Molson Golden - Molson Coors Canada

Not Rated.
Molson GoldenMolson Golden

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
67
poor

210 Reviews
THE BROS
64
poor

(Read More)
Reviews: 210
Hads: 594
rAvg: 2.81
pDev: 20.28%
Wants: 5
Gots: 72 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Molson Coors Canada visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-20-2001

A smooth, mellow beer of moderate sweetness, not too bitter and slightly malty.
View: Beers (57) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Molson Golden Alström Bros
Reviews: 210 | Hads: 594
Photo of sliverX
3.6/5  rDev +28.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Poured a light golden hue with a huge rocky head that faded fairly quickly bubbles streaming upward at a constant quick pace. Looks slightly better than every other macro.
Smelled of sweet light malt and not much else.
Tasted sweet malty and unlike a macro I picked up only a slight corn taste but this has more of a sweetness to it like good late summer sweet corn.
Mouthfeel is a thicker light not much wateriness in this one.
This ones not too bad I'd be happy to drop a few in the cooler for friends and give them a slightly better option over "cold water" (560 characters)

Photo of mikesgroove
2.56/5  rDev -8.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

and the quest to get the worst continues on. doing traveling most of this week, but managed to spot this one in a local bilo. served cold and poured into a pint glass, consumed on 08/18/2010.

actually a decent pour with a pale golden yellow that was simply loaded with carbonation. a nice head of white capped it off and reached a height of around two inches.

light aroma, mostly light grain and hints of corn. slight grassy hops, but very very light. this carried right over in the flavor which was again far too light for my tastes, but what can you do. small hop presence in the finish and a light cereal grain balance. nice feel, was not too light at all and overall not a terrible expierence by any means. (713 characters)

Photo of NODAK
3.28/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Somehow, this beer ended up being different than what I had expected. It had been a long time since I had one, and certainly don't recall this.

Smell was a bit skunky....a little bit of corn sweetness. Nothing special nor out of the ordinary. The taste, however, was full of corn adjunct sweetness followed by a somewhat pronounced graininess. Very little hop profile here at all. Finish and aftertaste are pretty sweet with a twinge of the grain. One of the sweeter finishes I've had with a lager.

All in all, not a remarkable beer as far as flavor is concerned but it's drinkable from the sheer standpoint that it will not offend. (634 characters)

Photo of jsprain1
2.52/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

A- Pale golden, straw colored even. Weak head.
S- Corn, with just a shade of toasted malt. weak smell.
T- The taste is of corn with just a shade of hop flavor.
M- Actually pretty rich and smooth for what it is.
D- This beer is just unimpressive. And is it really a blonde ale? (277 characters)

Photo of BigIrishman
3.02/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance: Pours straw yellow with little head that dissapears quickly

Smell: Corn chips over a bed of cooked veggies, not all that powerful but surprisingly not skunky for a green bottled beer.

Taste: Similar to the smell but pretty mild and not offensive.

Mouthfeel: Thin and crisp

Drinkability: Fairly decent for a macro lager, not too offensive which makes it fine for drinkingon a hot summer day. (406 characters)

Photo of ribby
3.3/5  rDev +17.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Upon opening, the almost skunky characteristic Molson aroma is just as I remember it from 30 years ago. It shows plenty of bubbles, but the head does not last long. The taste is mildly hoppy, with a hint of malt, but the excessive fizziness makes it hard to evaluate all the subtleties. A nice amount of floral hoppiness lingers on the palate. Mouthfeel is okay with the bubbles, as well as decent flavor for the style. This would be really nice on an 85 degree day. (466 characters)

Photo of twiggamortis420
3.18/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12 oz green bottle without any freshness coding. Pours a clear yellow color with a decent cap of white head. Retention is not too shabby and does not leave any lacing.

Smells more like a lager, than the listed blonde ale. Stale grainy malts and a hint of sugary sweetness. I do not get any fruit or bread yeast esters usually present in some form or fashion in an ale or much in the way of hops.
I think back in the day Molson Golden was an ale, but I dont think that is the case now.

Taste is pretty standard Euro Pale Lager fare, sweet and grainy adjuncts with a light touch of sulfur and hops in the finish to balance things out somewhat. Nothing really off-putting about this one, but there is nothing here that makes you crave more. Tastes pretty fresh and crisp, with a decent amount of flavor. Body is medium, maybe even bordering on thin for a EPL (which I am rating this as), as a blonde ale it would fail miserably. Not too much different from the Canadian Lager IMHO. (980 characters)

Photo of rfgetz
2.95/5  rDev +5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a clean but dulled gold color with a quick puff of white, frothy head. No retention or lacing. Smell is very faint whiff of adjunct grains with no impurities or skunkyness. Taste is a very faint bite of mildly sweet adjunct grains, hint of hops with no impurities or skunyness. Body is light and watery, not over carbonated like other beers in its demographic. A very adequate substitute for the typical BMC fare for a backyard BBQ or tailgate. (450 characters)

Photo of BEERchitect
2.45/5  rDev -12.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I am a bit surprised to see this beer classified as a Blonde Ale. Though it has a sweeter fruitier side, it does still drink like an American style Lager.

