1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Brava Cerveza - Lakeport Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Brava CervezaBrava Cerveza

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
69
poor

42 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 42
Reviews: 27
rAvg: 2.77
pDev: 28.52%
Wants: 1
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Lakeport Brewing Company visit their website
New Brunswick, Canada

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Brava is a premium lager containing 5% alcohol and brewed with specialized premium hops that promote a light-bodied, crisp, and refreshing lager.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 11-03-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 42 | Reviews: 27 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of Wordslinger
1/5  rDev -63.9%

Wordslinger, May 05, 2012
Photo of vondutch
4/5  rDev +44.4%

vondutch, Apr 23, 2012
Photo of beerhunter13
2.75/5  rDev -0.7%

beerhunter13, Mar 27, 2012
Photo of biboergosum
2.2/5  rDev -20.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

355ml can, no indication of origin other than the perfunctory Labatt's production info on the rudimentary label.

This beer pours a crystal clear, very pale golden yellow colour, with three fat fingers of puffy, thinly foamy, and fizzy bone-white head, which leaves a decent spectral lace pattern of lace around the glass as everything subsides.

It all smells of sharp, corny grain, musty rice, overcooked green veggies, with an unexpected boozy nature beyond reproach. The taste is understated nail polish remover, adjunct-heavy grainy 'malt', hard water, thankfully faded vegetal astringency, and well, nothing else.

The carbonation is quite reserved, the body equally so, with a typically bland, though even, medium body weight. It finishes mostly blithely sweet, with a musty corn/rice graininess, but again in a weakly rendered manner - nothing much else going on.

Cheap is, as cheap does. 6 bucks and change buys you the whole six-pack, yes sirree Bob! A typical Labatt's LCD offshoot from the brain guild down off Whitemud Drive - try harder next time, boyz...oh, right, you don't need or have to.

biboergosum, Feb 19, 2012
Photo of oldp0rt
3/5  rDev +8.3%

oldp0rt, Feb 10, 2012
Photo of wordemupg
2.23/5  rDev -19.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

355ml can poured into pint glass 2/2/12

A clear straw yellow with bubbles of all sizes feeding a thumbs width of bone white foam that sticks around long enough to leave a couple rings of lace, looks great for the style

S well my excitement was short lived, corny sweet malt with some very faint solvent, at least its not skunky

T simple and not very appealing, what I smell more or less, with a little apple on the finish

M lots of bubbles, a little watery and a relatively clean finish

O just like a thousand macros before it this one fails to impress me other then its look

I hope this was at least cheap beer, a party leftover from the other night gotta love random ticks

wordemupg, Feb 02, 2012
Photo of thehyperduck
2.25/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Tallboy can picked up at TBS. Lakeport's version of Corona, huh? Am I a masochist? Nope, just a ticker.

Pours that familiar pale golden-yellow colour, topped with roughly one finger of surprisingly ample, puffy white head that seeps away over a period of minutes. It leaves behind a thin cap and impressive quantities of lacing on the sides. I'll be blunt - for an adjunct lager, this actually looks pretty good. Unfortunately, the praise ends here - and look how much text is still below! The aroma is faint and not interesting at all, with hints of pale malts, corny sweetness and not much else for support. Not exactly enticing, but tolerable enough.

And 'tolerable' might as well be the word of the day - the taste is similarly tolerable, but nothing more. Grainy pale malts mingling with corny, sweet adjunct notes are basically the only flavours here. I'm pretty sure I have never used the phrase 'wet cardboard' in one of my reviews, but that streak now comes to an end because it's a very apt descriptor for the flavour of this stuff. Poorly balanced, with very little bitterness to counter the sweetness. Very thin, watery mouthfeel, with appropriate (fairly high) carbonation levels for the style. Easy to drink... but why?

Why would someone who enjoys beer drink this? Perhaps this is a trick question, and the only people who buy these Mexican pale lagers are beer-loathing Philistines, or evil, sadistic men who wish only to sully the good name of Beer. More likely, it is just people who want something light and easy, or people who pay attention to advertising. The definite answer will probably continue to elude me - but for what it's worth, the people at Lakeport have used (presumably) some of Canada's greatest alchemists to create a liquid that might as well be called Coron-eh. And they have passed the savings on to you!

Rather than continue to wax philosophical, I will say only one thing: If you are planning to buy a case of some other Mexican pale lager, you might as well save 10-15 bucks and get a case of Brava instead.

