Dismiss Notice
Subscribe to BeerAdvocate magazine and get 12 issues / year of fresh beer content delivered to your door each month.

Already subscribe? to manage your subscription.

Kingpin Double Red Ale - BridgePort Brewing Co. / Brewpub

Not Rated.
Kingpin Double Red AleKingpin Double Red Ale

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

171 Reviews
THE BROS
80
good

(Read More)
Reviews: 171
Hads: 530
rAvg: 3.46
pDev: 12.72%
Wants: 14
Gots: 45 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
BridgePort Brewing Co. / Brewpub visit their website
Oregon, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  7.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: msubulldog25 on 12-28-2010

OG: 17
IBU: 65
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Kingpin Double Red Ale Alström Bros
Reviews: 171 | Hads: 530
Photo of climax
3.5/5  rDev +1.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This one pours a deep copper red with good clarity. The head was pretty modest, but the retention of the final cap of film was good.

The aroma doesn't reflect 65 IBUs, just a bit of earthy overgrown garden smell. But it does have a plethora of subtle flavors to keep it somewhat interesting. Clove, banana, cinnamon, rye, caramel, red apple, and some phenols make up a not so hoppy aroma.

The flavor is a different story. The hop bitterness comes out pretty much right from the beginning. It has a slight citrus bite, on top of a solid grassy earth tone. The finish is especially floral. The hops are definitely in there, but not in that bold robust west coast sort of way. The malt is sweet and a bit spicy, balanced pretty well. The alcohol is hidden well.

The body is around medium with a real slick feel that makes it seem thinner than it is. It's mildly carbonated and the finish is just a tiny bit dry, pretty clean. Not a bad beer, but not earth shattering, typical Bridgeport. (990 characters)

Photo of generalnotsew
3.35/5  rDev -3.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Nice amber coloring with a 1 finger if not a bit weak head but still very clean and strong look. Smell is very sweet biscuity caramel. Has a slight floral tangy cereal smell. Gives off a certain pilsner smell for sure. Taste is kind of all over the place. Initially very weak at first but really open up in the middle. Strangely an aspirin like bitterness hits you hard in the aftertaste and really sticks around. The middle of the taste is a bit of a fruity, cereal like quality. Actually if not for the crazy bitterness in the end it would be quite nice. FYI, I love hop bitterness but this goes into medicinal territory. A bit undercarbonated on mouthfeel and also a bit hot for 7.5%. This beer had potential but they really lost me with crushed aspirin for the aftertaste. (776 characters)

Photo of Georgiabeer
3.03/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I expected there to be some more hop oomph from this beer. Not really there. More of a mild earthy hoppiness swimming in some grainy maltiness. Not sweet, exactly, but a bit boring. Some light citrus notes, and fairly thick, almost soupy in the mouth. Disappointing. (266 characters)

Photo of twiggamortis420
3.14/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz bottle pours a stunningly clear, reddish-copper color with a very creamy tan head. Nice retention and lacing. A good looking brew.

Nose is sweet caramel candy and some toffee nuttiness and light fruit. Surprised by the total lack of hop character, not sure I like where this is going.

Bitterness has plenty of bite on the palate, but still lacks in hop flavor. Candy-like maltiness is a bit wearing and the alcohol is a bit rough, shows every bit of the 7.5%. Toasty but almost more of the burnt variety. Mouthfeel is ok, but the finish is just too rough to qualify as a delicious craft beer. Pretty lame attempt at joining the 'double' or 'imperial' party by Bridgeport, I just cant imagine the testing of this and whoever thought this would be a good beer to release to the masses. Very mediocre offering. (815 characters)

Photo of Mebuzzard
3.44/5  rDev -0.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer looks darn good. Pours chestnut brown with tons of ruby highlights. Crimson, maybe? Just barely off-white color head. Foamed up nicely, convex bulge in the middle, great lacing.

Aroma is weak. I think I get sweetbread with some spice. Rye comes through a bit here, somewhat spicy. Hops gives it that noble floral nose a bit.

The combination of rye and Liberty hops is interesting. I get kind of a spicy / floral / metallic taste in the middle. Sweetbread is apparent, provides some 'cling'. Somewhat roasty. I can't really tell if this is dry, spicy, metallic, or herbal. Intriguing and pretty good. It makes me think...which sometimes isn't good. Ha!

Easy drinking. Probably a beer best paired with food. (720 characters)

Photo of birdypowder
3.25/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Appearance:
A beautiful copper color is capped by a generous off-white two fingered foam that insists on staying until you finish your beer. Unfortunately, some large floaters were swirling around like little piranhas.

