1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Chang Beer (Export) - Cosmos Brewery (Thai Beverage Plc.)

Not Rated.
Chang Beer (Export)Chang Beer (Export)

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
62
poor

402 Ratings
THE BROS
55
awful

(view ratings)
Ratings: 402
Reviews: 172
rAvg: 2.61
pDev: 24.14%
Wants: 4
Gots: 26 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cosmos Brewery (Thai Beverage Plc.) visit their website
Thailand

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: DoubleJ on 12-01-2007)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Chang Beer (Export) Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 402 | Reviews: 172 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of t0rin0
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

t0rin0, Nov 15, 2012
Photo of UCLABrewN84
3/5  rDev +14.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Part of a Beers of the World pack from Cost Plus World Market.

Pours a crystal clear light yellow with a 1 inch foamy white head that fades to a thin cap. Thin rings of lace drip back down into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of sweet grains and corn flakes with a slight honey aroma as the beer warms. Taste is of sweet grains and corn flakes too. This beer has an average level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty average lager in every sense. Nothing too bad but nothing too great either.

UCLABrewN84, Aug 07, 2011
Photo of spycow
3/5  rDev +14.9%

spycow, Mar 11, 2013
Photo of nmann08
2/5  rDev -23.4%

nmann08, Nov 15, 2011
Photo of metter98
2.68/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: The beer poured crystal clear light yellow in color with a small white head that quickly faded away. A moderate amount of carbonation is visible from the rising bubbles.
S: There are light aromas of grainy malts and corn in the nose.
T: The flavors in this beer aren't very strong, but there are some notes of corn and malty sweetness along with a hint of mild bitterness.
M: It feels light-bodied, clean and smooth on the palate. There is a light amount of carbonation.
D: The beer is very easy to drink but nothing really stands out in the smell or taste that would make me want to have another one of these as a standalone beer. I guess it's not a bad accompaniment if you're having spicy Asian cuisine.

metter98, Aug 27, 2010
Photo of BuckeyeNation
2.25/5  rDev -13.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Pastel gold with several tiny particulates that might be yeast... or might not be. Given such sparse carbonation, the bone white cap is a respectable size. It's also at least as attractive as the foam on your average American lager. A little lace was laid down, but not much.

This Asian macro lager smells more like a Euro pale lager than the style seen above. It's time for 'World Lager' to be a recognized style. The beer uses rice, just like Budweiser, which is undetectable, and it has a grassy hoppiness similar to just about any Saaz-hopped EPL you'd care to name. A lack of offensiveness definitely helps.

Chang is (barely) okay beer, though I'd prefer to drink it with a huge plate of spicy Thai food rather than drinking it solo, like right now. Style nitpicking aside, it's nothing more and nothing less than another flavor-challenged pale lager that is probably the most consumed style of beer in the world. No personality. None at all.

What we have here is watery grain with a modest bitter bite on the finish. Although the hops provide a slight grassy spiciness, it certainly isn't enough to carry the day. That's pretty much the extent of things. My taste buds are bored and so am I, so it's time to move on.

The mouthfeel isn't horrible. Then again, it doesn't deserve even one iota of praise. Unless you're a fan of beer that is light-to-watery and has too few bubbles that are brittle rather than soft.

As noted above, Chang Beer is kinda, sorta acceptable as a food washer-downer. There's nothing here that you can't find at your local Quickie Mart, except perhaps a fraction more bitterness. That alone will turn off most aficionados of *real* American macro lagers.

BuckeyeNation, Oct 13, 2008
Photo of BEERchitect
2.95/5  rDev +13%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The lable boasts winning the 2008 Gold Award for the Monde Selection. hmmm?

The pour brings a standard 'premium' appearance of medium straw color, fair head formation of white foam, light on lacing and retention. Looks like any other domestic beer, really.

Smells like it too. A crisp pilsner aroma seems to be part from grain husk, part from actual malt. Light floral hops help but I wanted more hop aroma.

Flavor are much the same- part malt and part grain. Crisp and bready, the beer seems fresh with no signs of oxidation or staling. Hop flavor is nice but timid. Bitterness balances the beer but does little else. Sulfur flavors and mineral taste hurt the finish as the alcohols take on an acetone flavor.

Body is light but crisp. If the balance of the beer tilted a bit more toward the malt and away from the grain, the beer might compare favorable to Bitburger and Warsteiner. The harsh elements in the finish have the last impression on the beer and keeps it from better drinkability.

This is basically the beer I expected from Thailand. Simple, light, and quite banal. It's not good beer, it's not bad beer, it's just beer. Kinda like Budweizer, Coors, or High Life.

