1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Ballantine XXX Ale - Pabst Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Ballantine XXX AleBallantine XXX Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

238 Ratings
THE BROS
79
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 238
Reviews: 152
rAvg: 3.01
pDev: 21.59%
Wants: 17
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Pabst Brewing Company visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Blonde Ale |  4.85% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 07-02-2001)
View: Beers (58) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Ballantine XXX Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 238 | Reviews: 152 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of bubrewer
bubrewer

Florida

2.1/5  rDev -30.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I was suprised enough to see this bright green 16oz can in the store that I had to give it a try. I'd heard nice things about Ballantine from the 60's; I hope this is a shadow of its former self.

Looks like a typical BMC. Head holds and laces better, but otherwise it's just very pale straw and brilliantly clear.

Smell is mostly sulfur. Not skunky really, strikes me more like a lager ferment that was arrested prematurely. This is an Ale? I'm starting to have my doubts.

There is more hop character than a usual BMC, but it's not very nice hop character. Proper bitterness level for a pilsner, but it's cheesy and not terribly pleasant.

Wish I hadn't wasted my $1.50 on this one. Don't you waste yours too.

Serving type: can

07-26-2006 01:14:56 | More by bubrewer
Photo of WVbeergeek
WVbeergeek

West Virginia

1.65/5  rDev -45.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Appears a light golden tone and forms a large white head leaves fine lacing behind on the fluted glass. Aroma is of some semi skunked herbal toned hops with a touch of fruitiness among light toasted grain and an adjunct mix of corn and rice that's evident. Taste is strong with a cloying sweetness adjunct ridee with evident alcohol presence and a very low bitterness touch of mineral character and her skunked hops. Mouthfeel is light bodied with fizzy carbonation. Drinkability some have a sentimental outlook on this brew not me...nothing classic about it.

Serving type: bottle

07-24-2006 20:31:48 | More by WVbeergeek
Photo of oberon
oberon

North Carolina

2.28/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Hey its $.89 cents so I grabbed it and its America's largest selling ale....hmmm Iam guessing its not but hey who knows.It had a decent pour light gold with a 1/2 finger white head that was gone rather quickly but left a mass on top,light skunkiness from the damn green bottle and some toasted grain no trace of hops though to be found.The beer tastes mass produced somewhat cooked and vegetal-like goes down a little harsh made me wince a little going down.Eh wont get it again even if free but its an old brand glad I can say I tried it anyways.

Serving type: bottle

07-17-2006 21:23:48 | More by oberon
Photo of PBRstreetgang
PBRstreetgang

Ohio

3.13/5  rDev +4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Pours straw with decent clarity. Fizzy one-finger head shows moderate retention but poor lacing. There is certainly some skunkiness in the nose, but it is accompanied by authentic saaz aromas as well; mild vegetal notes in the background. Pale malt and corny sweet at first sip; aftertaste is dry and presents some noble hop bitterness. Medium-high carbonation but not overly crisp, thin body but this helps it attain it's high drinkablity. Finishes mostly clean with a bit of light-struck flavor. Nicley balanced with a good use of hops; an unimpressive yet non-offending brew.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2006 05:10:19 | More by PBRstreetgang
Photo of tugdriver7
tugdriver7

Maryland

2.6/5  rDev -13.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The green bottle skunk hit me when the lid came off. I almost said, "forget it," right then and there. But I persisted. Once the skunk wore off, it poured with a decent (though quickly disappating) head. Low carbonation, extremly light mouthful. No taste to speak of, except the skunk wore off and bit of hop bite lingered. I see why the price was less than half the others I purchased today. Not even really drinkable. If you want a hoppy, cheap "ale," go for the Yuengling's "Lord Chesterfield."

Serving type: bottle

07-13-2006 02:41:25 | More by tugdriver7
Photo of edskirk3
edskirk3

Pennsylvania

2.85/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours from 12oz can a very clear gold with a white foam a finger or so thick. Is this even an ale? Because it looks awful lagery to me.

I think there's an aroma but I'm not really sure. There might be some hoppiness in there. And aluminum.

It tastes very light and delicate, which contradicts the 'XXX' on the can, and there's also, to coin a term, "token hop bitterness" at the end.

So, there's two occasions that I can see drinking this beer:

1. To wash down something that I ate, like pizza.

2. If it's really effing hot.

Because, after all, it is kind of refreshing. And it cost $2.75 for a sixer!

