1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) - Pabst Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR)Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

4,352 Ratings
THE BROS
84
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 4,352
Reviews: 1,506
rAvg: 2.94
pDev: 24.83%
Wants: 30
Gots: 344 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Pabst Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.74% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-24-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) Alström Bros
Ratings: 4,352 | Reviews: 1,506 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of KTCamm
3.28/5  rDev +11.6%

PBR me ASAP!

Ok, so I bit on the $2 can at a local burger bar. I won't work through the five-tier rating system here, and will just say, for what you are paying, this is an honest beer.

Drinks very smooth, a little watery, not a whole lot going on.

Beats the hell out of Bud, Miller, Coors any day.

Very refreshing on a summer day, I know from experience.

KTCamm, Feb 09, 2009
Photo of Thomajt
2.93/5  rDev -0.3%

Who can honestly say this is their favorite beer?

I can say that this one is a must when is seen on the $1 beer menu at the local bar.

Taste is similar to most cheap beers. Very light, easy to drink more than you should. Nothing too great, but would take a blue ribbon over a bud light any day.

Thomajt, Feb 08, 2009
Photo of mdwalsh
4.1/5  rDev +39.5%

This is our everlasting go to beer. Throughout late highschool and college, a trip home meant a 6er of something nice and a 30 of PBR with the guys.

PBR has exactly what you want in a crappy American Adjunct beer. There is no aftertaste like you get in Bud and Coors, and not as gassy afterwards as Budlight, and not at filling as MGD. Plus the price is unbeatable.

PBR is a drinking to drink beer, and nothing else. But hey, we're supposed to reveiw these things for what they are, not what we want them to be. Do you complain when an IPA tastes like hops?

mdwalsh, Feb 04, 2009
Photo of joshuadlight
2.93/5  rDev -0.3%

16 oz. tall boy to bring out the redneck in me.

I drank this sitting in a hot tub at my hotel after a long day of skiing. I didn't pour it from the can, but looking in the mouth showed me what I already knew. This beer is about as clear yellow as it gets. The smell is grainy and not appealing. The taste isn't much better, metallic (like licking tin) but not so much so that it was offensive. Like many beers of the type, it was loaded with carbonation that stings the tongue and covers some of the lack of flavor. Its made to be drinkable, and it probably wouldn't be tough to spend a whole night knocking these back.

joshuadlight, Feb 02, 2009
Photo of therica
3.5/5  rDev +19%

A= Pours a very yellow-yellow color with hardly any head despite the carbonation. If you even want to see head, you'll have to pour full-blast from some height, which would cause most beers to foam entirely out of the glass after only a small portion of the liquid.

S= Buttered corn, slight bready malts.

T= definitely the distinctly American Corn Beer taste, lacks the usual flat-dusty-bitter taste of many macro's though. Modestly sweet but balanced overall. If you keep thinking "this is American Corn Beer" as you drink it, you'll probably appreciate it better than trying to compare it to any sort of German or US-Micro lager.

M= fine aftertaste, mild sweetness, slight hops hint, clean.

D= any beer-fanatic could survive happily with PBR if they were stranded on a remote island and this was the only beer available. I say that kindly-- it's not a bad standard-stock inexpensive beer for basic swilling or dining. I can't argue when I just bought a 24-bottle case for $12 in January 2009.

therica, Jan 31, 2009
Photo of olmatty
3/5  rDev +2%

Appearance- Pours a bright white smooth looking one finger head with poor retention, beer is light straw colored.

Smell- Faint aroma of malts and very faint hops

Taste- Very light maltiness, dry with a bit of sourness in the malts, hops are not very apparent.

Mouthfeel- Thin, crisp and fizzy

Drinkability- Well, one thing you can say for PBR is that it's drinkable, it's downright sessionable. This is a very light beer with no unpleasant adjunct flavors. Among the better American pils lagers, approximately on par with Miller High Life.

olmatty, Jan 30, 2009
Photo of 1fastz28
2.53/5  rDev -13.9%

has a nice pure golden color to it but no foam at all. smell is of corn and water very little if any real malt or hop presence..
taste is pretty boring it isnt bad just a generic lager without alot to it.overall not a real exciting or different beer but not a bad one

1fastz28, Jan 30, 2009
Photo of KieranValla
3.23/5  rDev +9.9%

Poured from a 16 oz can into a pint glass.

A - A slight head on the beer that dissipated rather quickly. Slight lacing remained throughout. A good amount of carbonation present throughout tasting. A pale yellow with not much body.

S - Rice or wheat.

T - Somewhat plain. A bit bitter and some grassiness.

M - Fairly thin. Carbonation helps the overall feel, although sometimes I don't like the feel of carbonation on my tongue.

D - Goes down smooth. A good gulping beer or to wash down a meal with.

A mediocre brew, but a standard of mine, especially in this economy. You can get 12 oz cans at two for a dollar at some bars. That's what I call the "perfect date" beer.

