1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Arcadia Angler's Ale - Arcadia Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Arcadia Angler's AleArcadia Angler's Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
76
okay

242 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 242
Reviews: 143
rAvg: 3.3
pDev: 16.06%
Wants: 1
Gots: 7 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Arcadia Brewing Company visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
English Pale Ale |  5.40% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
1054 OG; 34 IBU

(Beer added by: SheepNutz on 01-06-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 242 | Reviews: 143 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jneiswender
1.48/5  rDev -55.2%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Poured out of a 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

A--yellow brown and somewhat cloudy

S--spicy, somewhat bubblegum

T--mushroom like, off, tannic

M--light to medium mouthfeel

D--This just tasted way off. Doesn't really resemble an APA at all. This may just simply be a bad batch but I don't get a sense that the base is close to the style it says it is.

jneiswender, Sep 23, 2008
Photo of brewdlyhooked13
1.53/5  rDev -53.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1

Appearance - pours a cloudy, murky and dull orange. A few fingers of stiff foam, decent lace. Lots of bead action in the glass.

Aroma - initially, not much at all. Powdery grain maybe. Some light floral citrus, very distant. As it sets up I pick up the rumblings of possible infection with a vague, acrid and sour scent.

Taste - some light biscuity grain, a brief glint of citrus, then yes, the definite flavor of contamination. Whassap with Arcadia? Not the worst level of infection but enough to make me cut this sampling short.

Mouthfeel - medium weight, uber-crisp (typical for an infected brew), a decent smooth feel.

Drinkability - I'm certainly disappointed as I can taste a decent beer hiding in there somewhere. Per the notch, best purchased before February. Hmm, it's still September, I did *my* part!

brewdlyhooked13, Sep 30, 2008
Photo of pmcadamis
1.68/5  rDev -49.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A - Medium orange and slightly cloudy with a billowing four finger head. Head retention is amazing, and lots of really nice lace is stuck in huge clumps all over the glass.

S - Funky fruit notes.... peach, apricot, and a slightly sour mustiness behind all that.

T - Eww. This is not good. Sour rotten fruit and chemical notes make this almost a drain pour. Almost.

M - Light bodied, sour, and dry.

D - No thank you! Hopefully this was a bad bottle, but it doesn't really have that noticeable skunked aroma and flavor. Not good.

pmcadamis, Apr 05, 2009
Photo of BeerBelcher
1.73/5  rDev -47.6%
look: 1 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

This is the foamiest beer I've ever opened! It didn't surge out of the bottle when I opened it, but the gentlest of pours down the side of a pint glass gave me nothing but a glass of foam and about 3mm worth of beer at the bottom. When things finally settled down I took a wiff and got some very mild hoppiness and some non-hop-generated citrus. Flavor is malty, watery, and unpleasant. Mouthfeel is watery. I can't say I recommend this at all.

BeerBelcher, Jun 18, 2007
Photo of GoldenChild
1.9/5  rDev -42.4%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1.5

Hmmm i have to say that most of the beers that i have tasted from acradia seemed very sweet to me and this one is no exception.

Appearance: Poured from a 12 oz into a glass, no head at all light amber color to it.

Smell: has a sweet smell to it.

Taste: just like i said before has a very sweet sugar taste to it, and like others have said maybe a plastic taste followed by dry mouth after taste.

Mouthfeel: has a light carbonation to it that you feel on your tongue has a cant get it out of my mouth feeling to it.

Drinkability: i would say that this is an easy to drink beer because it is light on alcohol flavor.

Overall: not impressed with any of the beer that came in the mixed twelve pack of arcadia that i purchased. it all kinda had the same taste to me like there was not enough yeast in it to ferment all the sugars?

GoldenChild, Nov 30, 2009
Photo of sixerofelixir
2/5  rDev -39.4%

sixerofelixir, Feb 27, 2013
Photo of Brew33
2/5  rDev -39.4%

Brew33, Jan 22, 2013
Photo of jwc215
2.13/5  rDev -35.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Best by Aug. notched on label:

This was a gusher - poured foam that pretty quickly settled revealing an amber body.