Final Grade: 2.25, a solid D. Avoid this, unless you are a Corona drinker on a budget. This falls under the umbrella of 'drinkable... I guess. If I have to'.

thehyperduck, Jan 15, 2012
Photo of ThinkAgain
1.5/5  rDev -45.8%

ThinkAgain, Jan 06, 2012
Photo of woodychandler
2.95/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

My CANadian CAN man, BigBry, recently sent me a nice box filled with north of the border CANs and I am slowly getting into my backlog of CANs. Bravo a la quete de CANnettes!

From the CAN: "Premium Lager"; "Exceptionally Smooth" et en Francais, mais oui.

The Crack & Glug was right on target and produced two fluffy, foamy fingers of bone-white head with modest retention. Color was a pale lemon-yellow with NE-quality clarity. It never ceases to amaze me just how many variations there are on the same theme. Nose was redolent with ... wait for it - corn! It smelled like silage and I was actually on a farm a few weeks ago and it really renewed my sense of smell for comparison. Hey, piggies gotta eat, CANQuesters gotta drink and hatas gotta hate. It is just the nature of the business. Mouthfeel was thin-to-medium and I was thankful that I was not tired after a day of teaching or this may have put me right to sleep. It was the epitome of ho-hum boring and I am not going to be any less blunt than that. Finish was more of the same-old, same-old. Had one, had 'em all, I am beginning to say. It was not unpleasant, which it at least had that going for it, but that was all. More damnation with the faintest of praise. Sorry, boys.

woodychandler, Dec 07, 2011
Photo of papawu76
3/5  rDev +8.3%

papawu76, Dec 02, 2011
Photo of ozmodium
2.65/5  rDev -4.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Purchased as it was "new" and near the cash register

poured bottle into one of my Sam Adams tulip glasses. Perhaps a mistake...was better chugged out of the bottle while BBQing

A: crystal clear bright yellow, brilliant white head, very fizzy, almost selzer-ish

S: too much corny sweetness. Processed grains. Odd, but not offensive hop character.

T: was better and more flavourful than expected. Like MGD on steroids. A bit too sweet, but actually not bad

M: Carbonation about right for my liking. ABV hidden well.

O: not a bad hot weather session beer...and it was cheap. Add a lime or lemon wedge. I could drink this. Better than Corona. Also better than Bavaria, Brahma and all those other "Corona Killers" they've brought out over the years.

ozmodium, Jul 05, 2011
Photo of CrazyMike
2.58/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pale yellow apperance with little head that quickly disappears. Smell consists of grain and a bit or corn, fairly light though.

Taste is similar to the smell, light taste of grain and corn with a hint of sweetness and a very small hint of hops. Very similar to corona. Light bodied with moderate carbonation. Aftertaste is a dry grain taste.

Overall, this is a cheaper version of corona, almost want to put a lime in it. It is refreshing in that manner. Since corona also has little taste to it, might as well save money and pick this up. Or drink something else.

CrazyMike, Jun 05, 2011
Photo of EsoxLucius
1.95/5  rDev -29.6%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

well, figured i'd give this a shot, head about it being "the beer of summer" and being sick of winter here figured i'd try it... plus it was cheap.

A: you can see it in the bottle... pale yellow. minimal lacing and retention, not as attractive as brahma or MGD in the bottle, though mostly resembles MGD.

S: skunk and wet grain. corn is present on the smell.

T: sweet corn and grain with the faintest of hops, it's a confused taste and not "smooth" at all. it has a wicked bitter aftertaste that really disapointed.

M: best part, it did cream up nicely, but that just made the sticky confused taste cling to my mouth. it's fairly well carbonated and i don't like overly fizzy beer.

D: ranks with coors light / coop gold... hah.

i will not be a repeat consumer unless it's free.

bottom line, it's a cheap Corona knock off, only problem is... Corona is terrible.

EsoxLucius, Mar 25, 2010
Photo of biegaman
1.68/5  rDev -39.4%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2

Brava's pale, inconsequential colour can be witnessed whilst still in the bottle - if ever there was an argument for clear class bottles it is that you can tell the shitty beers from those actually worth buying. Although the body is appreciably clean its complexion is alarmingly colourless. A swampy patch of white floats atop like moss in marshlands.

This is among the least appealing smelling beers I've ever come across. Each sniff shakes the spine like the sound of nails on a chalkboard. The dank, domineering stench of corn syrup makes for a most undesirable smell. This was surely meant to be drank from the bottle, and I wish I had. Zoos make for a more charming olfactory experience.

I have to say that so far the beer is doing a poor job of selling itself. What reason again is there for me to drink this? It took some time to summon the courage to take a sip. Fortunately, I wasn't poisoned, nor did I puke, suffocate or tun into some kind of savage monster. It did, however, incite a Frankenstein-like rage: "err, this not beer. Me angry!"

