1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

KC Pils - Boulevard Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
KC Pils
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
81
good

287 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 287
Reviews: 104
rAvg: 3.57
pDev: 15.13%
Wants: 8
Gots: 11 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Boulevard Brewing Co. visit their website
Missouri, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  4.80% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Like many American burgs, our town was once home to a number of small, regional breweries. As they disappeared, so too went the full-flavored but easy drinking classic American lager. Today, we salute these bygone breweries and revive their legacy with Boulevard KC Pils: 100% malt, real hop character, unpasteurized. It’s the taste of tradition.

16 IBU

(Beer added by: jdubjacket on 07-06-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 287 | Reviews: 104 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of acurtis
3/5  rDev -16%

acurtis, Jan 15, 2012
Photo of BuckeyeNation
4/5  rDev +12%

Canary yellow beneath four full fingers of ivory colored foam. The head develops deep craters and smaller pits as it melts. It's also sticky enough to grace the glass with some pretty good looking lace. No negatives here.

The nose gets it done in fine fashion too. The hop bill (Saphir, Perle, Magnum and Saaz) was well-chosen and gives the beer the earthy-spicy character that it needs. Malt makes its mark, with a hint of toasted breadiness in the background.

Boulevard Pilsner would have been better beer if it was hoppier beer (just 19 IBUs). On the other hand, what hopheaded craft beer aficionado wouldn't say that? The brewery most likely hit their target nail on the head with this balanced, drinkable lager.

As in the aroma, a little mid-range maltiness peeks through (thanks to the use of Munich). The beer's lightly nutty cereal grain flavor makes it taste more like an all-malt lager or an American pale lager than a pilsner. The hops are lemon zesty and grassy. Too bad there aren't about 50% more of them.

The mouthfeel does nothing wrong. It's roughly medium for the style and has a soft and lightly creamy feel that promotes rapid consumption. This stuff is solid across the board.

Simply put, this is what Budweiser, Miller High Life and Coors would taste like in a perfect world. Boulevard Pilsner is simple (in a good way), straightforward, balanced, flavorful, well-brewed and drinkable. Trying to help a macro drinker see the light? Start here.

BuckeyeNation, Mar 05, 2010
Photo of Texasfan549
3.5/5  rDev -2%

Texasfan549, Nov 01, 2012
Photo of jaydoc
3.5/5  rDev -2%

jaydoc, Oct 28, 2013
Photo of emerge077
4.2/5  rDev +17.6%

BBD clearly printed on the neck of the bottle: 12/19/11
Well within the freshness window, about 7 weeks away.

Poured into a tulip glass, it shines a bright, high clarity orange gold tone. Slow ascending bubbles rising solo here and there. Creamy white foam that hasn't broken after the first few sips, and a collar of lace that crowns the glass nicely.

Grassy hops in the nose, lemony with a hint of biscuity malt in the background. Infinitely clean and simple, a delicate balance that emphasizes subtlety above all else. Simplicity is underrated.

Clean and lightly crackery with pilsner malt in the middle, light grassiness, and lemon herbal tea upfront from the hops that are reminiscent of Sorachi Ace oddly enough. Crisp bone dry finish, effervescent body, creamy feel. Lingering subtle hop bitterness in the aftertaste, just for a few seconds.

As a testament to it's drinkability, last summer I drank a sixer of this (shared a couple) and drank it all before putting down any notes.This is a nearly flawless pilsner, consume as fresh as possible for best results. No surprise it won gold at WBC last year.

emerge077, Nov 01, 2011
Photo of zeff80
4.1/5  rDev +14.8%

A - Poured out a crystal clear, gold color with a slight orange tint. It had a small, bubbly head of white foam that left minimal lace.

S - It smelled floral and grassy with some sweet caramel aromas.

T - This one has a great sweet caramel malt flavor with some grassy hops.

M - It was crisp and smooth. A light bodied lager that is incredibly easy drinking.

D - This is a really good pilsener. It's sweet and tasty with a great finish.

zeff80, Jul 22, 2009
Photo of russpowell
3.63/5  rDev +1.7%

Pours an effervescent honey color with a finger of beige head. Slight vicious look to this, zero head retention & lacing

S: Soapy & grassy hops, plus some perfumy hops once warm

T: Breadyness, grassy & soapy hops, plus a touch of honey malt. Grassyness & soapyness continue to dominate as this warms along with a bit of dryness. Finishes slightly grainy with some lemony hops & a slight pear fruittyness

MF: Medium bodied with fairly soft carbonation. Balances alright

Drinks pretty easy, but nothing to get too excited about here, I hoped for more to be honest. A rare miss from Boulevard

russpowell, Dec 08, 2009
Photo of oline73
3.5/5  rDev -2%

oline73, Sep 11, 2013
Photo of mdfb79
2.8/5  rDev -21.6%

From 6/5/10 notes. Had at SAVOR in DC.

a - Pours a pale golden color with an inch of fluffy white head.

s - Smell is almost nonexistent. Hints of floral hops.

t - Tastes of grain or wheat, but it is very weak again.

m - Light body and moderate carbonation.

d - I did not think it was a very good pils at all. There was almost nothing to the smell or taste; I wouldn't want to have again.

mdfb79, Jun 12, 2010
Photo of jwc215
4/5  rDev +12%

Thanks to hwwty4 for this!

