1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) - Pabst Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR)Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
68
poor

4,488 Ratings
THE BROS
84
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 4,488
Reviews: 1,524
rAvg: 2.94
pDev: 25.17%
Wants: 30
Gots: 398 | FT: 2
Brewed by:
Pabst Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.74% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-24-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) Alström Bros
Ratings: 4,488 | Reviews: 1,524 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of cproioi
2/5  rDev -32%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pale golden body that crystal clear and constant carbonation rising. It looks like any other American Macro Lager. The smell and taste are nothing to special either. The both are filled with corny adjuncts. The mouthfeel is paper thin and it goes down like water. Not the worse Beer I've had but not the best by a long shot.

cproioi, Aug 07, 2006
Photo of CrazyMike
3.43/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Nice golden appearance with a smell that's a bit corny and grainy.

Taste is dry and malty with nice corn hops. Slightly sour however. After taste is very clean and a bit sweet, very drinkable and refreshing.

This is a solid affordable beer, a bit boring compared to other Lagers with corn hops but still respectable.

CrazyMike, Aug 07, 2006
Photo of BEERchitect
3.03/5  rDev +3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

01-02-09
Revisited this beer last night as I enjoyed some chicken wings and watched the football games at the local B-dub's.

This beer is picking up the pace in the Central Kentucky area since the In-Bev purchase of Anheuser Busch. The bar manager's take is that a lot of his Budweiser clientelle is put off by the acquisition and have turned to this American classic instead.

I actually think that this is a better beer than Bud. It has equal amout of pilsner malt flavor, but maybe a bit more robust if using less adjuncts. This beer also veers away from the acetaldahyde and sulftery flavors of Bud. Ceaner, bolder, and fresher make me a beleiver.

07-31-06

Went to pick up some beers to take to the lake and finally took up the recommendation from Kmpitz2 and purchased a sixer for the trip. The good thing about the beer is that there is nothing wrong with it. The look is a crystal clear and hightly carbonated canary yellow. Could have better head retetion. The flavors are grain, adjuncts, and vegetable-like. Nice tones of green apples and a light lemon-zest. Very light and playful in the body, with a very clean finish. A little dry and a little watery, but it is to be expected. Though there are no real standout characters, the flaws are what you'd expect for the style. Not bad stuff.

BEERchitect, Jul 31, 2006
Photo of Poser
2.83/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

I'm actually fairly impressed with this, considering it's an American macro. I started drinking it because they sponsor the Birmingham Roller Derby team, which I'm somewhat involved in.

It has a decent taste and it's very drinkable. Slightly sour, of course, but it's better than you might expect. Also, it's generally cheaper at the bars. If you're needing cheap beer, try this over your usual Bud/ Miller/ Coors varieties.

Poser, Jul 23, 2006
Photo of SetarconeX
1.85/5  rDev -37.1%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Purchased a case of this after they started sponsoring NPR. I say a case, because this is one of those beers that, outside of a bar, you can't buy in quantities less than a dozen. Also, it's union made. I like that.

Looks like your average pils, with a head that lingers perhaps a tad longer than usual. Smell is a bit sour, with a dash of malt and a heaping shovel of the sulfuric mud from the retention pond around the corner. Tastes a bit sour, but thinner and more watery than the scent would have led me to expect.

Actually, this is a little icky. I think I'll avoid it in the future.

SetarconeX, Jul 17, 2006
Photo of HoustonTX
3.43/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - Pale yellow, streams of carbonation flow towards the top of the glass, light frothy head, and small traces of lacing.

S - Smell is ceral malts, and a bit of alchohol pokes through.

T - Taste for an American Macro lager is excellent. Clean malt flushes against the palate, then slight hop bitters pronounces itself halfway through. Ends with a crisp bitter taste. Quite refreshing.

M - Perfectly carbonated and light on the palate.

D - Very drinkable on a summer day.

Definitely one of the best American Macros. Nothing offensive about this beer at all, and much better than 90% of BMC offerings. Give this one a try.

HoustonTX, Jul 16, 2006
Photo of kdmorse
2.83/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Extremely pale straw color topped with some white head that quickly disappers. Sweet smell of white bread, sweet corn, and college. Very simple and bland tastes. Nothing stands out as good, but nothing stands out as offensive either. Mostly a sweet corny malt flavor. No hop taste, but they must be there because it finishes pretty clean. Very bubbly and light. Easy and fun to drink because of all the memories. Not great, but the price is right for a big night of drinking.

kdmorse, Jul 12, 2006
Photo of Elecid
3.18/5  rDev +8.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Hands-down the best beer for price that I've ever tried. I'd choose PBR over any other American Macro, and I'll drink 10 pints of this before 1 pint of Heineken, the most overpriced beer in the universe.
Before you completely discount this brew, try it on tap. Sure, it's no work of art, but it's also not Natty Ice.

