1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Grimbergen Dubbel - Brouwerij Alken-Maes

Not Rated.
Grimbergen DubbelGrimbergen Dubbel

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
86
very good

838 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 838
Reviews: 480
rAvg: 3.8
pDev: 12.63%
Wants: 17
Gots: 36 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Alken-Maes visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Dubbel |  6.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-11-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 838 | Reviews: 480 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of rastaman
rastaman

United Kingdom (England)

1.85/5  rDev -51.3%

Bottled. Horrifically sweet toffee apple flavour. Very cloying. The sweetest and worst Dubbel i've ever had. Too much toffee and sweetness, no other flavours that stick out. Not a good example of the style in my opinion. Iverly sweet, flat and syruppy, very bad, worst dubbel i've had.

04-05-2002 18:01:02 | More by rastaman
Photo of Minkybut
Minkybut

Virginia

1.85/5  rDev -51.3%

Poured this beer from bottle to a 50 degree tumbler. The beer had a nice mahogany color with a big fat tan head that smelled a little like caramel. bready but like sour dough bread that went SOUR. The word yuk comes to mind and I poured this beer out. If you like sour beer go for it. I will not buy again.

04-07-2007 23:11:06 | More by Minkybut
Photo of motleybrew
motleybrew

New York

1.95/5  rDev -48.7%

I was expecting a LOT more from a beer with an $11/6pack price tag. I poured it a little warmer than the instructions as is my preference, and maybe that was the base for the problem...The color is a nice clean amber and the slightly tan head has reasonable durability, with lacing. But the look to me was all that was good.

The smell is like wet cardboard. Yeasty, perhaps, but not a clean scent...more like raw beer in a primary. This has a mouth feel not much different than water. A little fizz on the tongue but not 'bubbling'. Nice initial malt in the mouth, but quickly dissipates flatly into sucked wool. Ever sucked wool? At the end there is a little warm plum and sherry rounding, but it isn't strong enough to rescue the lack of character. Ultimately it culminates in a cheap metallic flavor that I'd normally get from something in an unlined aluminum can.

On the label it says chocolaty and toffee flavors from double fermentation...I get no chocolate. None. Toffee, maybe, but that is muted at best. It is smooth enough to drink, as who doesn't like water, but frankly given the choice between this and Molson XXX, I'd be all over the triple X.

I am terribly disappointed and will never drink this by choice again. The only thing worse than a cheap beer that pretends to be more robust is a beer that pretends to be classy that blows chunks and tastes cheap.

Not worth it for half the price.

07-05-2009 23:02:30 | More by motleybrew
Photo of kvnstfrd
kvnstfrd

Missouri

2/5  rDev -47.4%

05-23-2013 04:45:15 | More by kvnstfrd
Photo of Brent
Brent

Kentucky

2.05/5  rDev -46.1%

Well carbonated and hopped, but finish had an artificial sweetener character. Seemed mass produced and not well executed.

09-11-2001 00:02:35 | More by Brent
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

2.08/5  rDev -45.3%

33cl Bottle, drank 6 months before its death date. Poured into my Westmalle challice.

It obviously looked fine, everything does in a Westmalle challice (even water). Clean and clear body, Ruby Red in colour with a swiftly fading biege head, pity about the head leaving, I like them to stay through the drink.

Sickly molasses in the nose, nothing else could get passed them.

Sweet, too sweet, malts/molasses/treacle/toffee, not good.

The worst Dubbel I've had? Most likely. I've had this beer on tap many times and it has been OK, or at least I thought it was. Sat in the sun on holiday everything seems good and enjoyable, sadly this beer doesn't remind me of those balmy days of summers gone by.

04-19-2008 09:10:26 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of 1759Girl
1759Girl

California

2.2/5  rDev -42.1%

Appearance> Clear, dark, warm brown. Vanilla head that is rich and foamy. Lacy. Though, not too lively.

Smell> Dark malt, slightly metallic

Taste> Very syrupy, like cough medicine. Goes almost immediately into the hang which is terribly metallic, and well, terrible. I can't find a redeeming quality about this beer, sadly.

Mouf> easy, a bit sudsy.

Drinkability> Can't get over the hang.

12-01-2009 05:43:40 | More by 1759Girl
Photo of GONZALOYANNA
GONZALOYANNA

Spain

2.38/5  rDev -37.4%

330ml bottle. Grimbergen Goblet glass. Deep ruby color, red lights. Tan, creamy foam remains as a thin layer on top. Toasted, sugary & red currant aromas with syrup hues. Sweet & sparkling upfront. Medium to light body. Moderate to high carbonation. Oily to watery texture. Hints of grape, spicy & herbal bitterness. Bitter finish & sugary aftertaste. Artificial & cloying.

