crisp, dry finish.

14 IBU

(Beer added by: bditty187 on 01-13-2007)
View: Beers (52) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 233 | Reviews: 188 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of baseballrock
baseballrock

Texas

3.38/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

the color is brown, not very much carbonation, no head and no lace. the smell is slightly bannana and cloves. it has some bread taste. the problem i have has is the bannana, clove taste. im not an expert but i was'nt expecting those taste from a dark wheat beer. mouthfeel is a bit watery. this is just an average beer in my opinion, nothing special.

Serving type: bottle

04-09-2008 23:08:53 | More by baseballrock
Photo of Mora2000
Mora2000

Texas

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass. The beer poured an iced tea color and was slightly cloudy. There was a tan head about two fingers thick, which dissipated rather quickly.

The beer smelled caramel. The taste was malts, with some bread also.

Overall, this was not a bad beer. I have had better from Boulevard, but I am not disappointed in this one. I would drink it again, but it would not be my first choice.

Serving type: bottle

03-25-2008 01:28:24 | More by Mora2000
Photo of rbuckstar
rbuckstar

Massachusetts

2.15/5  rDev -37.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Just tried this beer and i was so dissapointed. It has some wheat and malt background but nothing impressive at all. The taste was something of a very badly done wheat beer with no background at all. I had to dump this beer out because i just couldn't finish it. I've had a lot of good beers in my day and i expected a little more but i tasted this and was incredibly unimpressed. It tasted like really bad bread, wheaty but not in a good way.

Serving type: bottle

03-15-2008 01:35:55 | More by rbuckstar
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

3.63/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance: Pours a cloudy ice tea color with a light tan head that pancakes the beer and leaves a few dots of lace

Smell: Banana bread and caramel are plusses, but there is a bit of detracting sulphur

Taste: Opens with a wheat bread flavor that expands in the malted milk and banana directions by mid-palate but a bit of sourness emerges as well; after the swallow, the flavors hang in there, much as you would expect for a wheat beer

Mouthfeel: Light to medium body with moderate carbonation; a bit chalky and watery, however

Drinkability: Despite the rather negative reviews around here, I rather enjoyed this one; while I'm not a big fan of wheat beers I liked the fruit and malted milk flavors

Thanks, Vancer, for the opportunity

Serving type: bottle

03-08-2008 00:54:39 | More by brentk56
Photo of scottblaze
scottblaze

Texas

2.85/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Boulevard's website says this is 4.5% ABV.

Whoa...an ambitious pour resulted in a frothy overflow, retention only fair, lacing not much to brag about, hazy brown. Floral and molasses notes in the nose. Taste is malt, hint of vanilla and biscuit finishing a little thin. Mouthfeel not much, Drinkability is ....so so.

I dunno, pretty much sub par overall, drinkable enough but something seems unfinished about this, probably won't venture this direction again.

Serving type: bottle

03-01-2008 00:20:17 | More by scottblaze
Photo of ttu94
ttu94

Texas

3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

The thing I like most about this beer is the bottle conditioning. Although all wheat beers should be bottle conditioned this one seems very smooth. Looks a dark cloudy beer with an ok head. Smell is malty with a hint of fruityness to it. Taste has a bit mor flavor to it than I expected. slightly sour malt hint not bad really. All in all a very drinkable beer. Boulevard is putting out some good stuff.

Serving type: bottle

02-26-2008 05:12:18 | More by ttu94
Photo of KarlHungus
KarlHungus

Minnesota

2.85/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

This beer pours a cloudy light brown color. The head is one inch in height, and recedes quickly into thin lacing. The aroma is of toffee and caramel, but is quite faint. The taste has a nice toffe note, but there isn't much else. The mouthfeel is light bodied and watery, with a high level of carbonation. Overall, this beer is a bit of a disappointment. I really love dunkelweizen, but this beer just does work for me.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2008 21:21:16 | More by KarlHungus
Photo of merlin48
merlin48

Kentucky

3.55/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle from a sampler box, pours a body colored like iced tea. Small khaki head leaves some skimpy lace. Aroma of clove, pepper, banana, and crackery wheat. Mouthfeel is on the lighter side and overcarbonated. Taste is clove and pepper with notes of banana, coriander, yeast, and wheat cracker. Drinkable enough, but the body could use more substance and less carbonation.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2008 14:28:07 | More by merlin48
Photo of morimech
morimech

Minnesota

3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Pours a cloudy light brown with a small white head. Retention is good with lots of sticky lacing.