The smell is fruity - pears and apple with a caramelish background.

The taste is of pear and sour apple with a light sweet caramelish/grainy maltiness. Slight metallic notes mix in. Cracker-like and yeasty. This is a mess. Bitter notes don't blend so well with the maltiness.

The feel is the lamest part of this brew. Watery and fizzy.

Odd, non-complementary tastes with a ridiculously fizzy/over-carbonated feel. Not good.

jwc215, Apr 19, 2008
Photo of pare311
2.25/5  rDev -31.8%

pare311, Oct 01, 2012
Photo of alexgash
2.28/5  rDev -30.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Very cloudy dark tangerine is loaded with sediment. Big, gushy, cobweb cumulus head of light beige. Nice head, but the sediment worries me a little. Pine needles are big on the nose along with faint sugar cookie malt. Tart, citrusy hop flavors up front. Acidic and lemony. Mild biscuit and sugar cookie malt, but mostly covered up by the metallic citrus. Gushy, overcarbonated mouthfeel. Not very good.

alexgash, Feb 10, 2008
Photo of jpkoch1962
2.3/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Not a good batch. This ale gushed from the bottle, overflowing my pint glass. Once things settled down, a cloudy copper colored brew remained. The aroma was sweet and malty wiith sour citrus overtones. The taste matched the aroma. It was a moldy sweet taste with sour, flowery somewhat bitter background.

A best-by date bar was on each bottle, but nothing was notched. This is really getting tiresome. I don't know how many micros I have purchased that were oxidized or stale because of thier age. This one was probably infected, yet it was on the shelves selling for almost 10 bucks/six pack. This is becoming a real problem for micros. Either they intentionally ship defective products, or they refuse to give the consumer a freshness date.

jpkoch1962, Jan 14, 2007
Photo of TastyTaste
2.3/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Another explosive Arcadia beer, what is with that?
Head is absolutely massive, about 3" atop about 1" of beer. The head is a light tan color, the body is a hazy copper color, with lots of visible carbonation bubbles. Taste is bitter, like an ipa should be, but doesn't have the bouquet (floral, pine, or citrus) of many a PA. Is this an infected bottle? It seems like Arcadia would be a big enough brewer to have better quality control, but this beer seems lackluster all around. Not great in any category, Arcadia is very hit and miss (Hit: Porter, Scotch Ale. Miss: Pale Ale, ESB).

TastyTaste, Sep 10, 2005
Photo of kmeves
2.3/5  rDev -30.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Pours a highly carbonated clear copper color with a huge off white head. The aroma is lightly sweet malt, light floral, fruit and paper. The flavor is masked by paper although minimal amounts of fruit, floral and malt manage to make there way through. Medium bodied, oily texture. Finishes very metallic.

kmeves, Sep 09, 2008
Photo of cynical1027
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%

cynical1027, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of SpongeKA
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%

SpongeKA, Mar 23, 2014
Photo of marcb105
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%

marcb105, Feb 28, 2014
Photo of gater_ade
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%

gater_ade, Sep 17, 2014
Photo of TerryW
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

An average looking beer, coppery with a short head that settles to a heavy film and gives up spotty lace.

After that this beer gets a little odd. Some off aromas and tastes, slightly funky or vegetal. Bitter metallic finish over top of some sweetness and a noticeable hit of rough edged alcohol. Something not quite right here and its off-putting.

Overall, not enjoyable verging on slightly unpleasant and not as good as other pale ales I've had. Poorest of the lot from the brewery sampler.

TerryW, May 25, 2009
Photo of barnzy78
2.5/5  rDev -24.2%

barnzy78, Nov 20, 2011
Photo of madeofsteel
2.53/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A - Pours a warm golden color with a finger's worth of fizzy head that dissipates to a thin film after about a minute, leaving some lacing.

