1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Double Daddy - Speakeasy Ales & Lagers

Not Rated.
Double DaddyDouble Daddy

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
82
good

564 Ratings
THE BROS
76
okay

(view ratings)
Ratings: 564
Reviews: 320
rAvg: 3.64
pDev: 14.56%
Wants: 8
Gots: 14 | FT: 1
Brewed by:
Speakeasy Ales & Lagers visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Double / Imperial IPA |  9.50% ABV

Availability: Rotating

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Troyone on 08-15-2005)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Double Daddy Alström Bros
Ratings: 564 | Reviews: 320 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of JerryG
JerryG

Oregon

3.6/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Amber/Red ale with a light white head

Smell is hoppy, but not a complete boquet of hops, along with roasted malts

Strong hop taste (average for an imperial ipa). Lots of roasted malt flavor. I would describe this beer as an over hopped double red. Similar to a Ninkasi Believer double red, but stronger malt and hops.

It doesn't taste like a 9.5% beer, maybe because the hops cover up the sweetness, and there is not a lot of body for an imperial.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2011 02:46:47 | More by JerryG
Photo of Rifugium
Rifugium

Pennsylvania

3.5/5  rDev -3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

First had: on tap at Eulogy, Philly, PA

Served on tap into a pint glass, Double Daddy had a slightly hazy orange-yellow hue, with a small foamy head that laced surprisingly well. A very interesting floral aroma, loaded with grapefruit. Surprisingly the taste is not too hoppy for an IIPA, though the citrus hops are ever present overlaying the sweet caramel malt base, but certainly not overpowering. Finishes mostly dry and piney, but with a little bit of sugary sweetness. Light-medium mouthfeel, and quite drinkable.

Serving type: on-tap

06-23-2011 13:36:50 | More by Rifugium
Photo of brotherloco
brotherloco

California

3.23/5  rDev -11.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

22oz Bomber.

Pours a cloudy medium-dark gold with a decent sized (for a DIPA) beige head. Tons of thick lacing in the glass.

Smells of significant caramel and biscuity malt. Citrusy tropical hop aromas are there too, but they don't take the foreground.

Tastes quite sweet, revealing all that malt that was in the smell. Hop bitterness and flavor makes itself known by the finish and lingers heavily in the aftertaste, which gets very dry. The middle flavor of this beer is quite flat, not in a carbonation sense, but on the palate.

Carbonation is decent, but feel is maybe a bit too thick. There is heat from the alcohol, but I don't find it so bad given the high ABV.

I'd say overall this beer is OK, but I'm liking it less as I work my way through it.

Serving type: bottle

05-14-2011 04:04:35 | More by brotherloco
Photo of DoctorDog
DoctorDog

Ohio

3.63/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Presentation: From a 22 oz. bottle into a nonic.

A- Clear amber/copper. Pours with 2+ fingers of off-white head, which fades slowly to a thin cap.

S- Grapefruit/citrus with a bit of floral hopiness, and the requisite caramel malt sweetness in the background.

T- Citrusy, floral hop notes provide a solid level of bitterness. A modest caramel sweetness, and a touch spicy on the finish.

M- Moderate carbonation and a medium full feel.

O- Good. Not a standout, but a pleasing, easy drinking DIPA.

Future outlook: Consumed while in California, and not distributed here- decent enough, but not worth seeking out.

Serving type: bottle

05-06-2011 02:38:38 | More by DoctorDog
Photo of thagr81us
thagr81us

South Carolina

3.73/5  rDev +2.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Big thanks goes out to chickencoop for sending me this one as an extra in a recent trade! Served from bottle into a Green Man snifter. Poured a slightly hazy red-orange with a one finger off-white head that subsided to half a finger slowly. Maintained phenomenal lacing throughout the glass. The aroma was comprised of sweet malt, caramel, citrus hop, and dark fruit. The flavor was of sweet malt, citrus, caramel, citrus hop, and subtle dark fruit. It had a medium feel on the palate with medium carbonation. Overall this was a pretty tasty brew. It had a very nicely balanced flavor with a good aroma. The caramel I picked up on in this one was a very nice touch of sweetness to the citrus aspect in this one. This one is worth trying if you get the chance, but that is about it.

Serving type: bottle

04-29-2011 12:09:21 | More by thagr81us
Photo of Knapp85
Knapp85

Pennsylvania

2.42/5  rDev -33.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Murky brownish color with a nice head, the flavor is hoppy but not in a way that really impressed me. The hops were more on the earthy side and not very citrusy or bright. Not really what I was hoping for in an American IPA. The aroma is earthy too with a slight aroma of malts.

