1. Don't miss our 7th annual American Craft Beer Fest featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers this May 30 & 31 in Boston, MA! Buy your tickets now!
  2. BeerAdvocate on your phone?! True story. Try the beta now.

Okocim Mocne - Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg)

Okocim MocneOkocim Mocne

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
70
okay

107 Ratings
THE BROS
-
no score

(send 'em beer!)
Ratings: 107
Reviews: 87
rAvg: 2.98
pDev: 20.13%


Brewed by:
Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg) visit their website
Poland

Style | ABV
Euro Strong Lager |  7.50% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes/Commercial Description:
Listed as "Malt Liquor" on some labels in the US, due to some US State laws.

(Beer added by: brewdlyhooked13 on 09-18-2001)
View: Beers (16) |  Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Ratings: 107 | Reviews: 87 | Show All Ratings:
Photo of jaz58
jaz58

Ontario (Canada)

3.85/5  rDev +29.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

A very interesting strong pilsner. Served in a pint glass.

A nice golden orange clear colour with a steady yet light carbonation.

Salty sour nose.

When poured a thick white head formed yet it dissipated quite quickly.

Slight hint of carmel and malt followed by a dry bitters finish.

A decent mouthfeel, not as round as other brews.

Serving type: can

12-23-2012 03:10:38 | More by jaz58
Photo of Kremlock
Kremlock

Ontario (Canada)

3.18/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Name and make is the same but the can is slightly different then the picture posted. Also the level of alcohol is 7% alc./vol.

A: Pours a nice golden colour with a thick white head. Beer is very clear with high carbonation.

S: Hint of alcohol is present, a bit of corn, maltiness

T: Sweetness is a bit candy like (like those little red raspberry candies) but it's faint yet present. Hint of caramel but it gets overshadowed by the candy flavour. There is a bitterness present in the background that does come out at the end.

M: low-medium bodied, a bit of a silk to it. coats the tongue and palate

O: A good beer if you are in the mood of a sweeter lager but not too malty. Bitterness is what you'd expect of a lager.

Serving type: can

10-19-2012 23:31:13 | More by Kremlock
Photo of bryehn
bryehn

Ontario (Canada)

3.03/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours a light golden colour with slight amber tinges and a generous soapy white head that gets retained as a collar and film while leaving some mild and spotty lacing.

Smells of malts, wet grains, corn and wheat flour. Slight waft of alcohol. Pretty one-noted and sweet, but no particularly bad aromas either.

Thick, malty taste with a surprising dryness. Mostly bread and grains with a slight toasted character. Slight sweetness and a light berry fruit tone.

Medium-bodied with a moderate carbonation level. Biscuit-like mouthfeel with a syrupy accent. The finish has a decent dryness to it and the aftertaste has a slightly sweet corn flavour.

Tolerable and would go best with a heavy meal like roast beef and potatoes or sausages. The dryness helps this beer’s drinkability, but it tends to drink like a malt liquor for the most part. Wouldn’t turn one down if I was in Poland, but won’t go out of my way to try it again.

Serving type: can

04-01-2012 21:54:33 | More by bryehn
Photo of liamt07
liamt07

Ontario (Canada)

2.63/5  rDev -11.7%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Can from the LCBO, 473ml into a stange. Best before February 1, 2013.

Clear gold with a reddish orange tinge, short-lived whited head with almost no lacing. Nose is generally sweet, some honey, grains, and what moderately resembles some caramelized malts. Taste is just the same, sweet malts, grainy, alcohol, apple juice and more alcohol. A general bitterness in the finish. Medium mouthfeel, high carbonation. Too much fusel here and lackluster flavour - a chore to get through.

Serving type: can

03-28-2012 00:14:26 | More by liamt07
Photo of spinrsx
spinrsx

Ontario (Canada)

2.8/5  rDev -6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

500ml Can

Appearance – Clear dark yellow colour with an above average size fizzy white coloured head. There is a below average amount of carbonation showing and there is almost no lacing. The head lasted for around 3 minutes before it was gone.

Smell - Grains, bread, corn, malts

Taste & Mouth - The beer has an above average amount of carbonation. I can taste malts, light hops, and lots of corn. There is also another cooked vegetable taste - can't my finger on it. The beer ends with corn/malt slightly harsh aftertaste.

Overall – Found this beer listed in the book '1000 beers you must try before you die'. Well I tried it.. definitely noting to write home about. I didn't have any issues finishing my glass, but it's not something I'd seek out again.

