1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Bell Ringer - RJ Rockers Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Bell RingerBell Ringer

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
84
good

360 Ratings
THE BROS
89
very good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 360
Reviews: 171
rAvg: 3.72
pDev: 12.1%
Wants: 6
Gots: 9 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
RJ Rockers Brewing Company visit their website
South Carolina, United States

Style | ABV
American Strong Ale |  8.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Our high gravity offering weighs in at 8.5% ABV and is delightfully loaded with malt and hops. This is an ale worthy of your sturdiest goblet or most treasured stein. Ring it!

(Beer added by: mikesgroove on 08-16-2007)
View: Beers (32) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Bell Ringer Alström Bros
Ratings: 360 | Reviews: 171 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Beer4Baltimore
Beer4Baltimore

Maryland

4/5  rDev +7.5%

11-24-2011 16:12:42 | More by Beer4Baltimore
Photo of jmdrpi
jmdrpi

Pennsylvania

3.75/5  rDev +0.8%

11-23-2011 04:19:32 | More by jmdrpi
Photo of koo10t
koo10t

Virginia

4/5  rDev +7.5%

11-19-2011 17:42:13 | More by koo10t
Photo of bacher468
bacher468

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -19.4%

11-19-2011 13:41:44 | More by bacher468
Photo of UnderPressure
UnderPressure

South Carolina

3.28/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Extremely hazy copper color. 1/2 finger head melts quickly.

Pretty nice malty caramel aroma.

Roasted malt and caramel flavor. Slight alcohol. Not a huge bitterness level, but enough to give a balance.

Smooth, medium thick bodied mouthfeel with a dry, slightly bitter finish. Good, but a little dry for my taste.

Overall, this beer is pretty good. Nothing incredibly special. If there was a style called "Imperial Amber", this would be it.

Serving type: bottle

11-13-2011 14:16:58 | More by UnderPressure
Photo of FeDUBBELFIST
FeDUBBELFIST

Pennsylvania

3.55/5  rDev -4.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

12oz bottle to snifter. 2003 vintage (+/- 8 years old at time of review.) Thanks to berpwillie for leaving this one behind.

A: In a widemouth snifter, a small 1 finger head is produced on a pour with above average vigor. Light brown in color. Nice retention. The body is a medium dark amber orange color and completely opaque. A light dusting of sediment has settled to the bottom of the glass. Decent amount of randomly slung strings of lace.

S: Malt forward with aromas of bread and strongly toasted caramel. Hop presence is faded, but hints of orange and grapefruit can be picked out amongst the malty backdrop.

T: Aging has created very smooth and mellow flavors as well as notes of paper and toffee. Moderately oxidized as expected. Malts provide a substantial up front sweetness while the back end of the palate provides a quick shot of much needed bitterness for balance.

M: Medium to full body with an average amount of fizzy carbonation. Well suited for a beer of this strength and flavor profile.

D: Drinks surprisingly well given the age.

Serving type: bottle

10-22-2011 11:37:40 | More by FeDUBBELFIST
Photo of socon67
socon67

New York

4.03/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

A - Copper color with solid foam retention. Cloudy.

S - I smell some vanilla, maybe a bit of cinnamon, and english malt.

T - Good malty flavor that has a hearty bit of spice and ends with a slightly boozy bite.

M - Very well balanced for the style. Incfedibly smooth and doesn't feel nearly as ptoent as it is. Impressive!

O - I would try this again. A strng ale that is actually one you could have a few of.

Serving type: bottle

10-10-2011 00:13:56 | More by socon67
Photo of startreker
startreker

North Carolina

4.78/5  rDev +28.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 4.5

Found this at a local grocery store. So I had to give it a try, being that its a localy made microbrew.

Nice orange beige color, that poured up thick with a velvety head. Not much in the way of lacing, but has decent head retention.

Very nice aroma, hints of vanilla and caramel to be sure.

The taste reminds me of a fine congnac, something to be sipped and savored. Very malty, but not at all overly sweet. The hops seems to balance out the sweet malt wonderfuly, with a finish that is neither to bitter, nor to sweet.

Mouthfeel is very full and satisfying, velvety smooth as it hits the back of my toungue.

Overall, one of the best brews to ever grace my palate. Not a beer to be guzzled down by anymeans, as it does have a much higher alcohol content then your standard beer.

