1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Rock River Red Ale - Minhas Craft Brewery

Not Rated.
Rock River Red AleRock River Red Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
71
okay

45 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 45
Reviews: 25
rAvg: 2.91
pDev: 24.05%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Minhas Craft Brewery visit their website
Wisconsin, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  ABV ?

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: zeff80 on 10-18-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 45 | Reviews: 25 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of cagocubs
2.75/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from bottle into pint glass

A: Pours a funky orange-red-copper color. Extremely active carbonation bursting out of the bottle into the glass causes a flash head. Disappears with no lacing. Left with an ugly colored beer and that’s it.

S: Smells sweet with faint malt aroma. The sweetness smells like a juice.

T: Um, I don’t know. It’s sweet, but that’s about it. Real odd aftertaste. This is a red ale you said?

M: Powerfully carbonated. Real light body. Funky aftertaste.

O: When marketed as a craft beer I am going to judge it as one. In that regard, this was awful. Having said that, if this was a macro beer I could see a following for this. To call this a red ale is almost laughable at this point.

cagocubs, Aug 03, 2011
Photo of TMoney2591
2.33/5  rDev -19.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Served in a Dogfish Head shaped pint glass.

Part five of my six-part Berghoff sampling. This has not been all that much fun, lemme tell ya. I almost don't wanna continue, but I feel Minhas is feeling the pressure to do better than it has thus far. A man can dream, can't he? This brew pours a clear dark rust topped by a half-finger of dirty white foam. The nose comprises toasted toffee, flowers, and what may or may not be a mountain of black pepper. The only thing helping things here is the faintness. The taste can most closely be described as old, toasted rye bread mixed with some light greens and black pepper. No. The body is a rather light medium, with a light moderate carbonation and a seemingly bone dry finish. Overall, this road I'm on is getting bumpier and rockier somehow. This was just plain bad. Straight up.

TMoney2591, Jun 01, 2011
Photo of richkrull
2.4/5  rDev -17.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Poured a pale orangish brown color with just a little bit of white head on it. Smell was faint, malty, maybe a little alcohol smell. Taste was not very good. Kind of a bitter dry flavor. Aftertaste is not real pleasant. Light mouthfeel. Overall not a very good beer. I won't lookk for this again.

richkrull, Mar 22, 2011
Photo of BR0ck94
3.35/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This is a session ale with approx 5.6% ABV which isn't too shabby for what it costs. It's not pricey at all. Good value for beer that's better than drinking a domestic lager.

Red-Brown in appearance; not cloudy at all

Smells sweet & malty

Tastes sweet & malty at first, but finishes with something not as good.

It has a light ale body which is to be expected for a session ale.

It's highly drinkable for somebody that's not too picky & would prefer to drink cheap session ale compared to American domestic lagers.

BR0ck94, Mar 04, 2011
Photo of chrsmat71
3.6/5  rDev +23.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This isn't bad. Better than I expected based on the reviews (especially since I thought the other Berghoff brews were much worse than reviewed). A lite red color, kind of looks like Killion's. Taste is grainish, maltish, and a bit sweet. No bitter hops at all that I could detect. Had a funky aftertaste I could quite put my finger on...but slightly medicinal, not bad medicine...but still. Not something I would seek out, but I certainly will not avoid it. I enjoyed my bottle, and will enjoy the other two I have.

chrsmat71, Feb 24, 2011
Photo of rings
2.4/5  rDev -17.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

My sample was called "Famous Red Ale," so is hopefully the same brew. This is an American Pale Ale that was pretty par for the course and their one departure from "German" style beers among the samples I had. While nothing special, it's certainly much better than it had been a few years before.

The Ale is light red in color and was relatively clean the first time around with a medium body and a crisp, hoppy bite. The balance was nice. Unfortunately, I catch a hint of DMS and some fruity notes as I progressed through my pint, but it was still a decent, average effort and not worthy of demotion on that alone.

rings, Feb 11, 2011
Photo of Schnitzelburger
1.15/5  rDev -60.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

I'm happy to see the horrible ratings of this crap. The old, pre-Minhas ale was an outstanding daily drinker. Did a side by side of the old and new a couple years ago and the new one was a drain pour. Hell, my friends dog didn't even lap it up after we dumped it on the patio.

Schnitzelburger, Jul 29, 2010
Photo of CHL
2.6/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Thin beer that looks and tastes more like an amber ale--and a weak one at that. Indistinct smell, light malt, and not much hop flavor. Fizzy, maybe a little sour on the aftertaste. It doesn't improve the flavor, just makes it less drinkable.