Serving type: can

11-22-2011 19:11:17 | More by spinrsx
Photo of thehyperduck
thehyperduck

Ontario (Canada)

3.05/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 2 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

500 mL can, best before May 2012. Listed at an even 7% abv instead of 7.5, and served ice cold.

Pours a relatively deep golden colour, comparable to apple juice in hue. There is one half-finger of soapy white head on top, which soon dies down to a thin, filmy cap. Mostly nondescript aroma with bready, pale grain malts, some grass and vaguely corny notes. Boring, but on the plus side there's no ethanol.

Decent taste. Lots of grainy barley malt sweetness, with some honey and green apple/pear notes. Some faint hop presence toward the end of the sip, mostly stale and earthy. Malty, sweetish aftertaste lingers for a bit along with just a bit of boozy heat - maybe I'm just getting used to higher ABV beers after all the Belgian stuff I've had lately, but the extra alcohol seems reasonably well-hidden. Leaning toward the heavier side of light bodied, with good carbonation for the style. Very easy to drink for a 7%er, although it definitely becomes funkier and more sour as it warms.

Not as terrible as the reviews led me to believe, but other than that there isn't much to say. You can certainly drink this, but you probably wouldn't want to unless you were just looking for something to get you wasted without being terribly unpalatable. For the discerning malt liquor connoisseur. Not something I'm likely to get again when I can think of 2 other strong Polish lagers I'd prefer, but at least this stuff is cheap.

Serving type: can

11-03-2011 03:58:12 | More by thehyperduck
Photo of JohnnyBarman
JohnnyBarman

Ontario (Canada)

2.33/5  rDev -21.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

Poured into a nonic. Deep golden, lots of visible carbonation, leaves behind a solid level of creamy head, great retention, a thin ring survives to till the end.

Nose is stale malts, corn, a bit of hops I suppose, and a metallic twang.

A boozy affair, this beer starts off admirably enough, but becomes less enjoyable with each passing sip. Sickly sweet to begin, with some pretty uninspired malts, and ends with a medicine-metallic dry taste that becomes increasingly more challenging to power through as I go along. I finished it, but reluctantly. Like Samuel Jackson Ale, "It'll get you drunk!" But then again, so will liquor or better beer.

Fun fact: apparently "mocne" is Polish for cheap, boozy swill. Avoid.

Serving type: bottle

08-20-2011 19:12:55 | More by JohnnyBarman
Photo of BlackHaddock
BlackHaddock

United Kingdom (England)

2.3/5  rDev -22.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

7.1%ABV 500ml can, lets hope I enjoy it more than the bottle I reviewed back in 2008.

The can had a best before of 27 Apr 2011, it was reviewed two months later: poured into my Budweiser Budvar 0.2 litre tasting glass on 23 Jun 2011.

No complaints from the look, bright, clear and golden. Lovely white head on each pour of the three.

Grainy, metalic type smell, but strangley not offensive.

The taste is all about the alcohol, with a drying bitterness that I didn't really take too. There is a hop mini feel in the flavour, but it just didn't seem to do much taste wise.

I could see two pints of this giving you the mother of all hang-overs. It's the sort of beer drunks drink out of brown paper bags!

As unimpressed as I was with the bottle, but for completely different reasons: have my tastebuds changed, or has the beer?

Serving type: can

06-23-2011 20:59:35 | More by BlackHaddock
Photo of tbeckett
tbeckett

Ontario (Canada)

1.93/5  rDev -35.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Bottle from a corner store in Lublin. Suggested retail price on bottle. From notes.

A - Light golden colour with a two finger frothy white head. Bright. Lot's of carbonation. Slight lacing and retention.

S - Weak. Typical of a strong Euro lager. Corn, sweet grain and nothing else. Very faint and almost nonexistent.

T - Corn and sweet grain. There was a little grassy hop to balance and keep this from being terrible.

M - Light to medium carbonation and a medium body. Sort of oily and unpleasant.

O/D - Avoid this. No way I would have it again. Saving grace is the mild hop presence. I didn't finish the bottle.

Serving type: bottle

05-29-2011 21:33:02 | More by tbeckett
Photo of Mancer
Mancer

New York

2.98/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

This beer poured a golden copper color with a two finger high, white head. The head dissipated into a thin lace that barely coated the top of the beer, let alone the glass. The initial smell of the beer was wheat and barley, with a subtle sweetness of perhaps a berry fruit. The taste was all slightly sweet barley. The flavors stuck to the tongue and were not what I preferred. The brew had a light to medium body with medium to high carbonation.

Overall, this was alright. Polish beers stick out easily and pretty distinct in their flavor, which is highly characteristic of this beer. However, there isn't much to set this beer apart from the rest, other than me liking the brewery's porter.

