Dismiss Notice
Microbrew Invitational
Join us June 3 + 4 in Boston and help us drink 300+ beers, ciders, kombuchas, meads, sakes and more!

TICKETS: beeradvocate.com/micro/

Old Milwaukee Beer | Pabst Brewing Company

244 Reviews
Read the review
For Trade:
Old Milwaukee BeerOld Milwaukee Beer

Brewed by:
Pabst Brewing Company
California, United States | website

Style: American Adjunct Lager

Alcohol by volume (ABV): 4.60%

Availability: Year-round

Notes / Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

Added by BeerAdvocate on 08-24-2001

View: Beers | Events
User Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Alström Bros
Reviews: 244 | Ratings: 763
Photo of Bighuge
2.95/5  rDev +18%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Looks like white apple juice. Decent sized white fizzy head. Carbonation rises aggressively. Aroma is sweet and malty (in a macro kind of way) and a little grainy. Mouthfeel is fizzy. Body is medium. Taste has some decent maltiness to it for a macro. Just a splash of hops evident in the dry finish. Not too bad. I'd place it just about in the middle of my spectrum of Macro brews.

 381 characters

Photo of mynie
1.73/5  rDev -30.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

Telling people that it doesn't get any better than this is just plain mean.

Smells like grain and adjunct metal. Tastes like grain and adjunct metal with a hint of fruit. Nothing impressive. Sits in my stomach like a rock. Seriously. It feels like I've been punched.

Not bad tasting, but way too fizzy. Avoid.

 315 characters

Photo of Ricochet
2.56/5  rDev +2.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Appearence: just like every other macro burp beer. Generic, yellow, same.

Smell: I had to try real hard to get a scent of this beer and just picked up the corn in the beer, nothing else.

Mouth: See Appearence score. More of the same.

Taste? I have to agree with one of the recent reviewers who mentioned this was a step below PBR. More of a corny adjunct flavor, but there is a hint of a hoppy flavor and alchohol finish.

Drinkability: Drank two in an hour's time, that must mean it's generic enough to be average.

Summary: I may have had this beer once in my days, but since OM NA has become my fave NA I thought I'd give this one a look see again. I paid 5.49 for a 12. It's okay, but nothing will make me buy it again. Regular Genessee is about the cheapest beer I'll buy when I want something cheap. PBR is still my "autoworker special" standard for cheap beers.

 883 characters

Photo of Gagnonsux
2.72/5  rDev +8.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I picked up a 32 ouncer at Circle K because I was feeling like something simple and cheap. Color is pale yellow with a fizzy head. Aroma is typical of cheap macro lagers, I've smelled a lot worse than this within this style of beer. Taste isn't very flavorful, which actually may make Old Milwaukee better than some of it's counterparts; there aren't any bad flavors to complain about. Seeing how cheap and unoffensive this is, I would consider this a good choice for a lawnmower beer. Still OM will never compete with my craft brew choices.

 541 characters

Photo of CBFanWish
2.36/5  rDev -5.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

When in a dive bar, do as the locals do, I figure. Seems to me that the locals drink a lot of Old Milwaukee. Pouring a fizzy yellow colour with little head, it seemed that this would be an uneventful tasting. The aroma was sweet. I couldn't quite place the smell. The taste was coppery. Hints of corn came through, but nothing original.

 336 characters

Photo of ZAP
2.35/5  rDev -6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

here's my issue with this beer....it is supposed to be a "price" lager but up in my neck of the woods it's priced damn near the Buds, MGD, and Coors....It's of lesser quality than those...hasa hint of cheap beer taste to it...very corny and sweet...body is thin almost fizzy..finishes a little tart....OK...not worth buying though

 330 characters

Photo of dren
2.8/5  rDev +12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Another on my crappy beers to purchase list. I bought this after a case of Schlitz. It really isn't too bad, not much to her at all. Some sweetness and fizzles here and there but nothing too crazy. A much better beer than I was expecting, but then again I was expecting the worst. For the price you really cannot beat it. This beer is easily drinkable like Budweiser but much cheaper.

 384 characters

Photo of longarm
2.58/5  rDev +3.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I haven't had Old Swill for many years, so I was a little apprehensive about this one. It carries a lot of memories from my younger years. I remember it being a decent beer at the time relative to other beers that I drank. Granted this was before the current era of better selection and improved personal taste in beers, so I'll have to taste it and see.

Color is light yellow. Carbonation is decent and lasts a fairly long time.

