1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Creemore Springs Traditional Pilsner - Creemore Springs Brewery Limited

Not Rated.
Creemore Springs Traditional PilsnerCreemore Springs Traditional Pilsner

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
80
good

134 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 134
Reviews: 73
rAvg: 3.53
pDev: 11.9%
Wants: 8
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Creemore Springs Brewery Limited visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
Czech Pilsener |  5.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Pilsner was first made back in 1842 by the Bohemians. They used special pale malt and an abundance of hops to create a delicious, golden beer. Up here at Creemore Springs we fire-brew our pilsner the same traditional way, using only four natural ingredients starting with our own clear flowing spring water. It’s eminently drinkable, and always refreshing. Classic yet unique; it’s our fresh take on a traditional Czech pilsner.

26 IBU

(Beer added by: CAMRAhardliner on 05-22-2007)
View: Beers (8) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
Ratings: 134 | Reviews: 73 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of BARFLYB
BARFLYB

Pennsylvania

3.1/5  rDev -12.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

16oz Tallboy into a pint glass
Creemore Springs Pilsner pours out of the can a dull golden color with some yellow shade towards the side. A inch of loose ecru colored foam came and went leaving nothing. Smell is pale pilsner malts, alot of them. Sweet smelling after some whiffs. Any hops have faded by now. Semi scent of extract. Taste is extract, corn, pale malt and sweet. Earthy hop taste that is old. Feel is a bit lackluster, I was expecting more carb from the can. Light bodied, yet not crisp enough to go down easily. I had one and now I am done.

Serving type: can

12-31-2011 23:51:03 | More by BARFLYB
Photo of kwjd
kwjd

Ontario (Canada)

3.23/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a pale yellow with bubbly white head that dissipates to a very small layer leaving spots of lacing on the glass. Smells of mild grassy hops with some bready malt. Flavour isn't very big, but it is clean. Carbonation is good. A nice enough pilsner, but there are better options in Ontario (ie. King and Mill Street). Nothing wrong with this beer though, it just doesn't quite do it for me.

Serving type: can

09-13-2010 21:52:13 | More by kwjd
Photo of andrewdanks
andrewdanks

California

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

05-31-2014 09:38:49 | More by andrewdanks
Photo of zimm421
zimm421

Ohio

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

02-28-2013 19:03:41 | More by zimm421
Photo of TheBeeraholic
TheBeeraholic

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

06-15-2013 18:29:14 | More by TheBeeraholic
Photo of coder
coder


3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

05-06-2012 03:10:14 | More by coder
Photo of andrenaline
andrenaline

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

A - Pours a crystal clear golden colour with a thumb of head. Head dissipates relatively quickly leaving small islands and a noticeable amount of lacing.

S - Scent was rather light on this one, bitter lemongrass, with a wheaty grassiness overpowering the scent. Alcohol was also noticeable on the nose.

T - Grassy and bready malts with a bit of bitter lemon hops noticeable on the aftertaste. The bitterness lingered in the throat.

M - Nicely balanced, smooth and sessionable.

D - A tasty pilsener, but nothing overly memorable. Easily drinkable and non-offensive, but don't look to this one for any unique or stand-out flavours.

Serving type: bottle

06-25-2010 23:24:38 | More by andrenaline
Photo of Kmat10
Kmat10

Alberta (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

05-27-2013 19:29:33 | More by Kmat10
Photo of BBP
BBP

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A- Very clear yellowish color. Slight head which receeded quickly.

S- Malty lead. Lemon and hops second.

T- Good blend of malt and hops as well as sweet and bitter. Found the taste improved the more I drank (takes a few sips to appreciate more). A little on the light side. A nice aftertaste with lemon and hops.

M- A bit light on the tongue. Fairly creamy though. Goes down smooth.

D- Quite drinkable. Fairly economic too. It'd be a great beer to share with friends, but I would choose something different if looking to impress somebody.

Serving type: can

08-19-2010 23:19:46 | More by BBP
Photo of yancot
yancot

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

02-18-2013 17:52:12 | More by yancot
Photo of WeissBoy
WeissBoy

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

09-11-2012 01:45:41 | More by WeissBoy
Photo of StrangerTides
StrangerTides

New York

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

07-05-2014 06:31:33 | More by StrangerTides
Photo of boszormeny
boszormeny

Ontario (Canada)

3.25/5  rDev -7.9%

12-09-2013 03:38:08 | More by boszormeny
Photo of OttoBomb
OttoBomb

Illinois

3.3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 473ml can into a DogFish Head signature glass (January 6, 2011). The code "K191009:43" is stamped on the bottom of the can, which for Creemore Springs means this was packaged at 9:43am on the 19th of an unidentified month in 2010. I hate obscure packaging codes.