Serving type: bottle

03-30-2011 03:44:09 | More by Knapp85
Photo of whatthehull
whatthehull

California

3.33/5  rDev -8.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured into a New Belgium snifter

A - golden sunset, half finger white head and some lacing

S - Very malty! With a piney and a bit floral, hop backbone. You can smell the alcohol, some brown sugar. It is a little grassy and maybe some resin and oak

T - The malt, alcohol and hops right up front. Boosh! The bitterness is nice and the sweet balances it awesomely. Not a whole lot going on. Pine, alcohol, flowers, sugar, malt, barley and more alcohol

M - Big, sticky, coats the mouth with sweet bitterness. It coats the mouth a bit to much

D - At 9%+ this is nice. Not to complex, but the simplicity is nice

Final thought - Cost to much, but it is worth a try, for sure

Serving type: bottle

03-24-2011 05:02:24 | More by whatthehull
Photo of nrbw23
nrbw23

Ohio

4/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

A- Pours a bright amber color, with a very thin white head. Head fades quickly and leaves a thin lace on the glass.

S- Smell is of floral and citrus hops. A fair amount of pine in here too.

T- Taste is pretty much like the nose. A bit of an alcohol burn. Good balance of hop bitterness and sweetness.

M- Medium in body and carbonation.

D- I found this one to be pretty solid and enjoyable. Pretty easy to drink.

Serving type: on-tap

01-29-2011 22:00:03 | More by nrbw23
Photo of negroobserver
negroobserver

New York

2.95/5  rDev -19%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

22oz bottle in a 22oz tall glass.

APPEARANCE: Hazy golden color similar to a hefewiezen like Blue Moon. About 1/2 inch of head which dissipates and leaves a creamy residue on the rim of the glass.

SMELL: Hops, ofcourse (it's an IPA). Malts. The hops and malts are present, but nothing else stands out. It's pleasant in a minimalist way, but also a bit disappointing.

TASTE: Bitterness common with IPAs followed by a smoky pungent quality. charcoalish burnt flavor.

MOUTHFEEL: Good Carbonation.

DRINKABILITY: The bitterness of the beer goes away after a few sips, but the smoky aftertaste is not too kind to the senses. Overall, it's a decent beer, but it could be substantially better. It is very distinct though.

GRADE: C/C-

Serving type: bottle

01-26-2011 04:42:55 | More by negroobserver
Photo of Docer
Docer

Washington

3.95/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4

Grabbed a bottle to try... because I haven't.

- Pours a rather clear light yellow to light copper color.. heavy pour yielded only about a finger of white foam.. down to a thin blanket and lace all about.

- Once poured.. hops carried across the space between me and the glass... floral.. citrus. Up close there is a lot of roasty caramel and biscuit-like malts.. seems rather sweet, and loaded with grassy earthy hops.

- Great bitterness without the dryness... huge big caramel malts.. roasty sweet sugars... grassy and citrus hops galore.. earthy.. seems the malt still over powers what I know is a massive amount of hops. Well balanced, and quit grainy. Seems adjuncts are absent here.

- Less sticky than I expected from the nose and flavor.. Medium bodied, creamy... I suppose it would dry sticky? Tastes sticky!

- Overall quit good! Looking at past reviews, I would suspect they refined this a bit, and brought its best traits forward. Rather good.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2011 04:21:21 | More by Docer
Photo of crestwood37
crestwood37

New York

4/5  rDev +9.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

For an imperial IPA, this is definitely a higher end. Normally, when I drink an Imperial that is high in alcohol content, I feel an overwhelming hard liquor taste and you don't get that with double daddy. The color is good - a yellow/orange color with a thin head that leaves a nice cascade on the glass. It is an enjoyable beer.

Serving type: bottle

12-12-2010 20:54:27 | More by crestwood37
Photo of BARFLYB
BARFLYB

Pennsylvania

3.68/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

22oz bomber into a pint glass and than some. I hear this is the first time in bombers for this one.

