1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Double-Wide I.P.A. - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Double-Wide I.P.A.Double-Wide I.P.A.

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
very good

2,014 Ratings

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2014
Reviews: 725
rAvg: 3.96
pDev: 11.36%

Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  8.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
The classic India Pale Ale is a traveler’s beer, aggressively hopped to withstand the long, hot ocean voyage to the British East Indies. Our Double-Wide I.P.A. also travels well, and is right at home in the most exotic ports of call of the Midwest. While this modern-day prairie schooner may not resemble a graceful sailing sloop, our liberal hopping regimen does make her virtually “twister-proof,” with toffee and caramel notes balancing out the lingering bitterness. Enjoy this beer fresh to best appreciate the complex blending of hop aromas, ranging from minty to citrusy, with subtle hints of pine.

71 IBU

(Beer added by: SafeAtFirst on 11-17-2007)
View: Beers (44) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Double-Wide I.P.A. Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 2,014 | Reviews: 725 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of burlyb


1.45/5  rDev -63.4%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Batch D8240 - not idea what this means with relation to date. Purchased at Surdyks in Minneapolis in early February '09. Cellared until uncorking.

Stale as the day is long. Wet cardboard dominates this one and it's down the drain. Disappointing to say the least. No hop character at all, although the copper color and heavy foam head were promising. Aroma and malt flavor like an old wet towel. Not a slam review, but after a recent dead 6'er of Racer 5 I'm a little intolerant of stale $9 beers.

I'll try again and reprise this if necessary as it seems my experience is an exception. I want to like this brewery, but this was my first Boulevard purchase. The liquor store has an impressive display of Smokestack beers, and I'd expect some turnover so maybe this one got away.

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2009 04:07:14 | More by burlyb
Photo of dragonWhale

New York

2/5  rDev -49.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

With one of the classiest names in the biz, it's no doubt that this is sure to entertain and delight with unequivocal ecstasy. It's been awhile since I spent good hard earned money on one of these corked and caged joints and been a bit disappointed. But those days were West Coast days. Now I'm here, a bottle as an extra from my man Peesie. 12oz proprietary (unnecessary) bottle. First time in this format.
Dark orange with an overly ample plumage. A bit troublesome with the consistency of the pour.
Wonderful metallic and cardboard flavors emanating from the depths of the glass. A little bit of vague hop flavor. Kind've awful to put to my nose. Regardless, and heedlessly, perhaps headlessly, I purse the glass between my lips to achieve the taste. The oxidation of what may be a perfectly fine beverage was exquisite. If that's what they were going for, they did it well. I assume not, and I was unable to have much more than a few ounces. Fortunately, my dear lady, who usually is well-equipped with her tasting acumen, chose to focus on the strong bitterness and the not-overly-sweet nature of the beverage. Pity her soul.

Serving type: bottle

06-19-2011 03:29:13 | More by dragonWhale
Photo of bluesovereign


2.5/5  rDev -36.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Served in a bottle at the Bayou in Salt Lake City.

Was a little letdown by this one - my server talked very highly of it, so I splurged the $18 for the 750ml bottle.

Deeper orange color, creamy head and lacing.

Smell was very grapefruit with a touch of floral hoppiness - almost pine, but not quite.

Very sweet on the palate, but not in a heavy, malty way. Light caramel, grapefruit, and almost a Vick's Vapor Rub sensation. Finished with a fairly subdued light and floral hoppiness, bitterness was more inline with a standard IPA.

Was rather thin in the mouth, but the overbearing sweetness and effervescent nature of the brew made it difficult to drink quickly.

In short, I definitely wasn't impressed with the DW. Very very sweet and light for a DIPA, yet still very slow drinking. Not a bad beer, but not one your typical IPA-lover would probably be thrilled with. Gorgeous bottle and art, however - love brewers with the stones to do 750ml corked bottles and rad artwork.