03-09-2014 17:54:06 | More by GONZALOYANNA
Photo of dasenebler
dasenebler

Maine

2.42/5  rDev -36.3%

50cl can purchased in the Netherlands. Yes, this beer comes in pounders, at least in Europe. I'll send you a photo if you don't believe me. Best by May, 2011.

Pours an attractive and deep reddish brown with a thick, off-white head. Pretty good lacing, and, overall, a stellar appearance.

However, appearance isn't everything.

Slightly caramel-malty aroma with unexpected acidic notes of grapes and other fruit.

Flavor is surprisingly tart, with a very fruity, almost saccharin, artificial sweetness. Behind this flavor there's a touch of toasted caramel malt, but it really can't shine through: tart-sweetness just dominates and makes this a very weird Dubbel. I mean, the style is supposed to be a bit fruity, but not tart or sour. This beer is almost in Flemish Oud Bruin territory, and even then it's not a great example of the style. Mouthfeel lacks body, but at least it wasn't over-carbonated.

This beer has flavor and it really isn't an "Avoid." It's just not a very good Dubbel.

09-23-2010 19:38:49 | More by dasenebler
Photo of rapidsequence
rapidsequence

Virginia

2.45/5  rDev -35.5%

I'd never seen this before-- a nice looking little 11.2 bottle.

Appearance: Looks really good. Clear ruby-amber with a big thick puffy head with great retention. Nice sticky lace.

Smell: Not a lot of complexity, but whats there is pretty inviting. A little spicy yeast, some mild fruitiness, and roasty toasty malt.

Taste: Very disappointing. I can barely taste any of the good things I smelled until after I swallow, because the palate is dominated by unwanted sourness. Its also a little bitter. Maybe this is a bad bottle. Maybe this stuff is just bad. The finish loses the sourness, and the aftertaste is actually alright.

Mouthfeel: Its very thin and watery despite the continued excellent head and visible carbonation.

Drinkability: Looked great and smelled decent, but it just doesnt taste good-- at all. I would say I want to wash my mouth out, but like I said, the aftertaste is ok. I wont get this again.

08-17-2009 00:52:25 | More by rapidsequence
Photo of pin
pin

Australia

2.5/5  rDev -34.2%

05-21-2013 21:37:48 | More by pin
Photo of Kahlerbock
Kahlerbock

Kansas

2.5/5  rDev -34.2%

02-01-2012 16:06:22 | More by Kahlerbock
Photo of stcules
stcules

Italy

2.53/5  rDev -33.4%

Dark brown color, with red edges. Beautiful foam hat, compact and creamy, cream colored.
Malty, sugary smell, red fruit, caramel, berry fruit. Not horrible, but definitely too sweet.
The taste is sugary and fruity too, berry fruit.
Too sweet and unbalanced, you can barely feel the maltiness under the sugar. Also quite flat.
Not interesting.

01-14-2012 12:45:54 | More by stcules
Photo of TheBrewo
TheBrewo

Michigan

2.6/5  rDev -31.6%

We pour a near black brew. It holds a two finger head of light brown bubbles. This shows okay retention, leaving microspecks and bands of lacing around the glass. Carbonation appears average, and no sediment is noted. The aroma is sweet, with synthetic cherry fruitiness. The malts are rich with caramel and copper. They also hold a thick breadiness, along with baker’s yeast. With warmth the sweetness is enhanced by booze and a lemony freshness. Our first impression is that the beer is wildly sweet. As we sip, the flavoring opens with cloying sugar and that same synthetic fruit from the nose. The sweetness is puckering, washing out most of the grain here, which is metallic and borderline adjuncty. The sweetness remains to the peak, where tea leaves and raspberry sugars take over, bringing us to an equally as sugary finish. The end also shows some burnt caramel malts and some fusel alcohols. The aftertaste breathes with tin, yeast, mineral water, and sweet cherries. The body is medium to thicker, and the carbonation is higher. There is big foam with each sip, building as you swirl the beer around your mouth. This also affords decent slurp and pop with each swallow. The mouth is initially coated with that same foam, but it quickly dries, leaving an astringent streak down the tongue. The abv is appropriate, and the beer drinks slowly on account of the sugariness.

Overall, what we enjoyed most about this brew was the rich coloring. It initially appeared jet black, but as it warmed and when held to light, more maroon hues began to shine through. Otherwise, the tasting was overly sweet. With this style the sugars should come from the malts themselves and have a deeper, more serious cooked caramel flavoring. Here, the sweetness came from additive fruitiness which was overdone and overpowering.

