Grimbergen Optimo Bruno - Brouwerij Alken-Maes

Not Rated.
Grimbergen Optimo BrunoGrimbergen Optimo Bruno

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
83
good

43 Reviews
THE BROS
-
no score

(Send Samples)
Reviews: 43
Hads: 105
rAvg: 3.69
pDev: 7.86%
Wants: 11
Gots: 14 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Alken-Maes visit their website
Belgium

Style | ABV
Quadrupel (Quad) |  10.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 02-14-2003

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (28) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Reviews: 43 | Hads: 105
Photo of stcules
2.23/5  rDev -39.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Beautiful color, between cherrywood and brown. Beautiful foam, beige, compact, even if not very longstanding. Not bad.
In the smell malt, light caramel, ligh red fruit (tropical?).
The taste is by far more unbalanced, with a lot of alcohol. Red fruit again, but anyway, far worse than the smell. Malt, again, and a lot of caramel. No. No way.
I remember it (some years ago) much, much better. (395 characters)

Photo of Paddez
2.99/5  rDev -19%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Pours an extemely clear, amber-coloured brew (rather than brown, wich the name suggests) that produced a small but dense head after a rather hard pour. It dissapeared rather quickly too.
The smell is malty with some fruity notes and some alcohol near the end of the sniff.
the taste starts of spicy and malty but it soon overtaken by a strong acidic taste of alcohol.
The alcohol has a warming effect, wich is nice but the overall mouthfeel is quite poor:
Same goes for the drinkabillity. Although this brew argueably hits less hard than the Grimbergen Triple it's still incredibly heady.

Quite an alcholic brew. It was okay for once but I won't be buying it again. (673 characters)

Photo of titvs
3/5  rDev -18.7%

Review based on the BJCP2008 guidelines (style 18E). Bottle 33 cl - Batch 10:43 <2>. AROMA: sweet malty profile with caramel notes. alcohol notes with a bit of solventy character. some esters but faint. APPEARANCE: deep amber color with ruby highlights. translucent. large tanned head with good retention. alcohol derived viscosity with lacing. TASTE: sweet malty profile with some esters reminiscent of dried grapes. strong alcohol presence almost solventy. some caramel notes. low bitterness and a semi-dry finish. no hop flavours. PALATE: medium body with high carbonation. some alcohol warmth noticeable. OVERALL: a belgian strong ale that lacks complexity. (661 characters)

Photo of thierrynantes
3.03/5  rDev -17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Beer bottle (33cl.), tasted in 2001.

Appearance: amber color, with a tan foam head.
Smell: massive fruit aromas and alcohol
Taste and mouthfeel: alcohol dominates all too
Drinkability: an average abbey beer (too strong) in the style Belgian dark ale.

Review translated from french 5-24-2008. (293 characters)

Photo of AlexLMS
3.06/5  rDev -17.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearance: deep brown with ruby highlights when put against the light. Good clarity. The head is off-white, moderate in size, creamy with good retention and beautiful lacing.
Aroma: interesting aroma. Combination of sweet malts, chocolate, a hint of toffee and alcohol.
Taste: sweet but not cloying. Alcohol presence, caramel, dark malts. Weak in the hop side.
Mouthfeel: silky and creamy, good carbonation, strong but not overwhelming alcoholic presence (10%) and a firm body.
Finish: sweet alcohol aftertaste.

Overall: A slightly above average abbey beer. Not the best Grimbergen, but very appealing nevertheless. (617 characters)

Photo of Radome
3.08/5  rDev -16.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Served from a 33 cl bottle bought in Spain.

A - Perfectly clear. Deep amber/medium brown but with red highlights and lets lots of light through. Off-white head started out about 1 cm thick, then faded to a thin layer with thick ring at the edge and lots of lacing. Very pretty beer.

S - Aromas are very muted and hard to pick out. Just a little wet malt, a little brown sugar, a faint grassy note that could be hops, and a hint of vinegar that always jumps out at me in Oud Bruin ales. That vinegar note seems to indicate some aging, maybe in wood. Nothing smells bad or off, it just doesn't have enough good aroma to be rated higher.

