1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Brooklyn Local 2 - Brooklyn Brewery

Not Rated.
Brooklyn Local 2Brooklyn Local 2

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
91
outstanding

1,154 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 1,154
Reviews: 508
rAvg: 4.05
pDev: 10.62%
Wants: 69
Gots: 147 | FT: 6
Brewed by:
Brooklyn Brewery visit their website
New York, United States

Style | ABV
Belgian Strong Dark Ale |  9.00% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: ClockworkOrange on 02-02-2009)
View: Beers (70) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 1,154 | Reviews: 508 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jwat
jwat

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -25.9%

02-06-2012 23:47:17 | More by jwat
Photo of TheBeerAlmanac
TheBeerAlmanac

Kentucky

3/5  rDev -25.9%

03-14-2013 19:54:53 | More by TheBeerAlmanac
Photo of jophish17
jophish17

Georgia

3/5  rDev -25.9%

12-24-2011 07:13:51 | More by jophish17
Photo of tastymug
tastymug

Washington

3/5  rDev -25.9%

01-21-2013 03:44:31 | More by tastymug
Photo of rderedin
rderedin

Maine

3/5  rDev -25.9%

01-16-2012 00:43:58 | More by rderedin
Photo of chcfan
chcfan

California

3/5  rDev -25.9%

11-17-2011 13:39:58 | More by chcfan
Photo of boondogglefob
boondogglefob

Montana

3/5  rDev -25.9%

12-23-2013 01:04:09 | More by boondogglefob
Photo of dirtylou
dirtylou

Washington

3.08/5  rDev -24%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

750ml bottle, brawleys

notes. i've had a day to reflect on how dissapointing this beer was.

appearance: dark cola body, frothy tan head with lively carbonation and foamy retention

smell: dark fruits, booze, wood, dark malts

taste: bitter orange rind, honey, dark malts, booze, woody notes, hoppy, booze soaked dark fruits. split this one and it was really too much.

mouthfeel: really bad - carbonation way over done, spicy boozy finish. basically the opposite of good

drinkability: bad.

Serving type: bottle

12-29-2010 05:06:58 | More by dirtylou
Photo of woosterbill
woosterbill

Connecticut

3.08/5  rDev -24%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

750 corked & caged bottle into a Duvel tulip.

A: Dark, opaque black-vermillion body with a lovely 3" head of frothy, creamy tan foam; good retention and light lacing. Great looking beer.

S: Rather dull aroma of bready malt, dark fruits, and spicy yeast. Not bad, but nothing special - especially for such a great style.

T: Starts out with fruity yeast, then the bready malts, then a distinct bit of cherry flavor (nice), and finally a wave of booze. Fairly complex, but overly boozy and not especially tasty.

M: Very smooth and fairly light, with abundant fine effervescence. Quite pleasant.

D: Not so great here. Mediocre taste and overly apparent alcohol make it a bit of a chore to drink a whole 750.

Notes: Much like Local 1, this was a faint imitation of the best Belgians (and, for that matter, top-notch American versions like Three Philosophers and Allagash Quad/Odyssey). Unlike the Local 1, it wasn't all that tasty in its own right. Even though this isn't a bad beer by any stretch, I was pretty disappointed. I'd recommend steering clear of this one in favor of one of the offerings from Rochefort, St. Bernardus, or Chimay, or...you get the idea.

Cheers!

Serving type: bottle

03-31-2010 02:03:07 | More by woosterbill
Photo of rapidsequence
rapidsequence

Virginia

3.1/5  rDev -23.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

750 ml bottle, $9.39 from my grocery store. Been in my cellar for a year.

Appearance: Pours a dark cherry brown with an off white head. Excellent head retention and some sticky lacing. When held to the light, the beer is a clear garnet color with lots of bubbles. The head and lacing on the second pour is even better, so I'm upping the score. Good looking beer.

Smell: Definitely its a BSDA, but not the best. Some dark fruit and bready yeast, but not too complex. Very spicy and peppery. The "citrus peel," which I assume is curucao is very tart smelling. Unfortunately spice and citrus drown out some of the other nice aromas.

Taste: Up front, a thin example of fruity and yeasty Belgian dark, followed by a ridiculous amount of sour, tart citrus all the way through to the finish. Why, just why? Why add citrus peel to a Belgian dark, and if you must, why this much? Its not terrible, but just wrong.

Mouthfeel: I like the carbonation. It allows it to be foamy and creamy without being too much. It does finish a little too dry/puckering, maybe because its so tart. That makes it seem a little thin though rather than thick and rich.

Drinkability: All in all, its an OK BSDA with too much citrus flavor. Its drinkable and decent, but not for $10 a 750. Much better BSDAs to be had for that, both North American and Belgian.

Serving type: bottle

07-27-2010 00:27:58 | More by rapidsequence
Photo of WalrusJockey
WalrusJockey

New Jersey

3.18/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

750ml bottle into Duvel tulips.

A- very clear and crisp brown on the pour, in the glass it is a darker, reddish color. The head is thick, and the color they call mocha that looks nothing like the coffee of the same name.

S- very sweet with lots of forest-berry aromas, with a choco-vanilla hint, assumedly from the malt.

T- spice and fruit linger behind and alongside the thick malt profile, with the fruit of the nose far removed from where it was expected to be. The dominant flavor is of spices, like a spicy cinnamon loaf, combined with the 9% ABV, the result is very warming. The berries of the nose are sadly underrepresented, and the label's "honey and citrus peel" seem to be more added to sound enticing on the label than to be significant ingredients.

The end result isn't *bad,* in fact it is rather nice, but it is not what the aroma, or the bottle itself, might lead you to expect. For a BSDA I find it to be far too much malt and not nearly enough...flavor besides malt.

