1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Huber Premium Beer - Minhas Craft Brewery

Not Rated.
Huber Premium BeerHuber Premium Beer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

42 Ratings
THE BROS
82
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 42
Reviews: 25
rAvg: 2.9
pDev: 30%
Wants: 4
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Minhas Craft Brewery visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Todd on 07-07-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Huber Premium Beer Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 42 | Reviews: 25 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of davidtarantino
davidtarantino

Mexico

1/5  rDev -65.5%

07-23-2013 07:43:40 | More by davidtarantino
Photo of Bigtwin
Bigtwin

Michigan

1/5  rDev -65.5%

05-24-2013 22:05:35 | More by Bigtwin
Photo of Kyrojack
Kyrojack

Indiana

1/5  rDev -65.5%

01-09-2013 01:01:11 | More by Kyrojack
Photo of mynie
mynie

Indiana

1.05/5  rDev -63.8%

K--

I had this a couple-three years ago, and it was totally alright. Like, maybe a halfnotch above Pabst but still solidly below the new/old Schlitz. Maybe I wrote some notes for it or whatever, but for some reason I never gave it a proper review.

So when I saw a 12er just sitting there for 4.99, I had to buy it. Beforehand, though, I asked the clerk--with whom I am friendly--why the beer is so cheap. Was it stale?

"No," he said. "Just shitty."

Hmm... figuring him a snob, the sort that doesn't know how to truly appreciate revival beers (that is, so absolutely unironically that your earnestness borders on irony), I handed over my fiver-plus-change and made way to the car.

A few hours later, mumbling to myself--to the beers, actually--about how "you delicious little bastards" were gonna enjoy living in my tummy, I cracked one open. It tasted of soap and used motor oil. But a while earlier I had had a Zombie Dust, and since Zombie Dust can make high-quality escort sweat taste like low-quality methwhore sweat, I decided to try it again the next day.

Next day, it was the same but worse. Like, the 'Dust had actually made my pallet more forgiving.

I don't know what happened, but this is absolutely not the same beer I had a few years ago. It barely even tastes like beer. It's like something puked out of one of those Mr. Beer kids--bereft of actual malt, it's easily worse than the first effort of most homebrewers.

11-27-2011 06:34:33 | More by mynie
Photo of FireMarshallStev
FireMarshallStev

Wisconsin

1.1/5  rDev -62.1%

Do not drink this beer. Period.

I'm not a beer "snob." I'll gladly down a Busch, Beast, Old Style, or Keystone if someone's serving one or the other at a party.

However, this beer is offensive and completely undrinkable. I brought it to a friends house to drink while watching a football game not knowing what it tasted like but thinking it couldn't be THAT bad. Well, I was wrong. I could barely finish it. Even my friend commented straight up that it was a horrible tasting beer. Stale, soapy, and flat, like a homebrew kit gone wrong. The yeasty-metal aftertaste lingered far too long.

Do not risk offending your friends, family, and clergymen by serving this beer.

Such a shame because it seems like this used to be a good beer before some recent changes were made (new ownership??).

02-07-2012 18:58:34 | More by FireMarshallStev
Photo of RCLOHR267
RCLOHR267

Indiana

1.25/5  rDev -56.9%

08-02-2013 04:03:11 | More by RCLOHR267
Photo of DaPeculierDane
DaPeculierDane

Wisconsin

2.28/5  rDev -21.4%

Appearance is nearly headless morning urine with steady and appreciated carbonation streams. Aroma and flavor are both dominated by corn syrup, urine, and honey. Grainy and metallic after taste. Sickeningly sweet. Mouthfeel is slight, syrupy, and sweet. Drinkability is low.

Note: Huber is way better in the bottle then on tap.

07-14-2006 21:17:19 | More by DaPeculierDane
Photo of A60sburnout
A60sburnout

Illinois

2.43/5  rDev -16.2%

Huber Premium poured out of the bottle creating a nice frothy head that quickly dissipated to a pale film floating on top of a pale yellow lager. thin lacing lined my glass within seconds of pouring.

Faint smell of malt, stronger smell of corn adjunct. Taste was sweet, almost like corn syrup, with a little malt in the background. Very little hop presence and carbonation.

That being said, the experience wasn't entirely unpleasant. Two bottles quenched my thirst while I BBQ'd on a warm Sunday evening. It went down easily and without a lot of thought. I'm sure Huber was a better-tasting beer at one time, but it still serves its purpose. Not a great, or even a good beer, but I'd still rather drink it instead of a macro brew from the heavy hitters.

07-30-2012 02:58:29 | More by A60sburnout
Photo of Jerseyislandbeer
Jerseyislandbeer

Jersey

2.5/5  rDev -13.8%

08-26-2014 18:38:15 | More by Jerseyislandbeer
Photo of rabbitguy
rabbitguy

Illinois

2.5/5  rDev -13.8%

08-09-2013 21:10:28 | More by rabbitguy
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

2.7/5  rDev -6.9%

Bottles of this have found their way to a cut price supermarket chain in the UK: 69 Pence (about a dollar) for 330ml worth.

I poured my bottle into a 'Back Forty Beer Co' glass to make it feel at home (kind of) on 9th Jan 2014.

Very pale golden/straw coloured body, clean and clear, the white head left before it arrived to leave a white collar and a little wisp on the surface.

If this is their Premium beer I'm not too sure I'd like their regular brew. Although to be fair this isn't a bad lager, it's just a bit thin on character and flavourings. Refreshing without testing your taste buds or other senses too greatly.