Olympic medal golden with some tanner spots towards the sides. Alot of activity within and on top about a quarter inch of fluffy stuff comes up, leaving a cap, it can be ressurected though. Small pokadots on the glass. Smell is a fruity and malty DIPA. The malt actually dominates the nose, but under that some citrus arises mainly of grapefruit. A big sugary scent comes up as well and I cant help but to notice the alcohol underneath. Tastes include citrus, pineapple, grapefruit, some big toasty malts, caramel, sugar, alcohol, bread and maybe some caramel. Tis not my favorite double but it's beating anything from out here on the east. Feel is above medium, sweet and coating, not really bittter, goes down smooth with alcohol at the end. Id prefer this in a 12oz bottle over a bomber anyday though, the 2nd half just sort of shitted out on me.

Serving type: bottle

11-14-2010 22:38:01 | More by BARFLYB
Photo of jeffjeff1
jeffjeff1

California

4.33/5  rDev +19%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

I had this after work the other night. It was so refreshing.

Appearance- golden color, nice head, nice lacing

Smell- hops

Taste- refreshing hops, not terribly hoppy but very refreshing

Mouthfeel- medium bodied

Drinkability- This was very nice. I loved it. Very refreshing. It hit the spot.

Serving type: bottle

08-30-2010 03:57:28 | More by jeffjeff1
Photo of diddly
diddly

New York

4.35/5  rDev +19.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Dark golden color with a good head.

This beer is powerful, both the aroma and taste. However, even though you obviously taste that it's a double and a 9.5 abv, it's still delicious. Great example of the style, and despite the high alcohol, actually a very refreshing beer.

Nice mouthfeel, as you certainly know what you're drinking, but not overpowering. Crisp and hoppy, I guess would be the best way to describe it.

Big fan of this one, and definitely will look out for.

Serving type: on-tap

08-05-2010 23:47:38 | More by diddly
Photo of HopNuggets
HopNuggets

Connecticut

3.95/5  rDev +8.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.5

Poured 22oz bomber into White Birch signature glass.

A - Poured a brilliant light golden orange with a 1-1/2 finger white head that dissipates to a covering that leaves lacing down the glass as you enjoy the beer.

S - Orange and grapefruit citrus with some sweet malt, not very complex, but has the major highlights of the style.

T - Orange, caramel malt, dry hop bitterness. Very dry aftertaste.

M - Medium body with medium to light carbonation. Very dry.

D - Very drinkable for a 9.5% IPA the dry finish keeps you begging for another sip.

Serving type: bottle

07-17-2010 23:16:31 | More by HopNuggets
Photo of ZSimon
ZSimon

Virginia

4.05/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Bomber from Corks and Kegs in Richmond, VA.

Pours a deep, bright golden with sticky lace. Nose is aggressive- bitter, floral, a touch of pine in there. Taste is big and solid, the 9.5% is evident but not overpowering. Sticky and bitter with plenty of sweetish malt to balance. The bitter finish drops off unusually quickly, and by then I'm ready for my next sip.

Very very good, but still a long way from a great DIPA. If the question is yes or no, it's a yes.

Serving type: bottle

07-11-2010 01:07:22 | More by ZSimon
Photo of ThreeWiseMen
ThreeWiseMen

California

2.73/5  rDev -25%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

22oz. bomber poured into a New Belgium globe. Bottling date unlisted.

Appearance: Poured out clear and golden, yielding a quarter inch of soft, white foam. Body shows off fantastic clarity, and boasts a thick column of active carbonation. Each sip adds thick gobs of lacing to the glass walls. Style-wise, I've got now complaints. However, this appearance lacks any sort of charisma or charm (maybe uniqueness is a better word?), as odd as that may sound.

Smell: Buttery whole grains, grassy hops, citrus (lemon-lime), and pine. Sadly, that's about all. I suppose there's also a touch of alcohol. There just isn't much to say about the nose on Double Daddy; it's pretty boring.

Taste: Whole grains and oily, grassy hops are the first flavors I get. Caramel comes through more as it warms, as do floral esters. Backbone is doughy and resinous. Not a bad combination of flavors, but I expect a lot more complexity from an imperial IPA. This beer could also use a bit more bitterness, but maybe it's just an old bottle.

Mouthfeel: Moderately-to-highly carbonated; a bit rough at first, but much softer toward the end of the bottle. Body is very oily and entirely coats the palate, yielding a flavorful and long-lasting aftertaste. Medium-bodied for the style. Beer finishes on a dry, slightly bitter note.

Drinkability: This beer lacks character and shows signs of poor craftsmanship: too many grassy notes, not enough bitterness, too few fruit flavors. I was reminded of a cheap (regular) American IPA when I drank this beer. Won't be buying this one again.

