1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

KC Pils - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
KC Pils
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
81
good

289 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 289
Reviews: 104
rAvg: 3.57
pDev: 15.13%
Wants: 8
Gots: 12 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Like many American burgs, our town was once home to a number of small, regional breweries. As they disappeared, so too went the full-flavored but easy drinking classic American lager. Today, we salute these bygone breweries and revive their legacy with Boulevard KC Pils: 100% malt, real hop character, unpasteurized. It’s the taste of tradition.

16 IBU

(Beer added by: jdubjacket on 07-06-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 289 | Reviews: 104 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of SavvyStudent
1/5  rDev -72%

SavvyStudent, Oct 29, 2012
Photo of CNOTEKC
1.5/5  rDev -58%

CNOTEKC, Jan 11, 2012
Photo of kzov21
1.75/5  rDev -51%

kzov21, Mar 15, 2013
Photo of MathNut
2/5  rDev -44%

MathNut, Jul 11, 2012
Photo of Weischej
2.25/5  rDev -37%

Weischej, Jun 02, 2012
Photo of mrjbrown27
2.25/5  rDev -37%

mrjbrown27, Jun 21, 2014
Photo of johnnybgood1999
2.3/5  rDev -35.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This beer tasted like a slightly smoother Budweiser and had less flavor than Miller. BMC taste throughout. The worst brew I've had from Boulevard.
A: Slightly darker than BMC.
S: BMC
T: Smooth, but lacking much flavor of any kind. Less skunk flavor than BMC, but still there. Nothing going on.
M: Smooth and well carbonated.
D: If you want to get hammered this will go down quick, but is it worth drinking.

After having Sierra Nevada Summerfest-I know it's a Czech Pilsner, not a German one-I expected a small hop bite in a refreshing and smooth beer. This beer offered nothing. BMC esque. I love Boulevard minus this beer. Disappointing. Other reviews describe flavor, so I will review again. Unless I don't get more before moving back to VA in a couple of weeks.

johnnybgood1999, Dec 01, 2009
Photo of pinkysup
2.5/5  rDev -30%

pinkysup, Feb 15, 2014
Photo of Archimedes
2.5/5  rDev -30%

Archimedes, Feb 18, 2012
Photo of DrumKid003
2.5/5  rDev -30%

DrumKid003, Dec 20, 2013
Photo of troymiller1984
2.5/5  rDev -30%

troymiller1984, Jan 03, 2012
Photo of jewellrunner
2.5/5  rDev -30%

jewellrunner, Jan 30, 2012
Photo of dbarny76
2.5/5  rDev -30%

dbarny76, Mar 11, 2014
Photo of akorsak
2.73/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Thanks to a74gent for this 12 oz bottle.

A: The pils is straw yellow color, full in its glory. Crystal clear, the beer offered no off colors and the only distraction was a steady stream, throughout the glass rather than from one point, of bubbles.

S: The pils has a light, bready aroma that supports a mild fruitiness. I was expecting a little more in the way of hops, but what is here isn't bad - earthy flowers.

T: I was hoping for a little more oomph in all aspects of the ale. A pilsner body has been replaced by a pale lager body, bland and inoffensive (although bland is offensive in and of itself) with little going for it. A sickly sweet finish has hints of hoppiness, floral flavor that is fleeting. After being spoiled with the Smokestack series, this is a hard comedown, a sessionable pils that comes across very light.

M: There isn't much of a body to the beer, just a fizzy, bready flavor, nearly untouched by hops.

D: One could, foreseeably, drink many of these beers without issue, but why?

akorsak, Jun 21, 2010
Photo of harrymel
2.73/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Best by: 25AUG11

A: Pours a light honey ale with less than a single finger of white foam which falls to a broken sheet of the same. No lace.

S: Smells of honey, grain, maize, hints of tea-like hops.

T: Slightly bitter, slightly sweet. Doesn't have the grain profile of a really nice German Pils IMO. A little too sweet without any sharpness.

M: Medium bodied (a little heavy for the style), sharp and high carb (good for the style).

O: No better than avg IMO.

harrymel, Jul 22, 2011
Photo of mojohawk21
2.75/5  rDev -23%

mojohawk21, Mar 01, 2013
Photo of AndyEdgar
2.75/5  rDev -23%

AndyEdgar, Jun 27, 2014
Photo of Tertullian007
2.75/5  rDev -23%

Tertullian007, Nov 04, 2013
Photo of skyisland
2.75/5  rDev -23%

skyisland, Sep 06, 2012
Photo of Magambi
2.75/5  rDev -23%

Magambi, Jan 25, 2013
Photo of appenzeller
2.8/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours a gold color, good clarity, thin head leaving some lacing. Aroma is very feint, tastes clean and crisp but with a slight metallic sense and no real significant hops or malts -- this is a real generic type lager in the American (not German) style, I'm a nut for good pilsners but this one sadly falls short. If the goal here was to produce an American lager without the gagging bad taste of a Bud or Miller, good job. If it was to create a good pilsner with a flavor profile, go back to "start."

appenzeller, Jul 21, 2010
Photo of ch473
2.8/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

I drank this one just below room temperature, where I think may beers taste the best and can really show off their flavors, especially pale beers like this.

In a pint glass this pilsner is a lovely pure gold transparency. A short head of white foam recedes quickly. There's an unusual lack of bubbles just a minute after pouring. There are maybe a dozen big pockets clinging to the sides of the glass and little bubbles rise only one at a time. Nice looking beer, love the bright golden hue.

Smells nice: sweet grains with mild hops. Nothing particularly noteworthy.

Just like the smell there's a good balance between sweetness and bitterness on the tongue. There's a very slight bit of sharp, sour hops but not much else.

Mouthtaste: flat, watery.

I'd compare this to Budweiser; Blvd. wins on color and flavor and aroma are about the same with a little more maltiness to this pilsner.

ch473, Oct 28, 2011
Photo of mdfb79
2.8/5  rDev -21.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

From 6/5/10 notes. Had at SAVOR in DC.

a - Pours a pale golden color with an inch of fluffy white head.

s - Smell is almost nonexistent. Hints of floral hops.

t - Tastes of grain or wheat, but it is very weak again.

m - Light body and moderate carbonation.

d - I did not think it was a very good pils at all. There was almost nothing to the smell or taste; I wouldn't want to have again.

mdfb79, Jun 12, 2010
Photo of Cresant
2.93/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured this 12 oz. brown bottle into a Sam Adams glass. Dated best by: 2/16/10 (which I did drink in before). The body was a medium golden, clear and bright. The modest head settled to a white film.

Smell was slightly vegetal. Faintly lemony and doughy.

Taste was also a little vegetal. Not light and crisp, it had some heft to it. Grainy/cereal. Well balanced and moderate. Solid but leaning toward bland. I recently had Shiner 101 (a Czech style pilsner) and I preferred it over the Boulevard.

Mouthfeel was smooth and medium in density. Light/medium carbonation. May be better when very fresh (but what pils isn't).

Cresant, Mar 11, 2010
Photo of mkrass
3/5  rDev -16%

mkrass, Jul 27, 2013
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
KC Pils from Boulevard Brewing Co.
81 out of 100 based on 289 ratings.