1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Grolsch Premium Lager - Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V.

Not Rated.
Grolsch Premium LagerGrolsch Premium Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

1,447 Ratings
THE BROS
74
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,447
Reviews: 612
rAvg: 3.1
pDev: 18.39%
Wants: 18
Gots: 90 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V. visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-10-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Grolsch Premium Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,447 | Reviews: 612 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of MmmIPA
3.55/5  rDev +14.5%

Pretty cool bottle with a flip top lid.Its a pint also thats a plus.Lets see how it looks and taste's.


It is golden with a thick fluffy head and tons of bubbles streaming to the top.Some nice lacing on the glass.The beer looks very fresh.

It smells a bit skunky but I think thats how all these euro pale lagers smell.It has a crisp smell to it also almost like a pilsner.I cant smell any hops in it.

I must have had bad pale lagers in the past because this stuff taste way better then they ever did.This stuff is pretty good, way better then Stella Artois in my opinion.I can taste the hops in it and the malt is sorda sweet.

Carbonation is pretty ruff but not to the point where its horrible.This stuff is pretty easy going down and refreshing.I can see drinking this on a hot summer day.

Ide buy this again, I got this bottle for $2.75, which I thought wasnt bad.Not a bad lager at all.

MmmIPA, Feb 22, 2007
Photo of vickersspitfire
3.35/5  rDev +8.1%

Grolsch Premium Lager has a very clear yellowish body that has little carbonation and a thin head with some mild lacing. It has a mild sweet flavor that just covers your mouth, it's crisp but it isn't dull either. It has a strong aftertaste that has a hint of alcohol in it. This isn't a bad beer over all and I would mind going back to the store for a few more every now and then.

vickersspitfire, Feb 21, 2007
Photo of elricorico
3.85/5  rDev +24.2%

Saw this in a can and thought it was probably time to try it out. I figured that skunking would be eliminated and I would get to taste the real beer.

Pours a pale gold with plenty of cream coloured head. The head seems to have some pretty good staying power, and is sticky enough to leave lacing.

Fresh and grainy smelling, hay is what comes to mind most. A little bit of a shampoo aroma in there. Not bad.

Light on flavour, a crisp hop bite and almost a lime citrus taste. Faint malt sweetness somewhat reminiscent of crackers. Refreshing and not overdone.

Not light enough to feel watery, but nothing really exciting in the mouthfeel department. Well carbonated, as expected.

Here is a beer meant to be refreshing and not challenging. I think it succeeds.

elricorico, Feb 20, 2007
Photo of alexskovan
3.28/5  rDev +5.8%

Poured pale gold with an egg-white head that dropped to a half-inch and stayed. Smells like euro-macro, grassy hops and a little light toasty malt. Taste is a little on the sweet side, low carbonation. Slightly bitter finish.

Euro macro. Ho hum. Better on average than American macro, but still boring.

alexskovan, Feb 09, 2007
Photo of theopholis
3/5  rDev -3.2%

Appearance- Very clear, dark straw/amber in color. Good head, good staying power, good lacing. Head is very white.

Aroma- Smells like a stereotypical continetal lager. Crisp, hint of malt sweetness, hint of bittering hops, some graininess. Just the barest hint of green apple.

Taste- Just a tad of malt sweetness at the forefront. Goes very quickly into hop bitterness. Not overwhelming bitterness, but noticable. Nice and crisp and clean tasting..

Mouthfeel- Body is average. Carbonation level is good. Some clinginess in the mouth, but not much. About what you would expect from a continental lager.

Drinkability- It's okay. Nothing great, nothing bad.

theopholis, Feb 03, 2007
Photo of SERENGETI
3.73/5  rDev +20.3%

during a longer stop-over at the Amsterdam airport I had the chance to sample various dutch beers on draught. Grolsch was the best in my opinion. Clean taste, clean aroma and a nice bitterness that other dutch mass-beers seem to lack. Yuo can surely drink more than a glass without endangering your health

SERENGETI, Feb 02, 2007
Photo of soupyman10
2.93/5  rDev -5.5%

A - Nice two finger head, average golden color with lots of bubbles, crystal clear, some noticeable lacing throughout the drink

S - A scent of corn, fairly light aroma with a very subtle fruit malt

T - Strong corn taste, light malt and a slightly bitter, hoppy aftertaste; fairly "macro-lager" taste, although a little better than most

M - Medium-high carbonation, thin body, nothing out of the ordinary

D - Fairly drinkable - its basically just a solid lager that's better than some but nothing particularly great; it's a little disappointing, really, given how sweet the bottle is

soupyman10, Feb 01, 2007
Photo of Cyberkedi
3.95/5  rDev +27.4%

An above-average beer that even a serious beer connoisseur can enjoy. The color is rich and inviting, and the smell is nice and beery. The taste, though not complex, is impressive. In the mouth it has a jazzy, sassy feel with a little bit of a kick. A truly delicious lager.

