1. The wait is over! Download the BeerAdvocate app on iTunes or Google Play now.
  2. Get 12 issues / year of BeerAdvocate magazine for only $9.99!

Okocim Porter - Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg)

Not Rated.
Okocim PorterOkocim Porter

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
92
outstanding

522 Ratings
THE BROS
84
good

(view ratings)
Ratings: 522
Reviews: 466
rAvg: 4.14
pDev: 10.87%
Wants: 41
Gots: 3 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg) visit their website
Poland

Style | ABV
Baltic Porter |  8.10% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
No notes at this time.

(Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 09-12-2001)
View: Beers (16) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Okocim Porter Alström Bros
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 522 | Reviews: 466 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of tbeckett
tbeckett

Ontario (Canada)

1.95/5  rDev -52.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 1 | feel: 3 | overall: 1.5

Bottle from a grocery store in Krakow. From notes.

A - Poured a dark ruby colour. Light comes through at points. Root beer type head with a loose three finger tan head. Lot's of visible carbonation and good lacing and retention.

S - Rich, sweet malt. A little roasty. Not strong but nice.

T - Woah. Diet Pepsi clone. Sweet malt is there but for some reason this tastes EXACTLY like Diet Pepsi. Usually I get a cola element in porters but I could easily mistake this for a pop. Doesn't taste like beer.

M - Light carbonation and a medium to full body.

O/D - Not a chance I would finish this. Too sweet. I was able to drink a quarter of the bottle. I'm not sure what the deal was with this but I just couldn't handle it. Pop instead maybe?

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2011 21:37:27 | More by tbeckett
Photo of schellsbeer
schellsbeer

Minnesota

2.2/5  rDev -46.9%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

I realize that Baltic Porters are different but never realized that they had to be this different.

Appearance is very good. A nice dark red brown but not black like so many American Porters. Clean and transparent.

Smell was average at best. Something there but can't get my "nose" around it. Dirty Socks maybe? Fresh swept garage? Dust? Musty? Something.

Taste is what I have a problem with. I was very unimpressed. Very strong acid taste...like vinegar. Sour Apples. The alcohol is very strong and cuts into the unpleasant taste. I purchased seveal bottles but could only drink a few of them. This is for sure not a drain pour but can't get over the strong taste. NOT SMOOTH like most American Porters.

Mouthfeel is ok. Very very thin. Almost burns in the mouth. Happened for each bottle that I opened.

Drinkability....If you want to tie one on, this is the beer for you. Very high Alcohol content. However, this isn't the reason why I drink beer. A cheap macro would do this for you.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2008 13:04:17 | More by schellsbeer
Photo of ChainGangGuy
ChainGangGuy

Georgia

2.45/5  rDev -40.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Appearance: Pours an opaque black body with a fading, light brown head.

Smell: Sweet-smelling, lightly roasted chocolate drenched in concentrated notes of leather, and alcoholic rum raisin.

Taste: Flavors of light chocolate and blackstrap molasses unfortunately are obstructed by a fierce, cloying sweetness that is tough to overcome. The oversweetened taste is close to becoming unbearable. Nothing but alcohol and a further spoonful of sugar on the finish which leaves an icky, viscid aftertaste.

Mouthfeel Medium-bodied, with a saturated syrupiness.

Drinkability: For the most part, this beer was all alcohol and sugar. Finishing the 500ml bottle was a hard-won battle. An appallingly syrupy beer with no redeeming qualities. I much preferred the Sinebrychoff Porter and Duck-Rabbit's Baltic Porter over this mess.

Serving type: bottle

11-27-2006 05:42:20 | More by ChainGangGuy
Photo of CHL
CHL

Illinois

2.48/5  rDev -40.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5

Appropriately dark, and relatively viscous beer that clings to the side of the glass, with heavy lacing. The smell is malty, with noticeable alcohol and more hops than seem to be present in a sip.

I was shocked by how sweet this brew is. There are a lot of flavors in this mix--fruits, caramel, chocolate--and these flavors pack a complex punch in the smell and taste, as does the alcohol, which causes sensation up the nose. Overall, it was too sweet for me, like figs buried in sugar. I suspect I would have enjoyed the malt flavor greatly if the sweetness and alcohol were taken down a notch.

I don't consider this highly drinkable: 500 mL was far too much for me to finish.