The beer pours with a strong straw color, bright clarity, airy yet froathy head, fair retainage, and light on lacing. Par for the course I guess.

Aromas are predominantly of pilsner malt with raw grain scents and with pungent European hops giving a big earthy, nearly skunk character.

Flavors of sweet grains are much more than I expected; not all malt, maybe additions of corn or rice are lingering on the palate. Hops give light flavors and bitterness but no where matches the character found in the nose. Pears, apples, and light mangos give a fruity note that amplifies the sweetness, but this could be attributed to aged ester character.

The body is a bit more full because of the impressions from sweetness and more moderate carbonation. Sometimes seemingly a bit too heavy to drink easily.

In the end, the beer fares about as well as Budweiser- where we are giving up on crispness and cleanliness we are adding fruity complexity and slightly more maltiness. (1,124 characters)

Photo of woodychandler
3.83/5  rDev +36.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A CAN from CANada's oldest brewery! CAN you dig it?!?

Wow, did my pour ever result in some nice head - two finger's worth of thick, foamy, bone-white head with decent retention! Color was a golden-yellow with NE-quality clarity. Talk about truth in advertising ... Nose had a slightly sweet cast to it, more lager-like than ale. Mouthfeel was medium with a slightly sweet taste, not much hops in evidence, but not overwhelmed by malt, either, striking a nice balance. Finish was slightly dry, and quite tasty, especially compared to Molson CANadian. If you did not enjoy this in a bottle, I urge you to give it a re-visit in a CAN! (632 characters)

Photo of mtnbikerpa
3.18/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 ounce bottle into a pint glass. Freshness date on bottle May 16 10. Basic gold/yellow color. About an inch of head that soon disappeared. Scents of corn and rice in the smell. Flavor is pretty plain and bland. Some maltlike notes, with also a very basic hop flavor. Not bad. Mouthfeel is pretty light and drinkable. (332 characters)

Photo of h00dak
3.28/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Twisted off the cap of one of these last night.

Took a whiff - sweet-smelling, not a good smell. No complexity.

Took a swig - Adjunct and skunk. Medium to high carbonation. Pleasant aftertaste of alcohol and something like watermelon. More complexity than I expected.

This is a boring beer. I won't get it again. I don't what makes it so golden that's for sure. (366 characters)

Photo of katan
3.61/5  rDev +28.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

12 oz bottle into a pint

A - Extremely clear, golden color. Light white head formation, turns into a film. Well retained. Bubbling is at a minimum. Looks like a pils.

S - Speaking of pils, I detect the grainy essence of pilsner malt. Light malt sweetness with that almost "funk" of pilsner. No hops detected here.

T - Starts off with a light malt note, which quickly turns to a pilsner malt dominated nose. Almost skunky at times. Mid-stream does show some bitterness, but hops are nowhere to be found. This beer intends to be non-offensive, and succeeds. Finishes with a pilsner malt hit. Aftertaste is non-existent.

M - Light, thin beer body. Some carbonation bite, edge. Little to no retained sensation on the palette.

D - Very drinkable. Smooth, moderate and manageable abv. I would think if i was in a pils mood this beer would certainly suffice.

Nothing at all wrong with this beer, besides I'm sure in many folks opinion, the label. That and the stupidly skunk inducing green bottle that is. (1,004 characters)

Photo of Stunner97
3.51/5  rDev +24.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Appearance- pours a very golden yellow color, nice clear and golden color, nice bubbles stream up the glass to what starts as a nice white foam head

Smell- very slight malts and hops can be lightly noticed, a slight grain smell,

Taste- very short finish but has a good slight hop bitterness more so then the regular lager, slight grain and malt, overall and enjoyable flavor,

Mouthfeel- medium to light bodied with decent carbonation, feels very smooth

Drinkability- very drinkable and for the price especially a very nice sessionable lager, I really thing to most of the mass produced things molson puts out a pretty solid product, and served up ice cold you would have no problem enjoying a few of these, a refreshing lager when looking for a no fuss cheaper priced beer (776 characters)

Photo of erosier
2.88/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

L: Pours a golden yellow color with a short and thin white colored head that laces the glass on the way down.
S: Smells faintly of sweet smelling malts and some light hops but nothing that is over powering.
T: Tastes like the aroma with light sweet smelling malts up front and a hint of hops at the end. There isn't much else to it.
M: Very crisp and refreshing as there is not much to taste.
D: Very drinkable because there really isn't too much to this beer. (460 characters)

Photo of goblue3509
2.63/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours a light golden yellow color with a faint head. The smell is of malt grains and some floral hops. Taste is of sweet corn and some floral hops, the taste is fairly weak, not offensive and not good. The mouthfeel is watery and moderately high carbonation. The drinkability is average nothing offensive and nothing very good. (327 characters)

Photo of tone77
3.23/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From a 12 oz. green bottle. Pours a pale yellow color with a 1 inch head. Smell is very skunky, not so pleasant. Taste is crisp with some maltiness but also a bit skunky. Feels well carbonated in the mouth and has decent drinkability. Overall this is an average beer. (267 characters)

Photo of kshankar
2.8/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

Pours golden strawish. Small head, if any, retention is lacking.