Cyberkedi, Jan 30, 2007
Photo of Mebuzzard
3.03/5  rDev -2.3%

Pours a dark yellow, perhaps light amber color. Frothy head, looks good...perhaps a bit light, but nice for a lager.
A bit skunked on the smell. Sweet malt and faint citrus in the nose.
Tastes like a fruity lager, and a bit skunked. Light citrus, some crab apple sourness. Sweet in the long run.
Average lager. Better than some. Can drink it if had to.

Mebuzzard, Jan 26, 2007
Photo of moonman00
3.55/5  rDev +14.5%

This beer is offered at local Sam's clubs but only the 5 litter keg, So I poured it into a beer glass.

It pours a dark-yellow with a little head.

It smells malty, with sweet fruits, apple.

Tastes a sweet malty flavor, with a nice body.

Served cold it is very refreshing. I could drink the hole 5 litter keg in one night.

I prefer it over Heineken.

moonman00, Jan 17, 2007
Photo of bigsteveo830
3.53/5  rDev +13.9%

12 packs were on sale at the local supermarket so I decided to giev this a try

A- Pours a golden almost copper color with a large foamy head that disapates fairly quickly, slight lacing, many small bubbles

S- hoppy sent, with a slight hint of malt and almost fruity

T- fairly grainy taste, semi fruity and sweet

M- Light and smooth

D- Very drinkable, could drink alot of these in one night

Definatly a good beer if i'm going out for a night of drinking

bigsteveo830, Jan 15, 2007
Photo of DoubleJ
2.85/5  rDev -8.1%

Bought one of these from the local liquor store (along with two other beers, Coors and Spaten), so let's get on to the beer;

It pours a rich, dense head, with some definition inside the body. A whiff of Euroskunk (tm) and spicy herbs is followed by a taste of herbs, hop bitterness, with some malts ending the sip. It's more difficult to drink than a typical pale lager because of the overwhelming flavor that gets in the way.

DoubleJ, Jan 15, 2007
Photo of bigone4
2.83/5  rDev -8.7%

Poured from a green flip top 16oz bottle. Darker golden yellow color well carbonated with a fluffy white head. Decent head retention that left a slight lace. Smells of pale malts with a sweetness of fruit and a slight caramel tone. Some hints of sourness. Rather smooth taste pale malt flavors followed by a dry slight bittering hop finish. Decent drinkability. Has the distinct Euro lager funk that I have found characteristic to the style. Not my favorite Euro lager but also not the worst.

bigone4, Jan 13, 2007
Photo of hanco005
3.58/5  rDev +15.5%

16 oz swing top bottle, best before 20 Jul 2007 and 6G20 17:34 printed on the neck label

A—pours clear honey yellow with a ½ inch foamy bright white head that fades down to a thin sheet in a few minutes, lacing resembles grains of sugar or salt

S—sweet grains, malts, some straw aroma, some milder fruit tones as well

T—mild hop bitters and even milder sweet malty flavor, tastes like a typical lager, there is a slight alkaline aftertaste, but not enough to get in the way. Some sour twang is in the mouth, too

M—a bit dry, light bodied, good carbonation

D—not bad, I honestly bought it for the swing top bottle since I just started home brewing. I bought another one and will enjoy it as well.

hanco005, Jan 09, 2007
Photo of gmfessen
3.35/5  rDev +8.1%

Poured from the bottle into a pint glass, beer has a nice three-finger head and is a clear golden color. Smell is like most commercial lagers, heavy on the corn smell with a slight metallic tinge. Taste is initially bitter with a honey sweet flavor to follow with hints of fruit and a crisp bitter finish. Mouthfeel is light and velvety with a moderate amount of carbonation. This is a drinkable beer, better than most macro commercial beers but nothing too special either.

gmfessen, Jan 09, 2007
Photo of zuggy9
3.83/5  rDev +23.5%

This lager pours a golden amber with a white head and little head retention. The smell was rather sweet, with a bit of herb. The taste is a good solid bitter with a sweet finish. It has decent carbonation and is somewhat balanced in regard to mouthfeel. I could drink a few of these.

zuggy9, Jan 05, 2007
Photo of Westsidethreat
3.03/5  rDev -2.3%

A: Medium golden copper with hundreds of little bubbles floating to the surface from the bottom of the glass. Head is just a touch off white and falling fast, made up of smallish bubbles.

S: Honeycomb, green apple, copper coins and dry biscuits

T: Crisp under ripe green fruits and green banana peels are my first thoughts. Spicy noble hops move in gently with really mild malty light barley. Finishes with some metallic moments and surprisingly bitter for the style.

M: Light body with a medim mouthfeel. Nothing special.