Serving type: bottle

04-10-2009 22:04:30 | More by CHL
Photo of clvand0
clvand0

Kentucky

2.58/5  rDev -37.7%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

This one pours a dark dark brown color with a small head that left a little lacing on the glass. The aroma was very strong - chocolates, coffee, and some other stuff that I didn't care much for - still decent and very complex. Not being a fan of the average porter taste, I didn't get too much enjoyment out of this one. I'll give it plenty of credit for being very complex and interesting, but the taste was just not to my liking. It tastes like an imperial stout mixed with a porter mixed with rum(?). The alcohol is present in the taste and has a lot of roastedness in the taste.

Serving type: bottle

10-01-2003 20:46:13 | More by clvand0
Photo of TerryW
TerryW

Ontario (Canada)

2.63/5  rDev -36.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Nope. Waaaay too sweet for a proper porter. Leaves a lingering sticky and cloying sweetness on the palate. Overwhelms the coffee, chocolate, and roatiness you typically find in a porter.

Smeels okay, but not really distinctive. Looks good though. Deep dark brown with a decent head and good lace. Too sweet to make a habit of.

Serving type: bottle

01-06-2007 21:38:51 | More by TerryW
Photo of jeffmonarch
jeffmonarch

Maryland

2.7/5  rDev -34.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

500 ml bottle in a pint glass.

A - Dark brown with a thick tan head.

S - Rich chocolate smell. Really nice.

T - Really sweet and thin. A little too sweet.

M - Medium bodied with good carbonation.

D - Not impressed. It was too sweet, way too sweet.

Serving type: bottle

08-16-2008 03:11:50 | More by jeffmonarch
Photo of DogFood11
DogFood11

California

2.75/5  rDev -33.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3

This beer is nice to look at. A bit of a cola type carbonation that clings to the sides of the glass. Tan, milky head has incredible staying power.

Caramel is the theme with this offering but there is an underlying creamed chocolate effect that helps with the complexity. I find that the lack of any toasty characteristic to be dissapointing. Not much of a counterpunch to the sugary dark malts either. The high notes were that the overall flavor is good. If I dig really deep there is a vinous lining that wraps up every pull. As this beer warmed a bit the heavy malts really take over completely without any bitterness at all. Not a fan.

Notes: I knew this was a highly respected beer going in to this sampling but I"ve had this many times and every time I come out of it dissapointed. I think this may be my last attempt. Its "OK" but there are many, many, porters worthy of my money compared to this.

Serving type: bottle

03-13-2007 03:46:16 | More by DogFood11
Photo of OtherShoe2
OtherShoe2

Massachusetts

2.83/5  rDev -31.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 2.5

Pours dark brown with an off white head that disappears. No real lacing.

Slight whiff of prune and alcohol. Hard to detect.

This beer is all sugar. Tons of brown sugar flavors, with alcohol soaked candied dark fruit and some over sugared coffee and some dark chocolate. Bitterness comes through the sweetness, and then is overtaken by a wave of sugar on the finish. Where the hell is the malt, the complexity, etc.? Ok, just at the very finish as your palate clears, you get a little dry cocoa and malt.

Decent body to this one. Can't knock it, although it doesn't really facilitate the drinkability. Body makes the sugar cling to the mouth. Alcohol cuts some of the sweetness, but overall, this is lacking. $1.95 for 1 pt. 0.9 oz., so it was a deal, but no way am I buying this again. Nothing off on this one, just very differently crafted. Not my taste/style.

Serving type: bottle

10-17-2009 00:54:52 | More by OtherShoe2
Photo of Crosling
Crosling

Colorado

2.93/5  rDev -29.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Nearly opaque black color, with a white and quickly diminishing white head. Moderate burnt currant and roast aroma with a light hint of smoke and coffee. I found the flavor overwhelmingly cloying and I usually don’t enjoy a lot of hop flavor and aroma in stouts/porters, but the additions here could have been more substancial. I found it pretty timid overall, with a fairly light body and light raisin, coffee, roast flavors. Not really enjoyable and a bit hard to finish.

Serving type: bottle

04-12-2006 05:12:34 | More by Crosling
Photo of botham
botham

Illinois

2.98/5  rDev -28%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

pint bottle poured into a snifter. pours opaque black with a single finger of rich light tan head after a hard pour. decent retention and moderate lacings make this one look great in the glass.

aroma is of lightly roasted malts and a bit metallic, along with a bit of chocolate and some subtle dark fruit notes. lightly sweet overall with an odd overall character; possibly a bad bottle due to the metallic character.

taste is much better, with a lightly roasted character and a solid black malt presence. the brew is sweet overall with a smooth character and an overall solid profile, though it could be a bit less sweet and more roasted.

mouthfeel is decent, though underwhelming. full bodied and rich in texture with a semi-dry finish of residual dark malts.

drinkability is good. the brew seems to do all the right things in the wrong way. too sweet, a touch metallic in the nose and not enough roasted malt to sustain the rich and sweet character. hopefully these negative thoughts are from a bad bottle. oh well, that just means another bottle is going to have to make its way in front of this BA.

