1. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Zatte - Brouwerij 't IJ

ZatteZatte

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good

106 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 106
Reviews: 68
rAvg: 3.77
pDev: 13.79%


Brewed by:
Brouwerij 't IJ visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
Tripel |  8.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
The first beer to come out of our vats, back in 1985, making it the classic beer of Brouwerij ‘t IJ. It is a ‘tripel’, the category reserved for the stronger, blonde beers in Belgian tradition. Zatte more than lives up to expectations in this respect. It is a full-bodied, golden beer with a scent of fresh fruit mingled here and there with a hint of grain. The flavour is slightly sweet, ending with a fine, dry aftertaste. A delicious beer that can be enjoyed in all seasons.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 03-15-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 106 | Reviews: 68 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of silenius
silenius

Illinois

1.88/5  rDev -50.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 1 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

Bottle marked from 03/05.

Pours a rich deep yellow with a great big creamy white head that laces my glass nicely.

Smell is malty rich and sweet with no hops present.

Taste is vinegar soaked cheese curds with a hint of sweetness. It is an oddly funky taste and I'm not sure if it is infected or oxidized or what.

Mouthfeel is thin and disappointing.

Never again. Is this what the brewer intended?

Serving type: bottle

11-18-2005 04:34:58 | More by silenius
Photo of tfinn
tfinn

Oregon

2.55/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pours a slightly hazy orangish yellow with rocky head which dissipates as the beer warms.

smells faintly sweet, slightly fruity, like golden raisins.

the front of the flavor has a pleasant taste to it, with a faint sweetness, but it's short lived and replaced with minerally, dusty, old stale basement. the tail reminds me of niacin pills my mother used to give to me as a child. I don't find it to be very pleasant.

mouthfeel is OK; the carbonation is not strong, but that's fine for this style. finish is minerally and abrupt. a little chalky, maybe.

I have tried both the double and the triple from 't IJ, and while I can see the similarities between them, it's just not my thing. I can appreciate dry tripels and doubles, (I find Orval absolutely heavenly,) but there's something missing here to balance out the mineral heavy taste.

Serving type: bottle

08-04-2004 06:44:19 | More by tfinn
Photo of madorb
madorb

Illinois

2.6/5  rDev -31%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Purchased 12/08 at Sun Devil liquors in Mesa Arizona. Looks like according to the label it is from 08/04.

appearance: poured hazy and golden with a very small head

smell: bready, a hint of belgian yeast, and very syrupy sweet. not very appealing.

taste: sweet, with that sweet corn taste you often find in macro lagers. not really getting the belgian yeast aspects, it's also a bit on the metallic side which all leads me to believe this is probably past its prime.

mouthfeel: a bit on the syrupy side but with nice crisp bubbles, this is pretty much the high point of the beer

drinkability: low.

Overall not very impressive, i'm not sure if it's because of the age, assuming i read the label properly, but it was an on the whole not particularly enjoyable beer.

Serving type: bottle

01-20-2009 02:16:51 | More by madorb
Photo of tobyandgina
tobyandgina

Nevada

2.68/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Head was average, off-white with not a lot of lacing.
Lightly cloudy and hazy body.

Smell was malty, straw with average hops for this style. A little bit of oranges, raisins and brown sugar. Heavy in yeast.

On the palate: Medium body, oily texture, soft carbonation with not a very big finish. Slightly bitter flavor as well.

Drinkability was pretty low little because it was too yeasty for me.

Serving type: bottle

02-27-2008 22:33:08 | More by tobyandgina
Photo of Jeffo
Jeffo

Netherlands

2.68/5  rDev -28.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Got this at the bottle shop down the road.

Into a chalice.

APPEARANCE: Pours a 2+ finger thicker looking white head with great retention. Colour is gamboges or carrot orange. Opaque and medium carbonation. A good foam cap remains and leaves lots of good lacing down the sides.

SMELL: Toasted malt and some sweet apples and apricot. Some yeasty spices with some coriander as well. Mild in strength.

TASTE: Toasted malt, sweet apples and apricots. Spicy yeast and coriander as well. Sweet honey notes and a slight metallic note as well. Mild flavour profile, though the metallic touch is not all that pleasant.