It would be a disgrace to simply chug down such an outstanding brew. Savor this beer slowly and enjoy!!

Serving type: bottle

09-28-2011 01:57:09 | More by startreker
Photo of HoosierInOhio
HoosierInOhio

Ohio

3.23/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

12 oz bottle no bottle date.

A - Opaque, cloudy amber/tan, thin head dissipates quickly.

S - Tough read, warming helps a little. Caramel for sure, some vanilla maybe? Some hops as well but caramel prevails.

T - Similar to the nose but thin. Not much body at all. Vanilla notes, caramel, slight hoppy-ness but just very thin. Maybe its too old? Not sure if thats how its supposed to be?

M - Thin and carbonated, sweet aftertaste

O - Not sure, taste is pretty good, reminds me of Hairy Eyeball but just no body. Maybe my bottle was old or is this by design?

Serving type: bottle

09-27-2011 02:16:17 | More by HoosierInOhio
Photo of chinchill
chinchill

South Carolina

3.95/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75

12 oz bottle served in a pint glass. No indication of beer style on the label. Were it just a bit less sweet, I'd guess DIPA.

A - Pours a hazy orange-amber color with a modest tan head that has great retention and leaves some lacing.

S - Has a sweet and fruity (spicy citrus) aroma with the high ABV fairly well hidden. Sweet malt base.

T - Sweet and malty up front with hints of orange hard candy. Plenty of hops in there too, athough more might be better given the heavy sweetness. Rather than balancing nicely, the sweetness and bitterness seem to battle each other with the early dominance of sweetness eventually losing out to hop bitterness in the bittersweet finish. Alcohol is hidden except in a slight warming sensation and a very mild tongue burn.

M: Full body with very good carbonation. Sticky. No ill effects of the alcohol.

O: A bold and flavorful beer that is reminiscent of Bell's Hopslam, albeit much sweeter and less finely crafted. In fact, my main reservation about this beer is that it seemed a bit roughly put together, like a very good homebrew. Some of that impression comes from the high levels of both sweetness and bitterness, with the bitter losing out until the aftertaste. It also lacks the complexity of a world class brew. Still, as a local brew it is about about half the price of Hopslam. Worth a try, for sure.

Serving type: bottle

09-20-2011 01:25:06 | More by chinchill
Photo of DaveBlack
DaveBlack

Virginia

4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Pours a hazy, burnt orange/amber color with a good 2 finger tannish head, which is thick and foamy and has a nice long retention and but doesn't leave behind much in the way of lacing.

S: Big aroma on this beer. Deep, rich malty smell, with very much of a candy sweetness to it. I keep thinking candied orange slices... Some pine comes through as well as a slight hint of the alcohol.

T: A nice beer: sweet and malty up front with that same candy sweetness from the aroma. Piney hops come through big on the flavor too, balancing out the sweetness, and reminding me again of orange gummy candy. The hops keep the beer from being cloying. Alcohol is nowhere to be seen except in a slight back-of-the-throat warming sensation.

M: Medium-heavy body with lots of little carbonation bubbles. slightly sticky but finishes dry and bitter.

O: A tasty beer. I found it in a "make your own sixer" area and picked it up. First time I've ever seen it, but definitely worth a look. I don't know that I would be quick to drink more than one or two of these, because even with the hops the sweetness builds at the back of the throat.

Serving type: bottle

09-06-2011 22:35:46 | More by DaveBlack
Photo of devilben02
devilben02

North Carolina

3.5/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep rusty amber color, with a thick, foamy, sticky eggshell white head. It smells like a pine forest, needles, branches, and all, with a little boozy character throughout. In the flavor, all of that pine is contrasted by big burnt caramel character. The texture is fine but average. In one sense, this beer provides the bold yet reasonably balanced flavor profile of a decent barleywine with a slightly lower alcohol content. On the other hand, this beer tastes like a barleywine despite its (comparatively) lower ABV, and it is never a good thing for a beer to taste boozier than it is. In the end, though, the beer was enjoyed, which is good.

Serving type: bottle

08-31-2011 04:50:16 | More by devilben02
Photo of carterbt
carterbt

Virginia

3.35/5  rDev -9.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - A really nice copper orange color. Tight head with good retention.

