1. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.

Knuckle Dragger - Walking Man Brewing Co.

Not Rated.
Knuckle Dragger
No picture uploaded.
Have one? Upload it now.
BA SCORE
88
very good

32 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 32
Reviews: 28
rAvg: 4.01
pDev: 7.98%
Wants: 1
Gots: 0 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Walking Man Brewing Co.
Washington, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  6.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: HiroProtagonist on 01-05-2004)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Ratings: 32 | Reviews: 28 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of czechsaaz
2.9/5  rDev -27.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pretty hoppy aroma. A little bit of malt aroma buried in there somewhere. Amber colored with a nice cramy head, but pretty cloudy.

Initial flavor is Maris Otter like malty. Nice ballance. Pretty assertively hopped. Aftertaste had a lingering hop harshness. Kind of distracting that. Each sip is pretty pleasant, but the lingering aftereffects aren't.

Medium-full bodied. Somewhat creamy.

Overall, I'm not wild about it. As an IPA it's O.K. Whatever mid-boil hop they're using needs to change to something with less aftertaste.

Photo of FightingEntropy
3.6/5  rDev -10.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Very excited to try this beer--cool name, cool theme for the brewery, and had read about it a bit. It is obviously a very good beer--probably better than my rating--but I had some trouble with it.

Off white cream head, thing, anda light amber color with gold highlights around the edges. Big hop nose--100 IBUs listed on the website, and they're not lieing. Fruity, aromatic, and completely cleared my sinuses. Taste of the hops is in the range of a DIPA, so ESB is definately out. For me, the Simcoe and Columbus hops(website) completely overwhelms the relatively medium malt that serves as the base. It also has an oily smooth, almost whiskey-ish character to it, maybe oak (?) but I don't think it's aged in oak, just the taste. Really a tremendous beer but I think I realized on this beer that I'm not a hop head; however, I would love to get a bottle of this and aged it for a year or so, let the hop bite blend in a bit and try it in. That might be truly fantastic.

Submitted a change after a discussion with another BA, and this should probably be listed an American Pale Ale. Listed in the category is stuff like Alpha King, so in the ballpark.

Photo of dirtylou
3.63/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

on-tap, chucks 85th

notes

appearance: served in a mason jar pint, clear medium amber body, sticky white film

smell: bitter hop resin, grapefruit rind

taste: very one dimensional and definitely confusable with the IPA style. bitter hop oils, pine resin, grapefruit, some bright citrus, touch spicy

mouthfeel: high bitterness levels

overall: needs some balance or less abrasive hop profiling

Photo of Docer
3.63/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

On tap at by the bottle in vancouver, wa here..

- Dark copper amber... slightly cloudy, thick and thin blanket of foam. layer was like white whipped cream...

- Grain, bread, biscuit, caramel.. bitter fresh hop.. grassy.. quite grainy...

- This is a malty pale! Nice grassy fresh bitter hops, light pine, slightly floral in flavor... caramel, biscuit, oats and grain.,..

- Overall pretty thick for a pale... more like a heavy amber.. medium bodied, slight (and perfect) carbonation...

- Overall not a bad beer... and reminds me and a buddy of McMenamins Hammerhead.. but is slightly better and cleaner tasting. Not a favorite from the brewery though..

Photo of Magpie14
3.65/5  rDev -9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: the body is a hazy, rather bland light brown with soft orange, a borderline caramel color. Head was nonexistent and left as quickly as it formed. just a thin strip of foamy lace exists with a small spot of foam here and there

S: the first whiff came with citrus, much like sweet peaches. I think some fruits of the tropical kind can be detected. Some spicy whiffs as well. Ever so soft toasted malts, rather hard to pull out. Seemed pretty cold in the glass

T: toasted malts step-up a bit stronger on the palate with a shot of caramel. Hops put forth spicy herbal notes with just a few of the fruity flavors showing up (grapefruit and lemons) otherwise mostly pine. Otherwise this is a spiced hop, toasted malt, caramel crusted brew. The shift from nose to palate seemed rather dramatic to me, somewhat of a staggering difference, and met with mixed results I might add

M: the body is mild and carbonation is in right order, for the most part. Finishes a bit dry and spicy with light dose of hop oils on the tongue

D: I am gonna have this again, I can not come to a clear consensus about my feelings toward this beer

Photo of beertunes
3.65/5  rDev -9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Served in Imperial pint glass. Poured a clear medium amber with a thin ring of soapy off-white head that had OK retention and lacing.