*Note on the Creemore Springs packaging codes. I was previously informed that the letter portion of the code was a direct correlation to the number of the month, (eg A=January, B=February), however I have come across several codes that are far too deep in the alphabet (beyond 12 letters), to relate to a specific month. I'm a bit confused by this, and quite frankly wish Creemore would come up with a more sane packaging date system.

I picked this up on a recent visit home to Canada.

Eyes: As expected from a pilsener, it pours a crystal clear pale golden color. A white foamy head form and dissipates kjust a bit too quickly, retention and lacing are minimal, but true to style.

Nose: Prominent grassy Saaz hops, with a surprising lemony, fruity profile.

Tongue: Follows the nose closely, a solid punch of sweet grassy/citrus noble hops, followed up by a modest bitter finish. True to style, but not overly impressive.

Mouth: Light, crisp, overall nice, while a bit heavy on the metallic, bitter finish. Carbonation could certainly use a bit of a boost.

Libation: This is a bigger beer than the 5.3% ABV would suggest. Flavorful and quite good, but there just doesn't seem to be enough balance of crispness and flavor to put it over the top.

Serving type: can

01-06-2011 11:17:04 | More by OttoBomb
Photo of Matt1516
Matt1516

Quebec (Canada)

3.3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Lots of carbonation i the pour, fluffy white head and golden body.

Smells of grass and lemon. Some hoppiness to the taste, a little graininess and some rice flavours. Malts are subtle but present and citrus and floral notes.

Very clean and crisp tasting. Dry finish. A thirst quencher--pair with spicy sausage or Indian fare

Serving type: can

06-27-2011 02:42:57 | More by Matt1516
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

3.3/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A very uninspired, albeit commonplace, tone of yellow that is brought to life only by the unimpeded march of bubbles which, in military fashion, walk with deliberation in their skyward ascension. It's an odd sight these bubbles given that its head was quickly exhausted. The colour doesn't catch my eye - there isn't much glitter or shine, although the clarity is certainly spotless enough to afford some.

Because of the prevalence of bastardized mass-produced offerings in this style, people often forget the fact that true pilsners are actually very hoppy beers; Creemore's example isn't likely to remind anyone. I was hopeful of finding a little spice, a lot of grassiness, in what should have been a fragrantly hop-filled bouquet. Instead I'm finding unclad pale malts and a tinge of corn. This is most definitely not to be considered aromatic.

Nor would the taste be defined as overly scrumptious. Pilsners don't always have to be delicious - they can suffice to just be quenching - but they often are. The leafy, grassy, earthiness that is distinctive of Czech Saaz hops is distinguishably tasty and their base of bready, sweet malts is always incredibly palatable. Here, there is a trace of floral hoppiness but it's easily overlooked - and the malts can't make up the difference.

It may not be a case of bad meat, but rather the meat being badly prepared. For one, the water seems too hard for a Czech pilsner. I trust the brewery treated their water but notwithstanding, it seems much better suited to an English pale ale. It is quite possible that the incessantly high carbonation is responsible for that impression; this barrage of artificial, almost painfully stinging bubbles should best be toned down.

You won't find the world's best pilsner in Creemore, Ontario - that is a matter of fact. Whether you'll find a dreadfully mediocre, frankly underachieving pilsner or a commendable, higher-than-average one is a matter of opinion. My personal opinion would side with the former although I don't wish to give the impression this is a bad beer, not by any means. As unexceptional this is as a pilsner, it's by no means inferior for a conventional lager.

Serving type: can

08-05-2009 22:16:01 | More by biegaman
Photo of decimator
decimator

Ontario (Canada)

3.33/5  rDev -5.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

473ml can poured into a pint glass.

A - Poured a golden yellow colour with a white head that disappeared in a couple minutes. Lacing is minimal.

S - Grassy hops, some malt sweetness and a bit of citrus.

T - A mild sweetness at first, a hint of citrus and then it's the bitterness from the hops.

M - Average carbonation. Not quite as crisp as I'd expect for a Pilsner. Leaves a bit of a sticky bitterness in the mouth.

D - Goes down pretty quick. Not my favourite Pilsner but it's still pretty good.

Serving type: can

05-10-2010 00:14:39 | More by decimator
Photo of DrJay
DrJay

Massachusetts

3.38/5  rDev -4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Crystal clear pale gold colour. A soapy white head fell quickly and didn't leave much behind on the glass. A thin collar did linger for a while, but disappeared quickly too. Mild aroma, sweet cereal and malts, grassy and spicy hops. Sturdy bitterness, mild citrus and grassy character. Sweet malts, a bit bready. Slightly minty in the finish. Medium bodied, average carbonation, off-dry, a little too soft in texture and lacking crispness. Decent overall, but not exciting enough to search for again. The Creemore Kellerbier was much more impressive.