Serving type: bottle

07-08-2010 03:15:57 | More by ThreeWiseMen
Photo of andyfrancis
andyfrancis

California

2.68/5  rDev -26.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Light to copperish amber color, with nice frothy head, just a shade off of white. Head is holding up well, reducing very slowly.

Smells very hoppy as one would expect, but there's almost a burnt character to it. Not sure what's up.

Holy shit...not in a good way. Tastes like grain alcohol. Very little hop flavor, or any other flavor for that matter. Again, not sure what's up with this beer.

Astringent as a mofo.

This bomber is going to leave me with a nice buzz, but it's going to be like work getting it down.

I'm a fan of Big Daddy and Speakeasy in general. I'lll often, especially lately, grab a pint of it around SF, but this did not work for me at all.

Serving type: bottle

07-07-2010 03:53:53 | More by andyfrancis
Photo of sacajaweea
sacajaweea

Illinois

2.85/5  rDev -21.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Poured from a 22oz. bottle into a pint glass.The color is a pale gold with orange hue that one can describe as a translucent copper. The head is off-white, and perhaps due to a turbulent pour, the carbonation has forced mammoth bubbles to burst at its peak. As a result, the head retains fairly well, but a more conscientious pour to initiate the second round renders the head half as assertive. Resilient lacing is present throughout the entire session and the top third of the glass is splattered with a stubborn pattern that asserts itself with the bluster of a Black Metal band's blasphemous trademark; that, or a very evil CAPTCHA design. On the nose, the head smells of rose and melon, but as it gives way, the brew insists upon its high ABV of 9.5% with a devilish, alcoholic tinge. What was once a pleasant aroma becomes harshly muted, as if the essence of the head's bouquet was distilled to a concentrated solution and used to wipe the surface of a wooden refectory, then wrung out and presented a second time. This description might be unflattering, but I wouldn't doubt if this was the proud declaration of the yeast - admittedly, it is an aroma that slowly charms as one reaches the last swallow. The mouthfeel is a creamy, light-to-medium bodied coating that gives way in a manner of a few seconds. Malt, its attendant sweetness, and alcohol is heavily pronounced, with the hops offering a floral presentation on the palette that is damp in comparison. Bitterness tames the malt, hop, and alcohol maturely, allowing the flavor to have its fun until the appropriate time to rest, slowly dissipating into a dry bitterness that coaxes the imbiber to sip again. Flavor undertones pronounce a spelt grain.

I will admit, years ago as a neophyte, Speakeasy's Big Daddy IPA turned me on to the variety and inspired me to explore the style. This double IPA seems like a stab at a genus of beer made popular by independent brewers for the sake of promulgating experimental excess as a bastion of progress. I'll take Big Daddy IPA over this brew any day. When I want excess, I'll turn to a barley wine, accept the excess as standard, and go from there.

Serving type: bottle

06-28-2010 15:37:39 | More by sacajaweea
Photo of hoppyhampy
hoppyhampy

California

2.83/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from at 22oz bottle into a tulip glass. I bought the bottle last week from BevMo but no other freshness info. Light amber color with nice lacing but below average head formation/retention. Lots of malt and not much hops on the nose. Maybe its the disproportional amount of malt, but these hops smell a little sour or old, not fresh. The taste is more of the same: malty sweet and underwhelming, old hops. There is a sourness to the taste that seems to come from the high alcohol and low contribution from the hops. Medium bodied with not much carbonation but a nice hoppy resin. All in all, not very good. Average at best. There are plenty of double IPAs I would highly recommend before this one.

Serving type: bottle

05-14-2010 01:38:39 | More by hoppyhampy
Photo of Pencible
Pencible

Virginia

3.53/5  rDev -3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This poured a clear gold with moderate white head. It smelled like dry caramel malt with sweet orange and mango and roasted barley. It tasted like orange and honey and roasted malt, followed by harsh herbal hops and alcohol. It was slightly thick with some carbonation, and had a lasting bitter aftertaste. Overall this was more like an imperial amber than double IPA, with lots of malt. It did also have a lot of hops, but those led to a rough finish. It had decent body, but it was pretty hot so it wasn't super easy to drink. Definitely not the best of this style.

Serving type: bottle

05-13-2010 16:21:23 | More by Pencible
Photo of jeffthecheff
jeffthecheff

Connecticut

2.3/5  rDev -36.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

Poured into a tulip, it has a clear, light copper color. The head is newspaper white, with a film of foam and really good lacing. There are quite a bit of bubbles floating in the glass, creating a more lively looking carbonation than most beers in this style.