PALATE: Medium-light body, slightly thin on the palate as well. Goes down smooth and finishes slightly dry on the palate. I'd like it to be a little thicker really.

OVERALL: A decent beer, but not something worth writing home about. Looks nice, but the rest of it is a little below average. A little too metalic in the taste profile and a little light on the palate. There are better triples out there. I'd pass on this one.

Serving type: bottle

09-13-2009 13:21:08 | More by Jeffo
Photo of BarryNL
BarryNL

Netherlands

2.75/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

A bit of a shock to me this one... from what I've heard I was expecting to like it a lot but to be honest I almost thought I'd accidentally poured it into an ashtray instead of a glass - the smell is pure ashtray and the taste has hints of this. Also, there's way more suspended particles than is really acceptable even for a beer of this style.

I almost wonder if I got an off bottle - I might give this one another go - perhaps I'll pop by the brewery one evening to drink one there even and if it's better I'll rework this review.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2007 20:53:19 | More by BarryNL
Photo of TheLongBeachBum
TheLongBeachBum

California

2.93/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Presentation: Classic Brouwerij ’t IJ 33cl [11.2 fl.oz] brown glass bottle with a red crown cap and the understated but highly recognizable diamond shaped label. Red background with a white border and the familiar Ostrich with an egg at its feet, stands in the desert affront a silhouette of a Windmill. Listed at 8% Vol., Cat.S., with a nicked on label Best Before Date of 8-05. Bottle Conditioned.

Appearance: Orange-golden body which is lightly clouded on the single pour of the entire bottles contents into my favorite Duvel glass. Bloated with an immense number of fine “bespeckled floaties”. Low yet fine-bubbled carbonation and a thin but firm white head remains constant, but it is at levels way below that of the draft version I had at the Waterfront Windmill Proeflokaal years ago. Minimal lacing.

Nose: Pastel aromas, flat hints of pineapple, pears and sharp oranges, nice enough yet it lacked a defined “real fruit” feel. After a while, deeper inhalation reveals a stark sour streak that takes the luscious edge off of the fruits in the nose. Lacking. Smells “old” in fact.

Taste: Dry grain entrance, that builds with the soft but spiky conditioning in the front. Middle has a delicate dry pineapple and a zesty orange feel. The grainy malts linger with an oatmeal consistency that is a little off-putting. Dry boring finish with some [as Vyvyan from the Young One’s would say] “Neil, Neil, Orange Peel” to rescue some interest in the ending.

Mouthfeel: Has a medium body that holds up well. The dissolved effervescent carbon dioxide supports well but ultimately cannot do anything to off-set the cloying oatmeal feel and the flat, limpid uni-dimensional fruit traits.

Drinkability: Spritzy carbonation helps, but overall I felt let down by this sample. Having had a few glasses of Zatte in the downstairs room at the ‘t IJ Proeflokaal, I am finding it hard to believe that this is even the same brew I had years ago!! One-dimensional with high spiky carbonation and flat fruit tastes with a grainy feel…..I wouldn’t drink another bottle of this if I had it in the fridge, put it like that.

Overall: Listed as an ‘Amsterdamse Tripel’, last time I ordered one of those I ended up with two women…..oh erm, I mean I guess I much preferred this one on draft to be honest. Does my memory fail me perhaps?? I don’t think so. I do vividly the recall the two women, No, erm….I mean this was a distinct highlight at ‘t IJ Proeflokaal during both my visits there over the years. Sadly, it looses something in the bottle I feel, the sample I had tasted a tad “old” and “cardboardy”, even though it was still within its BB Date. Not that bad, but not as good as my expectations – disappointing overall if I am honest, I am more likely to spend my money on the other type of ‘Amsterdamse Tripel’ rather than this one again.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2005 03:51:53 | More by TheLongBeachBum
Photo of wl0307
wl0307

United Kingdom (England)

3/5  rDev -20.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

BB 20/06/09, served lightly chilled in Hapkin's tulip-shaped bowl sniffer.

