1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Summit Maibock - Summit Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Summit MaibockSummit Maibock

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

357 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 357
Reviews: 200
rAvg: 3.6
pDev: 13.06%
Wants: 5
Gots: 9 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Summit Brewing Company visit their website
Minnesota, United States

Style | ABV
Maibock / Helles Bock |  6.70% ABV

Availability: Spring

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: ADR on 02-09-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 357 | Reviews: 200 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of abmhighrise
abmhighrise


1.75/5  rDev -51.4%

03-11-2012 03:18:16 | More by abmhighrise
Photo of homebrewhawk
homebrewhawk

Kansas

2.15/5  rDev -40.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

12oz. brown bottle served in a pilsner glass. Poured a brilliant, clear gold. Very effervescent with two fingers of fine bubbled white head. Good looking beer, unfortunately it went downhill from here. This beer seems to have some fermentation issues. There is some sulfur in the nose. It dissipates to allow a little caramel malt. Thin bodied. There is some corny, dms type of flavor there. Some maltiness, but not enough for the style. A little hop bitterness in the middle. I wondered if I had a bad bottle, but other reviews seem to reinforce my tasting.

Serving type: bottle

03-22-2008 03:51:42 | More by homebrewhawk
Photo of CharlesDarwin
CharlesDarwin

Rhode Island

2.2/5  rDev -38.9%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Originally reviewed April 9, 2005. Bottle at the Gitchee Gumee Brewfest 2005. I had high expectations for this somewhat mass produced bock and was let WAY down. I thought it tasted like a run of the mill cold-filtered lager. The flavors were dominated by a boring hop sugar and was way too sweet in the end. Blah.

Serving type: bottle

08-06-2006 18:45:08 | More by CharlesDarwin
Photo of bob3701
bob3701

New Jersey

2.25/5  rDev -37.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Poured into a shaker pint. I must say I had never heard of Summit but I do like bocks so I picked it up. looked a little pale even for a maibock and it did not smell too good either. It had no bock taste and an underlying taste of skunky (just faintly). Not sure if I picked up a bad 6-pack but Summit I'll be avoiding.

Serving type: bottle

12-15-2009 00:43:58 | More by bob3701
Photo of brentk56
brentk56

North Carolina

2.38/5  rDev -33.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Appearance: Pours a clear pale golden color with a modest head that doesn't leave much lacing

Smell: Vegetal, cooked corn aroma overwhelms the underlying sweet malt base

Taste: Starts with the anticipated sweet malty flavors with just a hint of maple; after the swallow, the vegetal flavors overwhelm along with some unexpected grainy hops

Mouthfeel: Medium body with moderate carbonation; warmth in the gullet on the way down

Drinkability: Possible DMS problem with this batch provide some real off flavors and the warmth from the alcohol is a bit too pronounced for the style; this tastes like one of those high octane lagers from Eastern Europe

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2007 12:30:23 | More by brentk56
Photo of Mebuzzard
Mebuzzard

Colorado

2.4/5  rDev -33.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Found this at an Old Chicago in Denver. Pours a dark, yet pale yellow. Kind of a light amber. No head.
Smells of sweet malt, yet stale at the same time. Nothing else
Taste starts out a bit crisp then slams on the staleness pretty quickly. Not refreshing at all. Perhaps the line was dirty, but it was their newest addition. Drain pour.

Serving type: on-tap

04-01-2007 22:08:28 | More by Mebuzzard
Photo of Gump
Gump

Minnesota

2.48/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Mellow pour. The thick light head will settle within minutes.
There is a stinky, dry fruit smell that pairs nicely with the thick syrupy taste of licorice. It's not the sweet taste I remember it as a kid. Its more raw and bitter. If I could get past its thick taste of medicinal root I could drink it more often.
It's consistant from last year, and within it's class as a Maibock, but not to my liking.

Serving type: bottle

04-24-2005 02:02:58 | More by Gump
Photo of mcallister
mcallister

Ohio

2.48/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A bright shiny clear orange. Rich fluffy two inch head rests atop this brew. Great head retention with sticky lacing.

Nose is weak and uncomplex. Hints of barley malt, and alcohol.

Very one dimensional, lacking complexity. Overly carbonated mouthfeel, caramel malt, and a little too watery for my liking. Not a beer I would try again yet glad I tried it.

Serving type: on-tap

05-31-2006 20:21:00 | More by mcallister
Photo of Tucquan
Tucquan

Pennsylvania

2.48/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Had this at Ike's bar and resturant in the Minneapolis / St. Paul airport in Minnesota.

It was served in a 16 oz glass and has a very clear, orange-amber color with a short head.

It has a light, grassy and herbal aroma. The mouthfeel is light and the carbonation is medium. The taste is grassy with light hops and it has an unusual orange candy sweet taste that I wasn't too wild about. A bit too sweet for me.

It was a drinkable but unremarkable brew.