Serving type: bottle

07-14-2009 03:59:29 | More by botham
Photo of metalblack
metalblack


3/5  rDev -27.5%

11-10-2012 23:27:16 | More by metalblack
Photo of ejimhof
ejimhof

Pennsylvania

3/5  rDev -27.5%

06-28-2013 01:26:44 | More by ejimhof
Photo of MillySox
MillySox

Illinois

3/5  rDev -27.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured from tap into 12oz hourglass. Pitch black with a little bit of a white head. Smells a little grassy and grainy. Dark but not heavy. Didn't seam to hold a lot of carbonation and I don't know if thats intentional. The taste is very sweet and simple. Low bitterness and light mouthfeel. Might be a nice option on a hot day.

Serving type: on-tap

02-01-2009 17:09:10 | More by MillySox
Photo of Naes
Naes

New York

3.03/5  rDev -26.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

This brews appearance is black with reddish / amber hues around the sides of my goblet. The head is a nice tan color but is small and fleeting. The head quickly reduces itself to a thin ring with an island in the middle.

The aroma is a bit bready with hints of roasted malt with a smidgen of alcohol in the nose.

Its alcohol content is quite noticeable and provides the throat with a minor burn. The flavor is a bit roasty but is dominated by alcohol and dextrose sweetness. This beer is a bit much for my taste buds.

The brews mouth feel is medium bodied and a bit oily.

Drinkability is definitely hindered by the ABV which makes this one a sipping beer for certain. It’s good for those who like the sweet ones with a bit of a burn, but not one that I would recommend.

I will leave this one to the heavyweights.

Serving type: bottle

07-30-2005 04:30:59 | More by Naes
Photo of biglite351
biglite351

Pennsylvania

3.13/5  rDev -24.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A - tiny bit of red through the center. Tall tight near white head.

S - malt, caramel and a touch of chocolate. A touch of prune in the finish.

T - dark fruit, dark chocolates, bitter mild coffee. There are a lot of things going on in this brew. Maybe even a bit of a Belgian touch.

M - light coating with a sort of bitter tingle in the throat.

D - I could have a couple.

Serving type: bottle

02-06-2011 01:04:19 | More by biglite351
Photo of CH3CH2OH
CH3CH2OH

New Jersey

3.18/5  rDev -23.2%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Pours a deep black with a tan head. Malt and caramel aromas and a sweet, one dimensional taste. Almost no aftertaste. The best thing to be said for it is that it hides its ABV very, very well. As close to a lawnmower porter as I've had.

Aroma - 5; Appearance - 2; Flavor - 9; Mouthfeel - 4; OI - 7 (27/50).

Serving type: bottle

09-02-2006 00:57:46 | More by CH3CH2OH
Photo of gonzo46and2
gonzo46and2

Florida

3.2/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3

Pours a dark reddish brown with a one-finger dark tan head. Laces nicely.

Aroma is sweetend premium coffee, chocolate and caramel. Very malty and sweet.

Taste is extremely sweet. Much sweeter than I like and the rating suffers for that reason. The malty flavors have a nice depth with chocolate, carob, caramel, dark fruit and coffee. Just too sweet for my tastes. A nice dry hopping on this beer could balance it out a bit and really make this a winner.

Mouthfeel is sticky and sweet with a nice roundness and full character.

Drinkability is lacking for me due to the high abv and overall sweetness.

Serving type: bottle

02-28-2009 22:42:56 | More by gonzo46and2
Photo of numenor1
numenor1

North Carolina

3.2/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 3

my 100th review

Well, not as dark as sinebrychoff, but certainly dark brown to black, with a khaki rocky head that laces very well. Smells of dust, faint chocolate, very light roast and rubber, go figure. Great flavors. Semisweet chocolate, roast coffee, cherry, almonds, brown sugar. Very nice. Unfortunately, as much as i want to like this, i find it overly sweet, cloying. Mouthfeel is good, medium, assertive carbonation, medium body. Drinkability suffers due to sweetness. Oh well. Drain pour.

Give me sinebrychoff any day.