Aroma:
Surprisingly, there is not a pronounced hop aroma, but rather a sweeter malt smell looms large. Some fruit and mild earth tones beg to be noticed.

Taste:
The rye malt lends its signature flavor giving a bit of uniqueness to this otherwise bland flavor profile. A bitter, semi-dry finish doesn't excite.

Drinkability:
One and done for me. The overly bitter finish makes it hard to enjoy more than one. (631 characters)

Photo of titosupertramp
3.26/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Clear amber in color. About a finger of white head that fades quickly to a thin film. Decent lacing.

S: Not much happening here. Some sweet malt and floral hops. Pretty faint.

T: Taste isn't too bad. Sweet and biscuit malts with bitter hops on the backend. Floral/herbal hops are nice. Weird for a beer with no smell to taste good.

M: Medium bodied, almost full. Good carbonation.

D: The alcohol is present, but not overpowering or distracting at all. Pretty tasty. I could drink a couple of these and be just fine. (522 characters)

Photo of Glibber
3.38/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Clear reddish amber with a 1/4 off white head that dwindled down to a small halo in a few minutes. Not much of a smell. Tasted good going in, malts, smoke, biscuit. Some mellow hops on the back end, and the warming of the belly with alcohol. Though the hops are not too bitter, they linger quite a while. (304 characters)

Photo of GilGarp
3.53/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz. bottle served cold into pint glass.

I picked this one up because I liked the idea of a highly hopped imperial red ale. Lets see if it stands up to the description.

Appearance is redish amber with good clarity. The head is short and settles fast but there is a little lace left behind.

Aroma is hoppy but more apple and orchard fruits than fresh citrus and pine.

Flavor is big on malts for sure but hops are mostly providing bitterness than actual hop flavor or aroma. Caramel and apples, pine and earth.

Mouthfeel is medium bodied and nicely carbonated. Alcohol is not very well hidden with it being especially evident on the after taste/burn.

Overall just not what I was hoping for or expecting. Bitter yes but hoppy goodness, no. (743 characters)

Photo of Tilley4
2.49/5  rDev -28%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

A murky reddish pour into my DFH glass reveals a slightly floral hop perfumed brew with a large dose of super sweet maltiness that actually reminds me of a cherry soda of some sort.... This smells intensely sweet and the floral hops don't really mingle well..

A husky graininess up front melds into a sickly sweet cherry caramel maltiness that has me wincing... A touch of floral hoppness as well but this is all abut the malts and its not good... There's a healthy kick of booze present as well..

I drainpoured this one... Couldn't get past the sweet malts... (562 characters)

Photo of godlessape
4.88/5  rDev +41%
look: 5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

Picked up a 6-pack because the price was right and I also loved that Hop Czar Imperial IPA that BridgePort puts out. Not to mention the great artwork on the label that turned my head.

Appearance: Absolutely gorgeous amber with subtle ruby highlights with a creamy frothy head that looks like vanilla frosting on a red velvet cake.

Smell: Floral hop's, with just a bit of caramel malt note's.

Taste: The balance of caramel malt and hoppy bitterness is just about perfect. All the red ales I've tried in the past never tasted as good as they looked. This beer is shooting me straight to the moon.

Mouthfeel: Light carbonation that fits, and a medium feel all around.

Drinkability: This beer has just made it into my top 5. It's that good. (741 characters)

Photo of codsmith
2.69/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance - Very nice and clear dark amber with a slight amount of head that dissipates rather quickly.

Smell - A sweet malty aroma mixed with hop bitterness dominates the entire smell

Taste - It starts off sweet and ends with very bitter hop notes. The hop bitterness overrides the sweet aftertaste and leaves a less than desirable taste in your mouth

Mouthfeel - it has a heavy feel and the carbonation dances on the tongue. Maybe a little too much cardonation

Drinkability - If you like very bitter finishing ales than this beer is for you, if not steer clear. (571 characters)

Photo of JEdmund
2.94/5  rDev -15%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Looks the part with a garnet color; smallish head forms and settles fast. Leaves some decent lacing along the way.

Smell is surprising. For a "triple hopped" beer, the aroma is completely malt-dominated. It smells good, but it's not a hoppy aroma by any means. So, I really should count that against them since it appears that's what they were going for. The smell does remind me of Deschutes' hoppy red ale, Red Chair IPA. Maybe it's the Liberty hops and I'm just not familiar with them. But I perceive malts in the aroma. After a few minutes, I'm getting more floral/perfumy notes, which must be those Liberty hops.