KieranValla, Jan 29, 2009
Photo of TheCrane
4.3/5  rDev +46.3%

This review is based on the style descriptions of the BJCP for Standard American Lager (1B), rather than the American Adjunct Lager of BA. In my humble opinion the latter carries a subjective, borderline elitist and certainly negative connotation.

A: Served at room temp (68 F) from a 12 oz glass bottle with no expiration/production date. Pours a pale golden color with a bright white, soda pop-like head that quickly settles to a thin white foam.

S: The aroma is surprisingly lively. A faint hint of pilsner malt and corn is garnished by an appropriately light, spicy hop bouquet.

T: The malt profile is delicate and mildly sweet. This is contrasted by adequate hop bitterness and some carbonic bite. Hop flavor is evident and spicy, however light.

M: Medium-light bodied and fairly dry. High carbonation gives an illusion of substance that fades quickly after swallowing.

D: Very refreshing, even at room temp. Could (and have) drink quarts of this.

Overall, this is as good as American standards get. Freshness definitely matters here; as hop character will quickly fade and give way to corn the typical BMC profile. When fresh and served at a reasonable temp (not half frozen), this beer exemplifies the style and offers a thirst quenching, delicate beer that can entertain the most experienced palate.

TheCrane, Jan 28, 2009
Photo of Rhynes2
2.42/5  rDev -17.7%

Nothing much to say about this brew. A very standard beer. Light flavor and light color. Not much of a head to speak of either. Being cheap is probably the best quality of this beer. If you're looking for quality, look elsewhere. Not bad for parties though.

Rhynes2, Jan 24, 2009
Photo of BierFan
3.03/5  rDev +3.1%

Poured from a 24 ounce can into a pint glass.

Appearance: A hard pour produced a large white head. Surprisingly good head retention and good lacing. Light carbonation. Crystal clear and very pale yellow. I think this is fairly decent for the style.

Smell: Rice.

Taste: More rice. This is a beer for people that don't like beer. Very similar to Bud Light.

Mouthfeel: Watery and thin. It's hard to count that against PBR, though, as a thin mouthfeel is a trademark of the style.

BierFan, Jan 24, 2009
Photo of CityBoy1986
3.63/5  rDev +23.5%

Poured from a 12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

The appearance is, as expected, a golden yellow with a thin, rapidly dissapating head. Lacing is minimal.

The smell is sweetness, some wheat and not much else. The taste is more of the same, but there is a metallic flavour on the finish (even out of the bottle).

Mouthfeel is thin and watery with a high amount of carbonation, though not too high for the style. Drinkability is high; I have finished a twelve pack in two days.

PBR isn't one of the best beers in the world, but it is one of the best for its style. It is inoffensive and easy to drink.

CityBoy1986, Jan 23, 2009
Photo of JayNH
4.25/5  rDev +44.6%

A- Pours a crystal clear straw with a large white foamy head.

S- A pleasant sweet dry maltiness.

T- A bland but sweet maltiness. A faint hint of balancing hops.

M- smooth, good body for this style. Carbonation is just right.

D- excellent, this is one of the better representations of the style.

JayNH, Jan 22, 2009
Photo of nc41
2.75/5  rDev -6.5%

I saw this on the recent tastings and couldn't resist. The perfect beer for broke college students. It also works well as a chugger after cutting the grass on a hot summer day. Obviously light, no head to speak of, and any hops present are in such small amounts they meet the requirement for legally being able to say there's hops in it. As average as it is it's still better than Budweiser or Miller, Coors etc.

It fills a void.

nc41, Jan 22, 2009
Photo of GilGarp
1.88/5  rDev -36.1%

Picked up a 24oz. can to do some brats and thought I might as well review some.

It should be noted this is from a grocery store in Colorado so it is legally not to exceed 3.2% alcohol by weight. Strange law in these parts...

Pours into a pint glass with lots of white head. The color is almost white as well. The palest yellow beer I've ever seen that wasn't labeled 'light' or Lite. Perfect clarity.

Aroma is sweet and grainy in a corn and rice kind of way. Smells almost stale even though the can is fresh.

Taste is an instant throw-back to college when we drank whatever was available and/or cheapest. Thin, light, almost tasteless. Slightly sweet and citrusy but even those qualities are barely there.

Mouthfeel is very thin. As we used to say, like having sex in a canoe...

Drinkability would be ok if I was still in college but I've moved on and this one doesn't cut it.

GilGarp, Jan 22, 2009
Photo of raoulduke37
2.85/5  rDev -3.1%

I feel I owe a lot to this beer if only for the fact that it has brought me so many good times in my sometimes turbulent youth when my ungovernable instincts (sometimes Pabst-induced)led me to some riotous good times. Nothing is exceptional about this beer except its drinkability. You could drink ten of these and still talk to you friends about how cool ELO is (coherently). So again, all you 21-24 year olds, enjoy this one in your poverty-ridden youth. It will only last until you discover a better tasting cheap beer. Like Schlitz.

raoulduke37, Jan 20, 2009
Photo of lolwut
2.17/5  rDev -26.2%

As of this post, I'm still just starting off here at BA, and I figure it won't hurt to take on a simple beer without much to be said about it. So here it goes.