If I were reviewing the aroma based on the bottle cap, this would score really well. Unfortunately, the beer in the glass smells like an old, faded DIPA. There is a decent caramel malt sweetness, as well as a subtle fruitiness. The hops have a faint citrus quality, but they are hidden behind the smell of wet newspaper. This is either really oxidized, or old.

The taste is a little more close to that of a DIPA. It's got high bitterness, some fruitiness, and just a touch of malts. It really just isn't that great though. The hop flavor doesn't have any fresh pop to it, and it has a bit of a cardboard taste. Overall, it tastes and feels a bit lifeless. The body is on the thin side, but not in a good way. The carbonation is a bit too high, which only adds to the other issues.

The bottle claims the beers are "fresh" because they are made in small batches. This is certainly not fresh, which is why all brewers should have freshness dates on their bottles. I'm sure this is an old bottle, but without a date, I can only say this is a bad beer.

Serving type: bottle

05-12-2010 00:25:26 | More by jeffthecheff
Photo of TheJollyHop
TheJollyHop

California

3.78/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Had on-tap at Boho poured into a outward curving apple shaped glass.

At this point in reviewing IPA/DIPAs I find there is often very little that separates the good from the great. A little brighter hop aroma here, or some additional flavor there usually makes the difference. With that being said, this beer falls under the good, but just barely.

Appearance is common and perfect for the style. with a very clear amber body beneath a thick finger's worth of fluffy head. Lasting retention and sticky lace? Yes.

Hops aroma is very vibrant as well. Juicy, pungent citrus with a floral backbone. Oranges, grapefruits, honeydew melon and sweet grain are noticeable. Similar to smelling ripe produce at the farmers market.

Taste is full of rich fruit flavor hitting immediately with orange citrus and becoming more acidic (grapefruit) after a beat. The finish long with a prickly, resinous, and a tad woody flavor. Not harsh however, and very drinkable. Alcohol is not masked and is quite bold with a substantial amount of warmth on the swallow; too hot and unbalanced.

I found the flavors both vibrant and happy to work together. The beer is creamy and has good carbonation while being tongue withering. While definitely not the best, this is a very solid DIPA.

Serving type: on-tap

05-10-2010 00:51:09 | More by TheJollyHop
Photo of thetomG
thetomG

Illinois

4.1/5  rDev +12.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Got this one in a trade with my boy baker (wavers1) - thanks homie!

Aroma is mostly piney/grassy/fresh = delicious. The taste is very similar with a predominantly grassy overtone to it. The freshness of this one seems incredible. that is the main thing that keep running through my mind as I sip on it - FRESH.

Never had anything from this brewer before, but I'm definitely looking forward to trying more from Speakeasy.

Recommended!

Serving type: bottle

05-08-2010 03:58:39 | More by thetomG
Photo of dwilson01
dwilson01

California

3.78/5  rDev +3.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

poured from a 12oz into my arrogant bastard pint glass, A pale yellow to orange hue, along with a light tint of reddish coloring, not too much haze with an initial flurry of carbonation dying off quickly. Head is mostly larger bubbles, quickly recedes, some lacing, plain white coloring.

Floral aromatics and sweet malt in the smell. Flowers, though curiously not very fresh. The sweet scents mingle well with the hops, not amazingly interesting or anything I've never seen before.

The flavor picks up very well, caught me off guard for sure. Citrusy hop bitterness infused with a thick body from the malt, loads of spices which I don't really recall getting in the initial nose. Cloves and nutmeg for sure, carbonation brings the spices to the forefront after the initial bittering hit. It's not a whalloper but it's balanced and has a lot of flavor.

The mouthfeel is probably the highlight for me, quite enjoyable and smooth feeling. The malt gives it an awesome body which is counteracted by all of the hops to overcome the sweetness that it would impart. The carbonation comes in as a major player as well, lightening the body just enough to bring the spicing to the forefront while maintaining a smooth character.

Very drinkable for a double ipa, not super super bitter or sweet or spicy, but it's a combination of everything together into a mellower type DIPA. Not bad in and of itself, but I imagine if I'm ever looking for a standard DIPA in the future I'll look somewhere else.

Serving type: bottle

05-03-2010 04:48:18 | More by dwilson01
Double Daddy from Speakeasy Ales & Lagers
82 out of 100 based on 564 ratings.