Poured into pils glass:

Pours golden yellow with steady streams of carbonation forming a foamy, lasting white head that leaves a fair amount of lacing.

The smell is grainy with floral/grassy notes. Classic pils nose.

The taste is of sweet grainy malt balanced by floral/grassy bitterness in a dry, refreshingly crisp finish.

It has a crisp, smooth light body.

A refreshing, easy drinking traditional pils.

jwc215, Dec 30, 2009
Photo of oriolesfan4
3.25/5  rDev -9%

oriolesfan4, Jul 18, 2014
Photo of corby112
4.25/5  rDev +19%

12oz. bottle received in a recent trade with thehand. Thanks again man!

Pours a clear pale golden straw color with very pal golden yellow hues when held to a light source and a two finger frothy, soapy white head that has excellent retention, only slowly settling into a lasting cap. Sporadic chunks of soapy lacing left behind.

Crisp, slightly hoppy aroma with lots of pilsner malt along with hints of biscuit, straw, grass and light fruit. There's a hint of apple and pear in the nose giving it a slightly sweet presence that balances out the earthy hops.

This beer tastes light and crisp but is fulller bodied that I expected, which is a very welcome surprise. Soft carbonation up front with a nice dry earthy hop presence up front that lingers over the pilsner malt backbone into a sweet, slightly dry finish. This beer is excellently balance wit the perfect amount of dry hoppines, sweet pilsner malt, light crisp apple and pear, straw and glass notes. Another nice offering from Boulevard and an excellent interpretation of the style.

corby112, Feb 27, 2010
Photo of barleywinefiend
3.05/5  rDev -14.6%

A: Poured clear, gold color with good carbonation and a nice white head

S: Smelled floral, grainy and grassy

T: Some caramel and grass, average at best

M: Crisp, light and plain

D: Average at best and not one I would seek out again. Another underwhelming Boulevard beer.

barleywinefiend, Jun 09, 2010
Photo of akorsak
2.73/5  rDev -23.5%

Thanks to a74gent for this 12 oz bottle.

A: The pils is straw yellow color, full in its glory. Crystal clear, the beer offered no off colors and the only distraction was a steady stream, throughout the glass rather than from one point, of bubbles.

S: The pils has a light, bready aroma that supports a mild fruitiness. I was expecting a little more in the way of hops, but what is here isn't bad - earthy flowers.

T: I was hoping for a little more oomph in all aspects of the ale. A pilsner body has been replaced by a pale lager body, bland and inoffensive (although bland is offensive in and of itself) with little going for it. A sickly sweet finish has hints of hoppiness, floral flavor that is fleeting. After being spoiled with the Smokestack series, this is a hard comedown, a sessionable pils that comes across very light.

M: There isn't much of a body to the beer, just a fizzy, bready flavor, nearly untouched by hops.

D: One could, foreseeably, drink many of these beers without issue, but why?

akorsak, Jun 21, 2010
Photo of afsdan
4/5  rDev +12%

afsdan, Apr 04, 2014
Photo of Mebuzzard
3.88/5  rDev +8.7%

A rather clear, light golden pour with a soapy head. Classic look to it.
I'm more of a Czech pilsener guy than German as I find the Germans to be too sweet for me. This one is a good example of that. Aroma is a husky malt with pinch of floral.
Taste has the threat of a staleness to it, but the malt is done very well. Light biscuit and sweet floral come through. Mostly, though, it's grainy.
Not a lingering aftertaste in this one, which is good. Somewhat crisp. I would say clean feeling. Served cold and it hit the spot. But I'm a hops guy, so off to the hoppy beers.

Mebuzzard, Jan 10, 2010
Photo of Tone
3.53/5  rDev -1.1%

Pours a clear, golden color. 1/3 inch head of a white color. Slight retention and poor lacing. Smells of pale malt, yeast, grain, slight citrus, and a hint of hops. Fits the style of a German Pilsener. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp with an average carbonation level. Tastes of pale malt, yeast, grain, and slight hops. Overall, slightly better than average pils., but it does not hold a candle to other boulevard brews.

Tone, Aug 25, 2009
Photo of beertunes
3.5/5  rDev -2%

Bottle with a best by date of 06/30/10. Just bought this at a local store yesterday, so we'll see how it goes. Poured into 10oz glass. Poured a medium golden-yellow with about a half-inch of white head that had moderate retention and light lacing. The aroma was fairly typical for the style, a nice, even grainyness with some gentle hopping in the back.

The flavors were also about average for the style, again smooth, even grains and nicely balanced hops. The body and drinkability were also typical. Light, smooth, crisp, refreshing and very drinkable. Overall, a decent example of the style, worth trying when you see it.

beertunes, Jul 18, 2010
Photo of flagmantho
3.58/5  rDev +0.3%

Poured from 12oz bottle into a Pilsner glass.