Serving type: bottle

11-28-2010 18:48:08 | More by bluesovereign
Photo of kawilliams81

Yukon (Canada)

2.55/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 4.5

Poured into a 16oz. snifter.

A-Lots of head right away. Cloudy, orange/caramel color.

S-Malty caramel upfront with a hint of pine hops.

T-Very thin! Notice the maltiness right away with the bitter piney hops at the finish. Lacking.

M-Again very thin! For 8.5% should be thicker and a bit chewier.

D-Can drink this all day, if I actually wanted too, because of the thinness.

Very disappointed. Not sure how this is rated A-. Use to DIPA's like Dreadnaught, Double Jack, Hopslam, Maharaja which are all in a different league than this beer.

Serving type: bottle

02-15-2011 02:44:06 | More by kawilliams81
Photo of Rhettroactive

District of Columbia

2.6/5  rDev -34.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

From 12oz bottle to Bruges hybrid glass on 7/7/12
*From notes

A: Clean ruby orange in color. A good pour yields a three finger head. Decent retention and moderate lacing.

S: Malty pine. Almost stale, yet I know this is fresh. Huh...that's not what I was hoping for.

T: Disappointingly malty. Not the big, juicy beer I was hoping for. Very east coast. Actually, this beer has no coast. At least the east coaters "taste" fresh. To be polite, this is simply not my thing.

M: Waaay overcarbed. Effervescent and, for the style, really dull.

O: I'm still waiting for Boulevard to wow me. I'm right here...still waiting....

Serving type: bottle

07-08-2012 06:51:12 | More by Rhettroactive
Photo of southsider


2.65/5  rDev -33.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 22 oz bomber into a pint glass.

Appearance- Orangy brown,very cloudy,with a tan 2-1/2 finger tight head that left little lacing. There is more sediment present than I am used to seeing in this style.

Smell- Fairly strong aroma of fruity,piney hops.

Taste-The beer had a spicy,carbonated,bitter and alcoholic opening that finished chalky and a little solventy. There was a lot of nicotine bitterness in this beer which I do not care for.

Mouthfeel-Moderately full bodied with stinging alcohol.

Drinkability- I was dissappointed in this beer which received generally high marks from BA. I found the excessive level of sediment in the beer unappealing. The "tobacco" component that others consider a plus I see as a minus. I will be more careful in the future to avoid beers that have this flavor in their profile and not to rely on overall scores. Lesson learned.

Serving type: bottle

01-21-2011 16:32:14 | More by southsider
Photo of TurdFurgison


2.68/5  rDev -32.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Corked & caged bomber picked up from Friar Tucks in Peoria 2 weeks ago. This was way darker than expected, the beer pours murky, dark copper, with tons of tan foam on top. The smell is likewise ominous, a strong malt presence not only balances the hops but threatens to take over. This smells sweet and barley-winish, I want more hops. The taste is more malty than I'd prefer or expect, just as the aroma promised. The hops are west coast citrus style but are just totally dominated by the malt sweetness. The body is thick which fits the rich flavors, but it doesn't suit me and it certainly hurts the drinkability. This is among the worst IPA's I've tried, too strong and too much malt.

Serving type: bottle

09-21-2009 00:19:05 | More by TurdFurgison
Photo of Bighuge


2.73/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Murky looking copper-orange. Thick and fluffy white head. Lace is quite full. The aroma leans way too heavy on the citrus and pine traits. Not that those are necessarily bad, but this is more like smelling pine-sol. Some grassy notes as well on the nose. The flavor doesn't pick up the slack for the nose. Very average as well. Too grassy. Too piney. And a little too harsh for my liking. There's a lingering harshness that is not like your typical lingering bitterness in well crafted DIPA. This is more astringent than bitter. More solvent like than resiny or pungent. I've had lots better. This is merely average.

Serving type: bottle

06-13-2008 03:30:21 | More by Bighuge
Photo of jault52


2.73/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a snifter. Very pretty dark amber with nice fluffy head and good lacing. Pretty beer for sure.