T - Again I get some hints of an Oud Bruin, but without any depth or complexity. There is very little malt. No hops flavor. There is a lot of caramel/brown sugar flavor, followed by a slight vinegar tang. A hint of alcohol in the moderately sweet finish. No overt oak or wood flavor to go with the "aged" impression.

M - Medium mouthfeel--seems appropriate. Some hops bitterness and a bit of alcohol burn. Light carbonation.

O - A beautiful looking beer that disappoints on the nose and tongue. Some nice flavor hints, but lacking in malt background and depth. (1,200 characters)

Photo of CrazyDavros
3.23/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours dark amber/ruby with a large, lasting head.
Nose shows chocolate, port-like notes, sultanas and brown sugar, along with a healthy dose of candi sugar.
Similarly sweet flavours, although it quickly dries out. There's lots more candi sugar and golden syrup along with more sultanas/dried fruit. A bit over the top. The alcohol is pretty noticeable too, almost harsh.
Carbonation is way over the top, but at the same time it's needed to cut through the sweetness. (466 characters)

Photo of distantmantra
3.32/5  rDev -10%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Bottle poured into a chalice. A La Mort Subite. Brussels, Belgium. Notes from April 2011.

A: Dark brown ruby red color. Poured with little to no head.

S: Extremely sweet smell with a hint of alcohol.

T: Notes of dark fruit, mainly cherry. Bitter finish with barely any sign of the alcohol.

M: Medium body with average carbonation.

D: Not a bad Belgian strong ale, but there better ones easily available. (409 characters)

Photo of Absumaster
3.35/5  rDev -9.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The heaviest beer of Grimbergen. It pours a burgundy red, brownish color with a small head that fades into a small layer of white foam.

The smell is of dark candisugar, malty and has some light tart notes, together with a typical Belgian, fruity yeast smell.

Taste is sweet and leans strongly on the malt. The candisugar adds a sweet and full taste. It has notes of candisugar, caramalts and dark fruits. There is a certain tartness in the beer that can't be called sour. It's more like the subtle tartness often found in Old Ales. The yeast adds a fruity, but subtle fruit note. The 10% alcohol is well hidden by the big body of the beer.
Mouthfeel is sticky which makes the drinkability lower. All together too sweet and sticky for my liking, although I can imagine that this beer is great at the fireplace. (812 characters)

Photo of janubio
3.42/5  rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Red brown colour, with a good head that doesn't hold too long. Aroma is sweet, alcoholic, toffee, cherries, dates.
Sweet flavor with a bit of sourness. Mouth of cherries, dates, sherry wine, with some hints of chocolate.Medium to light body. I'm not exactly a fan of Grimbergen but this is one is good enough. (309 characters)

Photo of batty
3.46/5  rDev -6.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 2.5

Crystal clear very dark brown-marroon color with nice dense head, drops to a centimeter layer which stays, nice lacing.

smell is pretty simple but nice, plum, grape, and dark fruit with a bit of toasty malt.

i'm catching a lot of grape in the taste, alcohol very well hidden for 10%, but warms as it goes down. just enough bitter to almost balance, but still too sticky-sweet for my taste.

as I've found with the other grimbergens, mouthfeel is full and beautiful.

drinkability is less than desired, very sticky and lingering fruity-bitter. (544 characters)

Photo of harsley
3.48/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A - A dark amber/brownish hue with a nice tan creamy head with decent retention.

S - of malts and sugar. There are some spicy smells that are either from the yeast or spices.

T - Lots of flavors going on, fairly complex. The backbone was fairly malty/sugary with a sweet/tartness coming through a bit more than I'd like in the style.

M - Good body, not quite as thin as I'd like for a Belgian like this.

D - Very drinkable, even though a bit sweet. (460 characters)

Photo of FLima
3.49/5  rDev -5.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5

Clear light brown color with a thick beige head with eternal retention and leaving strong laces.
Mild aroma with predominant notes of prunes, Belgian yeast, some coconut and caramel.
Malty flavor with notes of prunes, grains, cinnamon, noticeable booze, Belgian yeast, herbal hops, toffee, cranberry, wood and some toasted malts. Dry and alcoholic aftertaste.
Medium bordering full body with lively carbonation with tiny bubbles giving a smooth feeling. Alcohol of 10% abv is heavier than average for style.
Perfect day for a Quad, just not top notch. This missed nose intensity, some flavor complexity and alcohol could be better hidden. Still it did the trick and it grew over time. It also has a good depth with red fruits and a better hop balance for style. (761 characters)

Photo of Evil_Pidde
3.52/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: The color is deep amber while the tan tall head is very uneven, almost sizzeling. Some lacings.