The smell is a bit subdued and the aromas I do get are not that great. Mostly yeast with a little cloves.

The taste is what surprised me. The yeast adds a nice spice to counter the fruityness of the malt. I think it is well balanced and delicious. It leaves a bit of a cloying aftertaste though. The body is light and with the low ABV makes this a good session beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-24-2008 23:50:13 | More by morimech
Photo of russpowell
russpowell

Oklahoma

3.9/5  rDev +13.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours amber/brown with 3+ fingers of tan head.
Average head retention & lacing

S: Cloves, peppers, phenols & some banana at the end

T: Grainy, pepper notes, slight cocoa & a bit of bananas up front. Apples & banana flavors are present as this warms. Finishes juicy with cloves, good amounts of fruityness & a spot of brown sugar

MF: Light/medium bodied with moderate carbonation

Drinks good, fair example of the style that could pass for a dunkel weizen

Serving type: bottle

01-16-2008 04:27:18 | More by russpowell
Photo of Gehrig
Gehrig

Illinois

3.43/5  rDev 0%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A disappointing way to end the evening of beer tasting, I must say. Lunar isn't stellar, but pedestrian. The appearance is decent, with a plum-orange color filling the Ommegang glass, but topped by a thin finger of tan froth that dissipates quickly and leaves no lacing. The nose isn't bad, some roasted caramel, fruit, and a little pine. Same with the taste but, as someone who judges taste and mouthfeel in conjunction in the same way that I judge smell and taste together, the flat texture affected the mouthfeel and taste.

It's not a bad beer, and one that's cold worth grabbing. Yet this isn't a beer to go out of one's way for. This is a beer that could use a shot of some hop flavor, some fruit, and ultimately character.

Serving type: bottle

01-16-2008 02:56:23 | More by Gehrig
Photo of emerge077
emerge077

Illinois

3.58/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Grabbed a cheap single of this at Friar Tuck, since I liked a few other offerings from Boulevard. Neck label has a blurb defining bottle conditioning. BB: 3/24/08

Murky and dark brown, with the swirled addition of yeast sediment. A finger of off-white foam settles to a good skim, lasting for the duration of the glass.

Aroma of lightly sweet malt and yeast. A little bit coarse but not unpleasant.

Toasted malt with a touch of brown sugar, light astringency or bitterness, possibly from the whole hops. Slight aftertaste of grape. Smoother feel due to the wheat, and it finishes dry with some light maltiness and spicy clove. Fairly simple, and put together well enough.

Verdict: didn't love it or hate it, but it's just above average.

Serving type: bottle

01-03-2008 01:11:53 | More by emerge077
Photo of KodyBrannon
KodyBrannon

Texas

4/5  rDev +16.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Got this beer out of a sampler pack and poured it into a pint glass. It poured a dark brown color with a tan head. The taste of this beer was very dark, and malty. The smell was of wheat and malts. Over all I really enjoyed this beer and would drink it agian if I got the chance.

Serving type: bottle

01-01-2008 22:38:45 | More by KodyBrannon
Photo of allengarvin
allengarvin

Texas

3.33/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This is a cloudy amber-brown beer, with disappointing head retention. Grainy malt aroma, with some wheat apparent, and some medicinal cloviness. Upon tasting, there's not much malt. The yeast character is mildly interesting, spicy and clovey without the fruitiness one normally associates with the style. But it doesn't blend together very well, and I found it somewhat unpleasant.

Serving type: bottle

12-05-2007 23:58:39 | More by allengarvin
Photo of BuckeyeNation
BuckeyeNation

Iowa

3.23/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Dark orange-bronze that only became cloudy when the final ounce was added to the glass. At this point, the beer looks like murky cocoa mixed with dark honey. The frothy-firm head is orangish beige in color and is beginning to lay down a broken necklace of soapy lace.

The nose lacks power, but I can still appreciate the various ingredients. Lunar smells like what it is... namely, a hefe weizen that uses a few handfuls of chocolate malt for color, aroma and flavor. I don't think it's my imagination that faint whiffs of banana and clove are appreciated.

