1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Staropramen Lager - Pivovary Staropramen

Not Rated.
Staropramen LagerStaropramen Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
77
okay

647 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 647
Reviews: 305
rAvg: 3.35
pDev: 16.12%
Wants: 8
Gots: 39 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Pivovary Staropramen visit their website
Czech Republic

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-20-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 647 | Reviews: 305 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of terence
1.25/5  rDev -62.7%

terence, Jun 28, 2013
Photo of slitherySOB
1.48/5  rDev -55.8%

More euro trash beer. Staropramen is a light cold colour. Pours with a nice head, but the foam quickly recedes to film. Not much lace to speak of. Just a few whiffs sporatically placed around the glass. Makes the glass look broken, actually. Wet cardboard smell. Reminds me when I once helped a friend move in the rain. Bit skunky as well. Green bottle/lightstruck, or purpusely done? You decide. It's not an overwhelming skunk, so I'm leaning towards the latter. Starts out bland, like soggy cereal. Not much of anything expected in a beer, like hops, malt, or even adjuncts. Aftertaste is a bit skunky sour. I'm not sure what it is, but I hate the mouthfeel. It's dry, oily and leaves an unpleasant sensation on the side of the tongues. Not something I would drink again. I could state that if offered for free, I might take it. But that only means it wasn't truly horrible. I'd take Bud Light if offered for free, I might even take Colt 45 if offered for free. Don't get this beer.

slitherySOB, Jul 17, 2004
Photo of rm85
1.5/5  rDev -55.2%

rm85, Oct 21, 2012
Photo of gnikola
1.5/5  rDev -55.2%

gnikola, Jan 17, 2013
Photo of Luka
1.5/5  rDev -55.2%

Luka, Jun 29, 2014
Photo of kurgan3
1.75/5  rDev -47.8%

kurgan3, Sep 01, 2012
Photo of pipinmalikonj
1.75/5  rDev -47.8%

pipinmalikonj, Nov 21, 2013
Photo of MonkeyStain
1.75/5  rDev -47.8%

MonkeyStain, Oct 14, 2012
Photo of marc77
1.95/5  rDev -41.8%

Crystal clear dark straw hue topped by a fluffy porcelin - white head. Skunky mercaptans, sulfur, and rough grain huskiness in aroma. The sharp, astringent graininess coupled w/ the rough bitterness make this quite rough for a pilsner. Sulfur persists in the flavor and is a bit offputting... All around this beer almost abrasive on the palette. The body is weak and watery, while the malt backbone is seriously lacking. Finishes w/ an unpleasant tannic astringent note. I most likely got a poorly handled bottle, but I just don't see myself ever having this again.

marc77, Jun 30, 2002
Photo of Razr86
2/5  rDev -40.3%

Razr86, Mar 26, 2013
Photo of BGsWo22
2/5  rDev -40.3%

BGsWo22, Mar 21, 2013
Photo of TastyTaste
2/5  rDev -40.3%

Another euro lager in appearance. Crystal clear gold color, almost no head, just a few wisps of bubbles on the top of the beer. Smells of grassy malts, more skunky than most EL's, but other than that, mostly the same experience as any beer from that style, only worse. I will never buy this again, there are too many better beers out there.

TastyTaste, Dec 26, 2004
Photo of tmars13
2/5  rDev -40.3%

tmars13, Aug 21, 2012
Photo of GMB
2.15/5  rDev -35.8%

Good Czech Pilsners are difficult to produce and even more difficult to come by. Staropramen isn't one of them.

A standard pour yields a standard Pilsner body: light amber body, slightly thin, gassy head. A few scattered bubbles slowly make their way to the top.

The nose is fine, though there is a tinniness in it that can't be ignored.

The tinniness ruins the beer's taste. There are some good things going on here: The malt aroma is nice, and the bittering hops would balance it well if the tinny taste, probably yeast-produced, weren't getting in the way. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the aftertaste, in which the subtle, crisp hoppy flavors come through. Darn.

Czech Pilsners are among my favorite styles of beer. I wish that more of ones that are available in my area did justice to the style.

GMB, Oct 04, 2012
Photo of Drew966
2.15/5  rDev -35.8%

Staropramen Lager pours a light orange with a fluffy white head from a green eleven point two ounce bottle. Aroma is on the skunky side, which I suspect is intentional rather than being light damage. Skunky hops and medicinal herb flavors predominate. Not my cup of tea, or beer as the case may be. Makes you wonder how it tastes fresh from the brewery (like I said though, I think the skunk may be an intentional part of the beer profile), but as sampled I cannot recommend trying this beer.