Odd, off putting nose. Others have mentioned a solvent smell, and really for me it was overwhelming. I really couldn't get past it.

Same taste as smell. Got some malt at the end, but was mostly solvent and booze. Couldn't find the hops at all.

Was not impressed at all. Very surprised by all the love for this.

Serving type: bottle

02-11-2011 01:42:21 | More by jault52
Photo of SDDanC


2.73/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

man. this thing is boozy. poured pretty flat, very murky dark molasses. no head. the nose surprisingly reminds me a lot of DFH 120 Min. Very malty, boozy, and sweet. Not much hop presence at all. The taste is quite the same, malty without a hop back, molasses in the aftertaste, slightly chemical (again, nail polish). The alcohol really comes out at only 9%. Flat. Overall, I probably won't buy it again unless its fresh (which i doubt out here).

Serving type: bottle

09-20-2011 05:35:50 | More by SDDanC
Photo of jmerloni


2.8/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A - Dark amber coloration, wildly frothy big cream colored head, lacing and retention that is top-class. Impressive looking beer.

S - Very mild but refreshing aroma of apricot, peach, citrus, and some hops. Not much maltiness coming through here.

T - Very beery tasting. Not a whole lot of flavor, pretty dry tasting. Dried fruits, moderate hop profile, and almost no malt backbone to speak of to bind to those flavors, accentuate them, and make them come together as one thing. Pretty disparate.

M - Dry, carbonated a bit mich, medium bodied. Aftertaste is of club soda, though.

D - Not a great beer. This brewery could really beef up this beer with adding a bit of malt (and i stress - just a bit - because you never wanna overdo it with malt in a beer like this). Not bad, but not great. Don't see myself getting it again. However, I do love what I've tried from the brewery as a whole.

Serving type: bottle

09-29-2011 21:57:28 | More by jmerloni
Photo of dasenebler


2.8/5  rDev -29.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

12oz, best before 5/2/12.

Pours a nice and clear dark copper with a good-looking two-finger head. Very good retention and lacing.

The aroma reveals some hints of oxidation (staleness, cardboard), though also some nice notes of pine and citrus.

Yup, this one's oxidized, although some of the intended flavor comes through. Bits of apricot and orange from the hops, along with a hefty bitterness that lingers but does not overpower. Malt character is thick and rich, more than I like in a DIPA. Mouthfeel is relatively creamy, and has ample yet soft carbonation.

Brewery lesson here is don't put an unrealistic best-by-date on the bottle if the beer is going to be under-par and oxidized well before the advertised date.

Serving type: bottle

12-03-2011 21:49:24 | More by dasenebler
Photo of ColdPoncho


2.83/5  rDev -28.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Thanks Chuck for sending this
Best by 2-24-12

A - clouded ruby/amber body with much taupe head. A good look, not quite what I expect for the style.

S - Sweet fruits (cherries primarily), earthy hops...not much else

T - toffee malts, kind of a graham cracker taste. What the hell is this? A barleywine? This is not very hoppy...somewhat bitter, but there is very little about this to indicate IPA....

M - big, smoothish, somewhat dry. Pretty good for style.

O - must be an issue in transit. This can't be right.

Serving type: bottle

10-20-2011 22:14:32 | More by ColdPoncho
Photo of Genghis22


2.85/5  rDev -28%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - Pours a dark amber color, hazy and cloudy. Big foamy heady, nice lacing.

S - Lots of sweet ripe grapefruit. Touches of resin and floral hop notes. Not overly strong.

T - Extremely malty and sweet. The hops are there for bittering, not add nothing to the initial flavor. The aftertaste is bitter hops, but faint.

M - Highly carbonated, medium bodied. This amount of carbonation would better with a thicker beer. Finishes dry and crisp.

D - No thanks. It was worth trying, but there are much better IPAs out there.