BEERchitect, Mar 25, 2010
Photo of kjkinsey
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

kjkinsey, Jun 10, 2013
Photo of jaydoc
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%

jaydoc, Feb 15, 2014
Photo of womencantsail
2.73/5  rDev +4.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Keeping the "Beers of the World" pack tasting going...

A: The pour is a clear, light golden color without much foam.

S: The smell is very, very light. Almost nothing really tickles the senses, in fact. Just a bit sweet and grainy, to be honest.

T: Just like everything else about this beer, the taste is light as well. A mild sweetness from the grain and corn, and little to no hop character.

M: Very flight and crisp on the tongue.

D: This is probably the lightest, most water-like beer I've had. It would make for a good ball-game or lawn-mowing beer, but that's about it.

womencantsail, Dec 23, 2009
Photo of kylehay2004
2/5  rDev -23.4%

kylehay2004, May 18, 2013
Photo of ChainGangGuy
2.7/5  rDev +3.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

330ml bottle - $1.99 at Total Wine & More in Kennesaw, Georgia. Best Before: June 08, 2010.

Appearance: Pours a clear, standard yellow body with a large, suds-tacular, white head.

Smell: A lightly sweetish malt character reaches the nose alongside a herbal, vegetal note with some grainy aspects quickly replacing the sweet hints.

Taste: Lightly sweet-tasting, simple grainy malts in the fore. There's a slight vegetal tone that courses through the brew, but, while not particularly welcome, it is mercifully faint. Incredibly light hop character and bitterness. Crisp, drying finish with that damned vegetal hint sticking around into the aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium carbonation.

Drinkability: Glad to have met it, though this is definitely a one-and-done deal for me. While it is by no means great, Thailand could certainly do much worse for their "Number 1 Beer".

ChainGangGuy, Dec 15, 2009
Photo of emerge077
2.45/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pale, clear gold. Lifeless, no head at all really. Carbonation visible in streams in the center of the glass.

Cooked vegetable aroma. Stale papery malt. Musty wet dog...blechh. I swear i'm not making this up. Who in their right mind would enjoy drinking this?

Dull and chalky feel, dry paper, grape. Aftertaste is more like pear once the cardboard goes away. Prickly carbonation, gassy feel. Not really doin' it for me. Seems like something you should be able to drink in quantity, but it was hard to get down half a pint.

Hey, it has a cool bottlecap!

emerge077, Jul 17, 2008
Photo of zeff80
2.93/5  rDev +12.3%
look: 1.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A - This didn't look appealing. Very clear, straw yellow with a tiny, bubbly white head that didn't last longer than the blink of an eye.

S - Not skunky despite the green bottle. Grassy with subtle notes of caramel.

T - Much like the smell. Sweet caramel with light grassy hop bitterness.

M - It was a little thin but had a smooth finish. A light bodied lager.

O - No, this wasn't great. It was an add-in on a mixed sixer. Better than a lot of other green bottle imports of this style.

zeff80, Jun 17, 2012
Photo of biboergosum
2.65/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

341ml bottle, solid Thai elephant imagery themed label, a pleasant enough find on my brief stopover at Bottlescrew Bill's in downtown Cowtown.

This beer pours a crystal clear medium golden yellow colour, with two fingers of foamy, and weakly bubbly dirty white head, which leaves some sparse remote islet lace around the glass upon its relatively slow demise.

It smells of heady bready cereal grain, a bit of stale lemon, over-cooked veggies, and a slight nail-polish ready booziness. The taste is more overly sweet breakfast cereal graininess, further doughy, buttery, er 'malt' essences, a reduced acrid vegetal character, a weird underripe banana fruitiness, and earthy, somewhat tangy (in a less than optimal way) grassy hops.

The carbonation is a bit on the high side at first, but settles to an agreeable enough frothiness for the most part, the body medium-light in weight, and kind of cloying, in its wan attempt at generic smoothness. It finishes off-dry, with a zingy leafy, and slightly off-putting warming grainy character.

Like its fellow compatriot's offering around here, this comes off better than expected. Even though I wasn't having Thai food when I had it, and thus I can't do the usual ethnic "x food with x beverage" comparison, it still went down easily, I suppose, and was agreeable enough for this typically all-too underwhelming style.

biboergosum, May 07, 2011
Photo of StonedTrippin
2.8/5  rDev +7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

you know, for the asian mass beers, i kind of like this one. especially decent with authentic thai food, as was the case last night at bangkok cafe on the corner of hampden and downing. poured into a frosted metal mug, a good head rose up. smell was off, extracty and chemical, but not offensively so, just not maybe as fresh as it could be. flavor really isnt bad, middle of the road malt profile with just a touch of pseudo-hop bitterness to crisp things up in the finish. feel isnt bad either, very light body and good carbonation. kind of stits in the belly weird, and could be filling despite its lightness. i remember running amok on these during songkran on the streets of bangkok, its a good party beer.

