Dismiss Notice
Hello, is it beer you're looking for?

Learn more about beer. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for as low as 68% off the single issue price.

Subscribe now →

Labatt Blue - Labatt Brewing Company Ltd.

Not Rated.
Labatt BlueLabatt Blue

Educational use only; do not reuse.

610 Reviews

(Read More)
Reviews: 610
Hads: 1,887
Avg: 2.67
pDev: 41.95%
Wants: 23
Gots: 282 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Labatt Brewing Company Ltd. visit their website
Ontario, Canada

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 08-30-2001

Labatt Blue is the best-selling Canadian beer in the world. Introduced in 1951 as Labatt Pilsener, it was named for the colour of its label by fans of the Winnipeg Blue Bombers football team. Blue was the first brand in Canada with a twist-off cap and won the silver medal in the International Lager category at the 1998 Brewing Industry International Awards. Labatt Blue, brewed using specially selected aromatic hops, is a well-balanced, fully matured, full-flavoured beer with a fruity character and a slightly sweet aftertaste.
View: Beers (47) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Labatt Blue Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 610 | Hads: 1,887
Photo of GlennSt
3.67/5  rDev +37.5%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Most of us drank cheap beer before we moved on to more interesting and flavorful stuff. This is a very drinkable cheap beer. If I am watching a ball game and I need to pick something that I can drink for several hours without getting sozzled, this is my go-to. No, the taste isn't intriguing or deep, but I don't always want to drink beer that is intriguing and deep. Blue is refreshing and has a nice flavor. It's not in the same class as more expensive beers but it doesn't aspire to that class nor should it.

 511 characters

Photo of DodgeStealth93
2.41/5  rDev -9.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.25

It is a Canadian macro lager but brewed by Anheuser Busch! Pours a clear straw appearance with a head that doesnt stick around! Taste like a canadian version of Budweiser almost has that same rice adjunct flavor very sweet with a slight lemony finish to it no hops whatsoever! Mouthfeel is very light and watery! Great for a hot summer day or a throwback beer at a party but other than that its nothing special! Very bland aroma! Not bad but not good either!

 458 characters

Photo of fx20736
3.14/5  rDev +17.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3

Bought a 30 pack from Beers of the World on 8/1/15. Poured cold into a Hefe glass. Pale gold with a tall, craggy head. Nice lacing. Aroma is faint but of cooked veggies with a slight whiff of hops. Mettalic, touch of sweet and a faint bitterness. Mouthfeel is full. This is an OK macro.

 286 characters

Photo of DrainBamage
2.85/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a dark golden color with surprising frothy head. Smells like every other adjunct. At first taste is decent, but after it goes down, the adjunct flavor hits you. Goes down smooth though. Over all one of the better adjunct lagers out. there.

 245 characters

Photo of vainosuomi
2.85/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.75

Pale color. Smell and taste is light and somewhat sweet, with a little hops. Nothing particularly distinctive. Very light and clean finish. Not bad for what it is, but not great.

 178 characters

Photo of Ninjajake12
2.94/5  rDev +10.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 3

Look - It has a clear body, and you can see mostly through it.

Smell - It has a faint nutty and spicy smell, but nothing overpowering and strong.

Taste - Tastes stronger than it looks and smells. Has a nice faint spiciness and bitterness at the end of the sip. The aftertaste lasts a few seconds, then fades pretty quickly. Does have a slight watery taste which interrupts the beer (though this could be my perspective). Still has some good flavors hidden in there.

Feel - Very thin and watery. Goes down easy, and can drink it rather quickly.

Overall - It's a basic pilsner. It's good to drink on casual nights, but not if you're looking for an impression. I still enjoy it despite its flaws, but it isn't something I'd drink every night.

 746 characters

Photo of DabblinWiscCraft
2.66/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Picked up a 24 oz can at my nearest gas station the other day. Can't decipher the canning code. Poured right from the fridge into a stein.

L: Pours a pale straw color with about two inches of white head that dissipates rapidly to a weak film and leaves very little lacing on the glass. Crystal-clear, with profuse visible carbonation.

