1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Grolsch Premium Lager - Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V.

Not Rated.
Grolsch Premium LagerGrolsch Premium Lager

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

1,486 Ratings
THE BROS
74
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 1,486
Reviews: 618
rAvg: 3.1
pDev: 18.39%
Wants: 18
Gots: 106 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V. visit their website
Netherlands

Style | ABV
Euro Pale Lager |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-10-2001)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Grolsch Premium Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 1,486 | Reviews: 618 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of boblog
2.73/5  rDev -11.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Appearance was pale and not that great. Small head.
Smell-hoppy and skunky maybee the green bottles add to that.
Taste-Light and slightly malty.
Drinkability-Not very great wouldnt pay the price it cost to have another one.
Overall "okay" I prefer their ale more.

boblog, Jul 07, 2006
Photo of Illini5596
2.45/5  rDev -21%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Initially impressive with the swing top gasket cork style bottle, a thick creamy layer of head and beautiful pale body, the smell breaks down the image that Grolsch offers. Smelling strongly of chemicals, and macro, it was an immediate let down.

Grolsch actually produces two beers under their premium lager brand, those with bottle caps are actually brewed by Coors and relabled, while the swing tops are brewed in the Enschede. I had tried the Coors relabled Grolsch by accident, and decided to give the real stuff another go.

The taste itself was far from impressive, light and a little refreshing with a halfway descent spicyness to the character. Unfortunately the mouth feel, initial and after taste were that of a macro brew. Very watery with astringent flavors.

Unfortunately I can't say much for this beer positive for this beer, very little character, very little body, and the bad astringent taste of a macro.

Illini5596, Jul 04, 2006
Photo of supercolter
3.88/5  rDev +25.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Appearance is pretty bland. Just a bit above average, a little lacing, almost no head, pale yellow in color
Smell- not a whole lot going on here. Really no coplexity, but the hop smell intrigued me.
Taste and mouthfeel- not a real strong body but good feel, hoppy and ever so slightly malty.
Drinkability- well at last count I had....

supercolter, Jul 01, 2006
Photo of JayTheFinn
1.95/5  rDev -37.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Light looking in the glass without much of a head. Not a strong definable scent, at least none that I noticed, but then again I didn't feel like keeping my nose in this one for too long. It was just overall unpleasant. There was a murky kind of swampy taste to it. And the aftertaste lingered for way too long, which is not a good thing in this case. But hey, at least there was a lot of carbonation that kept me belching for a good long time (I'm laying on the sarcasm pretty heavy, in case you weren't sure). This beer is not worthy of the awesome bottle they put it in.

JayTheFinn, Jun 27, 2006
Photo of Blakaeris
2.93/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours orange-gold with a moderate head that dissipates quickly to a thin sheen.

Smell is slightly sour skunk and mild hops.

Taste is rather green, as expected from a pilsner. Finish is clean with a touch of hops.

Mouthfeel is on the thin side.

Better than expected. But I wasn't expecting much.

Blakaeris, Jun 12, 2006
Photo of Abita45
2.9/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

The beer pours into a pint glass gold, ending with a nice, foamy head that is fragrant from the start. Once receded, there is nice lacing. It has a bit of a sharp taste to it, a bitter hoppiness or sorts, which isn't necessarily a bad, though for this style, I'm not sure if it's a good thing. Still, it has some layers to it, unfortunately, that don't necessarily lend themselves to thinking the beer is "complex."

Actually, I'm finding that as it warms, the hoppiness evens out some. Giving it some time to sit seemed to calm down some of the initial sharpness. I'm not familiar with pale lagers, so I'm not entirely sure how this measures out, but I know what I like and I like this okay.

Overall, not a favorite, but I'm in for a case (thank you, PA liquor laws), so perhaps it will grow on me by the end of it all...or end up in friends' fridges.

Abita45, Jun 10, 2006
Photo of bunbury
4.18/5  rDev +34.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This beer has a strong aroma, as well as mouthfeel and hard after taste.
Pours nicely into a 2 fingers white head, yellow/gold appearance.
it tastes bit over cooked creating that exceptional bitterness

Drink 6 and your are out, so even though it has only 5% abv, is just the enough exact number for it.

exceptional to drink while in a cold place

bunbury, Jun 09, 2006
Photo of AaronHomoya
2.98/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

12 oz green bottle with metal cap.

Pours a nice, golden color with pretty good white head and good, but not overwhelming, carbonation. Aroma is a little malty, a little hop spicy, and somewhat funky like light-struck I think. Taste is better, malty sweet with some hops bitterness and less of the funk. Mouthfeel is nice, light, smooth and pleasing carbonation. Drinkability is lessened by the unpleasant aroma and marginal taste.