If this were a macro, and priced like a macro (instead of a cheapish craft), it might be worth grabbing in bars that don't have anything better. As is, there's not much to recommend it.

Blah.

CHL, May 12, 2010
Photo of robbyc1
3.03/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Clear light gold, not so red, small off white head, lacing is

Nose of amber malts and not much else.

As Minhas brews this now, it's not really one style, not bad for a macro type amber, but as a micro ale not so much, pale malt with slightly sweet front backed by a crisp balance. Very light body, very plain jane. An ok sessionable drinker, just not inspiring to have more than one.

robbyc1, Jan 03, 2010
Photo of BeerFMAndy
2.17/5  rDev -25.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

12 oz bottle poured into an American Tumbler. No date or info.

A - Clear light redish brown with a low and fizzy off-white head. Almost zero retention with no trace of bubbles afterwards.

S - The aroma is very mild with only hints at malts and hops but a more potent mineral and cidery nose. It smells like off-home brew actually.

T - Toasty malts in the background of a gross citrusy light yeast funk. Definitely bad flavors going on around what could be an alright red. It really tastes like a bad Mr. Beer batch.

M - Highly carbonated crisp and light with a dry finish. Sharp carbonation bite to the end.

D - One of, if not possibly the worst Berghoff beers I've had. Overly carbonated and off in flavor, there is absolutely no reason to have this beer.

BeerFMAndy, Nov 08, 2009
Photo of ChainGangGuy
2.63/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance: Pours a clear, reddish-brown body with a thin, whitish head.

Smell: Faint, lightly toasty malts with lone drop of apple juice and nothing more. Yawn.

Taste: Mild, middling malts with light touches of breadiness and caramel sweetness. Touch of apple skin fruitiness. Vague, indistinct hops character with no more than a low hint of bitterness. Finishes dry and particularly abrupt, though that's probably for the best.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium-low carbonation.

Drinkability: A sad, sad underperforming red ale, but, unfortunately, I would say that about pretty much their entire line-up. Not recommended.

ChainGangGuy, Sep 11, 2009
Photo of Redrover
3.18/5  rDev +9.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz brown longneck with a twist off cap. No freshness dating.

Poured into a pint glass, the beer is a darkish gold with red highlights. There is a fairly large beige head.

The nose is of caramel malts, a bit of apple and a hint of citrus.

The caramel notes from the aroma track over to the taste. There is a bit of plum and a very earthy finish. The hops are only there to add a touch of balance. There is a bubble gum cigar note in the finish which I think is the Berghoff yeast strain (or just an off note). Sweetens more at the finish.

The mouth is solid with a good amount of heft. Not a bad beer, but not one to go out of your way for.

Note the Rock River winds through South West Wisconsin and North West Illinois as it meanders towards the Mississippi. It is a great fishing and recreational River.

Redrover, Jun 27, 2009
Photo of RJUGA03
2.55/5  rDev -12.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

It has a deep mahogany transparent color with slight lacing along the perimeter of the glass with two spots of lacing along the middle.

Smell - It really lacks any distinct smells.
Taste - The taste is an effervecent tingle, probably due to the small ammount of hops. On the finish I get a metalically bite from the beer.

Mouthfeel - This beer is near thin an watery.

Drinkability- It could be a beer you get on a budget or when your in a jam.

RJUGA03, Jun 16, 2009
Photo of Vancer
2.5/5  rDev -14.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

The Rock pours a nice looking burnt amber into the Sammy pint nonic, with a foamy ivory head that lasts for a few minutes.

The aroma is the same with these brews - grassy grain and malt. Which is pretty much the same for the taste - lifeless, boring, and all styles having the same flavor backbone. No toast, no biscuit, same brew repacked.

I'm done with these brews, and I don't think this brewery has a future - you can't label the same beer flavor and then call it another style.

Vancer, May 25, 2009
Photo of becktone
2.63/5  rDev -9.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

From notes 3-29-09

Eye: Rock River Red pours a very clear amber hued lighter copper. The color is fairly nice, though it isn't real beautiful to look at, though thats probably the least important thing when it comes to a beer's asthetic qualities. It doesn't look bad but it doesn't look great either. Head started off well but has simmered down to something much smaller...like a double thick blanket over the top of the beer. In texture it is rather soapy looking, not at all that pleasing.