Serving type: can

07-03-2006 05:02:22 | More by edskirk3
Photo of alehopman
alehopman

Wisconsin

3.75/5  rDev +24.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Surprisingly low carbination, medium gold color, one finger head with some retention. Just enough ale fruitiness to stave off excessive adjunt smell and flavor. This really takes me back, sitting beside my dad and uncle at a local tavern, and absorbing that "old time beer" flavor/aroma. I heard this is hopped with Cascade, and I do get some floral elements, but I mostly get earthy/grassy smell and flavor. Some sweeter malts though the middle but good bitter finish. Mouthfeel is substantial for a macro produced beer of any kind. I drank this camping last weekend and at $15.00 a case I will drink more this summer if I can get a hold of some. The one to turn to when on a budget.

Serving type: can

06-30-2006 02:25:57 | More by alehopman
Photo of BEERchitect
BEERchitect

Kentucky

3.23/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Thought it was pretty good when I thought it was a Pilsner. Now that I have learned it's a Pale Ale, I changed my mind a bit. Has a nice blend of pilsner (tasting) malts with a lightly grainy body (which is allowed in a pils). The hops add an earthy, spicy character after the skunky hop aroma subsides. The body never really reaches medium or full proportions. The hops never reach citrus levels, although there is a light green apple, light lime flavor. The malts are not really caramelized or mildly toasty. Anyhow, I'm going to pretend it's an averagely brewed pilsner.

Serving type: bottle

06-19-2006 23:40:41 | More by BEERchitect
Photo of mynie
mynie

Indiana

4.1/5  rDev +36.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

This was my white whale. When I was little, I loved old commericals. I'd get tapes of them for my birthday. One tape had nothing but beer sports commercials, which included a couple spots for Ballantine. Being young, and therefore being repulsed by the scent of something so inoffensive as Bud, beer ads never really did anything for me. Except, strange enough, this Ballantine ad, which showed the beer being quickly poured into a ballpark cup. It looked tasty.

So, for years afterwards, I searched out Ballantine. Being in the midwest, this was quite tricky. Once I had tracked down a sixer, at a Binny's Beverage Depot, but was turned away because I had brought with me a small child. They can't serve you if you bring in under 21 with you, said the clerk. I think he was just being a prick.

Anyhow, I recently and finally came across some Ballantine, and it's actually pretty darn good.

One of the very finest macro pours I've ever seen, deep dark gold with a large, retentive head and great lacing. Certainly an ale, not an adjunct.

Smells of light, grassy and folar malt and a small hop.

Tastes sweet and grassy upfront, moving into a more floral, less sweet malt in the middle, and ending on dry, bitter hop.

It's simplistic, but it's still flavorful. And sometimes, simplicity is grand.

Serving type: bottle

06-17-2006 03:44:18 | More by mynie
Photo of hudsonvalleyslim
hudsonvalleyslim

Massachusetts

3.6/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Gots to agree with much of the Advocates. Ballantine is a very decent beer. (I believe it's now being brewed by PBR, not Falstaff.) It is actually the first beer I ever tasted. But this was one of the few ales that were available back in the day, the other I remember was Genesee Cream Ale, going back to the late 60's. Don't know fer sure, but there is a taste in today's version that I surely recognize. I think Ballantine would stand up pretty well in a blind taste test.

PS - I, too, am financially embarrassed, and find myself searching for good cheap beer. I'm brewing at home but Ballantine costs half what Dogfishhead is getting. Just sayin....

Serving type: can

06-16-2006 03:08:51 | More by hudsonvalleyslim
Photo of mattcomstock213
mattcomstock213

Virginia

3.1/5  rDev +3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Feeling nostalgic I went for some Ballantine. The smell was yeasty and, surprisingly, hoppy. The color of the beer is nothing special, but more of a deeper gold than the other cheap beers. The taste is suprising, its good, very good in fact. It tastes of hops and is clean and smooth. Nicely carbonated mouthfeel with superb drinkabilty. Its clean and smooth and feels more substanial than other cheap beers. I like it, alot in fact. I think this is one of the best economy beers around. I wish it was more readily avilable.

Serving type: can

05-24-2006 14:48:59 | More by mattcomstock213
Photo of mcallister
mcallister

Ohio

3.2/5  rDev +6.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a medium light golden color with high carbonation and a decent sized head with slight lacing.

Very yeasty and barley-y, with malt, and slight hops in the aroma. A little bit of freshly mown grass as well.

Not a bad beer to be honest. Definitely better than the big name macros. Big on the barley, with the same fresh grass taste, a bit yeasty and malty as well.

Nicely carbonated mouthfeel. Type of beer you would want to drink if you had to all day at a friends cook out. But otherwise I'd stray toward a pale ale or IPA.