Cereal grains dominate the aroma with no detectable hops and a faint smell of alcohol. These same attributes manifest in the flavor as well with a slightly sweet flavor of corn in the aftertaste. Mild bitterness.

This has a little more body than the average adjunct lager. Definitely this is the high point of this beer which also helps improve its drinkability.

Overall this isn't bad for the style and especially for the price. Like so many American macros, it seems like a little more flavor and aroma hops would improve it a lot.

 975 characters

Photo of maccroz
2.34/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Pours a...wait a minute...who pours this swill? I suck it out of a can (which is why the appearance gets a 3) It smells like ass, tastes like cheap beer, but it gets you saucy and goes down like water.

Perfect for sporting events when the parts of your brain that normally appreciate taste are too busy yelling at umpires and admiring cheerleaders.

Overall, a strong "Average"

 383 characters

Photo of MrNuggets
2.05/5  rDev -18%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 4

This is no different from all the other mass produced swill I have poured down my throat over the past few weeks. It certainly doesn't taste bad, it simply just does not taste. I would never turn this Phil his arm extends with an old mil in hand with my name on it. Kinda hits the spot during my work breaks.

 308 characters

Photo of beershrine
2.74/5  rDev +9.6%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Of all the lager clones out there if we were to buy by price this rates good. at 4.99 per 12 pack/cans its of good value.
This beer must be poured into a descent glass otherwise
I CAN'T TASTE MY BEER. What good is in there is very light.

Appearance - The best part of this brew is its color
Aroma -Adjuncts all over the place
Taste - very little, but not harsh or offensive
Mouthfeel - almost wants to have flavor but...
Drinkability - This stuff drinks to fast the alcohol content seems very low. I finished off the box in 2 afterwork sessions without much of a buzz.

 620 characters

Photo of brewdlyhooked13
2.48/5  rDev -0.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance - poured a very bland and pale yellow, but with a big zesty head, lots of white snowy froth which bubbles down and holds at a semi-solid cover.

Aroma - very plain, macro grain/adjunct sniff, nothing more.

Taste - basic grainy taste, but with a splash of hops at the back mixed in with some soda water saltiness. Wasn't expecting that, a little speck of personality there, alright. Finishes cleanly if unspectacularly.

Mouthfeel - crisp, bubbly, right for the style , but it's a style without much to it, IMO. Thin and watery, lots of bubbles as intended, I'm sure.

Drinkability - for the price and the taste, it's a decent value, I doubt if most macro swillers could tell the difference between this and the rmega-lager.

 743 characters

Photo of Frozensoul327
2.68/5  rDev +7.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Not a special beer, but for the money, a good beer. Straw yellow color and odors of grain and alcohol. Short lived white head. Strong flavors of corn dominate this brew, with a watery finish. If you are a fan of the typical pabst brews, this one won't dissapoint.

 263 characters

Photo of Billolick
2.08/5  rDev -16.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

OK I know I'm scrapin the bottom of the barrel here, but we all need to consume some mass produced crap to keep us honest and keep us abreast of what is out there. This stuff is, suprise, piss yellow with a large bubble, short lasting head. Not much nose to speak of. Ditto for malt and hops. It is cold and wet and did help me wash down my dinner.

 348 characters

Photo of TastyTaste
2.52/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Clear yellow color, small white head. Slightly malty, not a lot in the hops department. Not skunky, metallic, or musty like many beers in this price range. This beer, when judged against other American Macros, is actually somewhat of a standout. It's drinkability, affordablity, lack of off flavors, and wide availabitlity add up to a cheap beer that won't make you gag, at least.

 380 characters

Photo of Zorro
2.6/5  rDev +4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a screw top 32 OZ Bottle that I bought for $1.19 at Vons.

Pours an ultra clear yellow brew.

Smell is sweet and corny with a cracker smell to it. No skunking or off smells to it.

Taste is fairly dry with just a trace of sweetness and a bit of grain flavor. Taste is pretty neutral it doesn't offend or wow you.

Mouthfeel is OK this isn't a brew that pretends to be anything other than a cheap lager.

Drinkability is equal to or superior that which the macrobrews have.
This is a brew that claims to only be a cheap yet drinkable and non-offensive brew and in that capacity is succeeds fully. I have drunk a lot of this with dinner when I hit the supermarket deli for dinner and just wanted a beer to go with say fried chicken. Which is exactly why I am even reviewing this brew here.

 810 characters

Photo of Tballz420
2.15/5  rDev -14%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

This beer is one of those beers that comes in a can. Compared to those other canned brews it is on the sweeter, maltier side of taste. No bitterness. There must be a lot of great ingredients cause my head is ringing now and i didnt even drink that many of these. Better than some shitty macros, worse than the rest of the beers we love.