Yes, I find the taste of this beer downright infuriating. Unlike other Mexican-style swill lagers this fails to be tasteless. Instead, it has a foul, wretched, calamitous flavour - one that mimics moldy bread and sprouted grains and industrial strength corn syrup. A word like "nauseating" isn't often brought up in beer reviews, but this is a special case.

Believe me, I've brewed enough failed homebrews to know that fermented grains and hops, no matter how badly the recipe fails, require fantastic circumstances to taste this wretched and rotten - in fact, nothing short of infection will cause this kind of repugnant, reprehensible violation to the palate. Except infection isn't the case here...

It's an excess of additives and/or preservatives. Unlike *real* beers this has no crisp bitterness nor any biscuity malt sweetness. Instead, this has a very flat, stale, chemical, solvent-like texture that makes even the purest of lager drinkers beg for the cutting acidity of a lime wedge. Bleh, anything to rid this feeling from my cheeks.

I think I want a tetnis shot - I suddenly feel ill. It's anyone's guess what it is in this beer; I, for one, am not sure I even want to know (although I can imagine). Another thing I don't know is what's more of a tragedy - the fact that a brewery actually makes this or the fact that some consumers buy it. God willing this will never make it out of Ontario.

biegaman, Nov 23, 2009
Photo of mrmanning
1.5/5  rDev -45.8%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

341 ml bottle sample-Ohh man, what's going on here? I don't have time for games. This stuff is rough. Corn, and a slight alcohol aroma, with a similar taste and added wet paper for good measure. Spritzy and overly carbonated. How does this stuf get approved?

mrmanning, Nov 17, 2009
Photo of deckyeti
3.8/5  rDev +37.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I had a couple of these on the deck at my cabin on a scorching hot day. That would appear to be the ideal setting for this fizzy, light guzzler, because I enjoyed it greatly. Maybe you don't like the style Lakeport is immiitating here, but you have to admit they've done well. For a rock-bottom price, they've brewed a beer that's better in every way than the premium-priced import they're targeting.

deckyeti, Aug 17, 2009
Photo of vikingmike
2.98/5  rDev +7.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I'm not going to divide this review into the different components of tasting, like I usually do...this beer is meant to be enjoyed in the scorching heat, similar to the "leading clear bottle import", and not analyzed for "lacing", "phenolics" or "billowy head retention".

Seriously, this beer isn't bad. It really isn't. In fact I'd say its far better than the beer its trying to imitate. It goes down easier, has more flavour, and sits better after a few.

Lakeport brewery gets a lot of flack in Southern Ontario for being...well...crap, but they succeeded with this one. Will buy again!

vikingmike, Aug 09, 2009
Photo of mintjellie
3.3/5  rDev +19.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

341mL bottle poured into a mug.

Pale straw with two fingers of white head that quickly fades to a thin cap, leaving very little lace behind. That thin cap seems to stick around for a bit though.

Very typical pale lager smell. A little bit of grain with hint of grassy hops. It doesn't smell bad. It's just meek.

Sweet corn and crackers up front. A touch of grassy hops and citrus in the finish.

It's not as carbonated as you'd expect, given what it is. It's smooth, but also light in body. It's watery. It's thirst quenching and cooling on a hot summer day. That's what a beer like this is supposed to be. It's better than Corona, and cheaper too. It goes down extremely easy on a hot July day.

mintjellie, Jul 14, 2009
Photo of TheHammer
3.38/5  rDev +22%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Got this once from my uncle, although summer is coming shortly so I'll probably pick some up before the year is out.

Appearance: Poured with a solid finger of head that didn't retain overtly well but did leave a slight lacing. The beer itself is a golden yellow color which lies somewhere between your standard lager and an almost orange color.

Smell: The smell is there, that is for sure but it's nothing to write home about. Pretty much your standard Lager smell, with corn and grain with the barest touch of citrus hops. It didn't really take that much warming to come out, but it's pretty much a very generic beer smell.

Taste: I've had this beer before, back when it had an orange label and it's gone downhill a little since then, where it would have been a 3.5. The taste starts with an unmistakable light grain that shifts to a bit more of a corn-like flavor and ends with a slight dusting of smooth citrus hops that smooths out the slightly bumpy transition before it.

Mouthfeel: The big problem with the beer is the initial transition between the grain flavor and the more corn like elements. However, unlike most Lakeport offerings the plastic and metallic taste is not present. The carbonation is solid, and the final touch of hops leaves it quite smooth. It is a little bit watery at the end, but given it is a Mexican style beer, that makes it a good thing.