Serving type: bottle

05-03-2006 20:45:45 | More by mcallister
Photo of edchicma
edchicma

Massachusetts

3.55/5  rDev +17.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a nice clear light gold with an ample head and some lacing. Good carbonation. Aroma is mainly grainy with a hint of grassiness, not too bad. Taste is once again grainy, but with a nice smoothness and a hint of bitterness in the finish. Mouthfeel is medium, with a slight chewiness that I was not expecting. Very easy on the drinkability scale, most notably its smooth quality.

Serving type: bottle

05-02-2006 22:27:28 | More by edchicma
Photo of DaggerEyes
DaggerEyes

New York

3.43/5  rDev +14%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

This very well maybe the BEST of the cheap beers! Perhaps it deserves a ribbon or something that. I've been watching my wallet and unfortuantely that means making craft brews more of a treat than the norm. So i'm exploring the seedier side of macros with my new found wisdom and apprecaition for the art of brewing.... one I surely dind't have at 19 or so when I probobly last had ballantine.

Pours a typical straw yellow gold "beer" color. With a froathy and foamy two finger thick head and LOTS of carbonation, which is very vocal.

Faint smells of citrus and super sugary hops

A sweet malty and bready taste with a body that is not exactly watery but still rather thin and a good ammount of carbonation.

I can't imagine this beer offending anyones pallete yet by the same token it won't light your world on fire, it sure as hell beats bud though

Serving type: can

04-11-2006 22:30:49 | More by DaggerEyes
Photo of Zorro
Zorro

California

3.48/5  rDev +15.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 OZ bottle Sample provided by Thaichile.

Pours a clear golden ale nearing a yellow color, momentary white head.

Smell is light and slightly herbal and a little sweet. Not very sweet smelling but there is a faint trace of corn in the scent, but I am really looking hard for it too.

Taste is light and nearly neutral with a tiny bit of sweetness. Slight sourness and a mild but appealing herbal bitterness here from Lager type hops. An ale that tastes a great deal like a good lager. Mild and clean tasting.

Mouthfeel is light and clean but by no means watery.

This is what an American Macrobrew lager should really taste like. Clean with an honest good level of bitterness and good taste combined with very easy on the senses intensity. The ultimate lawnmower beer I think. This is what Budweiser should try to taste like.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2006 01:50:57 | More by Zorro
Photo of MrSeth
MrSeth

Massachusetts

2.48/5  rDev -17.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Pours with a very clear, almost watery light yellow body. The head is a thick white meringue consistency.

Smells softly of malt, almost like pretzel dough, and there's a seaweed nori, briney, harbor water stink, a bit off.

Huge bitter taste.. wall of bitterness. whew! Opposite from alot of ales, this one seems to start bitter and finish with a faint sweet maltiness. There is still a bready flavor giving this ale some kind of natural quality.

The mouthfeel is a bit overcarbonated, finishes clean enough though. I'd like to say that these are very drinkable, but the off-smell throws me a bit.

Serving type: can

03-27-2006 21:32:11 | More by MrSeth
Photo of marcobrau
marcobrau

Illinois

2.93/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

My favorite after work beer when I want to feel like an ale drinker in the 1960s or '70s. This is probably the best cheap macro-brewed beer that I can recommend. It's a beer with a lot of history and I like that about it. Of course, it's the taste that really matters, and this is a pleasant enough tasting light cream ale. It's not that good of a pale ale -- in fact, I think it's barely an ale at all -- with just a slight hint of ale-like fruitiness and diacetyl.

Ballantine XXX Ale pours with a brilliant white head that drops leaving a bit of lace and a thin layer of foam. The aroma is certainly nothing to write home about with a little whiff of canned corn and just a hint of hop spice. Light in body and in flavor, Ballantine shows off a little bit of grassy hops, under a blanket of sweet malt and corn. The hop bitterness is just enough to prevent this beer from being too sweet. Well-carbonated, yet smooth, Ballantine's is very drinkable and remains a bit of a classic.

Serving type: bottle

03-21-2006 02:43:31 | More by marcobrau
Photo of joeskirkie
joeskirkie

New Jersey

2.65/5  rDev -12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Gold, fizzy, soapy looking head that goes quick.

Scent is light, nothing real strong, possibly some citrusy hops but really nothing. It turns out not to be very bitter at all. It has a light sweetness and is very dry.

It's easy drinking and does manage to encourage me to have another one, but overall...eh.

Serving type: bottle

02-25-2006 01:08:29 | More by joeskirkie
Photo of LarryV
LarryV

Massachusetts

2.9/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

16oz can. Pours a weak golden color with a large fluffy head. The head settles to a 1/8" layer of foam that hangs around for the duration.