Serving type: can

12-28-2010 06:04:58 | More by Mancer
Photo of biegaman
biegaman

Ontario (Canada)

2.42/5  rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Okocim Mocne ("strong") looks a shade stronger than most Euro pale lagers; its golden tone is refulgent and its complexion clear as a bright summer's day. The little bubbles that dot the landscape give it character and charm, the soapy pool of head they become part of lend assurance that this is well brewed. Looking at it, I trust this will be a good lager...

Smelling it, however, tells a different story. Warm and bready corn muffins await the nose, all too eager to showcase a big box-store worthy processed smell. This bouquet is stale smelling and predominantly unauthentic, lacking in both hops and barley, and tinged with a note of alcohol that, while not outright just yet, is suspiciously close to the surfacing.

Okocim regular - like many bottled, mass-produced, exported Polish lagers - is reasonably unpalatable although in this case, it's made doubly so. The 'strong' in its name doesn't correspond so much to the alcohol as it does just the fact that its taste has been compounded twice over. The flavour of corn syrup and white bread is twice as strong.

To its credit, the alcohol itself is not made any more obvious; instead, what drinkers have to endure for the extra buzz is an extra-prevalent taste of chemical adjuncts and disagreeable, cheap malts. If you ask me it's not worth it - if you're drinking to get drunk try hard liquor, that's my advice. If you're looking to enjoy a satisfying beer look elsewhere.

The beer was designed to be as tasteless as possible, a goal in which it relatively succeeds, and as drinkable as possible - a goal which it succeeds only with the assistance of a plugged nose and near freezing temperatures. This is negligibly different from the original, which is a good thing for alcoholics, but an unfortunate disappointment for everyone else.

They can poke you with all different kinds of instruments but it's still pain. Okocim Mocne, living up to its name, roughs up the palate with more strength than lesser-alcohol lagers. The abuse suffered is nowhere worth the price paid for it, no matter the momentary jollies that 7.5% alcohol might bring. Stronger is definitely not better.

Serving type: bottle

08-01-2010 05:18:17 | More by biegaman
Photo of morimech
morimech

Minnesota

3.43/5  rDev +15.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear, light golden color with two fingers of dense white head that had decent retention before settling to a thick cap. Large amount of lacing is left on the glass. The aroma is not as impressive as the appearance. It is grainy, sweet malt, and just a faint wisp of hops. The beer comes back to life in taste. Not too sweet with a decent amount of hops to balance things out. Almost has a clean finish but there is a little lingering astringency. Otherwise has the Polish lager taste. The body is light despite the elevated ABV. Good carbonation that is far from harsh. I think I picked this bottle up right after it got off the truck at the store. So it may of benefited by being as fresh as an import could be. Add some more hops and this beer could be something really good.

Serving type: bottle

07-06-2010 21:32:55 | More by morimech
Photo of Phyl21ca
Phyl21ca

Quebec (Canada)

1.58/5  rDev -47%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Bottle: Poured a deep clear golden color ale with a medium pure white foamy head with minimal retention and not much lacing. Aroma of sweet adjunct is not too strong but not that pleasant either. Taste is also dominated by sweet adjunct with light cardboard notes. Body is slightly oily with medium carbonation. Not something I really cared about or that I would need to revisit again.

Serving type: bottle

05-19-2010 02:38:43 | More by Phyl21ca
Photo of sunrisesolara
sunrisesolara

Austria

2.98/5  rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

.5L emptied into a Pokal.

A: Poured an orangish gold with a 2-finger off-white head which quickly receeded to a thin ring. Light lacing.

S: Citrus, sour grain, some sweet malt and a twinge of hoppiness are tucked in there.

M: Really light bodied for a beer of this style, but with decent carbonation.

T: Biscuity malt, lightly hopped. Sourish booze and a dry, almost metallic finish. Mildly bitter aftertaste.

D: Got this a gift from my boss after a trip to Poland. I've had better examples of the Polish Mocne and I don't think I'll seek this one out anytime soon.

Serving type: can

05-09-2010 17:10:10 | More by sunrisesolara
Photo of tone77
tone77

Pennsylvania

3.18/5  rDev +6.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3

Poured from a brown 16.9 oz. bottle. Has a golden color wit a 1/2 inch head. Smell is of malts. Taste is of malts, alcohol, a touch of sweetness. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and has average drinkability. Overall this makes for a fairly decent brew.