StonedTrippin, May 27, 2012
Photo of Jason
2.25/5  rDev -13.8%

Jason, Jan 12, 2013
Photo of TheManiacalOne
2.05/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured from a 330ml bottle into a US tumbler pint glass.

A: The beer is a light gold color, with a short white head that fades very quickly and leaves very little lace on the glass.

S: The aroma contains light caramelized malts, adjuncts and a faint touch of hops.

T: The taste starts out with an adjunct and light malt sweetness. Then some grain and malt breadiness follows. The hops presence is very mild, but at least there is some balance. The after-taste is slightly sweet.

M: A little crisp and a little smooth, light-to-medium body, high carbonation, finish is slightly sticky.

O: Not very flavorful, goes down easily and not too filling since there isn’t much to the beer, mild kick, typical representation of style, it’s not completely bad but there are many other beers even in the style that I would choose first.

TheManiacalOne, Nov 02, 2013
Photo of mactrail
2.6/5  rDev -0.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Looks OK in the glass with a nice foam on the pale lemon color. Where does this sweet cardboard flavor come from? Certainly beer-like, but that flat, sweet taste is not what I hope for. Hard to get the taste out of your mouth. Some hops in the mix, but everything is dulled and beat down. A slight nose of cereal. Metallic aftertaste.

This was the one unusual beer in a crappy liquor store in Palm Springs, Calif.

mactrail, Feb 22, 2012
Photo of Mora2000
2.05/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

The beer pours a basic light, clear yellow color with a white head. The aroma is full of corn and grain with nothing else going on. The flavor is more of the same. Other than the grain, I get a little bit of grass but that is it. Thin mouthfeel and medium carbonation. Outside of the fact the beer was not skunked - as I expected it to be - I don't have anything else nice to say.

Mora2000, Jul 19, 2011
Photo of MarkyMOD
2.5/5  rDev -4.2%

MarkyMOD, Apr 05, 2012
Photo of smcolw
2.33/5  rDev -10.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

Modest head that leaves some spotty lace; Gold color and crystal clear.

The smell is that of spent grains from a homebrew. I cannot detect any real hop.

Not as thin as a typical American macro, but the rest is pure mass-produced grainy wanna-be pilsner. Again, no real hop to be found in the taste. And the aftertaste dies immediately after the swallow. Still, I'd say this is better than most factory beers.

smcolw, Aug 02, 2009
Photo of BlackHaddock
2.75/5  rDev +5.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

330ml brown bottle, best before 2nd Sept 09, drank out of a Corsendonk stemmed tulip glass in May 09.

Large white head at first, mid-range lager golden body, head turned into a collar and wispy covering. Some lacing tried to hang onto the glass sides but failed in the end.

Matly aroma as the bottle was opened, then a wet cardboard smell appeared, not nice smelling at all.

Thought the malt from the intitial aroma might be found in the taste, but it wasn't. A standard lager feel and taste. Pleasant enough and ideal for replenishing fluids after a day in the garden, like I did today.

Typical lager, no great depth or power and a dry aftertaste left in the mouth ruined the tasting for me.

BlackHaddock, May 30, 2009
Photo of dbrauneis
2.68/5  rDev +2.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

A: Pours a crystal clear medium yellow in color with light to moderate amounts of visible carbonation. The beer has a half finger tall white head that reduces to a thin small patch and a thin ring at the edges of the glass. Light lacing is observed.

S: The aroma of this beer is on the lighter side and slightly one dimensional - with that dimension being the malts. I can definitely smell some malts and lots of adjunct malts with the corn being the heaviest of the aromas. There is something lightly floral in the aroma as well.

T: Like the smell, the flavor of this beer is on the lighter side and slightly one dimensional. The beer is sweet but very malty - with much of the malty flavor being contributed from the adjunct malts and more specifically the corn.

M: Light bodied with moderate to high amounts of carbonation. On the slightly thin/watery side but fizzy.

O: Not a bad beer, a little light on the flavor and aroma but definitely easy to drink and sessionable. Obviously this would pair well with spicy food due to the sweetness. Something I would likely order again when out for Thai food as most of the Thai restaurants in the area stock Thai beers and this one is a little bit superior to some of the others.

dbrauneis, Mar 21, 2012
Photo of wrightst
3/5  rDev +14.9%

wrightst, Jun 22, 2014
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Chang Beer (Export) from Cosmos Brewery (Thai Beverage Plc.)
62 out of 100 based on 402 ratings.