AaronHomoya, Jun 01, 2006
Photo of JWFokker
4/5  rDev +29%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

Poured from a bottle into a stein, it's a pretty average looking pale lager, but the head is nice. It continues to swell for a minute or two until there's about 3/4" of head, then slowly dies down and leaves a nice, thin lacing. The nose is nice, somewhat grassy, could be described as floral. The flavor is well balanced. It's got a bit of an edge to it between a slight bitterness and a touch of alcohol flavor. Mouthfeel is pretty average, though nothing amazing. All in all, it's a very drinkable beer. It's well balanced and it could easily make be a session beer.

JWFokker, May 31, 2006
Photo of Noxious26
3.25/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

473ml green bottle with a swing-top cap. I've always thought this was one of the cooler bottles out there. Best before date on back of label 24082006.

Clear, pale golden in colour. Thick, solid white head is 1/4 inch on the pour, but recedes to a ring around the edge with splotchy islands. Clumps of lacing here and there.

Aroma is grassy with a pleasantly sweet background.

There's actually very little flavour making this clean and mild. There is a very light sweetness at the start which fades as a faint hop flavour comes in around the middle. Finish is mild grassy hops. Aftertaste is skunky/grassy hops.

Thin bodied and mildly carbonated.

There isn't anything wrong with this, but it's really nothing special. If you hold your breath before you sip, you hardly get anything for flavour, but if you inhale right before drinking, it mimics the aroma in the taste. A decent euro lager that would be refreshing on a hot day.

Noxious26, May 19, 2006
Photo of Kulrak
2.65/5  rDev -14.5%
look: 2 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours a golden straw color with very little head that fades into a film on top of the beer and laces the glass. Smells a little yeasty and a little hoppy, a tiny bit citrusy. Not unpleasant. Taste isn't very malty, slightly hoppy at first and then some chemical bitterness at the finish leaving a chemical aftertaste. I guess the fact that there isn't much flavor is a blessing. Mouthfeel is fairly creamy with a little bit of carbonation on the back of the tongue. All in all, it's not what I'd call a good beer, but it's not what I'd call a bad one either.

Kulrak, May 18, 2006
Photo of Sosh
2.1/5  rDev -32.3%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Of course I got this in the bottle....why the hell else would I even get this? It is a fun gimmick.

Looks like piss....smells like skunk, even more than heineken did. I do believe people when they say that not all Grolsch's smell skunky....but I'm not going to hunt down the few that don't.

Better than most macros, and a lot easier to drink (easier to drink that heineken, which is what this beer is very and obviously similar to). Eh, save your money, unless you really want one of the bottles. The taste isn't bad. It's not good, but the fact that it isn't bad puts it ahead of most macros.

Sosh, May 18, 2006
Photo of kbnooshay
3.43/5  rDev +10.6%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Wow this is awful. I don't why I continually try euro lagers because all they do is dissapoint. This poured an insanely clear straw color. The smell is so nasty! Chemical skunk times a million. The taste also is awful, grainy, hasrh and chemically. Kinda hoppy, of course they are death harsh hops. Very weak mouthfeel, but really that is irrelevant here.

It smells and tastes so unhealthy. I feel like I am going to wake up with cancer after consuming one of these.
---
UPDATE

i bought a case of flip tops and it was delicious! i updated my score.

kbnooshay, May 12, 2006
Photo of utahbeerdude
3.28/5  rDev +5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Visual: Medium golden color.
Aroma: Very Faint aroma, pils/light-lager type type, with more malt than hops after it warmed a bit.
Flavor: Bitter, then malt, then bitterness in finish. Nothing extraordinary, but not objectionable.
Mouthfeel: typical for style, medium body with decent carbonation.
Overall: Overall OK, not unpleasant, but I wouldn't go out of my way for it.

utahbeerdude, May 12, 2006
Photo of zeff80
3.6/5  rDev +16.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

12 oz bottle pours out golden yellow with a white two finger head.
No skunk smell...a major plus. The taste is lightly hopped and slightly bitter. It improves as you drink it. It has a crisp, sharp mouthfeel. It is also very drinkable. It goes well with food or by itself.

zeff80, May 08, 2006
Photo of ViveLaChouffe
4.33/5  rDev +39.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

From the 12oz bottle.

Pours a very, very pale gold. Palest beer I've seen in awhile outside of Mich Ultra. Crystal clear. 1/4 inch dense and persistent head. Head dissipates, leaves nice lacing. Smells of grassy malt, herbal hops. Just a bit of light skunk.

Taste is crisp grassy malt. Light bitterness in the finish. Persistent noble hops that build nicely. Hallertau or saaz? Don't know but it's a nice finish. Crisp and very clean mouth. A lightly sour finish. Lingering hops and fizzy mouth. This is shockingly tasty. Good stuff. Of the Eurolagers, this should be your choice.

ViveLaChouffe, May 05, 2006
Photo of acrawf6
2.9/5  rDev -6.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Pours out a slightly golden straw color. Nice white foamy head rises. nice lacing.