Aroma of faint grains

Taste: Bland..mostly draws its taste from light malts, some minimal sweetness, corn and grain

Mouthfeel: Carbonation is okay, and its a bit watery

Drinkability: Um, yea. Only because its so bland that drinking it is akin to water. This is a beer to be had while grilling, or at a game. Or getting trashed and not wanting to spend much.

Overall: Blonde Ale? Really? No. I wouldn't mind giving it a higher rating if it was more run of the mill, but by labeling itself as an American Blonde Ale..I'm going to have to review it relative to that. Fails. (641 characters)

Photo of DoctorStrangiato
3.4/5  rDev +21%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Poured a 341-ml bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance - pale straw yellow colour with bright white 1/2-inch head of fine bubbles, definitely reduces to the surface. Does feature some lacing.

Smell - smells of corn, grass and light hops and malt, all notably fresh. For certain this will be an uncomplex taste.

Taste - a pretty non-chalant taste in terms of the fact that it's a balance of light malt sweetness and some even hops throughout. A bit of a quick finish with some dryness. Inoffensive but rather bland.

Mouthfeel - the smoothness of this beer is notable. It is marketed this way, but the smoothness also makes up for the mediocre taste in a lot of ways. I remember the "Smooth as Golden" commercials from years ago and it's true! A smooth, even beer it is (even if it lacks taste).

Drinkability - this is another baffling aspect of this beer. Why would anyone put away several of these? But the key is - you do! It's like being beside a shrimp ring or a bowl of chips. Each "last one" leads to "another one". Boring as it may be, several more of these will be going down tonight. (1,095 characters)

Photo of hardy008
2.23/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Appearance - Pours a golden color, decent head, poor retention. Very average.

Smell - Corn and a little bit of sweetness from the malt. Also some skunk.

Taste - Some sweetness, bit not much. Bland.

Mouthfeel - Watery and thin, not much going on.

Drinkability - Below average, not the worst. (294 characters)

Photo of tempest
2.56/5  rDev -8.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Had a green bottle at Italiano Delight in Emmaus, PA. The bartender set it down with a frosted mug. Upon pouring the beer the a cloud of skunk hit the air. Man, this was bad, especially for a beer that was just in a cooler under a bar. Eventually the skunk cleared and I was left with a plain, light amber ale with a bready sweetness and not a lot of much else. Easy drinking, skunk aside. (389 characters)

Photo of OtherShoe2
2.73/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours clear yellow with a decent white foam head. No lacing.

A bit of skunk and some sweet malt aroma. A bit of boiled grain as well.

Flavors are a bit stronger than typical American macro, with some twists. Light sweet grain, then some corn, then some mineral bitterness. Some grassiness as well. Finishes with a sour/bitter edge.

Some decent carbonation, and actually not bad bodied.

Overall, this is lawnmower beer. Bought it on a lark, mostly out of fond memories of teenage drinking binges when this was considered "high end" beer. Luckily I'm no longer in that phase. This is better than the Corona/Bud/Coors group of brews, but not much better. Some bitterness and balance put it a step above, but it is a shallow step. So much for the trip down memory lane. (769 characters)

Photo of Beernoisseur
2.18/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Bottle -> Pilsner glass.

A - The color of vegetable oil. a little light for my liking. decent head develops, but loses its nerve and runs off, with nary a trace of its former presence to be found.

S - Bit of skunkiness. green bottle. Grainy.

T - Tart tang hits the palate right off the bat. It morphs into a a light maltiness, then finishes fairly clean.

M - Eh, nothing too special. Light bodied.

D - This is, to me, on par with the drinkability of most macros. I'll drink them, but if something else is available, i'll check that out first. (554 characters)

Photo of tittymcj
3.51/5  rDev +24.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 5

Poured out a very pale yellow color with thin head that disappears quickly. Little lacing.

Smells of some woody grains and a little bit of maple product. Pretty sweet.

Taste is sweet and mapley with a bit of malt and grainy taste.

Mouthfeel is very light and smooth, with some bubbly character.

Drinkability is amazing. Sweet enough to be tasty, but very light and drinkable. (380 characters)

Photo of RievyRW
2/5  rDev -28.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Source: 12 oz. bottle poured into a standard pint glass.

Appearance: Pale golden hue with a 1 finger head that dissipates quickly and leave little lacing. Also extremely bubbly, but that may have been a result of the glass.

Smell: A skunky smell probably due to the green bottle.

Taste: Some grain/hop flavors, but not much.

Drinkability: Eh, marginally average would probably be the best words to describe this beer. (421 characters)

Molson Golden from Molson Coors Canada
67 out of 100 based on 210 ratings.