08-20-2012 20:47:04 | More by TheBrewo
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

Texas

2.6/5  rDev -31.6%

Bottle into Guinness pint glass in San Antonio, Ibiza, Spain. Reviewed from notes.

A: Pours a dark amber colour, nontransparent, with a five finger head of nice thickness and cream. Excellent retention. Appealing. The head is impressive for the beer's high ABV.

Sm: Yeast! Hops, barley, the usual suspects. A bit musty, and of light strength.

T: Hoppy body: mainly nuts. Yeast comes through on the climax. Dark and biscuity flavour. Finish doesn't hide the alcohol as well as it needs to, leaving this part of the beer far less balanced against the first two thirds. No cream comes through on the open, but that wouldn't suit the style anyway. Slight wheat, but not to the extent you'd expect. Built a bit under par for a dubbel; it's rather disappointing if your expectations are high. In fairness, one ought to be skeptical of any abbey bier available in Ibiza.

Mf: Too light for a dubbel, and certainly far too smooth. Doesn't bring out the flavours of the body. Coarseness would suit it to this end, but then it'd also be class if the beer had more complex flavouring to begin with.

Dr: All in all, it's poorly priced by Ibiza standards, but I do suspect it's very fairly priced elsewhere, especially in Belgium. It doesn't hide its ABV well, but it's the best beer I've had on Ibiza so far (unless you count Guinness). Skip this one unless you're really into generic abbey beers that try to steal trappist marketing.

05-08-2011 12:57:20 | More by kojevergas
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

2.63/5  rDev -30.8%

This dark brown colored ale pours with a very large light tan foam that lasts well in the glass. Unfortunately, this Belgian ale is not bottle conditioned. Very light notes of hop and dark fruit are present in the nose. Flavors are very muddled and muted, not helped by the watery texture due to the lack of natural carbonation. Not an awful beer.

02-20-2009 16:16:15 | More by Crosling
Photo of LarryV
LarryV

Massachusetts

2.64/5  rDev -30.5%

Paid almost $15 for a six pack, that's the last time I buy it. pours with a lacy tan head and looks nice in the glass giving off a glowing mahogany color. Taste is too sweet for my liking and has an overwhelming note of sour apples. I've had much better Dubbels in the past, this one just doesn't live up to expectations. It was a chore to polish off all six bottles since I didn't find it very enjoyable at all.

05-06-2014 22:52:01 | More by LarryV
Photo of Doomcifer
Doomcifer

Rhode Island

2.73/5  rDev -28.2%

Appearance - Poured extremely murky, caramel color with a nice two finger head and great lacing on the glass.

Smell - Smells of sweet fermented fruit...more like wine than beer. Picking up honey, figs, toffee, herbs maybe.

Taste - Extremely sweet...probably too sweet, to the point of cloying, Very winey, some toffee, maple syrup. I find it hard to indulge in more than one. Definite dessert beer here.

Mouthfeel - Creamy, velvety, medium to heavy body....moderate to high carbonation.

Drinkability - Like I said, I can't have more than one of these without getting sick of it.

08-02-2006 01:24:17 | More by Doomcifer
Photo of bditty187
bditty187

Nebraska

2.73/5  rDev -28.2%

Largely clear, dark ruby in hue with some brown highlights; I like the color. The beige head was rocky and rather tall, the foam was three fingers tall at its maximum. The bubbles quickly faded to a fizzy cap. The subsequent lacing started immediately, the lacing was very widespread and thick. I am very impressed! A small cap lasted the entire consumption. This is an attractive beer.

The nose is clean and not very Dubbel-like. I detect hints of cola, faint Christmas cookie spice, rum, and a whiff of coca. The potency is low; this beer is just not saying enough. I need more depth, I need more chatter. I need much more malt depth. I can’t call the nose inviting. Yawn.

The palate is dull. Flat RC Cola is basically all I taste. Yawn. In the background are hints of veggies, spiced rum minus the alcohol heat, some veggies, and not much else. Oh wait… I taste plums too and maybe some cocoa. No matter, this is one of the worst Dubbels I have had. I would drink Chimay Red over this! Yikes! What a boring, flavorless beer. Sweet, sloppy finish… tacky and clunky; I am not impressed.

Medium-light in body, low carbonation with only a flash of bite, the mouthfeel is okay but at this point this beer is a lost cause. It is a bit thin but not watery… the mouthfeel is ho-hum.

