1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

James Squire Porter - Malt Shovel Brewery

Not Rated.
James Squire PorterJames Squire Porter

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
81
good

106 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 106
Reviews: 77
rAvg: 3.54
pDev: 13.28%
Wants: 2
Gots: 2 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Malt Shovel Brewery visit their website
Australia

Style | ABV
English Porter |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: dwarbi on 11-26-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 106 | Reviews: 77 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of SleepyMonk
2.15/5  rDev -39.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Poured from chilled bottle into a pint glass. Initial appearance is a very dark almost solid black beer with 2 fingers worth of creamy head that settles nicely with and leaves behind tight lacing. When held to the light however the black hue reveals itself to be a deep ruby jewel color.

A thin amount of roasted nuts and dark fruit but overall the beer does not unleash any thick odors.

Taste reflects the status of the nose; mild amounts of roasted dark fruits sitting level with a fairly average malt taste. Carbonation is heavier than one would expect and the mouthfeel is tainted by the unbalanced nature of rather bland tastes.

Quick Review: I have half a dozen of these and this is the first, now I'm concerned about consuming the remainder.

Probably best to give this one a miss

SleepyMonk, May 15, 2009
Photo of IntriqKen
2.45/5  rDev -30.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

poured a black/amber with a beautiful craggy 2 finger tan head that melts ever-so-slowly to very thick, sticky lacing.
Aroma was almost non-existent...faint malts like are used in a Sam Adams Porter but lighter.
Taste is very light of toasted malt with a slight hop bitterness on the tail-end.
Mouthfeel is weak and very watery.
Aftertaste is thinly wet cardboard and toasted malt.
I suppose a good introductory Porter because there is really nothing offensive nor anything that stands out in this brew. Just very watered down, IMHO. Mostly it is the very, VERY thin mouthfeel that puts me off of this porter.

IntriqKen, May 27, 2006
Photo of Kroehny_Loves_Hops
2.5/5  rDev -29.4%

Kroehny_Loves_Hops, May 27, 2014
Photo of rec
2.55/5  rDev -28%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5

A dark body and yellowish-cream head appear after pour, and cheap roast coffee paired with the smell of an actual brewery comes through strongest in the otherwise relatively uncomplex aroma.

The taste is overwhelmingly coffee, and unfortunately I just don't like it all. This falls into a similar category of dislike as Young's Double Chocolate Stout, which is something I couldn't actually finish a glass of due to the strength of the coffee taste. Strangely enough, the second taste distinctly reminds me of a local beef jerky I buy. So similar I feel like going and buying some.

James Squire's Amber Ale remains my favourite from Malt Shovel Brewery, with Golden Ale in a close second. While I can appreciate that this is a quality brew, I'm forced to give it a poor review due to my dislike for coffee, and the fact beer shouldn't take like beef.

rec, Feb 09, 2007
Photo of Stew41
2.58/5  rDev -27.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Pours chunky. Nice medium chocolate brown. Stout like on the nose with roasted notes. Flavours promised on the nose don’t really translate but still drinks ok. A touch too fizzy for my liking. JS should have done better IMHO. Won't be back for this.

Stew41, Jul 31, 2011
Photo of aeolianshredhead
2.6/5  rDev -26.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A- Pours a deep ruby red with a brown frothy cappacino-esque 2 finger head which dissipates quickly. Nice.

S- Raisin and coffee. Not detecting much in the way of chocolate on the nose.. Frankly, a little flat if anything.

T- Well, I am a little disappointed here. All this beer really consists of is roasted malts with little robustness. Ok, there is a nice, lingering bitter aftertaste but that's about it. Even the dark fruit aroma is barely present.. It's not actually unpleasant, I just expected a whole lot more from this brewery.

M- The first thing that strikes me is that this Porter is way too carbonated. Next, I found this to have little in the way of body.. Definitely not what I was expecting.

O- For such flashy advertising, I find this beer fails to deliver the goods. Mainly, the level of robustness was hugely lacking as was the mouthfeel in relation to the style. It wasn't a disaster or anything, just a bit underwhelming.

aeolianshredhead, Aug 07, 2011
Photo of Mustard
2.63/5  rDev -25.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Presentation: 12oz. brown bottle; no "best before" or "bottled on" warning; no ABV %; purchased as a stray single from Trader Joe's for $1.00.