Taste starts off all malt just like the nose, but midway on comes a barrage of hop bitterness that rides out through the finish. Malts are fairly sweet and the hops have a twang to them that I'm not appreciating. Tastes pretty coppery in mouth after the beer has gone down. Mid-way through the glass and I'm feeling like this beer is a bit of a letdown. After reading they used rye in the recipe, I'm starting to detect its unique spice quality, which is certainly part of the hard, bitter finish. Not interested in drinking this whole bottle when other good beers await. Body/texture seem fine.

Overall, I'm just not liking this one. I really don't like the aroma (it got more perfumey after it warmed), and the flavor is just not balanced right. I think the Liberty hops are running too high, resulting in a mouth-puckering bitterness coupled with that perfumey flavor. I wouldn't drink this again. I would, however, drink their Café Negro Porter though! That was a good new addition! (1,608 characters)

Photo of ruckus232
3.53/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 Ounce bottle poured into a pint glass

Appearance: Nice amber color with about 2 fingers of tan head that leaves really nice lacing.

Smell: There is a slight hoppiness to the smell but then right next to it is a sweet smell, almost caramel like.

Taste: There is definitely an initial burst of bitterness that is followed by a little sweetness but not a large amount of either. The taste quickly fades but leaves vary little aftertaste. (440 characters)

Photo of Groucho75
3.27/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle poured into a chalice. (I know, it was the only clean glass I had lying around) No markings to date it.

Average appearance with a color like a strong brewed tea. Single finger of chalky foam that evaporated pretty quickly. Some lacing, but not as much as the Port City Shark Attack I tried last night. Not a bubble in sight after settling.

Malt and hops on the nose. I'm hoping that aromas will develop the more it warms up.

Plenty of malt as far as taste goes. Not detecting much hopsy citrus for a beer marked "triple hopped" on the label. Hmmm. According to their website, these are Liberty hops.

While pleasant enough, there is that tangy finish that isn't sitting well with me. Granted, the 7.5% ABV hides well, so maybe after two more I could ignore the sharpness.

Not bad, and certainly good to see more red ales out there, and at $8 for a sixer, this would be interesting to bring to a beer swap without feeling like you're being cheap. I've tried a couple of the Bridgeport brews and think Hop Czar is a much better offering.

Would I buy it again? Not necessarily. Would I drink it again? Yeah, I think so. Draw your own conclusions based on that. (1,180 characters)

Photo of stephens101
3.58/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pale red in color with a dense and rolling tan head that holds its own for a bit before retreating into a thick frothy covering. Subtle sweet malts and grassy notes to the nose initially. Fleeting light fruits and florals meander. Good mix of bitter up front and background sweetness to the palate. Nothing bold, but it all fits. Has a medium body with a near creamy core which is followed by a definite crispness. Enjoyable, albeit a bit misleading in the labeling department, as there's nothing "double" about this brew. (522 characters)

Photo of Chyren
3.7/5  rDev +6.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours out a translucent copper hue with dense 1-finger head. Leaves significant lacing. Emits a beautiful hop scent, citrusy, complimented perfectly by the sweetness of the red ale malts and a light caramel. The taste is bitter, of course, hoppy and malty, somewhat of a copper bite to it, and a touch of booziness. Tastes great, actually, but unfortunately the fullness of flavor falls off at the end. It has full body, quite viscous, but not too sticky. It's a strong brew and perhaps not the easiest to drink for that reason, but I could drink a pitcher of this with beer if it were available. (596 characters)

Photo of beeragent
3.33/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pint glass from a 12oz bottle.

A - Pours a medium copper, forming a creamy 1 inch off-white head. Medium lacing sticks to the glass.

S - Strong bready malt aroma with some floral and grassy hop aroma throughout.

T - Bread and caramel flavor coat the palate with the grassy flavor of the hops coming through in the finish. The alcohol makes itself known in the finish and tastes a little stronger than expected.

M - Medium bodied with low carbonation. Very smooth with the flavor clinging to the tastebuds long after the swallow.

D - Very balanced flavor between the hops and the malts, with neither completely overpowering the other. With that said, this is a slightly boring beer. Nothing special going on. I have to admit this isnt my style of beer, but I thought there would be a little more falvor wise going on. Again, this isnt the style I usually drink so I'm not an expert at what the flavor profile should consist of. (945 characters)

Photo of ccrida
3.53/5  rDev +2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Grabbed a sixer on sale, as I love red IPAs, and hoped Bridgeport would knock it out of the park. Unforrtunetly, this didn't really meet my expectations. Poured into my large Gulden Draak tulip, Kingpin is amber with a bit off-white head that leaves heavy lace.