Serving type: bottle

10-09-2009 05:24:33 | More by Genghis22
Photo of vitALEity


2.86/5  rDev -27.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.75

Appearance - Amber/Murky in color. Huge head/lacing and retention. glass. This is really hazy beer that looks more like a barley wine than an IPA.

Aroma - Mostly sweet toasted malts and a hint of hops, but the hops are barely there.

Taste - Sweet, toasted. Not very bitter at all.Some light grassy/herbal/pine/mint flavor

Mouthfeel - Heavy/full bodied/viscous

Overall - Meh.

Serving type: bottle

10-16-2013 00:31:05 | More by vitALEity
Photo of jujubeast6000


2.88/5  rDev -27.3%
look: 5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Reviewed 12/14/2008 (bottle batch#D8240):

Pours a reddish brown color body..Big creamy head, lasting, okay lacing. Piney, hoppy aroma. Bitter pungent nose with some sickly sweetness. Balanced taste, some grapefruity taste. Watery body, some carbonation. Not a strong flavor. More aroma than taste.

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2008 03:59:29 | More by jujubeast6000
Photo of Philousa


2.9/5  rDev -26.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a dark brown (off for the style), nearly chestnut, with more than a finger tan head. The color is quite something to look at. This must have been bottle conditioned, as there are floaties suspended after a full pour. Malt is most prevalent with thick caramel and biscuit, hops have a grapefruit presence. Flavor is really caramelly with some wheat bread crust, bark and slight pine. Bitterness is nectary, flowery, and strong in the back of the tongue. Alcohol burn is noticeable, but not necessarily a flaw. Feel is slightly viscous, somewhat dry finish.  While this is solid, I'm just not used to such a malt prevalent double IPA. I'd really like some more earthy hops to go with the malt. I understand they aren't doing the whole West Coast hop thing, but I prefer hop forward IPAs. This is what a doucle IPA mist have tastes like in 1988. I'll try again, but my initial thought is that this isn't worth $12 for a four pack.

Serving type: bottle

12-10-2012 19:14:20 | More by Philousa
Photo of Gfunk720


2.93/5  rDev -26%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to Joe for this bottle, out of a pint glass. Dated 11/2011...

A- Very reddish amber, with a bright glowing color. TONS of white head, good lacing, but this foam is just overboard.'

S- Notes of metal, cat pee, and sweet malt. Some citrusy hop notes as well.

T- The initial flavor is quite watery. The malt and light citrus comes in. The aftertaste is most bitter hops and sweetness.

M- For a beer that is so foamy, it is light on carbonation. The body is nice, but the beer drinks kind of flat.

O- Overall this was a bit of a let down. Maybe I've been spoiled after drinking incredible DIPA's these last couple weeks, but after I smelled this I knew it wasn't going to be great. Perhaps it isn't as fresh as it could be.


Serving type: bottle

01-17-2012 00:07:34 | More by Gfunk720
Photo of denver10


2.94/5  rDev -25.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.5

Pours a caramel color with a thick, foamy head two and a half thumbs width deep. Nice lacing. A nice caramel base giving some off some bread, a nice hit of lemon zest sits atop it. A little too much alcohol shows up in the flavor, alongside what I can only think is some butterscotch, and bread. Not too much citrus or hops of any kind really. Medium bodied mouthfeel, some activity. Overall, a let down. Perhaps this was just an old bottle 'cause given the reputation of this beer, I expected a lot more.

Serving type: bottle

06-29-2012 02:08:31 | More by denver10
Photo of Koufax21

New Mexico

2.95/5  rDev -25.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Picked this one up in Durango at the Star. Nice to see they do this in a 12 oz bottle now. Yeast in suspension for a long time. Poured deep orange for 1/2 the bottle. Smells good. Pineapple and tropical fruit. Taste is overly bitter. They could have backed off a bit on the bittering hops. Good mouthfeel. Decent, but poor presentation.

