Oyster Stout - Marston, Thompson & Evershed, Plc.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 174 | Reviews: 110 | Display Reviews Only:
2.03/5 rDev -39.8%
A - Poured a dark brown almost black in colour with a two fingered biege head that dissipates in time.
S - Not much on the nose at all really. Very faint sweet malts, candy sugar with slight chocolate
T - Roasted malt . coffee and a little chocolate but fairly dry and bitter not too mention very watery leaving a horrible after taste.
M - Medium carbonation and seems rather watery for a stout.
O - Pretty average I thought. Fairly watery and very disappointing for a stout. Lacks flavour depth and one I would not recommend.
06-30-2012 09:55:28 | More by PolarBear3
2.15/5 rDev -36.2%
Appearance: Pours out a russet-colored hue with a thin, dark tan head.
Smell: Rather unexciting. This beer is very lacking in aroma, with only the faintest hints of roasted malts showing.
Taste: Dull, lifeless flavors of chicory and chocolate, with only the smallest hint of roasted bitterness.
Mouthfeel: Surprisingly thin-bodied for a stout with a sparkling carbonation that borders on being abrasive.
Drinkability: Far, far too lacking in all its aspects. One of the most unappealing examples of a stout.
07-03-2006 20:43:28 | More by ChainGangGuy
United Kingdom (England)
2.3/5 rDev -31.8%
Almost identical to the Satanic Mills I just drank, but ever so slightly thicker - very dark charcoal brown with ruby highlights and a sandy, thick, tan head that retains well. Strange, weak nose of cream cheese, coffee, rooibos tea, and brown bread - it smells thin, and sure 'nough, it tastes thin. Far from stout, it would make a passable dark mild, but the frail mocha-lemon flavor and the pilsener-thin mouthfeel simply do not cut it. This is a pretty lame excuse for a stout, lacking in flavor, depth, and body.
08-20-2009 08:06:19 | More by soulgrowl
2.33/5 rDev -30.9%
Churchill's Pub & Grille
San Marcos, CA
Brown in color and looks thin right off the bat. Very thin tan head. Little lacing. Unspectacular.
Some roasted elements, but not particularly pleasant or inviting.
Some roasted malt character and a hint of sweet fruits, but nothing comes together very well--seems a bit buttery. Not particularly enjoyable.
Extremely thin--a water-like mouthfeel.
Unenjoyable stout. Nothing really to recommend. Unspectacular on every level.
06-03-2011 04:33:34 | More by ehammond1
2.4/5 rDev -28.8%
On-tap at Pizza Port Ocean Beach
A: The beer pours dark brown in color with a khaki head.
S: Starts off with a lot of butter, unfortunately. Decently roasty with some random/inexplicable dark fruit notes. Perhaps a bit of licorice in there. To top it off, it's pretty watery.
T: The flavor has almost as much butter, which isn't winning me over at all. Again, dark fruit notes, particularly blackberries. It's mildly sweet and a touch metallic, but it's not as watery as the nose.
M: The body is thin and a bit watery with a moderate level of carbonation.
D: Most of the oyster stouts I have had have been pretty good, but this was certainly an exception.
02-10-2011 00:01:16 | More by womencantsail
2.43/5 rDev -27.9%
Bottle: unique and chunky 500mL brown bottle, decent old-school label as well.
Appearance: body is heavy, unmoving black with a good thick and creamy head. Lovely.
Aroma: very light on the nose, almost unnoticeable. Sweet malts and dark fruits are there though.
Taste: very, very light, once again - almost unnoticeable again. Honestly, what's the point? Tiny amount of malts & stonefruits.
Aftertaste: disappears quickly - really not much flavour behind this beer.
Mouth feel: mid-range body with a very low carbonation. Somewhat buttery in feel too. I really think it could have used a bit more life from some more carbonation.
Overall: a truly disappointing beer - too light on flavour with a truly horrendous price tag equivalent to AU$110 for 24 x 330mL.
06-17-2013 10:09:06 | More by SmashPants
2.44/5 rDev -27.6%
Stout o'clock once more. I'd seen this stout on the bottle shop shelves for quite a while now, but always brushed it off despite having a love for good stout. I'll try it later. I'm hungover. I don't have enough money. I can't be fucked. The list goes on and on. Finally, I decided to buy and try it and put to bed those constant voices reminding me of the stout I had never tried.
Serving Type: 500ml bottle poured into a Duvel tulip glass.
Appearance: Black and opaque. Almost no light can be seen through it. The head is almost completely white. How intriguing!
Smell: Subtle chocolate, coffee and malt. It's surprising how light and inoffensive the smell is given the extreme darkness of the body. Rather disappointing actually.
Taste: Starts off with roasted malt, chocolate, thyme and some very gentle spiciness, but dies very quickly. I know it's a milk stout, but milk stouts should be more flavoursome than this.
Mouthfeel: Water water everywhere, but I want to drink a stout. It's watery. The only thing that enables this beer to survive utmost crucifixion is the creaminess of the head. But the body? A let down.
Overall: A very uneventful stout. Marston's Oyster Stout looks gorgeous, but fails to match the appearance in the drinking faculty. I wanted to love it, but it just wouldn't let me. Perhaps Simon and Garfunkel would've sung this if they were alcoholics; Marston's, you're breaking my heart, you're shaking my confidence in stout...
05-26-2013 14:09:55 | More by SpruceMoose
2.58/5 rDev -23.4%
500 ml bottle.
best before date of 23 oct 11.
nice looking brown bottle with embossed detail.