S: A weak bouquet on this one: cracker malts, a bit of stewed corn, some diacety buttery notes, and a touch of pepper/spice. Perhaps a hint of a metallic note in there, as well. As it warms, it takes on a more unpleasant, sour aroma.

T: Bready malts at the outset, with a good deal of sweetness coming through that seems like it has its origin in corn. There's a bit of a grassy thing going on in the middle, with just a bit of cracked pepper in there, too. Some stewed vegetable flavor builds a little toward the end, and there's a faint fruity/tart note at the close that might be hops registering just a bit. Despite the relative diversity of flavor notes I've mention, this one really doesn't bring much flavor at all: it's a bit like drinking cardboard.

F: Per the style, this one is light-bodied, quite effervescent, and a little creamy in the middle. Overall, though, this one is quite watery, even for an AAL

O: In my college days, I'd often grab a six-pack of this if I was short on cash. It drinks quite easy, doesn't really offer any offensive flavors; the problem is mostly that it doesn't have much flavor at all, aside from the corny sweetness. If I have a choice between AALs, there are probably ten that I would take over this one.

 1,587 characters

Photo of Greywulfken
2.5/5  rDev -6.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

When I was younger and we went up to Plattsburg and Montreal, we drank this like it was magical. It's actually just like Canada's Budweiser. Watery, thin, low flavor - in retrospect, Bud was actually better. Pass.

 213 characters

Photo of Bear1964
3.5/5  rDev +31.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 12oz bottle into a Mason jar, golden color with a small fast fading white head leaving some nice lace as I sipped it down. Aroma was a simple Adjunct Lager with a touch of sweetness, flavor followed with a sweetness that put a step above just OK. Ice cold while doing whatever would work with this beer, it has history and that's alright. Not a bad brew overall.

 376 characters

Photo of bluesfan1181
2.22/5  rDev -16.9%
look: 2.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25

It is what it is. A good beer hockey league brew. Serves it's purpose as a thirst quencher in place of Gatorade. Nice on a hot day too or while bbqing. Nothing spectacular by any means.

 185 characters

Photo of Maiora13
3.32/5  rDev +24.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3.5

Basically what I think of when i think of pilsner. Growing up in Detroit it is basically a domestic and my go to beer of choice. That being said it is not distinctly flavorful or original but it is fun and easy to drink.

 220 characters

Photo of gopens44
2.28/5  rDev -14.6%
look: 1.25 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 2.5

One of my Stanley Cup playoff beers. This one stands out (to me at least) against other AALs due to it's heavier grain bill. It actually smells like and tastes like I am drinking something with at least some depth. The edges are tainted with a phenolic sting that is a little off putting, but otherwise, you could do a lot worse.

 329 characters

Photo of DevAJ
3/5  rDev +12.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Not necessarily bad, but it's a pretty one note beer. I honestly would rather drink Budweiser than this. At least with Budweiser there is a little complexity as you can taste the rice in it. I'm not much on hoppy beers, but I'm actually pretty disappointed in how weak it is for a so called pilsner. My first pilsner was Bofferding and that is supposedly considered a "beer for the masses" beer here on BA and it's quite a bit hoppier than Labatt.

 451 characters

Photo of SoulFroosh
3.69/5  rDev +38.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I'm not sure how people review beers in this place. Something's not right.

Comparing to American adjuncts it's decent stuff.
Nice maltiness, balanced -- even has a genuine pilsner taste to it.

I'll happily drink this over any of the AAL's.

 250 characters

Photo of ordybill
1.03/5  rDev -61.4%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1.25 | overall: 1

Poured from a 12 OZ bottle into a pint glass.
Aroma- Has a faint corn smell, not much of a beer aroma.
Appearance- A god awful faint yellow with a very small white head.
Taste- uhhmm, horrible is a good word for this beer. barely resembles a beer flavor.
Palate- When the palate category is the highest rated on a beer that should say enough. I can choke it down and it stays down.
Overall- I haven't had Labatt Blue in 25 years and i remember it being more shall we say drinkable. I don't know if my taste buds changed or if they tinkered with the recipe but this is terrible.