Drinkability: This is where this beer shines, and true to a Mexican style beer, is designed to refresh on a hot summer's day. Incredibly refreshing, the hop touch at the end smooths it out nicely. Also the price also gives this beer even more of a free pass in this department.

Final Thoughts: Brava used to be a bit better, back when Lakeport wasn't owned by Labatt. The beer didn't seem to have as much of a corn flavor and transitioned initially a bit better. However, I also recall that this beer wasn't as cheap as it is now. Sadly, Lakeport's strategy has always been to be a discount brewer, and that's pretty much the reason Labatt bought them in the first place.

If you are looking for a Mexican style beer, this beer is for you. This beer is a cheaper, better tasting, just as drinkable version of Corona. The lime for this brew is optional. Just keep in mind, this is still a Mexican style beer designed to refresh and be guzzled on a hot summer's day.

TheHammer, May 15, 2009
Photo of steeler
2.95/5  rDev +6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Another hometown favorite, esspecially popular in the summer. Anyway, its a nice golden yellow color, just like every other macro. Smells not all that bad, grainy, and fresh. Decent. It tastes like a corona with a beefed up flavor, its smooth, with a crisp finish. Very low hop bitterness. My only complaint with this beer, is the mouthfeel, its very thin and watered down. This beer can be sucked back in mass quantities with ease, in all honesty I've only really enjoyed this just sitting on the deck on a hot day, otherwise on normal occasions I will avoid this, because it just doesnt have much of taste. Lakeport has basically perfected the "mexican macro" here, i must give them kudos for that. They basically over a better version of corona at a fraction of the cost. Props. Definatly pick this up if you are a corona fan, you will definiatly enjoy this one!

steeler, Dec 05, 2008
Photo of allergictomacros
2.8/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Very light straw. Head isn't too bad at all and some patchy lace to boot.

S - A bit of quick skunk which clears up to grassy hops and sweetness. Some chalky/metal aroma.

T - A little bit lemony and a very, very mild bitterness. Not enough flavour to be offensive. Not much malt, some hops to keep balance but not much else going on.

M - Light, watery body but not overcarbonated, which is nice.

D - Very drinkable - like water. Not great, not bad.

allergictomacros, Nov 04, 2008
Photo of EatsTacos
2.58/5  rDev -6.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

My buddy likes this beer and puts limes in it because he's too cheap to buy Corona.

So this is a rip-off of Corona I guess, a pretty low standard to try to imitate but its still pretty bad.

Aroma is non existant and the beer is very crisp and dry. For sure this is drinkable but its pretty over carbonated, and that takes a lot away for me. With the lime this beer is middle of the road, without a lime its pretty hurtin

EatsTacos, Oct 07, 2008
Photo of GodOfBeer
2.93/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This is a decent beer from Lakeport. A nice pale yellow colour, very smooth and very drinkable. Not much taste or smell, but it doesn't need taste if you drink it to get wasted. This is much better than Corona and other mexican cervezas and much cheaper!

GodOfBeer, Jul 02, 2008
Photo of funkengruven
3.85/5  rDev +39%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Thought I'd give Lakeport's attempt at a Mexican style beer a shot. and I was rather impressed.

Appearance was pretty average, yellow typical of a corn lager. Smell was interestingly clean, with no metallic undertones typical of Lakeport. Flavor was definitely surprising, no metallic aroma, a delicate sweetness exists here. With or without a lime it's pretty good. Smooth, much smoother than other pale Mexican beers. Also very easy drinking. No offensive aftertaste or aromas that should not be there.

Bottom Line: Get a product better than the genuine article for 2/3 the price.

funkengruven, Jul 21, 2007
Photo of Bestuurder
4.28/5  rDev +54.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

I'm not too sure whether Lakeport rebranded this beer as "Brava Premium Lager" instead of the previous Cerveza. But either way.

This brew was very clear, excellent head rentention, good size head. What I would consider to be almost 'perfect' lacing effects, and a nice lcear bottle. Though it is a "pop-top" they are attempting to compare this brew to that of Corona. I am not too big of a fan of Cerveza beers, but this took my breath away.

The taste was well-balanced, fruity after a couple of sips, but not overpowering like Corona is. This beer will NOT require a lime.

Very smooth, actually, chekc that; exceptionally smooth. Just like the label claims. Very easy to drink, would be perfect with anything spicy or better yet, spicy BBQ.

Bestuurder, Jun 15, 2007
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Brava Cerveza from Lakeport Brewing Company
69 out of 100 based on 42 ratings.