Nose: Sweet malt notes and buttery tones are dominant here. Caramel tones as well. The diacetyl isn't all that bad, it seems to work well with the rest of what the beer is doing...it almost gives this one an english cast. Hop aroma is very low and there may be some vegetal notes about it. Aroma is overall weak on this one. The aroma isn't inviting, nor is it repulsive. Rather, its just there, not quite what I'd call average, but not all that bad.

Tongue: Light in flavor overall. Some hop character comes through, like noble hops....but not really in any way that impacts the flavor, just bitterness. General malt sweetness and some caramel that mingles with that buttery taste to give a sense to an english style. There's a good amount of sweetness to this one, like its under attunated. I know that this is odd, but I was drinking one of these just prior to reviewing this one...the flavor seems to be better, at least more concentrated, when drank from the bottle. With an overall watery taste this isn't one to be seeking out. This is drinkable but nothing worth buying, unless you want something that is cheap and not all that bad...Hey, thats the reason I bought it.

Feel and Drinkability: Finish is dry. Body is light, and kinda slick. Carbonation is low which doesn't help this beer much, the body is too light for there to be this little carbonation. It doesn't feel bad, but I'd definitely say its less than average. This beer is drinkable but as I stated before its only worth buying if you want a cheap beer thats not all that bad. For the price, its not all that bad....its only about a dollar more than Bud and it tastes much better.

becktone, Apr 19, 2009
Photo of russpowell
2.4/5  rDev -17.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Pours an effervescent copper with a quickly dissipating beige head. A trace of head & lacing

S: Vegtal smells, a touch of caramel & not much else

T: Toasty malt, overwhelmed by metallic hops up front. Dryness & a bit of caramel & woody pulp as this warms. Finishes dry with metallic hops, grainy, & a bit of toasty malt fighting through. Almost pulled a 3.0

MF: Thinish & overcarbonated

Drinks slow, not enough flavor here to hold one's interest; disappointing- like most other beers from these guys..

russpowell, Apr 14, 2009
Photo of BEERchitect
2.93/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

An ok little beer that does no more than justify the low price tag.

The beer begins with a toasted malt / toasted grain mix. No real hop presence, but a hearty dose of artificial caramels and butterscotch.

The beer takes on a, well... amber hue but with a dull, carbonated action without lasting head retention or lacing. Goes flat pretty quickly.

I taste the same grain/malt flavors that persist in the nose. The caramel and buttery aromas go directly into the taste, obviously a diacetyl taste. With no real hop flavor either, this review is taking on a harsh tone, but the beer is actually alright.

Textures are a bit heavy on the palate because of the lack of carbonation. Thinned by the light astringency found by the grains. Lightly slick on the mouth because of the diacetyl. The beer fails most in the texture.

A lot of bad descriptors going on in language but the beer ultimatly falls in the average range.

BEERchitect, Mar 01, 2009
Photo of BierFan
2.95/5  rDev +1.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a brown 12 ounce twist-off bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: Clear red/brown with a VERY small white head. The appearance of the beer is not bad, but it definitely fails to excite me about drinking this.

Smell: Light crisp smell. No real noticeable hops.

Taste: Floral hop flavor. This is a really mild and subtle American red ale compared to other bigger more heavily cascade hopped examples that define the style. It's an ok beer but it doesn't live up to other red ales.

BierFan, Feb 20, 2009
Photo of Tone
3.4/5  rDev +16.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear amber color. Short 1/5 inch head with poor retention and no lacing. Smells of yeast mostly and some slight sweet malt. I guess it fits the style, but not a real good example. Smooth and crisp mouth feel. High carbonation level is noticeable. Tastes of slight malt, but mostly clean yeast. Slight sweetness is present and a barely noticeable hop bitterness comes through. Overall, the the beer gets sweeter after a few sips, but mostly a lackluster beer. Kind of a boring and bland beer with very little hops.

Tone, Jan 29, 2009
Photo of zeff80
3.1/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Poured out an orange/amber color with a good deal of carbonation. It had a small, off-white head that faded fairly quickly.

S - It smelled of malt and earthy grasses.

T - It had a smooth caramel malt flavor with a touch of sweetness. A slight hop bite emerges later.

M - It was fairly crisp and sharp. A light to medium-bodied beer.

D - This is an okay amber, very affordable and easy drinking. Like most Berghoff beers it is solid but not spectacular.

zeff80, Oct 18, 2008
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Rock River Red Ale from Minhas Craft Brewery
71 out of 100 based on 45 ratings.