A: Yellow. Small, quick-leaving head. Not as bad as some, but it reminds me of an asian beer.

S: Adjunct-y smell, but just enough hops to differentiate it from (say) Mickey's.

T: Surprisingly, better than most Macros, and I have a soft spot in my heart for this beer. I swear that it tastes twice as good on tap as it does from those large cans.

M: What you'd expect. Light, not as much carbonation as its price-peers, but not too little.

D: EXTREMELY High, but that's what you want from these things: get buzzed quick for cheap.


Blue Velvet (1986):

Frank Booth: What kind of beer do you like to drink, neighbor?
Jeffrey Beaumont: Heineken.
Frank Booth: Heineken? Fuck that shit! Pabst Blue Ribbon!

Elecid, Jul 10, 2006
Photo of BuckeyeNation
3.1/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This review is part of Macro Smackdown X, in which this can of Pabst Blue Ribbon will be going up against its brewery stablemate, Stroh's. PBR has the distinction of being the first beer I ever drank. The summer I was 13, my friend stole a can out of his dad's basement fridge. We rode our bikes up to the local Little League field and drank it in the dugout. I remember that I didn't think much of it then and I'm pretty sure that I haven't had it since. Decades later...

Perfectly clear yellow-gold, a lighter and brighter version of Stroh's. I like darker, richer looking macro lagers so I'll have to give a very slight edge to the other beer. The head is where this beer really shines though. It's bright white, lightly creamy and sticky enough to leave a respectable amount of watery, sudsy lace. Overall appearance edge to PBR.

I've smelled them both multiple times now and my conclusion is that they might as well be the same beer. In addition to the usual graininess of the malt, the hops have a mildly pleasant fruitiness to go along with their usual muskiness. I hope that I'm able to discern some difference on the palate.

There's very little difference between the flavor of the Stroh's and the flavor of this beer. I can tell that I'm drinking two different beers, but I'm not sure why they taste different. I think it comes down to the fact that the Stroh's is (very) slightly more sweet and the PBR is (very) slightly more hoppy. I like them equally however.

Again, there isn't a dime's worth of difference in terms of body/mouthfeel. There is, however, a nickel's worth of difference. The Pabst has an ever so slight edge in terms of heft and is slightly creamier as well. It's just enough to earn a better score.

Both Stroh's and PBR have come through with flying colors in the tenth iteration of the MacSmack series. It's a shame that there has to be a loser. By virtue of its superior head and slightly creamier mouthfeel, Pabst Blue Ribbon takes the much-coveted crown. Really though, either one of these venerable American beers would be a good choice for reliving the good old days of one's youth.

BuckeyeNation, Jul 01, 2006
Photo of tcayiajr
2.6/5  rDev -11.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Ah yes the good old PBR. It's been quite the staple of my College life always finding it's time honored place in our refrigerator. It's a good beer for a nice cold shower after a day in the muggy New Orleans summer heat. However, this is by no means a good beer. I do prefer a Pabst Blue Ribbon over any Bud/Miller product any day, but this is only when I'm too broke to get a quality craft brew. After having an assortment of Abita and Sierra Nevada Kegs over the last month or so we got a little pour and decided to toss in a $59 keg of PBR into the kegerator. The PBR pours a light pale yellow and has a repulsive smell. After a night of drinking I woke up to find some beer stains on my shirt which were emitting quite a repulsive odor. However, the beer does go down smooth and is very very easy to drink. PBR, not the best of beers, but maybe one of the best of the cheap domestics.

tcayiajr, Jun 27, 2006
Photo of edchicma
3.15/5  rDev +7.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a pale yellow with very little head. Smell has a faint grassy aroma. Taste likewise has a faint malt presence, a very light hop finish. Mouthfeel is just a tad creamy...not bad. Very easy to drink. This is a beer I wouldn't mind having during a round of golf or after mowing the lawn...better than bud.

edchicma, Jun 26, 2006
Photo of NeroFiddled
3/5  rDev +2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

After drinking gallons and gallons of this on draft and in cans and bottles, I'm finally ready to give my review.

It has a nice appearance with a crystal-clear golden body and short head of creamy bright white froth that holds well and even leaves some nice lace.