Serving type: bottle

04-15-2010 13:03:34 | More by tone77
Photo of seand
seand

California

2.73/5  rDev -8.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A: An aggressive pour results in surprisingly small amount of white head with large bubbles - maybe a finger or two in a relatively small mouthed glass. The head dissipates fairly quickly, leaving minimal lacing. The beer itself is a clear golden amber.

S: Has that pale lager smell, but with a bit of additional sweetness and alcohol, and a subtle but strange almost metallic tinge.

T: Starts light, moving into a slightly boozy sweetness, and then the flavor just kind of empties out, again with a near metallic touch. Finishes quite dry.

M: Fairly low carbonation, light mouthfeel, finishes watery.

D: I guess it drinks easy enough, in terms of not having any overbearing offensive notes, but it's not something I wish I had a lot more of.

It's OK. I wouldn't say it's good, but it's not really terrible either.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2010 02:47:16 | More by seand
Photo of nasty15108
nasty15108

New York

3.3/5  rDev +10.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Poured from a 1pt .9oz bottle into a pilsener glass.

A - Poured a slightly cloudy orange color. The pour produced a head of white foam that subsided into a thick bubbly film.

S - Smelled like a typical Euro lager. Hints of malt, grain and alcohol.

T - Malty and slightly grassy. Finishes off with a slight bitterness and definite alcohol presence.

MF&D - Light to meduim bodied. Not offensive, but just not interesting or tasty enough to buy again.

Serving type: bottle

10-26-2009 19:17:48 | More by nasty15108
Photo of SLeffler27
SLeffler27

New York

1.7/5  rDev -43%
look: 4 | smell: 1 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 1

A big, white, meringue head develops quickly, leaving nice lace as it works its way down the pilsner glass over a crystal-clear, pale yellow water.

A skunk walked by, followed by a dirty skunk dragging wet cardboard. THIS is a bad omen. Seriously, this smells like a frat house the day after an all nighter.

Slight bitterness leads one to realize this is not filtered water. Rather, it is similar to light, mass-brewed, American lagers and deserves to be consumed very cold, thus killing all flavor that is present.

The mouthfeel is thin and watery, just not good. And where is that alcohol?

Looks simply don't make for a good beer. Maybe this was disrespected before I found it, but why waste money to find out. Even the drain tried to reject this one.

Serving type: bottle

07-26-2009 02:08:20 | More by SLeffler27
Photo of DerBayer
DerBayer

Germany

2.68/5  rDev -10.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

A - a golden-brown but slightly off so just OK

S - sweetish little hops, some honey and even spice but somewhat off

T - See above - this is trying to be a Bock type beer but failking miserably

M - medium carbonation, quite refreshing

D - HMMM would not go for this one again - sorry

Serving type: bottle

07-15-2009 21:22:57 | More by DerBayer
Photo of KTCamm
KTCamm

New Jersey

3/5  rDev +0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from the 500ml bottle into a pint glass. Poured a golden yellow color with active white foam dissapating very quickly. No lacing left behind.

Smell is unremarkable. That basic beer smell if you will.

Taste is malty and modestly hoppy. Corn, grains, etc. Its like your basic American lager, but with the malt liquor taste running through. Its not "clean" in the classic sense - maybe instead a little dirty.

A drinkable brew - not as smooth as a plain lager, but good enough to come back to.

Serving type: bottle

06-21-2009 11:43:21 | More by KTCamm
Photo of soulgrowl
soulgrowl

United Kingdom (England)

3.03/5  rDev +1.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

Par for the course for the style: golden body with an upward torrent of big, soda-like bubbles and an active, fizzy white head with not-too-bad retention. Smell is noticeably full of alcohol, but in a kinda nice tripel-like way; in fact, there is some delicate fruitiness and a nice fresh grain aroma here that is quite Belgian in character. Apples and pears flesh out the predominantly sweet nose; hops are basically undetectable. The taste is rather sweet, too, and boozy. There is a little nuance, but of course the problem with this style is that it was basically developed to try and answer the demand for beer that will get you drunk fast, slake your thirst, and cost you next to nothing - nuance doesn't really factor into it. So for what it is, it's not bad; off flavors are kept to a minimum, and while the alcohol is noticeable, it's not too hot. Hops are too timid, though; a bit more oomph from them and they could help balance out the sugars. The same goes for carbonation; it's too soft. More sparkle would help keep this refreshing. Overall, like most strong lagers like this, there isn't much point to this beer - Duvel, for example, is stronger, more delicious, more nuanced, more refreshing, and (this is key), not very much more expensive. So why waste your time?