Drew966, Jul 19, 2006
Photo of Hojaminbag
2.23/5  rDev -33.4%

Starapromen lager is a pale shade of yellow that is completely clear. The white head has good retention and OK lacing.

The aroma has some lemongrass, pale malt and butter.

I could certainly be wrong, but there are a lots of buttery flavors that make me think there is a dicetyl problem with this beer. Underneath the butter a light bitterness and lemongrass from the hops come through, as well as pale malts.

No complaints about the mouthfeel; smooth with fairly active carbonation.

I love a good Czech pils, and when I see them on-tap I almost always order them. This one, however, had something wrong with it.

Hojaminbag, Jan 23, 2012
Photo of prokopt2
2.25/5  rDev -32.8%

prokopt2, May 24, 2014
Photo of timmy2b
2.25/5  rDev -32.8%

timmy2b, Jul 01, 2014
Photo of ZEB89
2.25/5  rDev -32.8%

ZEB89, Mar 15, 2014
Photo of nickss
2.3/5  rDev -31.3%

Straw yellow with a 2" ultra-chunky head. Mounds of lacing frolic on the glass.

Light aroma with a touch of malt and hops, neither making a strong presence. Moderately yeasty and grassy.

Light, semi-bitter flavour. DMS/corn makes its presence known. Very macro-esque... bleh.

Ultra thin with moderate carbonation.

Moderately drinkable, but just flat out disappointing. Was hoping for more, being that I'm drinking this here in its home city.

nickss, May 28, 2006
Photo of mralphabet
2.33/5  rDev -30.4%

12 oz bottle poured into pint glass

A: Poured a dark copper color with a good fingers worth of head that settles to a thin layer with no lacing to speak of.

S: Little skunk here... very grassy with a little lemon zest mixed in.

T: Little flat on flavor.. There is skunk here... pretty grassy here with touches of graininess but not much else here.

M: Pretty crisp and well carbonated but pretty flat over all

O: Not very pilsner like to me... A little more Euro lager for my taste. Not bad if you a thirsty.

mralphabet, Nov 26, 2012
Photo of RoyalT
2.38/5  rDev -29%

Appearance – Light yellow in color with a tinge of orange and a smallish head.

Smell – Light citrusy hops with some sweetish malts that felt off-style.

Taste – The big citrus and sweet, orangish malt made this one off-style.

Mouthfeel – This was light-bodied, which is OK, but the nice, fluffy mouthfeel was absent.

Sinkability – This one didn’t cut the mustard.

RoyalT, Jan 12, 2004
Photo of yesyouam
2.38/5  rDev -29%

Staropramen Premium Lager is sparkling, clear and golden with a thin, creamy, blotchy white head that leaves outstanding lacing. It has a funky aroma, fruity and grassy. It's pretty light bodied and quite smooth with a little grit in the finish. There's not much flavor at all-- just a touch of funk and a lightly bitter finish. It has a lingering herbal bitterness. This doesn't taste that great, but it goes down smoothly. The lingering bitterness lets me know I'm drinking beer.

yesyouam, Mar 02, 2011
Photo of JustinBathurst
2.4/5  rDev -28.4%

Poured a light amber gold with a 1 cm head that vanished without a trace.

Skunked. Another rotten vegetable smell is overwhelming everything under the skunk. Underneath that, a slight bread loaf appeared.

Mouthfeel was crisp and light.

Taste was a wave of bitter, medium at first, then it overpowers all. Warms over the tongue without any sweetness. I think this lacks definition, personally.

This is trying really hard to be average. As you drink it, it doesn't even try to flatter itself. Tastes too unbalanced for me. Don't think I'll have another.

JustinBathurst, Jan 10, 2004
Photo of udubdawg
2.4/5  rDev -28.4%

Pours bright gold, excellent clarity, sizeable white cap and better than decent retention.

Bare whiff of skunkiness. What I mostly get is DMS, very light pale malt, and a vague sweetness - do they use adjuncts? No hop aroma that I can be sure of, and definitely nothing I'd call Saaz-y.
As a Czech pils, this is a subpar aroma, but as a Euro Lager it is at least average if not higher...

Flavor is a step down. Again rather sweet, with almost no bitterness to balance. No diacetyl, pretty clean. Where's the richness of the malt flavor?

Medium body. Medium/low carbonation could be a bit higher to make up for the lack of malt richness and severe lack of hops for the style. Not particularly drinkable, though on a hot day (like today) I'd have no trouble finishing one.

udubdawg, Jun 04, 2010
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Staropramen Lager from Pivovary Staropramen
77 out of 100 based on 647 ratings.