 336 characters

Photo of ADR
2.15/5  rDev -14%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured the can into a Pilsner glass...

Transparent lightest gold color, wide-bubbled head of a very thin character but better duration than some. Partial ring laces. Aroma is all sweetness, corn and cane sugar. Mouthfeel is thinnish but the carbonation is adequately done. No real sense of hops, malt is sweet and neutral without nasty qualities. Aftertaste is lightly honeyish without the overdone fizziness and mineral water taste of some macros. Cheap and forgetable, but not the worst of drinkabilities in the beer world.

 528 characters

Photo of JISurfer
3.06/5  rDev +22.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

I had this beast out of a 40oz bottle. I was drinking it during one of Radford's infamous "card games" that they play to get wasted. I actually did get to critique this beer, so all was not wasted. the appearance wasn't mind bending, like the WWStout that I divulged myself in earlier, but it was nice. Straw colored with a frothy white head. The smell was of citrusy and corn proportions. The taste was similar, but not too strong. All in all a good cheap one.

 461 characters

Photo of hotstuff
2.15/5  rDev -14%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Suffice it to say that there is not a whole lot to be said about this beer so I am going to get right to my rating.Can:It formed a large white creamy sized head with fine sized bubbles.The body was clear with lively carbonation and the hue was yellow.There was not much of a nose to this beer other than some malt notes.The flavor was blah and the mouthfeel was surprisingly smooth, thin, watery and light bodied.This beer left very little in the way of any lacing.

 465 characters

Photo of SetarconeX
2.44/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Color more golden than I'm used to in gas-station lager, but the head goes away quicker than a Kenyan olympic sprinter. Almost no smell, but that's better than being skunky, so I can deal with that. Taste is rather weak, not really malty, not really hoppy, just there. If you had a lickable encyclopedia, this would be your generic example of "beer taste." Unflattering, unrefined, but not really bad either.

Probably one of the most drinkable lagers available at the nearest small gas station. Drinkable, if only just. Not good enough for enthusiasm, not bad enough to slam. It's beer, drink it.

 599 characters

Photo of elmocoso
2.55/5  rDev +2%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

What can i say? I was very disappointed in the head. It dropped to absolutely nothing. not even a ring around the glass. Pretty active carb with some decent beading, but they pop and dissolve, leaving nothing on the top.

The smell is pretty vacant. co2? nothing else.

There is quite a bit of flavor here; more than many macros, but the flavor it has is pretty plain; a little bittering, not much though.

Overall, this is almost drinkable. I mean, hey. Its an american pilsner, a product of pabst. nothing fancy, nothing tasty. my grandfather lives by it, but what does that mean? it seems to be a case of product identity. Someday i will make a long line up of all the "usual suspects" and see just what the difference is between them all. Until then, i will drink good beer.

 784 characters

Photo of daledeee
2.65/5  rDev +6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Not THAT bad. Can't get much of a head or much smell. Clear yellow. I can taste a little malt, grain and some hops. $2 for a tall boy(not many beer choices) at the bar while my wife drinks margueritas. I guess it could be worse. Usually pretty fresh and cold.

 259 characters

Photo of 86MonteSS
3.06/5  rDev +22.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

As far as Milwaukee beers go, this one's the best. I've had ALL the cheap ones, and Old Milwaukee's flavor is the only one that's been constantly calling me back.

It's hard to blow sunshine up the ass of the average cheap beer, but Old Milwaukee makes it a little eaiser. The mildly sweet malt taste is quite the delicacy in a $5/12 pack beer. My dad told me this was the cheapest crap his fraternity could get; we should all be so lucky!

 441 characters

Photo of NeroFiddled
3.21/5  rDev +28.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A crystal clear, straw-gold body is capped by a creamy bright-white head that holds well. Its retention is surprisingly good, and it leaves some nice lace to boot! The nose is exceptionally clean; with just a light touch of sweet malt. The body is light, and it's crisp in the mouth due to a fine-bubbled, median carbonation. Sweet malt makes up the entirety of the flavor, coming on strong at the start and slowly fading through the swallow. It's quite clean and devoid of any yeast characteristics. Adjunct is obviously being used at a high level as there's no real "grain" character present. It finishes drying with a dollop of sweet malt that receeds shortly. Very well made, but lacking in character.

 705 characters

Old Milwaukee Beer from Pabst Brewing Company
61 out of 100 based on 244 ratings.