Serving type: on-tap

04-12-2008 12:12:03 | More by Tucquan
Photo of Damian74Shensky
Damian74Shensky

South Carolina

2.5/5  rDev -30.6%

12-07-2012 23:33:30 | More by Damian74Shensky
Photo of vidguy17
vidguy17

Iowa

2.5/5  rDev -30.6%

05-10-2013 02:56:20 | More by vidguy17
Photo of PieOhMy
PieOhMy

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -30.6%

03-05-2013 22:15:30 | More by PieOhMy
Photo of mmulebarn
mmulebarn

Minnesota

2.5/5  rDev -30.6%

11-16-2013 05:10:58 | More by mmulebarn
Photo of malty
malty

Michigan

2.53/5  rDev -29.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Pours a crystal clear golden color with a loose 1" rocky light cream-colored head. Visible moderate carbonation.

Smells like buttered biscuits, sweet cream, vanilla and almonds.

The above scents I mentioned that transfer into flavors are a bit sharper and less malty/creamy than I would have expected. There's definitely a sweetness that caresses the tongue at first sip, then a half-second later bone dry wicked saltiness wipes all that creamy, malty goodness away - quite a head jerker for sure. I don't know if it’s the alcohol that's throwing a monkey wrench or what, but it's very abrupt and distracting.

Mouthfeel is fine. Medium bodied with the right amount of carbonation.

Drinkability is not good for me. I'm taking the remaining bottles back to the store from where I purchased them.

I feel bad giving this brew a sub-par score from all of the other Summit's I tried so far. I sure hope it's last years batch, but seeing it just today from a reputable distributor, I doubt it. The salty/dry component is really turning me off. Better luck next time.

Serving type: bottle

03-29-2007 23:10:05 | More by malty
Photo of jasonjlewis
jasonjlewis

Texas

2.68/5  rDev -25.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

I'm starting to think that I'm not a fan of summit beer.

Smell is slightly vegetable like. Pilsner malt dominates throughout. Sort of a cattiness underneath.

Taste is sort of catty and has some vegetable flavors. Some grassy/lemony flavors arise as well. Some dry tannins lead to a little bit of off flavors. DMS throughout.

Mouthfeel is somewhat crisp.

This beer just doesn't do it for me. There are some DMS problems. I think I'm not a fan of summit. I don't like any of the beers from them that I've had, and I think I've had 4 even though I haven't reviewed all of them.

Serving type: bottle

03-19-2009 00:14:02 | More by jasonjlewis
Photo of mpalestino
mpalestino

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

08-06-2013 21:05:23 | More by mpalestino
Photo of ssimpson89
ssimpson89

Illinois

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

03-02-2013 20:35:04 | More by ssimpson89
Photo of Jamstone714
Jamstone714

Florida

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

03-12-2012 03:56:21 | More by Jamstone714
Photo of cervezango
cervezango

Wisconsin

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

07-01-2014 05:31:02 | More by cervezango
Photo of jscottku21
jscottku21

Pennsylvania

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

03-12-2012 11:53:53 | More by jscottku21
Photo of FortKnox15
FortKnox15

Minnesota

2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

07-20-2013 01:59:02 | More by FortKnox15
Photo of GarbageMan
GarbageMan


2.75/5  rDev -23.6%

08-13-2012 01:24:01 | More by GarbageMan
Photo of Pintofbrown
Pintofbrown

Iowa

2.78/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75

Reviewed from notes. Served in a shaker pint.

A foamy, white mass about a half finger in width dies quickly and barely covers the cap of this pale-gold beer.

The smells are clean and include some biscuit malt, sugary sweetness, and a bit of cereal grain.

I am surprised by the herbal and slightly sweet flavors out of the gate. Then comes some cardamom, earthiness, cereal grain, and a little bit of roast on the back end. These flavors are having a hard time meshing for me. I like the effort, just not what these profiles taste like all together.

This is another failing of this beer sadly.. This beer was watery thin, and even a little off putting. The finish is very dry and hard to get through.

Again, the downfall of this beer begins and ends with the mouth feel. It is also disappointing that this beer is entirely too grainy, and not malty enough for a bock.

Serving type: on-tap

11-04-2013 11:26:16 | More by Pintofbrown
Photo of matty
matty

Pennsylvania

2.78/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Golden colored beer with a slowly fading head.Aroma is light fruits.Taste is grapefruit and pine with a buttery finish.I am a person who thinks that pine is a scent not a flavor and should not be included in drinks.Overall though not terrible.I would not buy again nor recommend.

Serving type: bottle

02-20-2009 05:00:53 | More by matty
Photo of EwaldEichstaett
EwaldEichstaett

Jordan

2.8/5  rDev -22.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 2

Drinking this in July, perhaps a little late for the spring seasonal.

A: Pours a nice 2 finger head, colour is a bit lighter than expected. No lacing at all is present after the first few minutes.

S: Not much nose on this one. Some malt smells.

T: This beer tastes strongly of alcohol. At first, I detect a bit of malt, followed by some hops and ending with a tin/metal taste. This tin taste seems to be typical of Summit beers; but it doesn't bother me much as I have been drinking Summit for many years. Decent balance overall.

M/D: Feels great in the mouth apart from the alcohol being rather strong. Actually, it seems Summit did not try to mask the alcohol at all. The drinkability is poor. I would say Summit dropped the ball on this one.

Serving type: bottle

07-21-2010 06:34:52 | More by EwaldEichstaett
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Summit Maibock from Summit Brewing Company
82 out of 100 based on 357 ratings.