A: dark golden to bright amber hue, full of fine yet semi-lively carbonation, topped with a 1-inch light beige froth with rather good retention.
S: the astringent smell rings a bell of oak-aged cider even, full of damp, oxidised-fruity and funky-lactic notes, on top of a high-level of dry-ish tangerine/citrus-peels, woody spices, perfumy fruit esters, leaving a much milder input of pale malts behind. Overall, way too yeasty at the expense of any balance.
T: lactic-sweet, musty & rusty fruits, almost like a farm-house ale thanks to the high level of funky flavour, which was not so... unpleasant if it didn't go OTT and tarnish a potential balance on the flavour profile. Behind the lactic-yeasty façade lies a quieter flavour profile consisting of olive- and clove-ish spiciness, leather-ish woodiness, bitter dried citrus-peels, sour-sweet medium-bodied malts, and randomly chewy bitterness likely due to hops and, again, yeastiness.
M&D: the mouthfeel is pretty decent, with very smooth carbonation softening the overall palate and a potentially sharp flavour as a result of the yeastiness. Alas, just like all other 't IJ beers in bottles I've tried, the yeast sediments don't seem to bring out the best from this brew apart from only the most pungent elements that simply overpower a potentially decent flavour and aroma. A real pity.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2009 20:57:24 | More by wl0307
Photo of JBogan
JBogan

Nevada

3.08/5  rDev -18.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Strange label, with what looks like a picture of an ostrich standing over an egg in the desert with drool coming out of it's mouth and a windmill in the background.

Poured from a brown bottled marked 8-02. Nice bright orange color with a small head and no lacing. Lots of particles floating and some carbonation rising from the bottom.

Smelled of banana and apples, slight alcohol also.

Tasted of banana and citrus along with some sort of musty-ness (is that a word?)

Felt ok in the mouth, a but thick with some carbonation tingle. Smooth.

All in all this was an alright beeer. It sort of reminded me of Ayinger's Brau-Weiss but not quite as refined. Not sure what the prime drinking age for this beer is but this bottle had been around for over 5 years. Anyways, it's worth a try if you like this style beer, otherwise your beer drinking life will still be complete if you don't.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2007 21:59:47 | More by JBogan
Photo of paterlodie
paterlodie

Belgium

3.1/5  rDev -17.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

BB 8 05 or 06. Nice head and golden beercolor with lots of sediment. Nose is lots of koreander in a not 100% fresh stable. Has this one skunkyness or is it a sink/sewersmell? Anyway not fresh. Further good maltyness and a orange note. Taste is a lot better and is somehow a farmhouse but good. Sharp maltyness, good alcoholic note, (citrussy)fruity, balanced sweetness and aftertaste is spicy bitter. Too bad these IJ beers suffer a lot from productionproblems too often cause they can be very enjoyable.

Serving type: bottle

07-22-2005 21:32:42 | More by paterlodie
Photo of SeanChouffe
SeanChouffe

New Mexico

3.15/5  rDev -16.4%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

An amber/orange color, hazy, with a full white head; effervescent, with full lacing and a nice film. Aroma is of pineapple, apples, pears and other fruity esters. Flavor has a sweet start and bitter finish, dry and yeasty. Palate is smooth, medium bodied with low co2. Quite one-dimensional; smells like a tripel, but the finish is surprisingly dull and bitter.

Serving type: bottle

11-07-2004 23:35:22 | More by SeanChouffe
Photo of mjohn27603
mjohn27603

Michigan

3.25/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours orangish yellow in appearance. Smell is slightly sweet but very faint. Taste is slightly sweet. When I bought this from Cloverleaf fellow BA'er Putnam mentioned root vegetables. I would agree with that. There is a beet or parsnip flavor in the background. Not the sweetest or best tasating of the tripels I've had. Slightly metallic in taste. Has a slight tang to it.

Serving type: bottle

06-16-2005 02:17:13 | More by mjohn27603
Photo of Absumaster
Absumaster

Netherlands

3.25/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

This beer pours a murky orange yellow color with a creamy head that stays on the entire glass.

Smell is slightly sour, less than the other 't IJ beers I recently had, but this is for sure not intentional and points at an infection. There is some fruit in the smell, together with the sourness it combinates to melon and pine-apple. A association I have with all their beers.