Dark Rich Smooth Oyster stout.
poured in a chimay glass. black opaque with no head and very little sign of carbonation.
aroma:yeast malt chocolate coffee brandy.
was not expecting so much carbonation. and with a chalky coffee grounds aftertaste.
not winning me over so far.no sign of alcohol because there isnt much of it.leaves me feeling like i am sucking on a rag soaked in coffee-water.
interesting enough with some bitterness to get me through the glass, but kind of fails overall.
01-06-2011 02:40:11 | More by paxkey
2.68/5 rDev -20.5%
Another recent disappointment from the UK (ie. Burton Porter). As far as "Stouts" go, this one lacked depth, texture, richness, and overall quality. I found the beer to be quite light in fact. Where was the heaviness? Where was the complexity? None. This is not a beer that i would even rate as a true stout.
01-11-2003 15:29:27 | More by Popsinc
2.73/5 rDev -19%
Picked up a bottle of this in Victoria, as I've yet to see it grace the shelves here in Alberta yet. Best before date stamped on back label is 27 MAR 08, so this stuff is still in primo shape.
Pours out a dense pitch black, consistently tight spongy tan head with exceptional retention.
Notes of wood and smoke appear first in the aroma, toasted grains, some faint chicory, and even some brine.
Mouthfeel is creamy but thin, while the flavour comes across quaint and watery at first. Some roasted malt eventually builds up enough steam to make itself present after half the glass has been emptied, some sweet malt as well, but for the most part this is a fairly one-dimensional stout. There is some smoke that eventually develops in the aftertaste.
Well then, a bit of a let down in the stout dep't here, at least this bottle that I sampled. Thin mouthfeel and limp flavour, not really something I wish to revisit.
11-20-2007 00:34:15 | More by IronDjinn
2.75/5 rDev -18.4%
A- pours dark brown/black with a small light tan foamy head with shirt retention
S- light fruity notes with just a touch of chocolate malt, sweet sugar
T- light and sweet malty notes with just a touch of roasted notes, fruity sweetness with a slightly salty finish, the finish is dry with a touch of mineral flavor
M- medium body, medium-high carbonation, foamy mouthfeel, smooth finish
O- I didn't dislike this beer, but it tasted nothing like a stout, so grading by the style I had to give it a low rating.
04-20-2013 03:35:42 | More by Treyliff
United Kingdom (England)
2.75/5 rDev -18.4%
500 mL bottle poured into a pint glass tumbler.
I normally thoroughly enjoy stouts. While this isn't terrible, it's pales in comparison to some of the best in the field.
A: black with beige/latte-coloured thin head; lacks a real creamy head often associated with stouts
S: roasted malts, slightly burnt, nothing outstanding or appealing here
T & M: I was thoroughly disappointed in both taste and mouthfeel. Way too carbonated for a stout; neither sweet enough or rich enough for a stout--particular a milk stout; rather thin in both taste and mouthfull; slightly burnt taste, not caramelized or interesting
O: overall this was below my expectations
02-06-2012 23:17:51 | More by fullsweep
2.78/5 rDev -17.5%
Purchased it at the market of El Corte Ingles, between La Gran Via and Puerta del Sol in Madrid.
On the balcony of a hostel room facing fuencarral, we decided to try this with a friend. The purchase itself was purely out of curiosity.
But then came the unimpressiveness. is this actually oyster at some point? I don't get it. the appearance is like a very thin stout, not too much to my appeal but I up-rate it just because I guess it was perhaps the least offending characteristic.
The smell was not only pathetic and weak, it simply stank. no, not that fish stink I would've expected from an oyster stout. it smelled burnt, not in that roasted fashion, simply in an unappealing one.
The taste was weak and lame, simply nothing to see about it. no elaborate taste, no particular taste, simply like dipping some barley into water. whoop-dee-fuckin-doo, there goes a few euros I'll never see again.
01-15-2006 23:26:46 | More by Andreji
2.8/5 rDev -16.9%
Bottle picked up as part of the LCBO's winter release. Mostly picked it up for the name.
Handsome bottle design I have to say.
Poured into a nonic. Dark chestnut/black in colour, left a half-inch of frothy mocha head. Receded fairly quickly, leaving only a razor thin ring and a few flakes of lacing.
Nose is nice and roasty with notes of chocolate, and mocha. A touch of mineral and something very strange I can't quite name - almost cheesy. Mild.
A decent-tasting stout, but certainly on the thin side. The typical milk stout tasting notes of chocolate, mocha, and light cream are certainly present, but are far too muted to really make a lasting impact, especially when challenged by a tinny, mineral character and the tea-like hop flavor. An interesting leeky flavor as well. As I work my way through the pint, I'm finding I'm not really digging the flavor - far too mild to be calling itself a stout.
Body is too thin, almost watery, with unnecessarily harsh carbonation. Really killing it for me.
Because the flavors are a bit washed out, this beer could have been great as an easy quaffer - something one could down with a plateful of oysters or scallops. But with such a thin body, harsh carbonation and mixed bag of flavors, this one didn't really do it for me. Felt more like an English mild brown ale than a stout. I could certainly down a pint or two of this, but there are better stouts and browns to be had instead, ones that blast the flavors rather than muffle them.
12-10-2010 04:27:11 | More by JohnnyBarman
2.8/5 rDev -16.9%
Poured a clear dark brown, with a light lingering tan head.
The smell is light and minerally.
The flavor is a bit hollow, a bit of roasted barley and a touch of smokeyness, but not much else, has a bit of sweet english grain coming through a bit as it warms.
Thin and watery.
A bit of a letdown, not very stouty.
01-28-2012 23:40:00 | More by bashiba
Oyster Stout from Marston, Thompson & Evershed, Plc.
77 out of 100 based on 174 ratings.