Appearance: Pours a highly carbonated mahogany; huge, cocoa-brown head; c-cup's worth of lace; excellent head retention.

Aroma: Mildly of chocolate and roast; faint hop bitterness.

Taste: Largely dry; bland notes of roast upfront and throughout; slightly sour with a mildly bitter finish; hints of chocolate; somewhat light bodied; thin mouthfeel.

Notes: Totally forgettable, if not somewhat off-putting.

Mustard, Oct 03, 2003
Photo of Raebies
2.68/5  rDev -24.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Lightly carbonated dark beer with little to no head.. perhaps because I poured it straight from the fridge. Smells metallic and minerally. Nice smoky burnt caramel flavours, hint of chocolate and strong coffee aftertaste. Somewhat sour on the tongue and not very sweet, I feel it lacks the complexity of other beers in the James Squire range.

Raebies, Nov 25, 2011
Photo of Dmann
2.83/5  rDev -20.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

A unimpressive beer. This one had potential with its nice dark brown color, decent head and nice smell. But the taste was just average, with some slight coffee and dark chocolate flavors comming through. The beer would get a higher rating if it were not for the horrible mouthfeel. Thin, watery and over carbonated, this nearly ruined the beer. Pass.

Dmann, Jan 12, 2005
Photo of laituegonflable
2.9/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a dark brown with a slight orangey tinge around the edge. A little head with fairly good retention. Nice lacing, thick.

Nose has roasty notes with a hint of sour fruit. Nothing really out of the ordinary really, this is a very standard porter.

Taste is roasty and a bit gritty, like badly dissolved coffee. A bit weak, really. Unpleasant finish, like...Yeah, badly dissolved coffee. Mouthfeel is nice, quite full bodied, bit too much carbonation for the style. Apologies for a very unimaginative review, but I really think this is a very middle-of-the-road beer, quite unimaginative as a beer.

laituegonflable, Mar 12, 2009
Photo of Vanz
3/5  rDev -15.3%

Vanz, Feb 06, 2014
Photo of Boilermaker88
3/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from an 11.62oz (huh? - talk about precise!) bottle. Sported a dark brown color with ruby highlights and a firm, compact vanilla head that fizzled down to a cap, leaving gobs of lace behind.
The smell had aromas of roasted malts, some bittersweet chocolate and coffee in the nose, though not all that potent. Just kinda there and not meshing all that well. The taste was a blend of burnt malt, molasses, dark chocolate and old coffee. The finish had a touch of dark fruit also and a light, scampering bitterness that departed all too quickly. Again, the flavors seemd to have trouble playing well together as each vied for attention like little kids on a playground. The feel was medium-bodied (but leaning more toward light), thin and a bit watery.
Overall, a completely umremarkable brew. The flavors just didn't seem to get together as well as in other brews of the style. Nothing to wake up the neighbors about.

Boilermaker88, Jan 18, 2004
Photo of pin
3/5  rDev -15.3%

pin, Aug 27, 2012
Photo of cdwil
3/5  rDev -15.3%

cdwil, Dec 29, 2011
Photo of MenInVen
3/5  rDev -15.3%

MenInVen, Dec 28, 2011
Photo of rowew
3/5  rDev -15.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Presentation: 11.65 oz longneck, nice looking label, lots of description on the label.

Appearance: Dark brown with just a hint of red around the edges, thin head fades quickly.

Smell: Coffee and a bit of hops. Slightly sweet with some roasted aromas.

Taste: Medium mouthfeel and hops, same roasted and coffee flavors.

Overall impression: Middle of the road porter. For the price most shops here charge, there are many better options.

rowew, Mar 01, 2007
Photo of BILF
3/5  rDev -15.3%

BILF, Jan 28, 2013
Photo of fretlessman71
3.03/5  rDev -14.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Pertinent Preliminary Comments: Saw it, hadn’t seen it; couldn’t resist. ‘Nuff said.

APPEARANCE: Translucent brown with ruby highlights. Off white head, tight bubbles, pretty good lacing with strong ringlets as the liquid drops in level.

