1. Extreme Beer Fest. March 20 & 21, 2015 in Boston, Mass. Join us!
  2. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  3. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Michigan Brewing Mackinac Pale Ale - Michigan Brewing Company

Not Rated.
Michigan Brewing Mackinac Pale AleMichigan Brewing Mackinac Pale Ale

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
79
okay

98 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 98
Reviews: 80
rAvg: 3.4
pDev: 16.76%
Wants: 2
Gots: 4 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Michigan Brewing Company visit their website
Michigan, United States

Style | ABV
American Pale Ale (APA) |  5.00% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
This beer is retired; no longer brewed.

No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: Mitchster on 06-19-2002)
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Usefulness | Recent | High | Low | Top Raters
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 98 | Reviews: 80 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of pigpen892
3/5  rDev -11.8%

pigpen892, Nov 02, 2014
Photo of gater_ade
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

gater_ade, Sep 17, 2014
Photo of wizo
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

wizo, Dec 17, 2012
Photo of jaidenjb
3/5  rDev -11.8%

jaidenjb, Oct 13, 2012
Photo of Judson
4/5  rDev +17.6%

Judson, Sep 08, 2012
Photo of DruC4
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

DruC4, Jul 26, 2012
Photo of Alextricity
4/5  rDev +17.6%

Alextricity, Jul 24, 2012
Photo of JohnLynch
2.75/5  rDev -19.1%

JohnLynch, Jul 11, 2012
Photo of billyrenfroe
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

billyrenfroe, Jul 06, 2012
Photo of Tracker83
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

Tracker83, Jun 26, 2012
Photo of DMarlinJ
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

DMarlinJ, Jun 24, 2012
Photo of GRPunk
3.63/5  rDev +6.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Bottle etched (06/21/12) poured into a nonic pint.

A- A normal pour creates a 1-finger, off-white head that settles to a fully covering film. The body was clean, golden amber, with light-medium carbonation. Great sticky rings were left on the glass.

S- There was a burst of hops with the crack of the cap. It seems pretty fresh. Sweet, sturdy malt backbone. Very well balanced. Hopping is very organic, herbal. There's a hint of tropical fruit sweetness. Light caramel or brown sugar.

T- More balance. Hops are somewhat herbal and get a little aspirin-like twan at points.. Malts provide a pleasant sweetness. More caramel and a slight graininess.

M- Light carbonation. Very light hop bite. Medium body. Dry.

O- No frills, but solid all the same. Not something I'd seek out (though I can't say the style suits itself for my seek it out preferences). I could drink a couple without either burnout or boredom.

GRPunk, Jun 17, 2012
Photo of ckk527
1/5  rDev -70.6%

ckk527, May 29, 2012
Photo of ronfrommichigan
2.08/5  rDev -38.8%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Maybe I just bought a bad six-pack, or possibly it wasn't stored properly at the store, but this beer just wasn't pleasant to me at all. When I poured it, no matter how careful I was, all I would get was a huge amount of foam, which probably meant that this particular six-pack was handled roughly. The flavor wasn't what I was expecting; for some reason it had a strong almost well-water kind of flavor to it on the first one that didn't go away as I drank more of them throughout the course of the weekend. Oh well, I won't give up on any kind of beer on just one sampling. Being a craft brewed beer, occasionally you get a bad batch. It happens.

ronfrommichigan, May 12, 2012
Photo of CSFerrier
3.25/5  rDev -4.4%

CSFerrier, May 03, 2012
Photo of szmnnl99
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

szmnnl99, Mar 24, 2012
Photo of rlbthree
4/5  rDev +17.6%

rlbthree, Mar 02, 2012
Photo of MIBeerRanger4
3.2/5  rDev -5.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Just redcently had a pint of this APA in Sault Ste Marie, MI.
A= nice golden color. Head was non existing when beer was served to me. This could be because the place was packed and my beer tookm a bit to get to the table?? But there was no head or lacing with this beer.

S= smell was a bit more mild than I expect (or like) from a MI pale ale. Had a sweet-ish aroma as well.

T= taste was nice. Clean and crisp with good malt/hop bitterness balance. I was surprised the beer was this nice after the nose being so muted.

M= beer was a bit flat. Not going to go into it suffice it to say, it may have been the pour I got from the bar?

O= Overall, average at best. I will try this beer again sometime to see what a really fresh one is like. I liked the "heart" of this beer and could tell that something pretty good was in there.. had I got it fresh!

MIBeerRanger4, Feb 20, 2012
Photo of BrewCaveDweller
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

BrewCaveDweller, Feb 17, 2012
Photo of dmorgan310
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%

dmorgan310, Feb 03, 2012
Photo of SickGnar
3.5/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

A: Rich, darker golden. Clear & birght with several streams of steady bubbles. Just beyond medium sized eggshell head that settles quick but leaves some okay lace – especially nearer the top of half of the glass.

S: Citrus & floral hops. Soft cookie sweetness from light crystal malts. Toasty pale base malts are a touch biscuity. Hint of esters as it warms. A bit of a faint nose.

T: Biscuity pale base malts with grainy and toasty accents, a touch of sweetness and a hint of caramel. Good depth if quite straight forward. Hops are balanced – Flowery, herbal, general (generic) citrus undertone that grows through the middle and into the finish becoming a bit lemon and rind. A touch juicy in a floral way with sweetness from malts and hints of light esters.

M: Just medium body with afirmly matched CO2. Mouth-filling carbonation and some hop tannins for texture. Ultimately drying form hops.

D: A bright and quite standard, run-of-the-mill American pale. Nothing wrong with it, but nothing really special either. A reasonable offering.

SickGnar, Dec 30, 2011
Photo of westonhood
4/5  rDev +17.6%

westonhood, Dec 22, 2011
Photo of jsisko01
2.78/5  rDev -18.2%
look: 5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 5 | overall: 3

Appearance - Pours a golden-amber hue with a centimeter thick head that dissipates quickly. Has excellent lacing..

Smell - Smells very bitter.. almost like a musty smell. After a couple more intakes I can smell slight hints of caramel, lemon zest, citrus, toasted bread, and a bitter yeast aroma.

Taste - Strong caramel and toasted malts. Other than that all i taste is the yeast.. Has a pretty bitter aftertaste.

Mouthfeel - Medium bodied with mild carbonation. I love the creamy feeling from the caramel.

Overall - I really like the caramel flavor, but it would be a lot better if it wasn't so toasty. The toasty flavor doesn't pair so well with the bitterness (in my opinion). It's not a bad beer but I wouldn't buy a 6-pack of it.

jsisko01, Dec 16, 2011
Photo of buschbeer
3.4/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

12oz bottle
Served in a pint glass

A - It pours amber with a half inch of off white head.

S - It has a malt nose with a hint of some citrus hops.

T - It's a pretty fair balance of malt and mild citrus hops.

M - Moderate without a lot of carbonation

O - It's not a great beer but is still better than BMC.

buschbeer, Sep 23, 2011
Photo of WoodBrew
2.9/5  rDev -14.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

This is what I would refer to as a typical East Coast Pale Ale. Not alot of hop, but enough present to at least make it palletable. The appearance is a clear amber with thin to no head and therefore no lacing. The smell is fairly weak, there is some hop...thinking cascade...not sure though. The taste is...eh. If there are other options I would at least try them before settling on this. Mouthfeel is ok, could session if had to.

WoodBrew, May 05, 2011
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Michigan Brewing Mackinac Pale Ale from Michigan Brewing Company
79 out of 100 based on 98 ratings.