The aroma, however, is not quite a shining example of the brewer's art, displaying a little bit too much yeasty sulphur, and a distinctly adjunct-laden malt sweetness. There are some very minor hops present in the background, but they're not really discernable.

It's crisp in the mouth with a medium-light body and median carbonation.

The flavor is as might be expected - "generic". The yeasty sulphur at least helps to balance the sweetness of the malt, although there is a decent amount of bitterness there. I'd call it firm. Not unlike its aroma, the flavor is also hop-challenged, and there's more sulphur in the finish than anything floral, spicy, or grassy.

It is, however, fairly cheap; and a throwback to what I used to think beer tasted like as a kid. Recommended? Not really, but you can do far worse!

NeroFiddled, Jun 25, 2006
Photo of mattgert
3.65/5  rDev +24.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

I won't waste any time with how it pours, how it looks, how it smells. On those counts it is exactly like any American Macro out there. At $6 a 12-pack (bottles or cans) there is a simple way to review this beer: It is way above average for what it is. For an American Macro on the cheap it has flavor and there is nothing offending about it. It is better than most American Macros out there and even those pushing twice the price. For whatever reason I find the beer out of a can better than the bottle. A good lawnmower beer. If you can find Schlitz I would go for it instead but if not, Pabst is a good choice.

mattgert, Jun 25, 2006
Photo of Phatz
3.48/5  rDev +18.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

If you are a hands-down American Macro hater NOTE: this is a macro lager. That said, PBR is above average! If 3.0 what I expect average to be; this is a 3.35 beer. IMHO. Still out of hundreds of macro lagers few of them are even worth of a 3.0 IMO.

Appearance: This beer is what an average AMacro lager looks like. Light yellow with a fizzy white head.

Smell: Corn is at the front end of this otherwise clean aroma. Then there is a malty sweet undertone pleasant but (apropos for the style) it is quite minimal.

Taste: What a surprise! There *is* actually taste. It is smooth and sweet in the mouth with a (watery) corn and lightly sweet malt taste. I like the extra sugar. The aftertaste is clean and not unpleasant (like most AM lagers).

Mouthfeel: Crisp, well carbonated, and refreshing.

Drinkability: This simple beer is no fireworks; but it is very drinkable in a pinch. When out at the bar; this is certainly a sessionable option, far above BMC. It sits light in the stomach and is an acceptable brew all around.

Hope this is helpful.
Cheers!

Phatz, Jun 16, 2006
Photo of acrawf6
2.63/5  rDev -10.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours out an typical macro straw color with a small white head.

Smell. I think it is quite neutral. small nuttiness to it.

Taste. Small sweet maltiness to it. i get no hop presence. good for what it's going for. aftertaste is sweeter.

Mouthfeel is ok. decent carbonation, body is average for the style, light.

Overall, it's one of those cheaper beers worth getting over miller light (milwakee and all). For cheap beers, i'd prefer Shlitz anyday, but i know a lot of people loving this. good for them.

acrawf6, Jun 16, 2006
Photo of IntriqKen
3.8/5  rDev +29.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This is embarassing...I really enjoy this beer and will gladly buy it again.
Poured a slightly darker Macro yellow inthe glass with a nice one finger head that melted very quickly to a thin, thin outer ring lacing.
Aroma is lightly sweet malt and lightly hopped. (hops in a macro you can smell? Yep)
Taste is a surprise too...sweet malt...almost a MGD sweetness, but then followed with a genuine light hop bitterness or bite.
Finishes clean and crisp in the mouth with NOTHING unpleasant.
Just sort of makes you want to take another sip.
I was surprised....pleasantly
I feel guilty giving scores this high to an American Macro, but judging by style, I'm probably marking it low.

IntriqKen, Jun 15, 2006
Photo of palffyfan
2.42/5  rDev -17.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance - Pale yellow with a good deal of carbonation and a soapy head.

Smell - Smells like my Dove soap. Very processed, not what a beer should smell like.

Taste - Watered down, no taste in particular, but manageable (for a macro) because there's no offending taste.

Drinkability - Below average drinkability. There are better macros out there, but it's drinkable when it comes to macros.

palffyfan, Jun 11, 2006
Photo of GuinnessHero
3.1/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Pale yellow with a mild head which lasted for a short time.

Smell - Almost a cirtus smell in a whiff. Corn is prodominate.

Taste - Very smooth and refreshing. Slight bit of carbonation which dissipated quickly as soon as it hits the pallet. Full flavored and is rather non-offensive.