The aroma had rich malts and a solid hop scent. The flavor definitely had a strong hop profile, with the malt providing a solid background.

The body was certainly more full and well-rounded than most of the style. Drinkability was very good, having a couple, or more, was very easy and enjoyable.

Overall, even this beer is more like an IPA Lite than a true Pale Ale, it's very enjoyable and worth seeking out. A certain must try if you happen to see it.

Photo of HardTarget
3.73/5  rDev -7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

On tap at the Walking Man , menu noted 6.5% abv. and lists it as a “Strong Pale Ale”

Aroma: Grapefruit flowers on a sugary base.

Appearance: Amber gold glass was mildly hazy. Small but plucky cover lasted and gave ample lace.

Flavor: Yeasty, gentle hop note, mild malt base. Well balanced but not well integrated. Drinks like an everyday pale ale.

Mouthfeel: Medium body, a bit oily

Overall Impression: Nice and easy, a bit boring maybe, but that’s more about me than the beer. I’m very surprised to see 100 IBU’s listed, it wasn’t nearly in that range to my taste.

Photo of bluckbeyes
3.75/5  rDev -6.5%

Photo of barleywinefiend
3.9/5  rDev -2.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A: Poured a light amberish orange color with good carbonation and a nice white cap

S: Citrus and grass ont he nose with some light breadiness to it

T: Fruity citrus and lots of caramel, lingering fully-hopped bitterness. Stays pretty well-balanced but leans hard toward the hops in the finish...

M: Medium bodied, well carbonated and loads of taste

O: A good Pale overal.. Walking Man scores again..

Photo of BeardedBoffin
3.93/5  rDev -2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

The beer arrived an orange, amber color with wispy head. The aroma is full of big time grapefruit with hints of flower. Somewhat heavy on the palate with hop residue.The flavor is raw hops with a combination of citrus, flower, and pine.

The beer doesn't have much balance, but is quite drinkable nonetheless.

Photo of Rifugium
3.95/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

First had: on tap at their brewpub

A clear amber liquid with a nice white head that left copious amounts of lacing on the glass. Big aroma of citrusy hops, acidic, almost reminiscent of a DIPA, which I did not expect. More citrusy hops on the tongue, lemon and orange zest, backed by a sweet maltiness that never quite comes to the foreground, but still makes its presence known. Medium-bodied, and quite nice overall. It just seems to be more on the "IPA" side than on the "APA" side, so prepare yourself for a bigger hoppage than your typical Sierra Nevada-ish pale ale.

Photo of freed
3.95/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Tried this on tap at OBF 2004. It was excellent, despite weather that suggests lighter beers.

The color was a somewhat dull and ruddy brown - sediment in the ale took away the luster, but that's what you'd expect of a strong. The beer was initially listed as a Strong Pale, which it isn't. There wasn't any head either.

The aroma was terrific. A very earthy, terrene smell that was both sweet and musty in the best possible way.

The taste is dominated by its malt constituents - sweet, but with a robust enough body that it didn't come across as too sweet. The yeast provided additional fruit sweetness that melded well with the beer's intention. Neither hops nor bitterness factor too strongly into the beer flavor wise, and only seem to add a slight spicy tang.

The beer also seemed a bit young - like maybe a bit of time in the dark might improve its flavors. Otherwise, it was quite tasty.