Serving type: bottle

05-31-2009 19:03:38 | More by soulgrowl
Photo of BDIMike
BDIMike

Ohio

3.13/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Pours a clear golden color. There is a lot of fizz that creates a huge white head that slowly fades.
Smell has not much going for it. Aroma of a common Euro lager with a wheaty malt smell and a tinge of Eastern European hops (saaz?).
Taste is much stronger in the malt category. There is a wheat taste and a lot of heavy malts with the hops taking a backseat.
Mouthfeel is nice for a lager. Nice smoothness and thickness that is not usually as prominent in a Euro lager.
Drinkability is fairly nice for a strong beer. The smooth mouthfeel makes it go down easy, but there is nothing to ordinary or great to the taste to want to drink a lot of these. I would drink it on a hot summer day for a little refreshment, but I wouldn't seek it out.

Serving type: bottle

05-23-2009 01:37:05 | More by BDIMike
Photo of sweetbrew82
sweetbrew82

California

2.83/5  rDev -5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

500 ML into a pilsener/ no freshness date

My wife (not a beer drinker) accidentally picked this one up instead of the porter that I'd requested. Oh well, always down to try something different.

P: Orange honey with a white head that's soapy with small bubbles, but does have a decent amount of density to it. Vanished pretty shortly thereafter and left some spotty lacing behind as it did.

A: Toasted grainy malts, earthy/floral hops, sour green apples, and some alcohol. Nothing much going on here, just smells like plain old beer.

T: Toasted biscuity malts taste grainy, almost cereal-like with flavors of raw barley husk. Hops are earthy/floral tasting and deliver a bit of spice, while that sour green apple flavor is very pronounced throughout. Diacetyl is present as well, giving rise to a buttery taste that permeates the beer. After a while, it becomes increasingly off-putting, which more than warrants a drop in the flavor score.

M: Medium-bodied, oily and slick, semi-dry on the finish, with good carbonation.

Notes: Well, I'm glad I got to try this beer, even if by accident because I probably would have never bought this on my own. It's pretty much what you would expect from a malt liquor. I haven't had one since high school, but I know one thing, it's much better than all of the other malt liquors I used to drink. St. Ides, Mickey's, Olde E, King Cobra, eat your heart out, baby!!!

Serving type: bottle

05-17-2009 21:58:49 | More by sweetbrew82
Photo of ommegoose
ommegoose

Illinois

2.25/5  rDev -24.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

$1.29 a 500 ml bottle is worth trying. I suspect this is fairly fresh knowing how the Polish beer moves in my neighborhood. Label says 7% abv, not 7.5%.

Clear and bright. A little bit more color than a Euro Pale Lager. Head formation is rather weak, but tons of visible carbonation at work. The thin cap actually does last most of the way to the end. A dash of lace here and there.

Green apple dominates the aroma. I would feel better if this smell was from Ephemere, because I know what this suggests for a Euro lager. Sweet bready maltiness is under that, like a pale bock almost.

Alright, so we're looking at a Euro malt liquor basically. I gather that "mocne" translates to "malt", seen on other beers too. At 7%, it's even stronger than most malt liquors here. Vodka-like alcohol presence tasted, and it's there on the finish too. Characterless bitterness in the back end, but it keeps the beer from being cloying, which would be a legitimate concern due to the one dimensional malt character. Something sour in the back works against the sweetness as well. DMS detected.

The mouthfeel isn't bad. It's not fizzy. In fact the carbonation is soft enough not to bother. Sufficient body as well. Alcohol doesn't help. It numbs the tongue when I try to taste it for too long. Ends up being kind of heavy. Takes time to knock back the whole bottle.

It's something to drink to get drunk. I can do that with this beer. I'd think I'd rather have Steel Reserve or Labatt Max Ice for that purpose and less money spent. Those beers actually do a good job of minimizing taste and flaws, and they're more drinkable than this. It has more flavor, just not anything worth tasting. I don't feel compelled to have another. I seem to recall Hevelius Kaper being better. Go with that instead.

Serving type: bottle

03-11-2009 05:13:56 | More by ommegoose
Photo of ThirstyBird
ThirstyBird

Germany

2.8/5  rDev -6%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5

Poured from a 50cl bottle
A - Clear golden yellow with a fluffy white head that quickly dissipates. no lacing.
S - Very bready, a little alcohol and a little caramel.
T - Quite sweet from away. Taste follows nose.
M/F -Medium body. Beer is a little sticky. Carbonation is a bit light.
D - It's OK but a little too sweet for my liking. Will not seek out.

Serving type: bottle

01-27-2009 02:19:04 | More by ThirstyBird
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | next › last »
Okocim Mocne from Browar Okocim S.A. (Carlsberg)
70 out of 100 based on 107 ratings.