S: Sweet, sweet malt; molasses and dark dried fruits. Yeast and spices. The sweetness is almost candy-like.

T: Dark dried fruits up front, not that sweet. Then the malt sweetness evolves. Spices and yeast.

M: Long aftertaste that is both sweet and bitter. Body is full and carbontation mild.

O: Not as complex as I expect a beer in this style to be. Nice, but not great. (475 characters)

Photo of RblWthACoz
3.53/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear rub yhued dark brown with a decent creme head. Flavor is a bit apple-ly sweet (are we running a theme here on my last 4 beers?), but brings some nice sweet and a touch hearty character. Feel has a pretty full carbonation. Liquid is about standard. Easy to drink. An okay beer. (290 characters)

Photo of hawksfan82
3.53/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 33cl bottle into a la trappe chalice.

Pours an extremely dark brown brown. If you hold it up to the light you can get tiny hints of violet in it...but this guy is mostly big and brown. A good finger head with a fairly aggressive pour, dissipates quickly but a nice foam remains throughout the entire session. Not a lot of lacing, but it's very sticky....which shows the sweet nature of this beer.

Smell isn't too strong, it's a good indicator of the taste though. Usual belgian malty notes, but also a hint of the dark fruity sweetness that lies in this beer.

At first the taste is just a big malty belgian brown. After about half the beer, when it starts to warm up, you really pick up a bunch of sweet (not quite sour, but almost) fruits...I'm noticing a lot of cherry. The alcohol doesn't really come in til the finish. Even then it doesn't feel like a 10% brew.

Mouthfeel is a little thin for a beer that you think would be a bit "bigger". I expected a big chewy malty belgian, but this guy is a lot thinner and sweeter than I expected.

Drinkability is good, especially for a 10% beer. Like I said above it doesn't feel or sit like a 10% beer. Although I'm not sure being able to drink a 10% beer faster than normal is a good thing. (1,259 characters)

Photo of lacqueredmouse
3.57/5  rDev -3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a very clear, but solid red-brown colour, with a fine but insubstantial head of white. Some patchy lacing, forming from the very fine bubbling in the head and in the carbonation. Body is light, but solid. Looks decent enough.

Nose is mild and smooth, but undertoned by Belgian characters of slight acidity and a prickle of spice. Something slightly savoury to it as well, like baked italian bread. Quite pleasant.

Taste is much lighter, and the bread character comes through as a yeasty harshness. Slight acidity to it throughout, giving it a prickle as it passes over the palate, but also lightening the palate, giving a slight olive oil character on the finish. Feel is very light, which is unsurprising for the style, but the beer doesn't quite have enough complexity to make it stand out in other ways.

It's not bad, but it's a beer not at the peak of its genre or country. What we end up with is a rather insubstantial Belgian brew that doesn't do much one way or the other. (988 characters)

Photo of Sammy
3.58/5  rDev -3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Dark deep brown with retaining white head, a tad of the same lace. Malty yeasty aroma. A real foamer on opening. Above average mouthfeel. Mostly sweet malt taste,some raisin anda bit lactose-like, and yeast thickening it up. Drinkable, sweet though not cloying. (261 characters)

Photo of StJamesGate
3.64/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Clear chestnut with rocky taupe foam that instantly rims and leaves intricate trailers. So toasted malts and cranberry sauce but also lots of phenols and a whiff of booze - not the best nose.
Juicy red berries, some clove and woody spice, Balsamic oakiness, gingerbread, prunes and raisin toast plus just a hint of herbal hops.
Big sour cherry finish and root beer linger. Medium, some chew, but crisp and hot.

Serve chilled, says the label to my surprise.

The "other" site has this as a Quad, so not sure what to make of it. Fruit and clove, almost like a Christmas fruit cake, and lots going on but complex without being deep, if you know what I meant - flavors hit one at a time. Overall, too sweet, thin and boozy. (722 characters)

Photo of berley31
3.66/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A: Poured with hardly any head at all, and what was there was nothing but a ring after a few minutes. Body is a dark ruby color, mostly clear with just a touch of haziness.