Photo of cbarrett4
3.98/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured on tap at Henry's 12th Street Tavern in Portland:

Poured with a thin head rapidly fading to a non-existent lace. Shows a beautiful copper/red hue though. Smells of citrus and apple, some fresh, green hops and a hint of spice. On the palate there is bountiful fresh, piney hops with a hint of fresh nuts. Medium bodied with lots of hops noticeable on the finish. Fresh, smooth and very drinkable. Overall a very nice, good quality IPA.

Photo of sinistersteve
3.98/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Take home version from the brewery (growler)

Nice dark red color. Not much head produced from my pour. Seemed to look better at the bar. Lace is non-existant.

Slight carmel aroma attacks the nose.

Flavor has a nice balance. Not too over the top but enough to be called a strong pale ale.

Great beer. I'll definatley look for this one again.

Photo of jdense
3.98/5  rDev -0.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the Horse Brass 11/13.

1 finger creamy white head, amber body, nice carbonation, exquisite lacing.Bready malts and piney hops in the nose. Simcoe and Columbus hops provide nice balance between the nose and citrusy taste. The finish is dry, a spicey hop bomb. Given the big IBUs, this leans heavily towards IPA territory. In any case, nice balance, very drinkable. Looking forward to exploring more from this cutting edge brewery in bucolic Stevenson, Washington.

Photo of HiroProtagonist
4/5  rDev -0.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the Rose and Raindrop in Portland. The beer was an attractive hazy red-orange or copper color and had a thick fine white head. The beer emitted a robust, somewhat earthy hop bouquet with both floral and resiny components...nice complexity here. On the palate, this enjoyable brew presented a pleasing bitter hop profile and a complementing (barely) malt backbone. The brew possesed a medium full body, feeling appropriate for the style and character of the beer. Knuckle Dragger is a tasty and well-crafted ESB from a terrific brewery.

Photo of CoryR
4/5  rDev -0.2%

Photo of shelby415
4/5  rDev -0.2%

Photo of DaPeculierDane
4.15/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Listed as an American Strong Pale Ale. 6.5% ABV. 100 IBUs. Consumed in Panther Creek Camp Ground in the National Forest.

Appearance: Pretty light tangerine amber with little bubbles and a thick, creamy, and persistent white head.

Aroma: Simcoe city. Loads of grapefruit. Some grass. Caramel malt base.

Taste: Grapefruit Juice with a little carbonated caramel syrup. Hints of woodiness from time to time (although maybe it was just the atmosphere where I was drinking it).

Mouthfeel: Uber bitter. Really, really bitter. Unbalanced and very bitter. Hop heads delight. Otherwise…soft, and pleasant with mild warming. It’s surprisingly inviting for such bitterness and quite difficult to explain. Somewhat oily.

Drinkability: Great.

Photo of Gavage
4.15/5  rDev +3.5%
look: 5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Appearance: clear amber / orange in color with a 2 finger off-white head. Super thick lace paints the glass until the pint glass was empty.

Smell: malt sweetness and green apples.

Taste: nice bready / malty beer with a hearty pine bitterness, some grapefruits, and tart green apples. Dry finish.

Mouthfeel: medium-heavy in body. Smooth throughout. Aftertaste is long on the malt goodness and bitterness.

Drinkability: very easy drinking and worth having if you find it on tap.

Photo of msubulldog25
4.18/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Pint, poured at JAX in Portland, OR; this one I've had on several occasions. Listed on WM's website as a Strong Pale Ale (packing a 100 IBU wallop!).

A: Hazy rose/amber with very soft carbonation slowly wiggling toward a thin (1/2-finger) head of white cream. Velvety, soap-like curtain of lace glued to the sides of the glass is nice!

S: Pleasantly juicy (sweet citrus & grassy) hop nose, blanketed with a caramel/malty sweetness. Served a little cold, so smell may have never fully developed.