S - Mostly malt - Light hops, light alcohol

T - Initially malt with some sweetness. Hops hit mid-palate, but balance very nicely with the malt. Finish is nicely balanced. Alcohol is pretty well hidden.

M - Pretty typical for the style. Not bad at all.

O - A pretty good beer. Glad to see the SC beer scene is still heading in the right direction.

Serving type: bottle

08-02-2011 03:56:46 | More by carterbt
Photo of BeerBeatnik
BeerBeatnik

North Carolina

2.85/5  rDev -23.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a bottle into a non-iced pint glass. Pours a pleasant-looking bright light amber with a pretty good sized foam head. Probably a majority of the beer is made with 2-row grain without a large hop bill. Not a IPA. Some dark notes. Tastes slightly malty. Carbonated okay with a mouthfeel.

Serving type: bottle

07-19-2011 19:56:26 | More by BeerBeatnik
Photo of sendsilk
sendsilk

Florida

3.78/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Picked this up while on vacation in NC. Part of a mixed 6 pack of local beers that I have never tried.

Let me start by saying that I have never even HEARD of this beer before and I did not look at any ratings on it. TBH, I don't even really know the style that it is. With that in mind I will pour and review as an unknown right now:

Pours a pretty murky amber/dark orange color. 1/2" head dissipates quickly leaving some small lacing on the glass. Smells somewhat citrusy, I can almost smell orange blossoms in it. Smells pretty nice actually, much better than the appearance. Tastes pretty malty and bready and somewhat sweet. I can make out those orange blossom/honey flavors. This is not bad at all. Maybe a little maltier than I would like, but well balanced with the exception of them malt sweetness. Solid, almost thick, mouthfeel.

O- Glad I picked this up and tried it. I'm not going to seek out another one, but it's not bad.

EDIT- After reading more about the beer, I realize it's 8.5% ABV and the bottles claims it's nicely hopped, I don't find any outstanding hops to speak of in the flavor.

Serving type: bottle

07-18-2011 20:35:13 | More by sendsilk
Photo of PatLarsen
PatLarsen

South Carolina

3/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Very cloudy copper coloured body with an orange glow and a thin-ish tan head. Aroma of strong malt, alcohol, caramel, pit fruits. Malty flavour with not much behind the initial taste showing some alcohol, a bit of pit fruits and not much else really. Aftertaste shows a little bit of hops (I'm pushing the envelope here to find something positive) and a tiny bit of pit fruits and almost nothing else. Overall, a pretty uninteresting beer - I was expecting much more from the taste, but this one is very weak in the flavour - the look and smell are okay, but there is nothing at all to this beer. I think I've grown tired of giving RJ Rockers my money to be uninspired by their work. It's almost as if they throw 3 ingredients in and a little hops, and call it a day on all their stuff.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2011 23:31:24 | More by PatLarsen
Photo of AmericanGothic
AmericanGothic

Iowa

3.73/5  rDev +0.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12 oz bottle into a Sam Adams pint.

A: Pours a murky golden amber with one finger of cream-colored head. Good retention and lace.

S: Sweet caramel aromas predominate, slight hint of citrus hops.

T: Leads with the caramels notes and ends with a bit of piney, celery seed bitterness. As the beer warms, alcohol emerges a bit on the finish, and also a little butterscotch.

M: Not too heavy, pretty smooth and a bit creamy.

O: Not a bad beer, but a little understated overall. Wouldn't mind having another. Worth a try.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2011 22:22:04 | More by AmericanGothic
Photo of sulldaddy
sulldaddy

Connecticut

3.75/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Sampling a room temp bottle poured into a tumbler due to splitting with my brother.
The beer pours a clear copper hue with minimal bleached white head that fades to nothing quickly.
The aroma is some caramel and toffee with a bit of dry bakers chocolate and a little chalky. There are some earthy hops and maybe a little bit of grass.
The first sip reveals an average to mild body and very fine spacious carbonation.
The flavor is similar to the nose with some caramel and a bit of general malt sweetness but it rolls to dry and slightly bitter hops that are a little bitey on the finish but dont punch you in the face, There isnt any warming from the booze and the beer is extremely easy to drink with this kind of ABV. Could be a dangerous brew and is well crafted. The flavor profile isnt robust, where a little more beefiness would improve the beer in my opinion.
I am glad I tried this one and would drink it again if offered, but not sure I would chase after the beer in a trade, etc.