 580 characters

Photo of Hoss76
1.66/5  rDev -37.8%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.25 | overall: 1.75

I want to like this but it's just another adjunct beer heavily marketed around here. I guess moderate carbonation made the mouthfeel ok and it is not completely offensive when cold. Corn aroma and taste become more pronounced as it warms. Perhaps it gets a gold star for nostalgia sake.

 287 characters

Photo of TopherBreski
2.29/5  rDev -14.2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Hey, listen. It's not on the top of the list of awesome craft beers but in a pinch ($1.15 for a 24oz) it works and isn't bad. Plus, when your friends come over for football they will relish drinking an import instead of Miller or Bud

 234 characters

Photo of dukeandduke
2.42/5  rDev -9.4%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

3/2 Bottle - Clear pour, not very thick or heavy. Minimal smell, not many flavours while tasting. Minimal carbonation, easy going down. Overall average offering.

 161 characters

Photo of TheBierdimpfe
1.84/5  rDev -31.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Brilliant straw color. The white 2 finger head is quickly dead. Nothing special.

Flavors and aromas of corn with a fruity/sugary feel. Very faint taste but well balanced.
Slight metallic smell.

Light slick body with average carbonation. Short and faint sugary finish.

Overall : Bland beer with added sugar to compensate. Still feels relatively fresh.

 353 characters

Photo of Edbutryn
4.94/5  rDev +85%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 5 | feel: 5 | overall: 5

I don't understand some of the reviews. Top rated beers are nasty. And some of my favorite are ranked 6 or 7? I've tried the beers that are ranked high and have to ask… why? I've read the reviews and don't get it. I think, if it's not BAC over 5.9, it's considered piss water. But flavor that doesn't make me squeal and want my eyes to water, isn't a qualifying factor for a great beer for me.

 395 characters

Photo of yemenmocha
3.46/5  rDev +29.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

As far as adjunct lagers go, this is a better one. Great appearance with color and head. Nose is a weak spot though with some cereal grain and hint of canned veggies, but the flavor on the palate is a decent malty-grainy taste with balance of hops to make it have some overall flavor worth enjoying. Too many adjunct lagers seem designed to have as little flavor as possible, but this one is more flavor forward and a decent flavor. If I was a regular adjunct drinker, then this would be in my fridge fairly often.

 518 characters

Photo of mark5692
4.02/5  rDev +50.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

My only problem is that the bottles are only 11.5 oz and cans are 12oz. Hey do the math. Regardless, I'm a big fan of Blue, not so much Blue Light I love the taste and color. Its a beer that serves many purposes, great for getting a buzz, great for relaxing and great for watching sports. Can't really go wrong with Labatt Blue

 327 characters

Photo of forgedinmetal666
1.59/5  rDev -40.4%
look: 1 | smell: 2 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.75

Tastes like spoiled rice. Did not pair well with the barleywine I was drinking at the time. Awful beer. Don't know what it looks like because I drank it out of a can.

 166 characters

Photo of taters21
3.2/5  rDev +19.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

All in all this beer is a somewhat better adjunct lager than others I've had, namely Budweiser, Miller, or Coors, however as with any adjunct lager, I advise this be very cold when you drink it, or the funky sweet grain and corn notes will come alive in the smell and taste and it'll be much harder to drink, but this beer does have a nice crisp, smooth finish to it, other than that, it's got all the qualities of a typical adjunct lager.

 439 characters

Photo of kkleu357
1.76/5  rDev -34.1%
look: 1 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Shared a pitcher with the bowling team. They always have a different $7 pitcher and this week was Labatt. Wow was it bad. Ugly traw colored body. Taste like stale Bud with some sugar water added. I don’t mind when the $7 pitcher special is Pabst, Coors, or Miller, but this stuff was terrible. We ended up not finishing the pitcher :(

 336 characters

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Labatt Blue from Labatt Brewing Company Ltd.
63 out of 100 based on 610 ratings.