1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Brooklyn Monster Ale - Brooklyn Brewery

Not Rated.
Brooklyn Monster AleBrooklyn Monster Ale

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
84
good

1,779 Ratings
THE BROS
76
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,779
Reviews: 1,063
rAvg: 3.72
pDev: 13.17%
Wants: 40
Gots: 213 | FT: 13
Brewed by:
Brooklyn Brewery visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
English Barleywine |  10.10% ABV

Availability: Fall

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: Todd on 11-26-2000

This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

ABV varies a bit year to year.
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Brooklyn Monster Ale Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,779 | Reviews: 1,063 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of TheLastEngineer
3.58/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Class of 2004 12oz bottle - This was my first one in three years but also the first one I had allowed to age for 12+ months.

Has a very appealing orange/copper color with an off-white head that quickly dissipated. Lots going on with the smell...fruits, malt, alcohol (but not so much as to clue one in to the power of this brew). It was sweeter and smoother than I had remembered it. Good fruit balance to help distract from the potential onslaught of alcohol and hops taste, but still not a personal favorite in this aspect. Mouthfeel was lighter than expected but still left a bit of a coating... not very satisfying. Very clean finish and lack of bitterness made for a high probability of multiple visitations in a single session. Do this at your own risk as that 11.8% ABV will make it presence known soon enough.

I might want to pour my next one more aggresively to wake things up a bit. Quite drinkable for the high ABV. I'll let a couple age for another 3 months and then give it another spin.

Photo of EStreet20
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

12 ounce bottle that states "this monster ale was born in 2005" poured into a large sized snifter glass.

A - A translucent red-orange color with a small tan head. Not bad.

S - Sweet fruity smells along with some caramel. A bit of cherry and grape flavors specifically.

T - The fruit tastes are leading the way here with a bitterness and some of the caramel flavors on the finish. A pleasant tasting barleywine.

M - A little thin for the style buit still pretty good.

D - Not the most complex barleywine I've tasted but seems to drink rather easily for the style.

Not too bad. I like the more in your face American barleywines better but this is a pleasant sipper after dinner or at the end of the night.

Photo of rajendra82
4.38/5  rDev +17.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

The 2004 vintage of this beer was the first one I picked up after the law change in Georgia, and at the time I though this was a beer worth cellaring. In the past year and a half I was able to avoid the calls of the lone remaining bottle of Monster. I suppose now is as good a time as any to take the plunge.

Poured into a tulip, the beer looked as clear as ever, with reddish brown body, and a small head that formed for a short while before settling down to a thin ring of bubbles. Not much carbonation to speak of either. The aroma was sweet, and floral. There were lots of fruity esters reminding me of figs, cherries, bananas, oranges, and apples. The alcohol was like rose oil. There was no hint of any oxidation, despite the warmish cellaring conditions in my basement.

The taste was smooth and mellow, with the flavors melded together to form a taste similar to fruit punch mixed with caramel sauce. The warm and spicy alcohol came shortly after, until giving way to vanilla. The texture was silky smooth and delicate. The hops which I remember being somewhat noticeable when fresh, had all faded into a slight peppery tingle.

This Monster was definitely a better beer with some age on it. The warmth of the alcohol has me wondering if this beer can go on improving a little more with age. Sadly the 2004 is now history, and 2005 bottles have some ways to go. Good things come to those who wait I suppose.

Photo of ybnorml
4.13/5  rDev +11%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

This is a vintage 2004 bottle

A clean dark amber/copper colored beer with ruby hightlights. Has a nice off white head. The aroma has a creamy caramel character up front with a hint of apple in the background followed by a strong alcohol note. That creamy carmel character flows over into the taste. Bringing with it a creamy smooth mouthfeel. There is a quick snap of bitterness on the finish. Which is where the heat from the alcohol starts to slowly make it's presence felt. Marvelous

Photo of trep
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2003 Vintage

Pours a bloody amber color with an off-white head after a pretty aggressive pour into my balloon. Nice lacing as it slowly fades and a little bit of carbonation rising up.

Apples, raisins, grapes, and a sweet caramel malt sweetness that is tied together with a bit of alcohol.

A good bit of caramel malt with some notes of apples, cherries, rasins, and some woodiness that I can't pinpoint. Very sweet malt and the alcohol is barely noticable. Smooth as silk finish. The 3+ years of aging has done this one some justice. I had the previous 5 of the six-pack before I learned of aging and its benefits and remember it being a bit hot for my tastes. But that was before my pallate could handle any Impy Stouts.

Medium-Full body and little carbonation. Regardless, this one is smooth as hell and goes down surprisingly easy. I wish I hadn't drank the other 5.