Serving type: bottle

09-10-2006 06:42:02 | More by numenor1
Photo of Folderol
Folderol

New Jersey

3.2/5  rDev -22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

I looked forward to trying this beer ever since the death of Heavyweight and Perkuno's Hammer. I remember reading that Okocim was the model Baltic Porter - but then I also read that it went out of production for a while and came back in its current form with a slightly different recipe. I can only guess that the original was much better.

This beer was just not all that interesting - the taste is sweet dark malt, but I didn't pick up any complexities, no chocolate or fruit, maybe just a hint of molasses and soy sauce. I didn't detect any hop flavor and bitterness was minimal. I also picked up a lot more ethanol fumes than I'd like - there are brews that cover their alcohol pretty well, and this is not one of them.

Sorry Okocim - this one is not worth the trouble to find.

Serving type: bottle

04-27-2009 14:46:12 | More by Folderol
Photo of generallee
generallee

New York

3.25/5  rDev -21.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Presentation: It was poured from a brown, 1pt.0.9floz. or 500ml bottle into a pint glass.

Appearance: The body has a very dark brown color with some lighter brown highlights. Its head builds up thick and slowly settles down to thin cap that hangs on to the last sip. The head is tan in color and makes nice slippery lace that slowly slides down the glass as I drink.

Smell: Its aroma is strong and has a heavy sweet and fruity malt character with a very noticeable alcohol presence in the nose.

Taste/Mouth feel: The overall flavor is very sweet with a sticky, almost syrupy texture. Sugary sweet malt with dark caramel, molasses and toffee notes dominate its character. There is a very noticeable alcohol presence in the flavor and notes of cherry cough drop with some mild herbal and leafy hops. Any bitterness from the hops is overpowered by the extremely sweet malt however. It finishes slowly with its malt lingering on the palate. Carbonation is moderate to average and it's about medium bodied.

Notes: Its overall drinkability for me was low due to its unchecked and unbalanced syrupy sweetness. The alcohol had some ruff edges as well; still this is a very interesting brew.

Serving type: bottle

07-08-2008 14:41:57 | More by generallee
Photo of rorjets
rorjets

Connecticut

3.25/5  rDev -21.5%

06-03-2014 14:42:43 | More by rorjets
Photo of KTCamm
KTCamm

New Jersey

3.28/5  rDev -20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured from the above-size bottle into a pint glass.

Pours dark brown with fizzy off white foam that disappears into the glass. Remaining liquid is completely opaque.

Light aroma for a porter. Small hints of roasted coffee.

Taste is a milky creamy burnt coffee. Slightly bitter finish accompanied by some alcohol burn. Some carbonation, but not distinctive.

Good drinkability. Not the best porter out there - but pretty good.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2010 11:04:51 | More by KTCamm
Photo of mrasskicktastic
mrasskicktastic

New Jersey

3.3/5  rDev -20.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2

A - A very dark red with a one finger tan head that dissipates fairly quickly leaving delicate rings of lacing behind.

S - Elderberries, chocolate, coffee, cherries, some smoke, raisins and dates. Alcohol is detectable.

T - Metals (iron), sweet currants, chocolate and a bit of coffee. These mesh to create a very slight blood flavor that I don't find very appetizing. The iron flavor lingers for a long time as well as a bit of a sweet mocha flavor. Without the iron flavor this would be delicious.

M - Viscous and smooth. There is a slight drying in the front and tounge of the mouth (seems to be a side effect of the iron flavor), but the very back is well refreshed. A little strange.

D - Well, I can't session it and it is too sweet for food. I'm not going to hunt it down in the future either. Finishing one is not difficult, but it is a bit of a chore with the blood and drying character. I guess that it is sub par in this category.

Serving type: bottle

02-23-2006 04:28:39 | More by mrasskicktastic
Photo of cvstrickland
cvstrickland

North Carolina

3.33/5  rDev -19.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

500 ml bottle poured into a tulip yields a deep brown body capped by a finger of rocky tan foam that recedes to a broken sheet that leaves lacing.

Smell is of roasted malts, spicy caramel, raisins, overripe apples and maple syrup.

Taste is overwhelmingly sweet and malty with caramel flavors, a fruity note of ripe banana and bitter plum skin, a mean alcohol bite followed too closely by a floral-bitter finish.

Smooth and rich in the mouth at first with a relatively clean, watery finish.

Serving type: bottle

05-17-2008 12:47:37 | More by cvstrickland
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Okocim Porter from Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg)
92 out of 100 based on 522 ratings.