Smell is sweet, some floral hops, malty, pretty sharp. There's a mish-mash about it, kind of compost like, not gross, but not awesome either.

Taste is mostly malty, the sweetness of the hops, as well as the earthiness provides some depth, but it's definitely not IPA styled...which I don't mind, but expected by the language on the label.

Mouthfeel is on the lighter side, nice carbonation without being to sharp, fairly dry.

Drinkability is pretty good. Not what I hoped for, not beckoning, but slid down easy enough... (790 characters)

Photo of wagenvolks
3.26/5  rDev -5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz bottle into a pint glass.

Perfectly clear copper body with edges of fiery orange and a healthy carbonation level. Average retention to the mottled taupe head with sticky lacing. I can't believe they actually use the term "Triple Hopped" on this beer's label. Pretty tame aroma for such a bold statement/marketing ploy? With some fruity pebble hops and amber malt sweetness that suggests caramel and mineral water.

Assertiveness kicked up a notch in the flavor, but the alcohol clashes against an onslaught of German style hops and a syrupy/spicy rye note. This beer is having trouble finding its identity, as it has the sweetness of an amber, the hop profile of a German pilsener, and the body of a double IPA. I can't say it really works for me. Mouthfeel is dry, but syrupy and sticky on the palate. Big bubbles of carbonation feel gritty going down. Not my bag. It's a decent attempt, but has too many stylistic and flavor errors for my liking. (955 characters)

Photo of homebrewhawk
3.23/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12oz. bottle served in a shaker pint. Poured a clear dark copper with a finger of off white head. Malty aroma with a hint of fruit and hops. Medium bodied. Malt predominates, but there is a decent hop bite. Bit of a tang that was off putting to me. Fairly dry on the finish from the hops. This didn't do much for me. (316 characters)

Photo of ElGordo
4.07/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured from the 12oz bottle into a pint glass. Body is a pretty orange-amber color, with almost no head. In fact, the body is almost perfectly still. Aroma of sweet, bready malt and fruity hops. Notes of sweet fruit (apple? maybe a little citrus?) and a touch of roast character come through as the beer warms.
Palate is sweet, bready, and a touch fruity up front. A mild bitterness from the hops emerges on the swallow, helping to temper the sweetness. The yeast imparts a very distinctive, bready character that's endemic to all Bridgeport beers. The roast character really comes through on the finish.
Body is smooth and creamy, not nearly as still as the appearance would indicate. As full as a big red ale should be, without the stickiness of some imperial ales. On the whole, a very drinkable new offering from Bridgeport. While this is obviously an attempt to compete with Ninkasi's Believer, it fills a slightly different spot in the lineup by not being a complete hop bomb. Still, it's a very enjoyable brew. (1,019 characters)

Photo of BilbosNuts
2.74/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a pint glass.

A: Pours a deep red/amber color. Small head with little retention that fades in a few minutes.

S: Not much going on here. Some sweetness detected and toasty malts.

T: It's taste and smell don't really coincide. I was expecting a sweet taste but more a earthy taste was detected. It was definitely more hoppy than a regular red ale.

M: A light mouthfeel with minimal carbonation.

D: A drinkable beer for 7.5%. But overall, a forgettable brew. (472 characters)

Photo of Kiwano
3.23/5  rDev -6.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - light orange glow. A tiny lace that disappeared shortly into drinking the glass of eer.

S - some hops - nothing special

T - some citrus and sugar with a tiny bit of hops and bitterness but slight- the sweetness stays through.

M - nice carbonation. medium sized bubbles.

D - Great drinkability. Nice and light but depth of flavor - not heavy at all and the hops and bitterness balances well with the sweetness . (421 characters)

Photo of crossovert
2.91/5  rDev -15.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A triple hopped beer, where have I seen that before?

It pours a clear amber/red with a frothy white head that dissipates with a bit of lacing.

The smell is very sweet in the aroma. Very basic actually, not much hops at all. It has a little bit of candied orange and vanilla icing, not what i was expecting.

The flavor is sweet and tangy with a medium bitterness. It is mostly malt-driven and the malts just are super flat, they do nothing to compliment the hops. The hops are mainly citrusy but also a bit tangy. There is a hint of vegetal bitterness in the finish.

I had a NN last night and can't help but compare the two, this one pales. (643 characters)

Kingpin Double Red Ale from BridgePort Brewing Co. / Brewpub
79 out of 100 based on 171 ratings.