Smell. grainy and sweet. nothing too special here, smells like a typical euro lager.

Taste. on this sweet side, but expected. i get no noticable hop appearance, but do get a cereal like maltiness. not horrible, but i'm not a fan.

Mouthfeel. Decent mouthfeel, average carbonation, good enough balance. but not all that good.

Overall this one isnt one for me, but i dont hate it. I'd pick this over heineken, but thats about it.

acrawf6, May 02, 2006
Photo of shererjt
3.33/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured a slightly straw-colored clear with a rocky head. Probably as average looking as a beer could be. Aroma was malt with some grassiness in the background. Also had some astringency or other off-smell I cant' quite place. Medium body with some caramel notes. Had a bit of hop flavor but not much bitterness. Overall, leans to the sweet side.

Pretty decent beer. Not a world-beater, but nothing wrong with it.

shererjt, Apr 23, 2006
Photo of dubman003
3.25/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

The bottle is eye catching and I expected an explosive, unique beer. And then I drank a regular lager that came out of a really cool bottle. Realistically, Grolsch is just one step above any regular brand lager, it had a higher 'sweetness' to it, which made me feel like its quality was a bit higher.

Unfortunately, the bottle alone must be the reason this beer costs so much. It is very expensive, and I don't think I got as much beer as I paid for (almost $4). Grolsch has the right idea, I definitely bought the beer because of the interesting bottle, but I won't be returning to it, because I can drink a Foster's for less money.

Still, keep the bottle for something.

dubman003, Apr 12, 2006
Photo of ReebShorts
3.23/5  rDev +4.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Standard clear yellow colored lager, decent slightly chunky head. Best before July 21 2006, so a pretty fresh sample.

Mildly spicy Floral aroma, malts, and a bit of hops.

Slightly buttery mouthfeel, bitter finish, and a bit of a lingering aftertaste, but all in all fairly decent brew.

Carbonation is just right, and this one laces the whole way.

ReebShorts, Apr 07, 2006
Photo of scottoale
3.25/5  rDev +4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Haven't had this one in a while, 12oz. green bottle dated:29 JUN 2006. It pours a light gold with ample 3/4in. of bubbley white head. Nice streamers as well as sporatic bubble outbursts in the carbonation, with just a scant of lacing. Looks just as it's style should.

Smells of light malted barley with light hop balance, a wee skunky at first, but that subsides (much like Heine, Becks,etc..).

Tastes clean with feathery light barley balanced with a nice bitter hop to dry the finish. A fuller, stronger tasting lager than others of this style, the mouthfeel is a bit fizzy then turns dry, much like champagne with very little sweetness. Easy drinking, medium-light body with enough flavor to satisfy, not bad.

scottoale, Mar 18, 2006
Photo of charlatan
2.7/5  rDev -12.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Pours from can with straw colour and very little head. Smells like a rather stale cross between a pilsner and a bock. This doesn't augur well.

Almost honey like sweetness is followed by stale malty flavour which sticks around too long for the hops to give this enough edge. Quite like the carbonation here but that's about it. Would be easy to drain a lot of but this is no better than PBR as far as I am concerned.

charlatan, Mar 14, 2006
Photo of CDBeerDisappear
3.33/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

A - Pale straw color with thick but short lived head.

S - Aroma is malty with a bit of European hop sourness.

T - It has an initial sweet taste dissolves into a European hoppy bitterness. Kind of an old world taste. Flavor does not improve as the beer warms. Drink it cold.

M - Good viscosity with plenty of carbonation. Feels clean and refreshing

D - Easy to drink, goes well with food.

CDBeerDisappear, Feb 19, 2006
Photo of danielharper
3.63/5  rDev +17.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Purchased from Target on University, Huntsville, AL.

(Notes taken on 2/12/06. Review verbatim from notes.)

"Light yellow color, thin foam on top. Aeration continues from bottom of glass. Sweet aroma, touch of grass but less than expected. No skunk aroma. Sweet malty up-front, clean and slightly grassy aftertaste. Still no skunk. Thin mouthfeel, well-done to style. Not my favorite beer, but not bad for a Euro Pale Lager."

Let me put it this way: if you have the choice between this and Heineken, pick this every day of the week.

danielharper, Feb 18, 2006
Photo of BDTyre
3.68/5  rDev +18.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

"Cheap Dutch lager for the lady?"

Decent, pleasing but nothing exceptional here. Gold colour, with a snowy, dense head that disappates fairly quickly. Hoppy smell, with hints of grass and a bit of a corn mash smell. Taste is bland malts and tame hops with some grassy overtones. Reminiscent of Tusker or an Indian lager. Not bad, but nothing great. Easy to drink, great for the summer with some spicy foods.

BDTyre, Feb 17, 2006
Grolsch Premium Lager from Grolsch Bierbrouwerij N.V.
72 out of 100 based on 1,486 ratings.