1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Pietro Piegari - Choc Beer Co. / Pete's Place

Not Rated.
Pietro PiegariPietro Piegari

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
78
okay

45 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 45
Reviews: 35
rAvg: 3.38
pDev: 13.61%
Wants: 0
Gots: 1 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Choc Beer Co. / Pete's Place visit their website
Oklahoma, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
20 IBU

(Beer added by: timbro81 on 09-22-2008)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 45 | Reviews: 35 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of OKCNittany
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

OKCNittany, Jul 21, 2014
Photo of sneezye
2.75/5  rDev -18.6%

sneezye, Nov 07, 2013
Photo of Kingcurio
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

Kingcurio, Jul 03, 2013
Photo of DelMontiac
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

DelMontiac, Jan 12, 2013
Photo of beernads
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

beernads, Jan 05, 2013
Photo of t0rin0
4/5  rDev +18.3%

t0rin0, Dec 07, 2012
Photo of chilidog
3.63/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

One of my favorite choc brewes. Got it on vacation, Moore ok.
Pours amber, nice head that disapates quickly, no real lace to be had.
Aroma of malts and bread.
Taste of bread like malts, toast, yet earthy.
Taste of caramel malts, sweetness of raisin bread with a slight hop bitterness at finish.
Mouthfeel is smooth, hop crispness is there
Overall a good malty amber. Would buy again, bring on vacation.

chilidog, Nov 18, 2012
Photo of Shasty
4/5  rDev +18.3%

Shasty, Jul 30, 2012
Photo of bushwack
4/5  rDev +18.3%

bushwack, Jun 03, 2012
Photo of bpackertx
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

bpackertx, Feb 05, 2012
Photo of 4balance
3.5/5  rDev +3.6%

4balance, Feb 02, 2012
Photo of KarlHungus
2.13/5  rDev -37%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

This beer gushes out of the bottle upon opening. It pours a cloudy amber color. The head is massive, and recedes slowly into a thich cap of airy foam. The aroma is of light caramel malt, and not much more. The taste is similar to the aroma, but a bit stronger. There is, however, a nasty chalky thing going on in the aftertaste. The mouthfeel is medium bodied with high carbonation. Overall, this is a bad beer that I will not be drinking again.

KarlHungus, Oct 17, 2011
Photo of scruffwhor
3.48/5  rDev +3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Thanks Mom and Dad for picking up this unobtainable brew from OK on your trip to AR.

Copper and bronze color intertwined with great bubbling. That is all underneath a good two fnger head and thick foam that lasts through all twelve ounces.

Spritzy, toasted cracker with mild grass and earthen hopping.

The hops come out pretty well, almost take over the flavor of this beer on the finish. Starts with caramel and cracker and finishes with medium orange bitterness and Earth. Good session ale, underrated

scruffwhor, Sep 01, 2011
Photo of OlRasputin989
3.63/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured into Old Rasputin nonic pint...

A: a slightly hazy brownish red with a small off white head with good retention

S: a dusty, grapefruit peel and piney hop aroma with a solid caramel malt backdrop that blends with the hops to create an orange liqoure/orange marmalade cake aroma

T: not as hoppy as the aroma led me to expect, however, nicely balance with the malt flavors. that same dusty flavor lingers into the bitter finish but it seems to help give the beer some complexity, as this one seems fairly average

M: light medium body with nice carbonation and a chalky dry finish

Overall, an average amber that is affordable and tasty. worth a shot especially for the price

OlRasputin989, Aug 17, 2011
Photo of rebel1771
3.98/5  rDev +17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a very pale amber color with an absolutely massive head that fades slowly.

S: Sweet caramel malts dominate the smell with a small citrus hop note near the end.

T: Subdued caramel malt make up the majority of the brew with the flavor of toasted bread showing through. A hint of hops come through as well to balance everything out.

O: Pretty darn good beer. Nothing crazy, just simple and delicious.

rebel1771, Aug 07, 2011
Photo of chocosushi
3.53/5  rDev +4.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz->Pint glass

A ~ Deep Amber with a 1/4" of white, cratered head.

S ~ Sweet malts, toast w/ honey & a touch of floral/citrus hops

T ~ Sweet with a hop background. Notes of caramel, waffle cone, yeast roll...notes of earthy hop oils. Also Choc's brewer's yeast. Simple taste.

M ~ Creamy, semi-thin mouthfeel. Hops are a good backbone for the sweet malt.

D ~ Very enjoyable, but so different from the first time I had it earlier in the year. Doesn't wow the palette but is a good, not-overhopped ale. Worth trying, yet from other reviews it seems like they are having consistency problems.

chocosushi, Aug 05, 2011
Photo of Thorpe429
2.33/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Bottle courtesy of a generous trader. Poured into a Hill Farmstead wine glass.

Body is a moderate amber with a bit of haze. There is a huge off white head with a strong amount of lacing. The nose is a bit off with some cardboard and odd fruit plus a bit of bread and toast. The flavor goes far downhill with a bitter metallic bite and some cardboard. Weird tannic character as well. Mild bread, but that's about all that is there that should be there. Feel is a bit thin and metallic. Not a fan of this one at all.

Thorpe429, Mar 15, 2011
Photo of SickGnar
3.25/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Deep amber, reddish even, with coppery edges. Decent head with okay stick and stay and lacing. Quite hazy even with a careful pour.