Photo of jabocu
3.38/5  rDev -9.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

bottled in 2005

Pours a clear medium brown color with a thin head. Cap was gone in seconds and left no lacings. Aroma was fruity esters, brown sugar and hops. Flavor was more the same with raisins, brown sugar, light roastiness, and unusualy strong grapefruit hops I thought. Had a spicey harshness that left a slight peppery aftertaste. Hops hangs in back of tongue for a few seconds. Body is medium, with medium carbonation, leaves a bitter dry mouthfeel. After reading some posts on cellaring this beer, I'm more looking forward the to future drinking of the rest of this six pack.

Photo of Enola
3.08/5  rDev -17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

As far as this style goes this one is average at best. The beer poured with little head. It is a mahogany color. The smell is alcohol with grain notes weaved in. The taste is alcohol up front. A slightly sharper barleywine. The mouthfeel is alcohol first. I could drink this beer again but there are better barleywines out there. Average at best.

Photo of grub
4.03/5  rDev +8.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

2003 vintage, sampled may 11/2006

pours a deep amber color with a 1/4" of tight yellow head. the head quickly dissipates into a ring around the glass. carbonation is fairly light.

aroma is really interesting. caramel, dried fruit, slightly vinous, alcohol in the background.

taste is great. nice roasty/malty flavour, with no trace of any sticky or cloying sweetness. just a hint of the dried fruit/vinous character. nice alcohol finish. really nice well balanced and quite smooth. any trace of hops, even bitterness, seems strangely missing, but i think that's just because i'm more used to american style barleywines.

mouthfeel is actually a little thinner than i expected. i'd have expected a beer of this size to be a little fuller, but it makes it more drinkable.

overall this is a good beer. the slight thinness to the mouthfeel and lack of bitterness leaves a little something to be desired, but it's definitely worth a try.

Photo of crwills
3.8/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Great colour to this beer. Gem-like and shiny amber, very smooth. Almost no head.

Sweet, malty smell -- canned tangerine oranges, and easily detectable alcohol.

Taste has a strong alcohol bite, even a little bit harsh. Stings the mouth. Once past that, it's quite pleasantly malty, with some hop presence that's overwhelmed by the yeast and alcohol. Slightly watery mouthfeel for a barleywine, but still smooth.

Could probably do with some aging to remove a bit of the bite, but still relatively easy drinking.

Photo of MUSHROOMCLOUD
3.88/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

2005 Edition

A - 1/2" slow forming dense khaki head. Head sticks around for a couple of minutes. Slow moving bubbles. Amber / golden in color. No lace.

S - Sweet aroma. Nice balance of malt and hops - neither dominates.

T - Sweet malt with a thorough hop bitterness in the finish.Tangy. Alcohol. Caramel / nuttiness. Slight hint of fruit. Mellow BW overall, I can see the 11.8% sneaking up quick though!

M - Big mouthfeel. Thick, coating. Mid-level carbonation.

D - Very nice! I was very excited to be able to sample this and Black Chocolate thanks to xcjetta. I have one more to look forward to as well!

Photo of orfeu
3.95/5  rDev +6.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

2004 bottling. Glowing copper in an oversized wine goblet with rapidly diminishing sand-colored froth. Vinous, tannic nose with hints of sherry and bourbon and an ever-so-slight nuttiness. Soft and fruity on the palate, with a mellow and round finish. Overtly vinous -- a barley wine with the emphasis on the wine, I suppose. A bit boozy, but this character subdues as the beer warms (I poured it slightly cooler than room temp). Cherry and prune juice flavors in the middle and only the faintest hint of earthy hops. As I mentioned, alcohol is apparent in the taste, but surprisingly well-hidden in the swallow -- no heat detected at all. A solid version of an English-style barley wine; I liked this better on the second try than I did on the first sampling a few months ago.

Photo of mcallister
3.78/5  rDev +1.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Hardly any head, what there was dissipated very quickly with very little lacing. Good color though of caramel and murky amber with reddish orange highlights..

Aromas of caramel, mollases, sugar cane, and malt make me think this may have a decent amount of RS.

Definitely english in style. Big sweet malty profile. With a little more hop than expected. Sweet caramel and toffee are the main flavor proponents with some side items getting in on the action especially the alcohol leaving a warm burning sensation in the esophagus and chest (not a complaint by any means).

This barley wine is highly tannic with a very long finish. A very good wine true to the style. Yet the tannins and alcohol make this one score slightly less on the drinkability factor.

Very solid beer.

Photo of tom444
4.1/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Pours a deep orange-gold, with a moderate off-white head. Little head retention, decent lacing.

Aroma is alcoholic, and a bit fruity, with some sweet malty notes

Mouthfeel is a bit thick, with just the right amount of carbonation. The taste starts out with some hop bitterness, then a lot of malty sweetness, with some notes of raisins and black cherry. Finishes cleanly, with some warming alcohol, and just a bit of malty aftertaste.