S - Not a whole lot of hops going on, but it is a little citrusy, but what I'm picking up is mostly funky sour. Not much aroma to speak of, even.

T - There's that weird, unpleasant sour... but now it's in my mouth! Faint hops in the back, but it's such a weird, funky flavor. Almost reminds me of Magic Hat #9, which I cannot stand. Maybe it's past expiration?

M - Prickly carbonation, it's a very excited beer for being a pale ale.

O - Since this is from a brewery that has put out some other decent beers, I'm inclined to give them the BOTD and say it might have been past expiration or somesuch, but I probably won't ever get this one again.

madeofsteel, Dec 01, 2011
Photo of Shiloh
2.53/5  rDev -23.3%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This is not an impressive brew, the body is thick and medium dark for an amber. The head is white and minor with short duration.
Carbonation is heavy.
Very quick bitterness attack but shortlived...no retaliation from the other side.
Syrupy.
Nose is there but a nondescript sweetness, is that the retaliation?
Not crisp.
Yuck.

Shiloh, Jul 02, 2003
Photo of bonk0076
2.55/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours an amber golden color, with a slight white head and no lacing. Aroma is of roasted malts, some mild hops, and something I can't place but seems off. Taste consists of a slight hop flavor, with a plastic taste as well. Mouthfeel is pretty light and watery.

bonk0076, Nov 24, 2009
Photo of adamette
2.55/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Live review. Poured from the 12 oz. bottle that I bought at the new SAVE-ON Tobacco & Beverage in Mentor, Ohio for $1.30. Very reasonable price as the broken up 6 pack was simply the price of the 6 pack divided by 6. Very BA friendly as far as an effort to try a lot of different beers. I picked this one up as I have just visited Arcadia in Battle Creek but they did not have this one on tap. Poured into my Samuel Smith pint glass. . Both "Aug" and "Sep" are punched on the right side of the label. Message above that says "Best when purchased before the month notched." Label also mentions that this is a "Pale Ale brewed in the British Tradition."

A Rather basic light brown/orange translucent body with brief (30 seconds) but bubbly very light brown head. Reasonable lacing on my glass as I sip though. 3.0

S Distant smell of barley, little to no hops and very little malt. 2.0

T Barley is primary. As suggested by the smell, very little malt or hops tasted by me. This may be a Pale Ale but you should not expect the hop levels that we Americans have become accustomed to from most of our Pale Ales. Even Sierra Nevada Pale Ale has a significantly higher hop presence (and malt presence now that I think of it) than this beer. 2.0

M Thin but this is appropriate to the style. 3.0

D Good but I will not buy this again. 4.0

Notes: Probably a great beer for the 'ol fishing trip or a weekend with the guys (as long as it is very cold!). The thing is, there are many other (cheaper) options that would fit the purpose that this beer serves.

adamette, Oct 27, 2009
Photo of jackndan
2.63/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Arcadia’ Angler’s Ale: Hmmm.. .. I’ve been disappointed with this mixed twelve pack, the tastes are fairly faithful to their styles, but the flavor is very middle of the road. This style has a fairly under whelming hop, a little malt and a whole lot of nothing. I’ll pass it by next time.

jackndan, Dec 18, 2002
Photo of Forb
2.63/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from a 12oz bottle...

Appearance: Strong head; vivid copper translucent; head retains fairly well. Leaves scattered streams of lace along the glass after each sip.

Smell: Detrimentally low start to this review as the aromas come in far too weak. A lemony yeast element pushes forth stronger than the faint hop and malt aromas that can barely be discerned.

Taste: Yet again, weak. Light malt flavoring comes through presenting the faint elements of hop bitterness that lack the ability to be noticed. Bland to a lemony citrus finish.

Mouthfeel: Plenty of light, fluffy carbonation. Light to medium body overall.

Overall: Bland - but an extremely easy drink.

Forb, Mar 24, 2012
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Arcadia Angler's Ale from Arcadia Brewing Company
76 out of 100 based on 242 ratings.