S: Very sweet smell, with some alcohol present. To be honest it smelled a lot like cheap church wine to me.

T: Very sweet as well... the dark fruit is there, and it's coming across as mostly cherry-tasting to me. Finish is slightly bitter and dry, but the 10% ABV really is barely noticeable, surprisingly.

M: Medium-bodied, creamy, with soft-to-average carbonation.

D: A good Belgian Strong Dark Ale, which luckily rises above its average aroma. (623 characters)

Photo of GONZALOYANNA
3.7/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

330ml bottle. Grimbergen Chalice glass. Copper brown color, veiled appearance. Close crown, light beige in color, shows fairly good retention & leaves a lasting thin layer on top. Aroma profile includes caramel malts & berries, herbal & citric notes, hints of chocolate & sugar alcohol. Toasted malty & sugary upfront with light tartiness. Medium body. Moderate carbonation. Silky palate. Hints of sirup, candies & fruits - strawberries & currants-. Tartar touch & warming alcohol & spices linger into a long sweet finish. Slight fruity aftertaste. (548 characters)

Photo of therica
3.73/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours out as a nice dark amber-caramel color with a fair head that doesn't stand or stay long.

There's not much of a nose to the beer, at least what I can smell. The taste is very interesting and has tastes of buttery burnt caramel, possibly anise as a light undertone, and an interesting assortment of other subtle flavorings.

Alcohol is (someone's going to retrieve the bottle)... 10 percent. Yep. Maybe why I just started having difficulties typing this review. Heh.. we thought the date on the rear was the brewed-date-- it's not for another 8 months... "best by" ie consumed by date. Funny what alcohol can do when it sneaks up and bites you on the a88. So much for writing any more, I was doing fine trying various Belgian's that I brought back on the flight, before this beer, but obviously this one has just toasted me... (835 characters)

Photo of Nesued
3.75/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On-tap at Dadz Bar and Grill, Lumberton NJ. Served in a chalice.

Appearance - Dark brown, tan creamy head that was a two-finger depth when it arrived at the table.

Smell - Malt, malt and oh, by the way, a bit more malt. This is a malt lovers dream. I did sense some sugars but only faintly.

Taste - Depth of character. Very complex with more than just "malt" once you take a hit. Some sweetness and a "bready" and spicy flavoring to round out the description. It took me at least three of these to figure out that much, I'm sure I missed more than I found.

Mouthfeel - mmm, nice and meaty. The carbonation adds to the ability to "feel" this beer more than I expected.

Drinkability - Here's where I have a problem. To say this is representative of the style is a no-brainer, but the company it keeps in Strong Belgians is a weightly lot! This was a special occasion when I tasted this offering so I'm not sure of the availabilty. To be in the company as a Gulden Draak, Delerium Noel/Tremens is saying something. To stand with them is saying something else. I would put the Bruno almost on par with these, not far behind. (1,136 characters)

Photo of jonb5
3.78/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4

330ml bottle, poured into Kasteel Chalice.

A: Dark mahogany, thick looking, one finger head, decent retention, lots of lacing.

S: Lots of cranberry, molasses.

T: Cranberry, brown sugar, hints of cocoa like bitterness towards the end.

M: Surprisingly light, smooth, moderate carbonation.

O: Gets points for the crisp body and well hidden booze, but lacked depth of other Quads. (386 characters)

Photo of Gusler
3.8/5  rDev +3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

I have been a fan of Grimbergen since I sampled my first double so many years ago, and I still seek them out when possible. A pretty cherry red to almost copper as it sets in the glass, the head modest in size, frothy in its consistency, and the color off white, but it does evanesce quite quickly leaving a very thin veil of lace. Nose is a bit vinous, tart and crisp; the malts play a big role. Start is quite tart, lots of malt, the top is middling in feel, with the finish bitingly acidic, and the hops are perky in their spicy bite. Dry long lasting aftertaste and a decent beer, not a great beer, but well worth the sample and the 10% ABV does warm the “tummy” if not the cockles of your heart. (702 characters)

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | nextlast
Grimbergen Optimo Bruno from Brouwerij Alken-Maes
83 out of 100 based on 43 ratings.