Serving type: can

08-17-2010 02:12:56 | More by DrJay
Photo of paxkey
paxkey

Ontario (Canada)

3.4/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

pale yellow with a ton of carbonation. poured in a samuel smith pint glass yields a large white head.

floral hops sweet malt on the nose. zesty citrussy. with some cracker malt.
tastes smooth and refreshing with a cracker malt middle finished with some hop bitterness and some more malt on the finish.

really fresh tasting. a good summer refresher.

Serving type: can

08-14-2011 22:36:34 | More by paxkey
Photo of bryehn
bryehn

Ontario (Canada)

3.4/5  rDev -3.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep golden colour with a frothy white head that falls to a collar within a few minutes without leaving any real lace behind.

Aroma of freshwater, grains and tangy hops. There is a citrus-like note as well. Not very complicated, but always smells clean.

The taste is malty with a slight roastiness, but not sweet. It has a significant bitterness and a faint lemon peel taste as it passes over the tongue.

The mouthfeel is a bit light on the carbonation, but offers an earthy creaminess. Starts off easy, but for me has an unfortunate sourness on the end.

I used to really like this beer, now not so much. It's a quality brew overall, but the other three from Creemore Springs are all better.

Serving type: can

04-05-2011 17:21:03 | More by bryehn
Photo of CanuckRover
CanuckRover

Ontario (Canada)

3.43/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep gold with a nice snow-white head. Settles to a film and leaves spotty lacings through the whole beer.

Very nice aroma, spot-on for the style. A firm barley background but with wonderfully aromatic grass seed hops giving real character.

Grassy hops with a slight barnyard flavour jump forward and settle into a very subtle bitterness. The malt sort of lets the beer down, too sweet. It's almost in vienna lager territory. I'd prefer a lighter malt.

I prefer the Creemore lager to this. The hop presence is there, but the heavy malt character takes something away.

Serving type: can

05-02-2009 18:34:08 | More by CanuckRover
Photo of IronDjinn
IronDjinn

Alberta (Canada)

3.43/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

From a 500 ml can. Pours out a crystal clear gold, tall foamy white head with good retention.

Clean crisp grains at first, although a little bit of veg as well.

The flavour is clean, earthy grains followed by grassy, spicy hops, some sweetness lingers in the aftertaste.

Medium-light mouthfeel, crisp carbonation.

An okay pils, falling someplace between a German and Bohemian pils. I hate to say it but this is more crisp straight out of the can, although the appearance is nice enough to pour into a glass every time just for that. I like it, but it's a little rough around the edges.

Serving type: can

07-19-2010 09:13:14 | More by IronDjinn
Photo of JohnnyBarman
JohnnyBarman

Ontario (Canada)

3.45/5  rDev -2.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a Creemore-branded lager glass. Medium golden hue, about a half-inch of head that dissolves into a thin ring. A few patches of lacing.

Nose is malty, with notes of biscuit and lemony hops.

Taste is quite similar: starts off with a malty kick before transitioning to leafy hops. Finishes slightly bitter. Some yeast or biscuit as well, which makes this one all Creemore.

Mouthfeel is slightly watery, moderate sting to the carbonation.

Not bad, certainly quite drinkable, but my least favorite of the Creemore brews. Definitely needs to be more assertive. Still, I'll happily drink this one over other local lagers, but there's more robust examples of the Czech style to be had.

Serving type: can

05-11-2010 19:57:45 | More by JohnnyBarman
Photo of nokes
nokes

Ontario (Canada)

3.48/5  rDev -1.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a tall pilsener from a 473ml can. Very clear yellow-to-gold with a two-finger dense-soap head that hung on not too badly and left lacing on the glass. Carbonation bubbles, not too many, not too few.

Smells clean and grassy. More malty smell as it warmed.

Tastes very simple, but not bland. A bit o malt, and then mild bitter. It's good. I'm not blown away, but it's good.

I like the mouthfeel. It's not watery, which helps the simplicity to work. Not really creamy but somehow reminiscent of that. It has presence enough to carry it. The carbonation is just right, and it feels good in the mouth.

This is quite drinkable. I remember liking other Pilseners more, but I certainly remember liking still other Pilseners quite a bit less.

I'd drink it again. It was a nice warm sunny September day, with cicadas buzzing and all that, so it worked. I won't go looking for it, though.

Serving type: can

09-20-2009 02:44:51 | More by nokes
Photo of FadetoBock
FadetoBock

Alberta (Canada)

3.5/5  rDev -0.8%

08-18-2013 16:05:58 | More by FadetoBock
Creemore Springs Traditional Pilsner from Creemore Springs Brewery Limited
80 out of 100 based on 134 ratings.