What a letdown. The flavor that's present is decent and *might* even be good if it did more than a hit-and-run on the palate. Since the beer is already an estimated 55 degrees, I'm not sure than warming will help (note: it doesn't). My suggestion would be to add more malt, amplify the yeastiness somehow and add another few percentage points to the ABV.

My buds are begging for more to work with. No more than fleeting impressions of cocoa covered bruised banana and clove make it from tongue to brain. As for the Magnum and Simcoe hops... what the hell are they doing in what amounts to a dunkle weizen? It doesn't matter in the end because their flavor is AWOL. Besides, at only 13 IBUs, there can't be too many of them present.

Given the 4.5% ABV, the mouthfeel is (barely) acceptable. It's light and properly bubbled, but I still maintain that a bigger Lunar would be a better Lunar. The finish is dangerously close to watery.

This is an okay effort, but Boulevard is capable of better. I think they aimed too low and went for a dumbed-down dunkel weizen rather than one that craft beer lovers could sink their teeth into. My hope is that the brewery doesn't see this as a finished product and that some serious tweaks are forthcoming.

Serving type: bottle

12-01-2007 15:23:14 | More by BuckeyeNation
Photo of lackenhauser
lackenhauser

Maryland

3.8/5  rDev +10.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Somewhat muddy brown in color with a slight off white head. Mellow aroma of banana and apple. Nice malty and and crsip wheat flavor. Some phenols. Slight clove and spice. Dry in the finish. Sort of thin body wise. An enjoyable brew and just the right amount of "wheat beer" notes for this kid.

Serving type: bottle

12-01-2007 02:16:28 | More by lackenhauser
Photo of BradLikesBrew
BradLikesBrew

Missouri

3.05/5  rDev -11.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz brown bottle
"Best By 12/24/07"

a: Slightly hazy amber brown with a small amount of white lacing around the edges. No lacing.

s: Mild aroma, hints of caramel malt and wheat, little else.

t: Weak flavor, some malt and wheat, a touch of bitterness in the finish.
The sweetness of the malt is similar to a soda.

m: Carbonation provides some bite. Body is light and smooth.

d: Goes down pretty easy, but the flavor just isn't very good.
When I heard that Boulevard was making a new beer, I was thrilled.
When I first tried Lunar, I was dissapointed.
Maybe I just built it up too much in my mind, maybe I just don't like the style, but I keep wanting to like this beer and its not happening.

On a positive note, I do seem to dislike it less each time I try it.
I think this is Bully's worst offering, but that only goes to show how good the rest of their beers are.

Serving type: bottle

11-28-2007 04:15:00 | More by BradLikesBrew
Photo of AMo
AMo

Missouri

2.3/5  rDev -32.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Boulevard Lunar Ale pours a deep brownish, amber hue with no head. The smell is a bit odd, I really can't describe what it is I'm smelling, but it isn't that pleasant. Neither is the taste, which is slightly bitter and overall pretty tasteless. The mouthfeel wasn't too bad, it was smooth with a medium to light body. I was really expecting a lot more from this Lunar Ale, especially after pouring it and seeing that nice deep color. Unfortunately, aside from its appearance, I would have to say this beer is a bust.

Serving type: bottle

11-24-2007 23:01:31 | More by AMo
Photo of Strix
Strix

Wisconsin

3.53/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a nice translucent dark brown/orange color.

Smell is mostly malty, some wheat-type aromas, pleasant but not too much aroma.

Taste is malty and wheaty. Finishes with a sweet aftertaste like apples.

Mouthfeel smooth, carbonation adequate.

Pretty drinkable. I don't know that this stands out as particularly remarkable, it's not too bad.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2007 03:03:06 | More by Strix
Photo of Dogbrick
Dogbrick

Ohio

3.18/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On draught at Kauffman Stadium in KC, served in a plastic cup. Pours a darkish-brown color with a medium thin off-white head that diminishes to a compact layer that stays. Lacing spotty but again it was a plastic cup. Aroma of toasted malt, wheat and caramel. Medium-bodied with a somewhat banal flavor profile of roasted malt, banana and caramel. Not much bitterness. The finish is sweet spices and more malt. A lot better than most beers you can find at a ball park, but overall pretty average.