Photo of alexgash
4.3/5  rDev +15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Bottled in 2003

Dark, vinous ruby with a small, ringy off-white head. Nose is full of blackberries, port, strawberrries, a hint of toffee. There's a definite rum and alcohol component as well. Very nice. Tastes of sweet fruits (blackberries). Has a tangy, vinous, port quality to it. Tannins. Rich chocolate/molasses mid palate and then a balancing, powerful bitterness sets in for the long, tannin-bitter finish. Way warming, but not "hot" like I remember. Much better than the young bottle I had over 3 years ago (an '02 I think). Medium-full body that coats the mouth well. Need to get some more of this and maybe aging is the key...

Photo of phisig137
3.1/5  rDev -16.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

2005 Vintage, pours a copper color with no head, and no lacing. A few bubbles can be seen rising from the bottom

Smells slightly sweet, and very alcoholic. not much else

Tastes hugely of caramel and malts up front, with a somewhat weak hoppy finish. Mouthfeel is fairly thin for the style, and drinkability is rather low. The alcohol makes itself very apparent after only a few sips.

Perhaps this is just an off batch. I expected much more from Brooklyn, especially with one of thier seasonal, which are normally very good.

Photo of jed
3.88/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Presentation: Comes in brown, 12 oz bottle with different label scheme than normal Brooklyn beers. No visible freshness date or style information, but "this Monster Ale was born in 2005." 11% alcohol.

Appearance: Pours a rich, brown red color with almost no head. Stray trails of carbonation creep up the side of the glass. Small amount of lacing, but nothing significant.

Smell: Strong alcohol esters dominate Monster Ale's aroma, with lesser notes of dark fruits and caramel sweetness. The smell brings to mind Dogfish Head Immort Ale, with more restrained alcohol and no maple or smokiness.

Taste: Monster Ale's nose is surprisingly bitter, with assertive hops balanced by the malt. The initial bitterness gives way to more sweet malt, and then a dry, astringent finish from the alcohol. Here's where Monster gets interesting: dark, candied fruits in the finish, with hints of sherry. Lingering dark alcohol sweetness. The bitterness of the nose rapidly fades; after a few sips, not much in front except some grain before giving way to the alcohol. As the beer warms, chocolate undertones in the finish. Commendable complexity.

MF: Smooth, although the carbonation seems to be a touch too high. Almost chewy from the alcohol.

Drinkability: It's 11% alcohol with a rich, full flavor, so not a good candidate for a session beer unless you're looking for a monster of a hangover. A nice sipper.

The American craft beer scene can be frustrating for barleywine lovers: with some notable exceptions, barleywines, like IPAs, seem to be turning into an arms race for the most hops, the most intense bitterness, and the biggest alcohol punch. Kudos to Garrett Oliver for turning out a beer that, like his IPA, bucks the trend and stays true to his historical interpretation of the style. Monster Ale is a good, not great beer that doesn't quite come together. Still, worth checking out if you're tired of the usual American barley wine and are willing to take on a more English style.

Photo of DaggerEyes
3.23/5  rDev -13.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

2005 Vintage poured a crisp ruby tinted brown with no head visable.
Very perfumey on the nose. the scent is a well balanced one featuring equal part citrusy hops and sweet sugry malts.

Monster Ale is light bodied with heavy carbonation and is very active in the mouth. The carbonation was much higher than I would have thought based on the apperance of the beer.

Fruity and sweet this beer has very similar characteristics to a young wine and seems that it could benifit from a few years in a cellar.

Photo of far333
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2005 vintage: Clear maple-ochre colored liquid is capped by a thick head of light brown meringue with a film of sheeting rising up evenly all around the inside of the glass. Aroma of cinnamon and pear, toffee malt and light brown sugar. Initially vinous and brandy-like, chewy fruits, faint smoke and sweetish molasses malts. Mouthfeel is a little thin and wispy upfront, but finishes full. A slight alcohol warmth lingers in the mouth and cheeks, accompanied by a fine hop bitterness. Fairly drinkable for such a big beer.

Photo of falloutsnow
3.53/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

2005 version.
A: Poured the bottle's contents into an oversized wine glass, which produced a one centimeter head that was off-white in color. The body is clear and clean, with an appearance similar to light caramel and amber. Carbonation is virtually nonexistent, despite the transparent body; this is backed up as the head collapses into a thin ring around the glass within twenty seconds.
S: The scent's forefront features mild, citrusy hops that are well-balanced with fruity esters and malt sweetness. The back of the nose is rich in alcohol burn - not exactly pleasant.
T: Taste opens up with a semi-spicy (assuming from the hops or alcohol) tones of sweetish malt and fruits such as apples or pears. This leads into a mildly bitter hop finish alongside the expected alcohol kick. As the beer warms, the alcohol presence becomes significantly more pronounced, almost dominating the finish of the beer.
M: The Monster Ale demonstrates a medium-heavy mouthfeel. The lack of significant carbonation acts in this one's favor, allowing the drinker to savor and enjoy on the palate as long as possible. Relatively "wet" finish despite the obvious hop presence in the scent and taste.
D: For English barleywines, this is a fair attempt, but I prefer the richness and more intense sweetness of Young's Old Nick. The alcohol sharpness turns me off, as does what seems to be this beer's tendency to be in many places at many different times, never doing justice to any particular area. Perhaps with some aging, the alcohol could be tempered and the beer would take on a mellower character, which would enhance its scent and taste attributes.