Serving type: bottle

07-10-2011 00:10:56 | More by sulldaddy
Photo of SFrankBrew
SFrankBrew

South Carolina

2.78/5  rDev -25.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

From notes: 12 oz Bottle. On sale -- should have known to avoid right there. Pours a cloudy orangish color with a finger nail thick white head. Aroma is sweet malts, caramel, no hops, fruit and brown sugar. Taste is malt, malt, bread, malt again, caramel, and a little more malt. No hops to speak of. The malt kind of beats the beejeezus out of the hops. I have tried a number of RJ Rockers brews now and they are pretty much all super average, boring beers.

Serving type: bottle

07-05-2011 19:44:33 | More by SFrankBrew
Photo of EJ6759
EJ6759

South Carolina

3/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

I like to take a brewery completely in as far as profile, and RJ Rockers doesn't stack up for me. This latest offering pours with very thick orange color. Lots of floaties in this beer. White head that doesn't remain around. Aroma is sugary sweet with no hops to think of, brown sugar and sweet bread. Flavor is bitter, sharp alcohol. Sweet sugar and bread. Finish is boozy. Slightly sweet but mainly distasteful. Steer clear.

Serving type: bottle

06-20-2011 23:21:14 | More by EJ6759
Photo of drabmuh
drabmuh

Maryland

3.48/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Served in a wine glass. Beer is copper with a tiny white head, some lacing, low carbonation, looks fine.

Boozy and mildly vanilla and oaky in the nose. Some caramel and sweet malt too.

Beer is strong, hot, and boozy, some sweetness and caramel. The beer is sweet throughout with a moderate bitterness at the back of the mouth. Strong throughout. Not great but not bad either.

Serving type: bottle

06-17-2011 17:54:27 | More by drabmuh
Photo of Thorpe429
Thorpe429

Illinois

2.95/5  rDev -20.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

From the bottle at SAVOR 2011. Served in a goblet.

Pours a medium copper color with a small white head. Sparse lacing on the way down. The nose brings some caramel malt and quite a bit of booze. Lightly-sweet bread in the background. The flavor has a bit of booze with some fairly-strong caramel notes. Sugary malt throughout. Medium body with a bitter and slightly-dry finish. Odd beer. Never came together.

Serving type: bottle

06-10-2011 13:24:21 | More by Thorpe429
Photo of Yagman3000
Yagman3000

New York

3.53/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance is one of its better aspects. Orange brown with a half finger head that remains intact throughout.

Very little smell. Almost surprised by it's lack thereof. Faint malty scent with no hops.

Has a malty caramelish taste with pacifically no hop bitterness to speak of. Boozy taste as well. Abv comes through.

Mouthfeel is thick and creamy.

Overall this might be a bellringer with some booziness but not too impresses with flavor. Wish it was more balanced with some hops.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2011 23:30:30 | More by Yagman3000
Photo of MayLattimore
MayLattimore

North Carolina

3/5  rDev -19.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Okay, I'm a little confused by this beer. It says American Strong Ale and then it says its an Imperial ESB. Clearly, this beer has an identity crisis going on. For me it was super malty. There were no hops to really speak of. While you could get that it was pretty high in the alcohol value - that's all there is to this beer. Malt and alcohol. The appearance had the look of a ESB, I guess. There was no real smell other than dominating malt. The taste was a bit boring. Just a malty carmel. Again, a bit boring. Not all that impressed so far with RJ Rockers.

Serving type: bottle

05-11-2011 21:13:51 | More by MayLattimore
Photo of nrbw23
nrbw23

Ohio

3.68/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- Pours a hazy orangeish copper color with a nice off white head. Head has good retention and leaves quite a bit of lacing.

S- Smell is pretty tame. A bit of citrus hops, a touch of roasted and caramel malts. Maybe a bit of grains and toffee.

T- Lots of hop flavors, spicy, citrus, and grassy. Sweet caramel malts, a bit of an alcohol burn too.

M- Fuller side of medium and nice carbonation.

O- Not too bad at all. Surprised by the Imperial ESB would of never guessed that.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2011 20:56:31 | More by nrbw23
Bell Ringer from RJ Rockers Brewing Company
84 out of 100 based on 360 ratings.