Taste is slightly sour with fruity melon and pine-apple. The mouthfeel is sticky and there is also a honey and light caramel taste in it. This beer is so much better on tap, when there is no acidity in the beer. Yet of all the infected beers I had so far from 't IJ this is the best one.

Serving type: bottle

12-17-2006 09:13:31 | More by Absumaster
Photo of GClarkage
GClarkage

California

3.3/5  rDev -12.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

11/13/06- Purchased at Plumpjacks in San Francisco, CA.

Presentation- 11.2oz bottle. Bottled on date notched on label. Poured into my St. Bernardus chalice.

Appearance- Deep golden in color. 3/4 inch head which retains a nice fluffy rim. Light streaky lace trails remain.

Smell- A textbook scent. High alcohol fumes, candied sugar with a fruitcake and cookie dough aroma.

Taste- High alcohol flavor. Really not much of any spices. Maybe some juniper berries. Not even as much sugar as in the nose. Reminds one of a malt liquor without the corn. Picture a Westmalle without the spices.

Mouthfeel- Waterlike, medium carbonated seltzer. Gin-like aftertaste.

Drinkability- Needs something major to tie this beer together. More sugar...how about at least some spices. Very bland. Pass on this one.

Serving type: bottle

03-09-2007 23:12:00 | More by GClarkage
Photo of patto1ro
patto1ro

Netherlands

3.38/5  rDev -10.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Amber colour with a fluffy white head. Fruit, orange, coriander, grass and cream aromas; bitterish taste with coriander, orange and fruit aromas; bitter finish with coriander and orange aromas.

Pleasantly dry, but the spiciness overwhelms pretty well everything else.

Serving type: bottle

06-29-2006 15:04:12 | More by patto1ro
Photo of geetlord
geetlord

Florida

3.43/5  rDev -9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer poured a cloudy gold with lots of suspended yeasts. The head was tall white and foamy. The smell was sweet with reasonable amounts of yeast. I found the flavor predominantly full of yeast with hints of light malts and fruits. The mouthfeel was crisp and dry. Overall I found this to be a pretty decent tripel, though I cannot say that I was particularly impressed by it.

Serving type: bottle

10-06-2007 21:10:41 | More by geetlord
Photo of sfprint
sfprint

Germany

3.43/5  rDev -9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Massive fluffy cartoon head, lots of carbonation, slightly hazy golden yellow.

S: Strange intense smell. Somewhat chemical and bitter thistle. Unique for sure.

T: That weird thistle is very present and isn't my favorite flavor. Interesting though. Underneath that it's a slightly spiced banana-y weiss. Sweet corn.

M: Very weissbier like. A bit astringent and mouth souring.

D: Almost a good beer, and I'm sure it's good for a lot of people. It's just the strong thistle that turns me off.

Serving type: bottle

11-30-2010 23:27:29 | More by sfprint
Photo of mzwolinski
mzwolinski

California

3.48/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Cloudy peach in color with a thin, off-white head. Good lace down the glass.

Nose is spicy, with light hints of fruit and lemongrass. There's a nice tartness here and something a bit odd/funky lurking underneath.

Flavor, too, is tart, and a bit spicy. Quite hot in the finish with a spicy finish that grows in intensity as the beer warms. Lots of fireworks here, but not a lot of body to undergird it.

Heavily carbonated with a light mouthfeel. A bit too ephemeral.

All in all, a drinkable beer, but ultimately a bit unsatisfying -- too much hoopla and not enough body for a well-rounded drinking experience.

Serving type: bottle

08-28-2006 03:28:55 | More by mzwolinski
Photo of GCBrewingCo
GCBrewingCo

North Carolina

3.58/5  rDev -5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

The beer poured into the chalice a chunky and slightly hazy golden with a very compact head that barely made an appearance to the party but did lace the glass as the beer was consumed.

The aroma was sour lactic with spices and belgian yeast character and a candy aroma residing way in the back. The aroma was not exactly stellar and had an "off" quality to it like dishwater.

The flavor was fruity and with a only a slight sourness that added to the beer instead of detracting. The spicy flavors were well balanced with the bittering and the candylike maltiness.