Photo of AltBock
4.05/5  rDev +8.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12oz. bottle that was born in the year 2004. The beer label as well as the neck label was silver in color with the word "Monster Ale" in black. The vintage date is on the front under "Monster Ale." The neck label had the information about the beer, food pairings with the beer, and the location of the Brooklyn Brewery. Basically it's a just a nice label that doesn't need to have a stupid Monster on the label.

Appearance: When I poured in into my Snifter, the beer was a copper color with a 1 finger head of foam that was an off white color. The foam dissipated fast leaving very few rings and little lace around the glass.

Smell: I was expecting this beer to have this strong medicine aroma, but to my surprise it was fruity in aroma instead. Besides the fruit, there was also a sweet caramel aroma with a slight hoppy background. Very good indeed!

Taste: Again, I was expecting this beer to be strong in medicine cause of the high ABV%, but to my surprise again it was actually quite mellow in fruit and sweet malts. I also detected some hops in the background as well. Very nice!

Mouthfeel: Now this is where I felt that strong medicine taste I thought it might have. Well, not just medicine in the aftertaste, the medicine was kind of fruity at the same time. Even with that medicine taste, I still didn't feel that high ABV % of 11.8%.

Drinkability: Even though this was my first barleywine style ale, I was quite impressed with this beer. Not only is it good, but it's affordable, being only $8 for a six-pack.

Photo of Freshie
4.45/5  rDev +19.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

2005 Vintage

Pours an awesome dark amber color, with nice head that dissapated to the sides of my snifter. Laces beautifully.

The aroma was a plethroa of smells from caramel to raisins. Very appealing to olfactory senses.

The taste was very expansive, with a strong sweet caramel malt to start that finishes to a nice hop bitterness.

The bitterness stays in your mouth, but it is pleasant. The high ABV is masked well by the ingrediants.

Very smooth. Very well put together all around.

Photo of DrJay
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2003 Vintage:
Reddish/brown topped by a thin head. The fine bubbles remained throughout and formed delicate lace. Aromas of fruit and toffee, very malty with some raisin and a bit of hops. Aging has really mellowed the aroma. Strong bitterness and solid malt backbone. There's a mellow fruit character throughout. The malt finishes a little short, but bitterness lingers. Full body, low carbonation, very smooth. The alcohol strength is well hidden. Surprisingly easy to drink. Very enjoyable.

Photo of danadeny
4/5  rDev +7.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2005 bottle aged a little over a year. Whe i first tried it fresh it was rough around the edges. Too much alcohol bite, not what i would say ballanced. So i figured aginf would smooth things out. And age did. The smell was much the same, it had lost little of it's typical barley wine aroma. But the ballance in flavor was much improved. A good, typical caramel sweetness at first due to a blen of medium roasted malt and alcohol, and the hops were present but just enough to ballance, you need to look for them. Overall at this point i would concider it a good, easy drinking barley wine, well within the barley wine catagory it was easy drinking. Something i could just relax and enjoy a mouthful of rather than a sip.

Photo of Goldorak
3.83/5  rDev +3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

2003 Vintage that I've had hidden in my cellar for who-knows how long.

Appearance: Sludgy, cola-brown, barely any head at all, just a really thin veil. It's pretty much average looking for the style, it doesn't mean I have to like it...

Smell: The madeirization (if that's even a word), was pretty evident, giving it a nice soothing, worked-in feel in the nose, and mellowing out the booze fumes that can sometimes be too harsh.

Taste: Surprisingly well carbonated, the body feels roasted and sticky sweet with notes of plums and just a little bit of strawberry jam in the hops, who coexist with the alcohol well enough to provide a dry finish that was enjoyable. Pretty easy to drink, considering the alcohol involved here.

Photo of MarkBlackout
3.85/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A strange brew indeed.. I've had numerous barley wines but never one that tasted like this. The first sip is a bit shocking due to the alcohol presence, but my palate quickly adjusted and I enjoyed the remainder. Has a nice caramel flavor without being too sweet. This is one beer that should be tried by anyone, even if barleywine is not your particular style of choice.

Brooklyn Monster Ale from Brooklyn Brewery
84 out of 100 based on 1,779 ratings.