The nose was semi-sweet and slightly grainy, the taste followed in that vein, being pretty sweet: where did the hops go?

Pleased it popped up in Shropshire, but I'll not be rushing off back to the shop for any more.

01-09-2014 17:28:58 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of Jimboe
Jimboe


2.75/5  rDev -5.2%

10-03-2012 15:37:24 | More by Jimboe
Photo of Brunite
Brunite

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -5.2%

01-27-2013 16:12:34 | More by Brunite
Photo of Joefisherman
Joefisherman

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -5.2%

07-08-2012 14:38:17 | More by Joefisherman
Photo of bicyclesnbeer
bicyclesnbeer

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -5.2%

08-19-2012 15:39:06 | More by bicyclesnbeer
Photo of jazzyjeff13
jazzyjeff13

United Kingdom (England)

2.79/5  rDev -3.8%

A 330ml bottle with a BB of March 2014. ABV is stated as 4.8%. Acquired a little while back from a B&M store. The label claims that this is an all-grain brew with roots going back to 1845.

Poured into a straight pint glass. A clear golden-amber colour with slight floating sediment and good carbonation. Forms a decent head of creamy white foam that lasts for a minute or so before subsiding to a patchy surface layer. Aroma of light, grainy malt with faint hints of biscuit, husk and stewed leaves. Slightly sweet but otherwise bland.

Tastes of sweet, watery malt with a mild finish. Notes of cooked grain, faint husk, stewed leaves, a twinge of overdone veg and a hint of fruity yeast. A delicate sweetness in the background, followed by a vague dry character upon swallowing. No bitterness to speak of. Mouthfeel is smooth and tingly, with prickly carbonation and a thin, insubstantial body. A subtle aftertaste of steamed grain and leaves.

Meh - a most underwhelming brew. Looks OKish for the style, while the aroma and flavour are dull as ditchwater. Faint malt and leaves with a slight sweetness; not much going on. Lacklustre body. No serious technical flaws but this is unbearably bland. Give it a miss, unless you need something to water the plants with.

04-02-2014 00:39:02 | More by jazzyjeff13
Photo of kmpitz2
kmpitz2

Tennessee

2.9/5  rDev 0%

Sampled at the brewery. Definately not my favorite beer. It poured a yellow color with a finger of head that had good retention through the drink. The nose was honey sweetness with a grainey background. The flavor was grainey, with a metallic aftertaste that didn't sit well with me. Eh. The feel was moderate at best and drinkability suffered from all the above stated qualities. There are other beers that are made here that are much better.

12-09-2004 03:28:09 | More by kmpitz2
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

3/5  rDev +3.4%

This beer seems to harken back to an earlier era of American brewing. Not that it is all that fantastic, in fact, it is pretty average in its own right, but it does have some depth and complexity to the flavor profile. Crisp up front, softening in the middle with some faint fruity flavors struggling to rise above the grain. Alchohol flavors are a bit brusk, but are held in check. Finish is clean and a little dry. I don't know why, but the beer makes me nostalgic.

09-25-2003 02:33:21 | More by Brent
Photo of yankees27
yankees27

Iowa

3/5  rDev +3.4%

08-29-2014 02:09:11 | More by yankees27
Photo of KellyScottMad
KellyScottMad

Wisconsin

3/5  rDev +3.4%

10-03-2013 01:45:48 | More by KellyScottMad
Photo of Lgarciaosuna
Lgarciaosuna

Mexico

3/5  rDev +3.4%

04-11-2014 19:14:51 | More by Lgarciaosuna
Photo of Tone
Tone

Missouri

3.03/5  rDev +4.5%

Pours a clear yellow color. 1/4 inch head of a white/transparent color. Poor retention and poor lacing. Smells pale malt and yeast cleanliness. Fits the style of an American Pale Lager. Mouth feel is smooth and crisp with high carbonation level. Tastes of pale malt and yeast cleanliness mostly. There's a slight hop kick in the finish, but it's barely noticeable. Overall, about what I've come to expect from an American Pale Lager. Nothing worth going out of your way for.

03-04-2009 04:15:43 | More by Tone
Photo of biboergosum
biboergosum

Alberta (Canada)

3.05/5  rDev +5.2%

12oz glass at the newish microbrewery in NE Cowtown.

This beer appears a clear medium golden colour, with a half finger of wispy, very loosely foamy off-white head, which leaves a few minor streaks of remote island lace around the glass as things quickly sink away.

It smells of faint pale grainy malt, a bit of white grape and apple fruitiness, and weak earthy, musty hops. The taste is more tangling between thin grainy pale malt, and icy vinous drupe fruit, with little more beyond a subtle hint of weedy hops.

The bubbles are pretty sublimated, and not particularly noticeable, the body medium-light in weight, and generally smooth, nothing really interfering here. It finishes well off-dry, the middling fruit and malt still really the only game in town.

A very so-so Yankee lager, somewhat better than yer typical offering sporting the 'Premium' moniker, but not by much, and with little balancing offset to make it at all memorable, or especially revisit-worthy.

08-07-2013 00:14:00 | More by biboergosum
Photo of bigred89
bigred89

Maryland

3.25/5  rDev +12.1%

12-04-2011 02:44:40 | More by bigred89
Photo of chicagoish
chicagoish

Pennsylvania

3.25/5  rDev +12.1%

04-14-2014 00:05:46 | More by chicagoish
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Huber Premium Beer from Minhas Craft Brewery
71 out of 100 based on 42 ratings.