The finish was dry with a lasting pleasant spice. The body was medium and well done.

33 cl bottle. If this was not bottle conditioned and I was to have it again and smell that aroma I would drink it from the bottle. The flavor is pleasant and nice, but you have to bring the glass to your nose to drink the brew. The flavor was not off so I do not believe the beer was experiencing sanitation issues nor did I see any sign of infection.

Serving type: bottle

10-30-2004 00:31:06 | More by GCBrewingCo
Photo of scruffwhor
scruffwhor

Illinois

3.6/5  rDev -4.5%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Appearance- Pours a two finger head that quickly receds to a thin ring of foam and foamm island. No bubbling or Brussel's lacing to add to the light amber, golden hay color and an orange middle. Lots of sediment.

Smell- Crsytal, tomahawk, and amber malts stand out in the aroma. These malts that I can pick out come with a molases like sweetness in the nose, but maybe a bit lighter than staright molasses.

Taste- Stars with some grany sweet, golden tasting malts. The carbonation picks up and gives me the feeling of tasting hay beer. Maybe a little too natural.

Mouthfeel Great carbonation, just the incorrect flavors to go along with that great carbonation. Maybe a little dry, but thats just cause of the carbonation.... or so I think.

Serving type: bottle

06-22-2006 05:23:44 | More by scruffwhor
Photo of Onslow
Onslow

Texas

3.68/5  rDev -2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

"Had fresh on tap at the tiny brewpub in Amsterdam: Looks a little like Duvel but darker, has a big head to but a lot fuller and creamier. honey apple alcohol smell...

.. boom! has a noticeable kick. but a fruitiness in the taste is nice. a good good tripel..."

..there is not a lot better than a truly fresh tripel on tap in the place it is made when its 3 degrees outside!! wonderful!

Serving type: on-tap

02-26-2008 14:12:47 | More by Onslow
Photo of merlin48
merlin48

Kentucky

3.7/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Bottle, as pictured, pours into a goblet a hazy peach hued body. Small white head is fleeting and leaves only a few speckles of lace. Aroma is fruity melon and mango, with bubblegum, earthy notes, and vague spices. Some fusel alcohol is underneath. Mouthfeel is medium but thins as it warms. Carbonation is medium. Taste features the same fruity mango and bubblegum as the aroma. Earthy hop and yeast bitterness. Slightly hot, with a bitter yeasty finish. Not an outstanding tripel.

Serving type: bottle

12-30-2006 15:38:07 | More by merlin48
Photo of pleasewearpants
pleasewearpants

California

3.7/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Hazy golden straw color. Nice white head dissipates after a few minutes. Light tropical fruit aromas. Mango is the most prominent. Flavor seems a bit dry with a light iron minerality. Finishes with a pleasant coating bitterness. After swishing this around in my mouth for a bit I noticed a strange numbing and lightheadedness. Nice beer.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2011 01:23:51 | More by pleasewearpants
Photo of Andreji
Andreji

Colombia

3.73/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Wasn't overly impressed by any of the IJ products and this one- good and all- wasn't an exception.

Pour kinda threw me off after tasting the Scharrel Wit because I thought they'd just poured me another one of the same. looks orange, bright, with a medium white head that has considerable retention.

The nose is very distinctive, because it's far fruitier than the wit. much as the flavour, it brings accross an interesting blend of mandarine and maracuja- a bit citrusy sour at the same time- and then ends in a strong, yet balanced bitterness.

Full-bodied, definetly, with the carbonation consistent to the sort of beer it is. worth trying.

Serving type: on-tap

06-30-2005 09:27:39 | More by Andreji
Photo of lou91
lou91

California

3.73/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

As a triple it looked like something else - like a an amber hefeweizen. It was dark orange and opaque with mild but pleasant triple scents. The taste was pleasant and refreshing with a lingering tartness in a rich body. Warming does nothing to bring out any other flavors. This is so easy going down – nothing too complicated or overbearing. The small size is not enough and while it is not world class I would love to have a few in a row.

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2005 05:24:58 | More by lou91
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Zatte from Brouwerij 't IJ
85 out of 100 based on 106 ratings.