D: IMO this is a mediocre version of the style. Its certainly drinkable but its not a beer I'd really ever buy again.

Westsidethreat, Dec 15, 2006
Photo of JOaikido
2.98/5  rDev -3.9%

330 ml bottle. Best before 09 03 2007.

A- Golden colour. White foamy head that sticks to the glass. Very clear. Nice for the style.

S- Meadow flowers. Grassy. A touch of fruit. Pleasant but too weak.

T- Nice bitter hops afertaste. Over flavour OK with nothing bad. But it is much too bland.

MF- Refreshing. Clean. Carbonation good. Far too watery though.

D- Goes down like water. Not unpleasant. Easy to drink but nothing special to make it an experience to remember.

JOaikido, Dec 10, 2006
Photo of MaxxDaddy
2.9/5  rDev -6.5%

Light golden appearance with thin white head. Aroma not that great, smells like many other pale lagers. The taste however distinguishes it from the rest. Has a bit of a nutty taste to it and is easier to drink. Definitely something I'd stock the fridge with for parties or just for relaxing when I don't have much cash available for the better stuff.

MaxxDaddy, Nov 09, 2006
Photo of bdjacoby
2.3/5  rDev -25.8%

A - Standard urine-coloured lager. White head dissipates quickly into almost nothing, though it leaves some lacing.

S - Grainy...corn, maybe. A bit sweet. Really, nothing that jumps out at you.

T - Too bitter for my tastes, though there is some sweetness.

M - Lots of fun on the tongue. The bubbles fizzed on the back of my tongue. It's a bit thicker than most beers I've tried.

D - I'm not a huge fan. It doesn't go down as smooth and I would have liked, and it's too bitter for me to drink on a regular basis.

bdjacoby, Oct 25, 2006
Photo of nekronos
2.55/5  rDev -17.7%

First impression was like a strong tea, very herbal, strong taste. HAd it while the Eurocup 2004 was taking place. We did a Eurobeer contest that day. Very hopy, maybe the herbal nastyness was due to the expiry date. The second time I had it was on can, very drinkable, reminds me Stella, very golden and foamy but nothing special.

nekronos, Oct 10, 2006
Photo of hunteraw
3.28/5  rDev +5.8%

Since this is one of my dad's preferred beers, it's shocking it has taken me so long to review it. I'm reviewing this out of the capped bottle, not the flip-top.

Appearance: Very clear, golden in color. Good head, but lacing isn't notable.

Smell: Smells like an import lager, grainy with a hint of German hops.

Taste: Crisp and bitter, I don't think it's skunked. Bitterness continues through to the aftertaste. Not much of a malt presence at all.

Mouthfeel & Drinkability: Not watery, but light. Good carbonation. As for drinkability, better than BMC and better than Heineken, but not great.

hunteraw, Oct 10, 2006
Photo of vancurly
3.05/5  rDev -1.6%

Gold, even white head with some lacey suds.

Aromas of bread, light honey. Some fleshy, wurst & dill pickle notes, and deeper notes of toasty malt.

Typical Euro malty flavour, spicy hop aspects, fairly well balanced.

Mouthfilling effervescence, medium bitterness,

Probably a good drop with a light meal, or with a few mates in the sunshine. Nothing particularly appealing about it, however.

vancurly, Sep 19, 2006
Photo of afinepilsner
3.35/5  rDev +8.1%

12oz green bottle

Grolsch Premium Lager was a clear golden color. The head was white and had pretty good retention, leaving some lace behind. The aroma was hops with a little malt. The taste was crisp and clean with a dry finish. The mouthfeel was light with plenty of carbontion. This was a refreshing thirst quenching beer.

afinepilsner, Sep 18, 2006
Photo of asabreed
3.68/5  rDev +18.7%

12 oz. bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: A pale yellow hue with lots of tiny bubbles going toward the top. Head stays at about 1/2" and is pretty stingy about dissipating. Nice clumpy lings left around the sides too.

Smell: Flowery, sweet and aromatic though-not-too-complex malt, with some slight citrus hop bitterness. Some nuttiness and bread crust is in the nose too.

Taste: Again, slightly flowery sweetness and some citrus coming through from the hops. Nothing too bad at all, but I can't really discern a lot of complexity to any of its elements.

Mouthfeel: A nice amount of carbonation lends an initially slightly creamy feel before it's spread out, making it less than any sense of astringent and pleasant enough to continue taking down.

Drinkability: One of the best EPLs you can get that's readily available in my opinion. This isn't a style of daredevil beauty, but I think this brew serves the style well in coming through with what it's supposed to do. It's also a brew that goes well with washing some grilled food down too.

asabreed, Sep 16, 2006
Grolsch Premium Lager from Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V.
72 out of 100 based on 1,447 ratings.