Mouthfeel - Clean and crisp with a taste that lingers on.

Drinkability - Easy to drink, not offensive as it is mostly concieved. Great beer for social gatherings.

GuinnessHero, Jun 08, 2006
Photo of Erdinger2003
2.58/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Apperance isn't impressive in any respect. The head is all but dissapered and the lacing almost dissapears right away. The color is the clear yellowish color you would find in many macros.

I can barely smell anything, but I do smell a little something without malts and no hops, but a funny off flavor is in the smell.

Taste isn't horrible for a macro, it doesn't leave a crap taste in your mouth and the nose isn't crappy tasting.

Mouthfeel reminds me of ice water even though it was warmed. Not impressive, but not off-putting.

I will keep this one as my session beer.

Erdinger2003, May 30, 2006
Photo of zeff80
3.23/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured a 16 oz can into a glass. Straw yellow color. It had a descent head, but it didn't last long. It smelled grainy and of corn. It tasted very malty. The mouthfeel was dry. It's drinkable if you're looking to get a buzz.

It was better than I expected. Somehow I had never had PBR while I was a poor/college student beer guzzler. I had to try it and see how it tasted.

zeff80, May 29, 2006
Photo of Sosh
2.1/5  rDev -28.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

I can't listen to someone tell me that this beer tastes SO much better than 'other macros'. What is the deal here? Here's what this beer has going for it....it is not as repulsive as Natty light, but is just as cheap. It'll get you drunk and can wash down food.

Sosh, May 27, 2006
Photo of goochpunch
3.43/5  rDev +16.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours the typical light yellow with the quickly disipating head. No surprises. Smell is really grainy with a hint of booze. Surprising for the low abv. Really pleasant and not too sweet in the taste. Kind of drying in the finish. Mouthfeel doesn't suffer from the typical prickliness of excess carbonation. This is really good if you want to drink at home/at the bar on the cheap and makes a good summertime refreshment.

goochpunch, May 26, 2006
Photo of rabsten
3.2/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

5 of the 6 pack were consumed right out of teh bottle, which was the better way to drink this brew. In the name of science - or beer advocacy - the first one was poured into a plsner glass. Solid yellow, decent head, some minor lacing. Looks like the beers in the ads we see every day.

Smell was malt, malt, malt. No toast or carmel or chocolate or any other characteristic to the malt. Just malt. Which is good, sometimes.

Tastes about as good as the style allows. Mild malt and some latent hops.

Mouthfeel is again, dead-on average. Some dryness due to the carbonation, with a later mellowing out. Unlike some AMLs, the carbonation dies in your mouth, so it doens't follow down into the gullet.

Drinkability is decent. Refreshing beer. I can, and have, gone through entire sixes in one session. Like my birthday, last Saturday.

Bottom line: The Ironic Hipsters who seek this out as "proletariat beer" are actuall onto something. You can do much worse than this beer. Also, Very good bang for the buck ($3.99 a six). Worth your time if no real craft beer is around, and beats anything Coors makes.

++ EDIT ++

I forgot to note the cool "poker caps." The bottle caps have card values on the inside, so you can play games like poker and blackjack. Pit your caps against everyone else's, and the loser pays.

rabsten, May 17, 2006
Photo of kbnooshay
3.5/5  rDev +19%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Had this at the showplace theatre in Buffalo, NY for 2 bucks a pop. This is a whole nother beast on tap. The beer was an average looking american macro gold with a very small faom cap. The aroma was really sweet and grainy. Very clean and inoffensive when compared to bud or miller. Taste is actually kinda hoppy. Mouthfeel is thin to moderate. Very smooth. This is incredibly drinkable espcially when you compare the tap version to the bottle or can. This is much sweeter and smooth on tap. If this is on tap with the other standard crap I will have to go with this.

kbnooshay, May 08, 2006
Photo of shroompod
2.88/5  rDev -2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

12oz can poured cold into pint glass

Golden clear beer , with a nice fizzy head that retreats quickly.

Smell is rather bland , corny adjuncts , smells like a dive bar Sunday morning.

Taste is a little sweet , some malt tones with no perceivable hop presence. A little tinny flavor comes through. No aftertaste.

Mouthfeel is thin , light , good carbonation.

Drinkabitly is OK , leaving me in a search for the perfect summer quencher.

shroompod, Apr 30, 2006
Pabst Blue Ribbon (PBR) from Pabst Brewing Company
68 out of 100 based on 4,488 ratings.