The appearance suggests that the brewers assumed it would be drank from the can or a red Solo cup, as it is a sickly, pale, clear yellow, without any (lasting) head. There's no use in pausing to admire this beer.

Not much point in sticking your nose in it either, unless you've never smelled a generic American lager before, and might just becurious (spoiler: it's adjuncts, corn).

It's maltiness and cooorn. There may be more grains than some other macros. Some dryness at the end.

It's clean and fizzy and thin and you can slam it down without thinking about it-- so long as you don't actually think about it.

lolwut, Jan 18, 2009
Photo of cagocubs
3.23/5  rDev +9.9%

One of my favorite "bowling alley beers". I could pound these back like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino...

A: Pours a yellowgold color with very little head retention or lacing.

S: The smell is weak, but better than other macro lagers. Slight smell of hop but the usual macro lager skunk is present.

T: Some grain/malt and some corn taste.

M/D: Very drinkable especially when you only have the selection of macro lagers.

cagocubs, Jan 17, 2009
Photo of mirish72
3.2/5  rDev +8.8%

Sometimes a beer is what it is.

If you are drinking PBR than you are choosing to enjoy one of America's great macro brews, and all that it entails, the good and the kinda skunky.

It doesn't taste great, doesn't smell great and doesn't look like anything special. That being said it is easy to drink and no better or worse than most macro brewed beers, except it tends to be much cheaper. I also think it a bit better tasting than other retro macro brews such as Schaeffer, Stroh's or Schiltz.

The main problem with PBR is, if you drink it you get tagged with the ironic hipster label. But is isn't a bad beer to drink when you want to drink a lot of them.

I'll pick it up every once in a while to have in the fridge. I think of it as a Lawnmowing Beer", something you drink after you do stuff in the yard in the summertime.

mirish72, Jan 10, 2009
Photo of WakeandBake
3.15/5  rDev +7.1%

A pale golden yellow pour with a fizzy white head.Aroma is slight skunk,and yes a kiss of hops. Flavor is pretty plain and watery.Some dry grain,corn,maybe come hops. Thin crisp mouthfeel.Tward the end of the glass I get some kind of a cardboard flavor. Drinkable but not my favorite.

WakeandBake, Jan 09, 2009
Photo of Wisconsin
3.15/5  rDev +7.1%

A - Clear body with no cloudiness at all. There is some slight carbonation and a one and a half finger head that quickly fades to a lace. Overall average look.

S - Malts and grains.

T - Tastes like it smells with a faint sweetness that is a pleasant surprise. Overall it is really smooth throughout. The grains and malts are balanced well.

M - Smooth throughout. No flavor really stands out in this beer.

D - Very easy to drink. This one of the best 'cheap' beers to get.

Wisconsin, Jan 08, 2009
Photo of noknife83
3.13/5  rDev +6.5%

A very decent beer for that of an American Lager, which is saying something. Far better then Bud, Miller, or Coors. Of the three I think it tastes most like Bud, without the rice flavor coming through. Slight copper taste comes through but not unpleasant. Lots of Co2, but a little lacking on the lace. Good beer to pair with a white fish, also goes nice with a bbq pulled pork sandwich. All in all a very decent beer.

noknife83, Jan 05, 2009
Photo of brewbucker
3.6/5  rDev +22.4%

I do not ever remember having this beer. I must have when I was just a young lad but I sure don't remember it.

Pours a light golden with a faint white head. Moderate carbonation. Aroma is your basic light corn, malt and wheat. Hints of citrus. Flavor is tart and crisp with more corn and light malt and a touch of caramel. Actually after many big stouts and IPA's this is a nice change.

brewbucker, Jan 02, 2009
Photo of chris217
3.9/5  rDev +32.7%

Good ole' Pabst Blue Ribbon. One of my favorite after work, sit on the couch and zone out brews. Yea, yea, I know there's much better choices out there, but this is the beer I remember my Dad and Grandad drinking when I was kid.

Poured out of a 12oz can into a pint glass.

Color is pale yellow, with about two fingers of head that quickly disappears.

Smell is that of a typical macro, kinda hay like.

The taste is almost sweet at first, but then finishes off smooth and crisp, with very clean aftertaste. It doesn't have that metallic aftertaste like some other macros I've had. Certainly better than BMC.

A very sessionable beer. PBR always has a spot in my fridge when I want to keep it simple.

chris217, Dec 27, 2008
Photo of likethetaste
3.7/5  rDev +25.9%

Ok, this is by far the best lager of the big American Macro breweries! It looks and taste like your average American mass produced Lager, but it is the best of all the Major Macro Lagers out there.

I have no problem buying this beer and recommending it to anyone for just a simple good tasting Macro beer.

likethetaste, Dec 11, 2008
Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) from Pabst Brewing Company
68 out of 100 based on 4,352 ratings.