M- much thinner than I expected. Not creamy or thick at all. In the glass, it looks quite heavy, and the head is fairly substantial, but in the mouth, the beer is light, and with the heavy amounts of malt and spice present, it winds up feeling lacking in body, though it isn't wattery by any stretch. Honestly, if the mouthfeel had matched the flavor profile in ANY way, this beer would have received a much better score from me.

D- I don't think any 9% is going to be overly drinkable, but I don't especially like this beer, so I would rate it poorly.

Notes- if you want a strong, spiced-unto-spicy beer that won't weigh down your stomach with tons of body, and isn't distracted by fruit flavors, you might like this beer. I don't care for "winter warmer" types, and if I had known that was what this is, I probably would have passed on it. Rated as a BSD it fares even worse.

Serving type: bottle

04-01-2009 02:03:34 | More by WalrusJockey
Photo of psyphin
psyphin

Missouri

3.2/5  rDev -21%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A - Very dark brown with ruby highlights. Huge slight off white head on top, no lacing.

S - Boozy with typical belgian esters. Dark fruit and malt hidden behind.

T - Heavy malt, fruity with a heavy alcahol heat.

M - Slightly thin with aggresive carbonation.

D - The overwhelming sensation of the alcahol detracted from an otherwise interesting beer. Worth a bottle for sampling, definitely not intended for session drinking.

Serving type: bottle

10-10-2009 18:58:40 | More by psyphin
Photo of Hoppington
Hoppington

New York

3.23/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The bottle discretely states: "Ale brewed with honey and citrus peel". Sounds good to me so I bought a bottle.

I have mixed impressions here. It is a decent Abbey influenced beer, but the taste is not evoking either honey or citrus peel. Still, its a good beer - but pretty much a straight belgian style ale...and not particularly distinctive.

The malt notes strike me as a bit muted and the overall mouthfeel is a bit more liquidy than I would expect for this style. Also there is a slight lagerish nose which turns me off a bit.

I'm not going to pan it completely, but I probably won't be drinking this one again unless they refine the recipe a bit. This has potential, but it's just not quite there yet for me. It needs to be more distinctive and exhibit a bit more character. This one seems a bit timid.

Serving type: bottle

04-05-2009 00:40:32 | More by Hoppington
Photo of matty
matty

Pennsylvania

3.23/5  rDev -20.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Dark brown colored beer with a rapidly fading head.Aroma is dark fruit.Taste is the same dark fruit,alcohol and a bit of hops on the finish.Overall it's ok but this is not something I can see myself buying again in the future.I would probably recommend to try once but as for me one is plenty.

Serving type: bottle

05-16-2009 01:02:17 | More by matty
Photo of whoneeds8
whoneeds8

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours out a dark brown with a one finger head that disappears rather quickly. I can't tell anything along the line of smell because of allergies. This is the worst time of year for me to be reviewing anything, lol. The taste doesn't really have the flavor intensity I would like for a beer at this price level. The taste is well balanced, but I am having trouble finding the honey advertised on the back of the label. There is a sort of mapel taste upfront, maybe that's what they were talking about. The spices from the belgian yeast is there, just not very strong. The mouthfeel is way way way too carbonated. So much so that it almost takes away from the flavor. It definatly takes a notch off drinkability.

Serving type: bottle

10-08-2009 22:54:50 | More by whoneeds8
Photo of zachpaschal
zachpaschal

Indiana

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

05-09-2014 02:17:24 | More by zachpaschal
Photo of leinie13
leinie13

Ohio

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

03-31-2012 03:06:59 | More by leinie13
Photo of jaypb
jaypb


3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

07-28-2014 01:30:55 | More by jaypb
Photo of JedediahK
JedediahK

New York

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

04-07-2012 02:58:09 | More by JedediahK
Photo of champ103
champ103

Texas

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Pours a cloudy brown color. A large beige head forms with good retention. Light lace is left as the foam recedes.
S: Brewers yeast, some fruity esters, and some alcohol.
T: Follows the nose. Yeast and fruit. Sweet sugary malt and alcohol. A strange mineral flavor.
M/D: A medium body that is way over carbonated. The alcohol is noticeable, but still a good beer to sip on.

Not bad, but kind of bland IMO. Worth a try, but not my favorite for the style or brewery.

Serving type: bottle

10-11-2009 00:17:30 | More by champ103
Photo of wembly13
wembly13

West Virginia

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

04-08-2012 14:28:29 | More by wembly13
Photo of nzerbe
nzerbe

New York

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

03-04-2013 00:22:19 | More by nzerbe
Photo of YouSkeete
YouSkeete

Massachusetts

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A: Deep dark cloudy mahogany color. Very opaque. Enormous tan colored head.

S: Honey, dark fruits and chocolate are the main aromas coming from this one. Smells pretty malty and pretty yeasty. Strong aromas.

T: Sweet upfront, notes of chocolate and honey. Caramel and some darker fruits can be noticed after the initial taste. Also tastes a bit nutty, like a brown ale. 9% ABV isn't very noticeable. Fizzy finish, almost like champage.

M: High carbonation, light to medium body. Again, tastes like champagne.

D: Easy drinker, though not really my style. Too simple: very face value.

Serving type: bottle

11-09-2010 04:06:37 | More by YouSkeete
Photo of mrfrancis
mrfrancis

Kentucky

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

07-12-2013 20:59:18 | More by mrfrancis
Photo of Scarflower
Scarflower

New Hampshire

3.25/5  rDev -19.8%

12-30-2013 00:11:00 | More by Scarflower
Brooklyn Local 2 from Brooklyn Brewery
91 out of 100 based on 1,154 ratings.