Serving type: on-tap

11-06-2007 18:50:47 | More by Dogbrick
Photo of tavernjef
tavernjef

Minnesota

3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Deep root beer brown copper toned color, quite clear. Large, light sandy whitened head that lasts for a good duration. Lots of thick, cob webby lacing sticks to the glass.

Soft cocoa-esk aroma with a bit of dark wheat grain and some old flour sourness.

Taste is pretty good with a great snappy tone of wheat and a calming bit of roast and cocoa. Firm lasting tang of deep breadyness with a slimming dryness as it finishes.

Feel is about medium with a bit of lightness in the front. Faintly drying and has a fairly bold wheaty hold and snappy tang.

Had this on-tap the other night and liked it alot and gotta say it favored far better then this bottled version. May have to go back and review the tap. As that was actually much better.

Serving type: bottle

10-21-2007 20:06:04 | More by tavernjef
Photo of NatetheGreat
NatetheGreat

Nevada

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Another good offering from Boulevard.

A: the head is bubbly, fizzy, soda-like, and vaporized before my eyes. In terms of appearance, this beer could be confused for a root beer, that's the kind of color it has, and is steadily carbonated.

S: Aromas are toasty and have some nuances of a German hefe, with bananna definate.

T: There's a lot to taste. Some moments followed the smell and had a hefe-like taste, while other sips showcased notes of coffee and caramel. The toasy aroma is supported by some clear roasted flavors, but nothing strong. Not the zesty wheat flavor of a pale wheat beer, rather, more bitter flavors.

M: mouthfeel is light, carbonated, not as rich as anticipated - suitable for spring, summer, and transition to fall. Smooth feel, provided by the wheat.

D: easy to drink, plenty of flavors to dwell on also.

Good beer but not a favorite. Not a strong hop presence, nor any malts - I guess since wheat is the primary presence.

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2007 03:20:00 | More by NatetheGreat
Photo of jdubjacket
jdubjacket

Georgia

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Poured into a DAB beer mug.

Pours a murky brown. Looks almost exactly like Corsendonk brown.

Smell is slightly fruity...and something else that I can't put my finger on.

Taste is OK. Tastes like a Hoegaarden that is slightly more complex. It is a very refreshing beer that is probably better in the Summer than the Fall.

Slightly carbonated mouthfeel.

Overall, a pretty drinkable beer. Not my favorite style, but a good session beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-20-2007 22:54:18 | More by jdubjacket
Photo of orangetee
orangetee

Kansas

3.88/5  rDev +13.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Nice dark brown amber color with an ivory head. The smell is pretty light, but smells a little like roast beef. In a good way. Fruity taste with banana and slightly mouth numbing clove flavor. Definite sweetness with some caramel taste as well. Super smooth. Taste only gets better as the beer warms. Pretty good stuff. Also, I'd like to note, that Boulevard does a great job with packaging, and I like the label. It does make a difference and adds to my enjoyment.

Serving type: bottle

09-15-2007 22:46:45 | More by orangetee
Photo of RedBaron
RedBaron

Illinois

3.75/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Bottled-conditioned (brown?) ale from the BBC in KC.

Appearance: A devilishly enticing dark brown/ruby ale. Faint white-ish/red head that sustained well.
Smell: A bit musty, which was pleasant enough, but not too much else. Low malty sweet smell. No real hop aroma to speak of,
Taste: Mainly malty sweet throughout, though not very complex. However, the secondary fermenation in the bottle does lend for a nice apple fruitiness.
Mouthfeel: Wonderfully balanced from start to finish. Fairly full-bodied; As mentioned there's a good malty sweetness up front, but it finishes with a fairly nice dryness. If you like full-bodied beers, as I do, this one is more than satisfying.
Drinkability: Quite a good beer really. I would think this would pair well with a good cheese (Stilton), or just to relax on a fall day.

I'm not sure what the actual classification style of ale this is, but in my best estimation, it tastes like a Belgian brown ale with aspirations to be an Abbey dubbel. It's certainly worth seeking out. Definitely a good one to ponder over a full moon!

Serving type: bottle

09-14-2007 00:26:57 | More by RedBaron
Lunar Ale from Boulevard Brewing Co.
78 out of 100 based on 233 ratings.