S: Sweet caramel malts. Fruity with a sour/tart edge. Faint grassy hops in background. A touch restrained. And while it is interesting enough, it is not what I was expecting.

T: Definite sour/tart note. I get the feeling it wasn't supposed to be there. Underlying the twang are malty caramel notes and a general grainy sweetness - a sort of rounded multi-grain caramel sweetness. There are some fruity esters and a bit of toasty grain in the background. Hops are floral and vaguely citrus. Not bad flavor at all, but not really to style due to what seems like a flaw.

M: Medium light body with medium, yet lively, carbonation. Drying finish is accentuated strongly by the odd tart / sour note.

D: Not bad and okay drinkable overall, but I have to think the tart / sour thing is a ding on this beer. Or at least the 6-pack of it that I picked got. I would like to sample it as an amber and not some sort of weak & mild Flanders.

(from notes - tasted May 2010)

SickGnar, Jan 01, 2011
Photo of soju6
3.23/5  rDev -4.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a hazy amber color, with a small head and no lacing.

S: Has a citrus and grain aroma with a trace of malt.

T: Light citrus and malt taste with a mild bitter finish. Has a slight metallic aftertaste.

F: Medium body, quite smooth and very little carbonation.

D: Non-offensive amber ale. The label seems to present a depressing image/feeling. Beer came as part of a Choc 6-pack mixer.

soju6, Nov 13, 2010
Photo of northaustin
4.28/5  rDev +26.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5

pours a murky amber with a chubby finger of even white head which settles into a pretty even foam that leaves no lacing.

smells very syrupy and strong.

taste: bitter up front then quickly evens out with a heavy dose of amber malts.

mouthfeel: refreshing. leaves a very thin layer of syrup throughout the mouth.

this is so far one of my favorite ambers.

northaustin, Aug 02, 2010
Photo of TheManiacalOne
3.8/5  rDev +12.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Acquired from davey, courtesy of the Local Goods 3 BIF so a big "Thank You" goes out to him. Poured from a 12oz bottle into a pint glass.

A: The beer is a deep amber color, with a large off-white head that fades slowly and leaves a thick lace on the glass.

S: The aroma is of caramelized malts, some citrus and some hops.

T: The taste starts out bready with a hearty malt character up front followed by some sweet flavors of caramel and citrus. The hops presence is mild but is strong enough to bring a good balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: Crisp and smooth, medium body, medium carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

D: Tasty, goes down easily, not too filling, mild kick, good representation of style, this is a decent mild beer that is worth drinking for a while.

TheManiacalOne, Jul 18, 2010
Photo of ZAP
3.43/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

A-Muddied orange color..

S-Juicy oranges from the hops are the first impression...then some rustic, musty malt backing..

T-The rustic/musty maltiness is in front...lighter impression of juicy oranges...not a blend I experience too often...

M-Medium bodied...semi-dry finish...

D-An Ok amber ale...nothing spectacular and nothing horrible...probably wouldn't buy it again but if offered wouldn't pas it up.

ZAP, Jul 05, 2010
Photo of garymuchow
3.58/5  rDev +5.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Loud fizzy sound upon pouring, and the sound continued.
Malty, generally one dimensional aroma with a touch of hoppy grassiness in background.
Amber of orange with large off-white tan head. Quite clear.
Mild malt flavors with slight brunt _(or at least excessive toastiness), caramel (but not sweet), with bitterness showing late and lasting through an extended finish. Not a lot of hop flavors beyond the bittereness, but the finish isn't too bad. This warmed up nicely and when I added the yeast from the bottom of the bottle the fruity flavors increased.
Carbonation is soft and fine and mixes with a moderate light body.
All is all this is adequate. Drinks easily and lightly. I would accept this one if offerred.

garymuchow, Jun 29, 2010
Photo of climax
3.2/5  rDev -5.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

This one poured in the traditional choc fashion of hazy and dull. The color was amber, with some tan floaties in there. The head was mediocre, as was the retention.

The nose was a good balance of leafy greens and sweet caramel malt. Peat moss and some other unrecognizable spices rounded it out.

The same bit of smoked peat and spice were heavy on the pallet. The balance is still there, but distracted by the odd gamut of flavors. Apricot finish.

The body was medium, and the carbonation was very sharp. It had a smooth chalkiness to it that was pleasant and interesting.

Interesting, yet forgettable

climax, Jun 14, 2010
Photo of GeezLynn
2.98/5  rDev -11.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

My first Oklahoma beer after a big trade with coldmeat23. "Chapter 1, A Legacy Begins (off the label)" - seems like a good brew to start my tour with.

A: Cloudy red/orange shade with a large, frothy white head.

S: Mostly medium malts, with a little soggy cut grass smell.

T: Nice maltiness and a little dried fruit followed by an "off" flavor I can best describe as latex-like. More bitterness than typical for the style, which is a positive addition here.

M: Medium-bodied and fully carbonated.

Overall, I think this isn't too far from being a solid amber. Eliminate some of that "off" flavor and you'd have a pretty decent beer.

GeezLynn, Jun 04, 2010
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Pietro Piegari from Choc Beer Co. / Pete's Place
78 out of 100 based on 45 ratings.