AROMA: Black patent stands out more than anything. Smells more like a good stout.

FLAVOR: Roasty biscuity black malt comes thru, just as in the aroma. Very little sweetness present; not much in the way of chocolate either. I’m inclined to say this beer is really a stout rather than a porter. Not a bad stout, though – kinda mild in that regard. Could it be that this is a true stout porter? Hops certainly come through, and not as flavorfully as the could have.

MOUTHFEEL: Slightly acidic, but again, like a good stout would be. Med. weight.

DRINKABILITY: I could have a few of these, but truth be told, I was really in the mood for something more porter-like.

OVERALL COMMENTS: Enjoyable, but disappointing in the way that biting into a Snickers and getting a Milky Way would be disappointing. Less black malt, and LOTS more chocolate malt might improve this beer dramatically.

fretlessman71, Aug 30, 2005
Photo of MrKennedy
3.08/5  rDev -13%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

16oz cylindrical James Squire glass at 30 knots bar.

Poured with minimal off-white foam. Dark brown to black appearance with a hint of red on the outskirts of this. The foam dispersed quickly to leave a little crown around the edge of the glass.

Smell was a little restrained, partly due to the cool serving temperature. Some light coffee grounds are there with dark chocolate.

Taste has a modest amount of chocolate there, with the barest trace of the coffee.

Mouthfeel is pretty full for the size of the beer. The finish is made full with the chocolate flavour. Not a lot of bitterness, but it doesn't really need it with the gentle flavour.

A pretty average porter. Nothing there to offend, but not much to get hyped up about. Pretty modest, dependable and reasonably sessionable.

MrKennedy, Jan 06, 2012
Photo of CRJMellor
3.08/5  rDev -13%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured light black, deep red colors with a thin white head. Dark fruit and chocolate malted aromas dominate. Very light feeling in the mouth for a porter, mouthfeel is a little thin. Roasted malt taste is light with a lingering bitter finish. Just not enough complex malts to be a great porter.

CRJMellor, Dec 14, 2003
Photo of diablo14
3.15/5  rDev -11%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

great looking beer, as most of malt shovels are, but often arent backed up for the rest of the trip. this porter is not a bad brew, but there are so many better. even emersons of new zealand's porters cane this one. again its better on tap than the bottle, but i havent drank it off the tap to rate it in that format.

sensational appearance of dark red and brown colors, with a lovely fluffy latte` like head. lacks a bit of punch in the aroma, standard hints of burnt grains. chocolatey elements also, but nothing really jumps out. it is fairly smooth tasting. nice gentle roasted flavor, chocolate, coffee and a slight hint of forest fruits and caramel in the mix. having said the word gentle in there, it says to me this just isnt full on enuff to be a porter, but is more of a schwarzbier. lacking the hop dryness or bitterness and a bit too light and bubbly to be taken seriously as a porter. despite this, its overall not too bad and quite drinkable.

there are better porters in this region, let alone the world. its not really an accurate description of the style. still its an inoffensively pleasant beer thats not a bad starting point for locals who want to drink dark beers that arent guinness.

diablo14, Nov 18, 2003
Photo of dill
3.23/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

poured from a 12 oz bottle into a pint glass. It has a deep brown color with a cream colored head which quickly receded. The smell was a bit sweet with notes of caramel and mocha. As it warmed the aroma of soy sauce started to come through. Taste was also a bit sweet with a bit of toastiness. Medium bodied with tight carbonation. This is an easy porter to keep drinking.

dill, Apr 05, 2008
Photo of Gusler
3.23/5  rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

The pour a deep ruby red color, the head spumescent, beige, the lace chunky. Nose is malt, caramel, lightly roasted grains, pleasant. Front is malt sweet, the top washy, the finish is modestly dry, minutely acidic, slightly hopped. Drinkable and a "Beginners" Porter, lacks a "Robustness", I like in my Porters, not bad mind you, just a bit "Thin-Wasted.

Gusler, Oct 17, 2002
Photo of tobelerone
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

tobelerone, Aug 04, 2013
Photo of hopnerd
3.25/5  rDev -8.2%

hopnerd, Nov 02, 2012
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
James Squire Porter from Malt Shovel Brewery
81 out of 100 based on 106 ratings.