T: Fruity citrus and lots of caramel, pretty much what is expected out of that aroma. Sweetness fades to a bracing jolt of Simcoe & Columbus hops and lingering fully-hopped bitterness. Stays pretty well-balanced but leans hard toward the hops in the finish...

M: Creamy and mellow, mild alcohol warmth on the cheeks and towards the back of the tongue. That clinging bitterness lasts just long enough...then lasts, and lasts some more...

D: Walking Man makes very good beers and this is no exception. Has a bold, lively flavor and huge hoppy mouthfeel. Slightly strong ABV for a session beer, but tasty enough you'll want more than one. Definitely recommended when you can find it on tap...

Photo of SickBrew
4.2/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

Had this one at brewery is Stevenson, WA.

This beer pours a nice orange/amber with a good bright white head that leaves a bit of lacing. Aroma is through-the-roof hoppy. It definitely smells like garden fresh hops with a bit of grapefruit in the background. Taste is great and is somewhat like the nose. A nice initial maltiness is finished with hoppy bitterness, each complementing the other. Mouthfeel is smooth, almost sexy with a medium body and light carbonation. All the beers I've had from Walking Man Brewing have been excellent and they're now on my favorite list!!

Prost!

Photo of RedDiamond
4.2/5  rDev +4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

An ingenious aroma combines the immediacy of potent, garden-fresh hops with a scintillating spearmint fringe. The smell is so strong and so vital, it nearly singes my olfactory nerves. But I’ve gotta have more!

Of course, the house smell of pizza at the Walking Man Brewpub competes with Knuckle Dragger for attention, but that’s okay. The smell of this ale is sexy and otherwise unrelenting – at least initially. As the head fades, a wall of lace takes shape on the glass and the odor diminishes somewhat. I settle in to admire the clear oaken body with low carbonation, the velvety smooth mouthfeel, and the muscular bitter finish.

Knuckle Dragger’s forward leaning hoppy charisma earned it the 2nd place People’s Choice Award at the 2005 Spring Beer and Wine Fest in Portland. (Walking Man’s Somnambulator took 1st place.) This is a proud Cascadian ale. All accolades are deserved.

Photo of unklesyd
4.22/5  rDev +5.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

On tap at the 2006 OBF.

Nice, deep garnet color with a creamy head.

Great hoppy aroma and slight MO sweetness.

The fun part of this beer is that it has a really unique flavor balance. There is a good bit of bitterness, but not nearly as much as would be indicated by the citrus and slight herbal hop flavor, which is quite pronounced and enjoyable. Bitterness provides a little cut and is mostly noticable after a few sips. Slightly toasty Maris Otter and light caramel malt backbone.

I could have a few of these, but probably would have scored it a little higher in drinkability in a little cooler weather. This was really popular at the Fest, and I can certainly see why. Very well done.

Photo of Thrasher
4.25/5  rDev +6%
look: 4 | smell: 5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

This was described at the brewpub as a strong pale ale (it's 6.4%), but that's basically what an ESB is anyway. They also described it as their hoppiest beer, but the hops are entirely integrated into the beer and the bitterness is relatively mild. Hopheads who are used to over-the-top beers like Stone or Bear Republic will need to take a step back and appreciate the subtleties here. This is what hops SHOULD do in a beer, not overstep their bounds nor overstay their welcome. A tawny orange amber, with a tremendous hop nose: elements of citrus and skunky weed (if ya know what I mean and I think you do). Of course, hops are present in the beer from the get-go, but the beer remains mellow and decidedly un-bitter. A remarkable achievement brought about by copious and thorough dry-hopping, I presume. The beer has a couple shortcomings: the malts are just a fraction too weak to keep up with the hops, which overall are excellent but contain some elements that are slightly green, grassy, and unrefined. Mouthfeel is thinnish. The crisp hop finish is dry and delightful.

« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Knuckle Dragger from Walking Man Brewing Co.
88 out of 100 based on 32 ratings.