Serving type: bottle

01-08-2012 04:24:40 | More by Koufax21
Photo of dannydetox


2.96/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

double-wide takes the approach to double IPAs that turns me off from the style. yes, it's big, boozy, and has some dryness to it, but the malt body seems to be the dominant factor. pours a coppery, amber tone with a small head. minimal lacing on my mini imperial pint glass. nose is nutty, malty, and full of brown sugar with more than a hint of peach cobbler, but none of the pine and apricot the label promised. taste is sweet up front, with bitterness coming in at the end. i can tell this beer is up there in abv. if they called this a hoppy barleywine i would feel more satisfied, but it doesn't have the tang, the dankness, or the pine i like in an IPA beer. guess my west coast palate is showing....the malts and the abv do give this beer a respectable body, though.

Serving type: bottle

07-13-2013 04:21:15 | More by dannydetox
Photo of maximum12


3/5  rDev -24.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Thanks to turbine2475 who sent me this brew as an extra in a trade.

Been on an IPA kick lately, I should write a song about that. This beer would not make it into verse, although the excellent bottle might.

There are two kinds of IPA for me: the clean, citrusy, hoppy assault on all your senses. And then there are those that, for whatever reason, taste of earth, Wiccans, & the unclean.

This falls into the latter category. Right away I notice there's no bright, clean IPAness around the look of this, it's murky as twilight in Mordor. And the taste...IPA that's been lurking under a musty pile of last winter's leaves. The hoppiness is as fleeting as spring love, & if you're making an IPA, why would you do that? Not terribly drinkable either. Splitting the bomber with the wife, who seems to enjoy it more than I have.

This is strictly OK. Too bad. After trying the Smokestack Quad, which was fantastic, I had high hopes for this brew. Oh well. Plenty of great IPAs out there.

Serving type: bottle

12-14-2008 02:11:57 | More by maximum12
Photo of ccrida


3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Batch # 08305. Muddy brownish copper with a big, large bubbled sand colored head that leaves lots of foamy lace. I don't like dark colored DIPAs.

Smell is minty herbal hops, EKG and fuggles like, malty as well boozy. The hops aren't that strong and lost in the spice.

Taste is rather malty, with more West coast style hops then I got on the nose, citrus and resin. Big bite from the specialty malts, loads of caramel and iced tea, which is definitely not my taste in DIPAs. These are new to the state (WA), and I got it from a cooler at a big beer store (QFC University), so I doubt it's that old, unless it was redistributed from another state. Overall, the spiciness of the hops and alcohol is to much, in-spite of the huge malty backbone. More American strong ale, I'm sure stone lovers will dig this.

Mouthfeel is thick, prickly and dry.

Drinkability is isn't to high. There's a strong bite to this that reminds me of a fusel laden extract strong ale. Seems stronger then 8.5%. At least it was under $10 in spite of the cool label and corked & caged champagne bottle, as well as hyped up new arrival brewery. Still, will not be buying another.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2009 23:38:03 | More by ccrida
Photo of THECPJ


3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Reviewed from notes:

appearance: copper orange with a 1 finger white head

smell: caramel, malts, hops,

taste: caramel, malts, some hop profile

mouthfeel: mild carbonation, medium body,

overall: not the best balanced DIPA I've had but glad I got to try it anyways.


Serving type: bottle

07-25-2011 19:56:26 | More by THECPJ
Photo of kingcrowing


3.03/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle poured into a Hill Farmstead tulip.

Pours a hazy rown color with a creamy yellow head and some thin creamy lacing. Nose is a bit disappointing, it's malty and earthy, light citrus in the background but it's subtle.

Taste is quite bitter, a bit sweet and sharp with a lot of earthy mellow flavors. I think the this ipa would actually benefit from some age.

Serving type: bottle

10-09-2011 20:59:17 | More by kingcrowing
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Double-Wide I.P.A. from Boulevard Brewing Co.
89 out of 100 based on 2,014 ratings.