Not drinkable because it is just not likable. For a Dubbel this beer is thin and lacking flavor. Even if I set aside the style this beer is not tasty. If I had a 750ml I would dump most of it. Thankfully all I have is an 11.2oz bottle. I will finish it but I will not revisit this beer again. For a Dubbel this beer is lousy... as a “beer,” this beer is lousy too. I never heard of this beer before I seen a few bottles in Lawrence, KS. So I bought one… you can skip it though.

01-09-2006 16:12:14 | More by bditty187
Photo of jwc215
jwc215

Wisconsin

2.73/5  rDev -28.2%

Pours crimson with ruby hues. A thin, off-white head is well-retained and leaves lace on the glass.

The smell is of roasted dark grains, dark fruits, a touch of spiciness. Not too bad - quite restrained and un-dubbel-like.

Metalllic upfront. It subsides, but annoyingly hangs around. Sweet, but restrained. Some subtle perfumy notes come through. Sweet spiciness mixed in with sour. A touch of raw, fusel-like alcohol comes through a touch too much. A touch of wateriny thinness in the middle, followed by caramel sweetness.

The feel is light, fairly creamy and coating.

Not what I would expect from Belgium. The tinny characteristic, while mild, is annoying. The caramel aspect isn't bad, but seems too little, too late to really help, and it's rather one-dimensional to boot. The spiciness that I expect were muted. While it's true that it is at a fair price for a six-pack, I'll be skipping this one and splurge for something with more character.

03-20-2007 19:36:31 | More by jwc215
Photo of stevecee2003
stevecee2003

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -27.6%

It looked good coming out of the bottle! I had eagerly taken home a 6-pack from my local beer haven, hoping for an exciting new experience. Aaah well.

The best that can be said is thats it's "OK". But when you're expecting a new ale on the horizon, well this is a bit disappointing.

Fresh into the glass it has promise. Deep reds. Rusty and rich looking. A nice frothy foam on top. But that soon goes away, as does the rest of this test.

The smell had SOME of the malts and some of the fruitiness. But that died too.

Then the taste. I read one reviewer who had it spot on.. "mouthfeel has almost nothing in common with most Belgian ales in existence. It isn't bad, though. There are plenty of bubbles, but oddly enough, they aren't volumizing the beer very well". That says it! Perfectly.

Don't expect much, and you wont be disappointed.

02-01-2008 03:16:29 | More by stevecee2003
Photo of petluo
petluo

Finland

2.75/5  rDev -27.6%

04-19-2012 13:18:50 | More by petluo
Photo of atrocity
atrocity

Virginia

2.75/5  rDev -27.6%

04-25-2014 16:54:18 | More by atrocity
Photo of BWH3
BWH3

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev -26.8%

Had this on tap at World Cafe in Philly. Perhaps served a bit too cool and in a pint glass.

A: Solid reddish brown with thin tan head that quickly fades to dollop of foam in the center. I liked the color of this beer but the absence of a head and minimal carbonation were huge liabilities.

S: Aroma more of a porter with notes of toffee, chocolate, and roasted nuts. A slight fruity esters of a belgian yeast come through and minimal notes of Special B.

T: Tastes a bit like a sweet porter or brown ale including a fair amount of roast malt bitterness to clean the palate. Raisin flavor is more pronounced than the aroma let on, but still major toffee and chocolate components to the taste. Ends with a bit of roast grain that barely compensates for the sweet palate.

M: Very flat, very sticky, pretty heavy. Not what I expect from a dubbel nor was it remarkable enough for me to over look these faults.

D: I have had worse dubbels, but most of them have been American micro attempts. I would not pick this one again.

07-27-2008 12:48:47 | More by BWH3
Photo of smedley
smedley

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev -26.8%

A - a beautiful pour. Deep amber with an inch of off-white head. As the head slowly goes away it leaves great lace and ends up in a creamy, bumpy layer on top of the brew. No visible signs of carbonation.

S - Coffee, grapes, toasted malts. Almost has a generic red wine undertone. Hints of raisins and a copper penny. Not overwhelming.

T - Very sweet then leaves you almost with a brandy/cheap red wine taste after swallowing. I can't say I like this very much.

M - Medium body, low cabonation. Because of the brandy-like taste, I expected it to have a warming sensation, but it never happened.

D - I'm having trouble finishing this one. I can't imagine wanting another. Maybe it's the style that I don't like, but I found this fairly disgusting.

01-06-2009 23:10:07 | More by smedley
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Grimbergen Dubbel from Brouwerij Alken-Maes
86 out of 100 based on 838 ratings.