Appearance: slightly hazy body with a very rich golden hue and two fingers of pillowy ivory foam. Looks damn good.

Smell: sweet malt aroma with just a hint of earthy hops. It is a little bit too sweet for me, in fact, but otherwise it's pretty good.

Taste: sweetish malt flavor with, again, just a hint of earthy hops. Bitterness is relatively light for a Pilsner. It's tasty, but again the sweetness is just a bit much for me; in fact, it almost reminds me of the light corny flavor of an adjunct lager. Still, not too bad.

Mouthfeel: medium-light body with really quite a good level of carbonation. Nice, creamy texture like this is something I rarely seen in a Pilsner ... kudos!

Drinkability: not bad. Refreshing and relatively light; but for the sweetness this would rate a bit higher.

flagmantho, Sep 01, 2010
Photo of LiquidAmber
3.55/5  rDev -0.6%

Poured into a Gulden Draak tulip. Pours a clear orange amber, thin white medium head that dissipated quickly but left light lacing. Aroma is typical pilsner; sweet bready malt, light hops and citrus. Mild flavor of sweet malt, with hints of lemon and grains. Light hops finish. Light bodied. Pleasant and refreshing, but light flavor. A satisfactory pilsner.

LiquidAmber, Feb 04, 2012
Photo of Rhettroactive
3.75/5  rDev +5%

Rhettroactive, May 13, 2014
Photo of WoodBrew
3.6/5  rDev +0.8%

Notes for recent beer tasting club.

The Boulevard Pilsner is a smooth drinking pilsner. The color was golden clear in color with not much head. There was no smell other than hints of grain. The beer was a very solid pilsner with great taste, it was not over powered by grain. The mouthfeel was very nice, this beer is easy drinking.

WoodBrew, May 29, 2011
Photo of barnzy78
3.5/5  rDev -2%

barnzy78, Jul 11, 2014
Photo of FosterJM
3.55/5  rDev -0.6%

910th Review on BA
Bottle to Pint glass
12 oz

Best by: 12/10/11
Purchased from: On the Rocks, Lawrence, KS

App- A strong golden yellow with a big two finger head that faded to a 1/2 in puck of bubbles and a lot of bubbles in the glass.

Smell- A good bit of malt behind this one with a bit of hop oil essence. Not overly buttery as I have found most pilsners to be.

Taste- I liked this one. Again, Boulevard does a lot of things well even small styles. This was a good full flavor with some malt and a little bit of bitter and a touch of thickness and bubbles to add a certain depth.

Mouth- A medium body and a medium carbonation level. A nice thick malt feel with a earthy and grassy note.

Drink- This was very tasty. I like what Blvd does with more of there beers and this was no exception. A style I normally don't like was very good.

FosterJM, Oct 31, 2011
Photo of mynie
4.25/5  rDev +19%

I met the guy who claimed to have invented the Gusto Schlitz and the Kraeusened Old Style. He was a business student sort, dating the sister of my good friend. A nice enough guy. I asked what he meant, and explained: he was a marketer, see, and when I told him I loved the new Schlitz he kinda looked at me like I was a rube. (Being a marketer is different than being a salesman. A salesman would have never let on that he thought he had fooled you.) He explained that it was mostly a marketing invention. You know, like New Coke. What he meant by saying he invented it was that it was his idea start a fad based on new-old beer. Nothing about it was inherently better than the Schlitz that preceded it. I was just a member of the target market, you see, the kind of guy who believes the things that commercials tell him.

Thus began my ugly contemplations of the recent retro American beer fad, which has coincided with BA's acceptance of lagers and the tendency of your average beer geek (not snob) to drink more beers that aren't hop bombs. Are we being manipulated? Did this market precede us, or did our untainted desires presage the formation of this market, which in turn effected other, less experienced drinkers? Is it all a big lie or what? What about my precious Potosi? Are *they*, of all people, just another group of liars?

I dunno. I do know that it was with trepidation that I purchased this sixer. If this exact same beer had been released 3 years ago, Boulevard wouldn't have tried to go for a 30s feel with the packaging. Then again, it probably never would have been released 3 years ago, since beer people would have turned their noses up at it.

So here's my conflict: this pours, smells, and tastes like Potosi and Gusto Schlitz. Weedy, medium hoppy, adjuncty in a way that knows it's adjuncty and doesn't cover it up so much as it embraces it. Bitter and sweet and earthy. It's like all the commercials say, only it's not like now when Miller stays it has More Flavor and they're just full of shit. This is actually full-bodied, full-flavored, and yet easy drinking. The old slogans actually makes sense, when applied to this beer. The--good god--the marketing is connected to some kind of actuality.

We're not a target market. Or, we are, but not the usual, bad sense. We're a target market in that we like stuff that doesn't suck, and if marketers are just now beginning to realize that, well, bully for them.

mynie, Mar 20, 2010
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
KC Pils from Boulevard Brewing Co.
81 out of 100 based on 287 ratings.