Aroma is very light, grainy. Slight hops in the aroma, but no citrusy notes detected. First thing that hit me when tasting it was the sweetness of the malt, but it fades quickly to a dry finish. I couldn't detect much of a hop presence. Even though it says it's an ale, it definitely tastes more like a lager to me. It lacks the crisp dryness that some of the other macros tend to have. I would have preferred a 12 oz can as 16 just seems to be just enough to fatique the palate with this beer. I can only drink one of these and would have to move on to something else. I don't really think it's significantly better than any of the other macro competition out there. In my opinion, it would be best as an accompaniment with some pizza or spicy food. To have one by itself for the sole purpose of enjoying a brew, it doesn't really cut it.

Serving type: can

02-20-2006 22:43:25 | More by LarryV
Photo of MarkBlackout
MarkBlackout

Indiana

3.45/5  rDev +14.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Ballantine is an American classic, even if they changed the recipe. I'm not sure if I've ever poured it into a glass. If you can get this and haven't tried it, you should. This is one of few true macros out there with any significant hop content, even if it is a weird, sour brew! I enjoy it about once a week now that I live in Brooklyn. Economical at $2 even for 40 cold ounces.

Serving type: bottle

01-31-2006 23:03:26 | More by MarkBlackout
Photo of Manosbeeroffate
Manosbeeroffate

Maine

2.98/5  rDev -1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

I've only tried this stuff once before and didn't really remember what it was like. This was at my local Hannaford so why not. This is the most pale of any pale ale I have seen, barely yellow. Fuzzy white head that lasts forever. Taste? Well it actually has some pleasent hoppy flavor (not sure what kind) that does fade out pretty quick. Mouthfeel is quite thin. Overall this beer has very nice flavor and can be made into a real nice beer, regardless of any kind of macro status. If I were offered another I would take it.

Serving type: can

12-19-2005 00:52:18 | More by Manosbeeroffate
Photo of tgbljb
tgbljb

Pennsylvania

3.48/5  rDev +15.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

purchased as a 40 ounce green bottle with suggested retail price of $1.25 marked on it. poured a light golden color with modest white puffy head. Smell is very minimal with only a hint of sweetness to be found. Taste is also very mild, but not unpleasant. finished wet and thirst quenching. Good lawnmower beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-04-2005 23:44:05 | More by tgbljb
Photo of Frozensoul327
Frozensoul327

Michigan

2.68/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Walking the line of mediocrity. This is a drinkable brew, but beyond that, it's not much. Pours out to a medium golden color, with a fuller 1 inch head of foam and some lacing. Aroma is fresh and laden with hops and grain. Taste is a letdown. Very mild and reminiscent of bud light. Flavors of watery hops and bland malts are hidden in the background, but a stale character fills the palate mostly. Mouthfeel is weak, very light and uninspiring. Fair drinkability. This is probably best when you are dead ass tired at the end of a long summer day of working in the yard. Next time that happends to me, I'll come back to this beer. Maybe.

Serving type: bottle

11-19-2005 19:01:14 | More by Frozensoul327
Photo of DevilDogBeer
DevilDogBeer

Pennsylvania

1.25/5  rDev -58.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

This beer was not worth the 15 bucks I paid for the case. The pour was an off yellow color with a thin head that dissipated quickly. The smell was a mixture of adjunct ingredients (rice I believe), pun gent hops, and pale malts. The taste was very reflective of the smell and provided no complexity and a poor aftertaste. The mouthfeel was watery as in most macro-lagers, and the off flavor made this beer low on the drinkability scale. I tried this beer since it has been around for so long, but it was not worth the investment.

Serving type: bottle

10-31-2005 14:10:37 | More by DevilDogBeer
Photo of barknee
barknee

New York

3.03/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

XXX pours with a whipped white foamy head that lasts several minutes. The brew is champagne gold and has generous carbonation. Hops are quite noticeable on the nose, surprisingly the most abundant aromatic of the beer. The taste is one of sweet malt, perhaps a tad too sweet, as this distracts from the drinkability, which is still quite pleasant. As the brew hits the mouth the sweetness is easily detected, then fortunately dries quickly. Perhaps the quintessential ol' time American ale; reducing the residual sugars would add dramatically to the potential for long term multi-serving quaffing of this decent American Mucho Macro.

Serving type: can

09-27-2005 00:27:45 | More by barknee
Ballantine XXX Ale from Pabst Brewing Company
70 out of 100 based on 238 ratings.