Dos Equis Amber Lager - Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.

Not Rated.
Dos Equis Amber LagerDos Equis Amber Lager

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
72
okay

711 Reviews
THE BROS
80
good

(Read More)
Reviews: 711
Hads: 2,640
rAvg: 3.09
pDev: 16.83%
Wants: 33
Gots: 396 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V. visit their website
Mexico

Style | ABV
Vienna Lager |  4.70% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: BeerAdvocate on 04-24-2001

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (38) | Events
Beer: Reviews & Ratings
Sort by:  Recent | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Dos Equis Amber Lager Alström Bros
first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Reviews: 711 | Hads: 2,640
Photo of hopphead31415
2.78/5  rDev -10%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Look-This one pours an orange amber color with frothy fringes on the medium small head.

Smell-It is a malt forward (duh) lager.

Taste-It has floral and herbal notes singing high over the lager malt base. It has a pretty low alcohol content weighing in at 4.7% ABV.

Mouthfeel-It is crisp and refreshing with noticeable carbonation.

Overall-There is nothing special about this beer, but it is a nice brew if you are at the right place probably eating an enchilada. (466 characters)

Photo of Andrewharemza
3.03/5  rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Pours clear medium amber with a thin beige head, good retention. Aromas of hay, caramel, biscuit, earth. Light watery body, good carbonation. Light sweetness, a hint of citrus, gentle bitter finish. (198 characters)

Photo of lechap
4.3/5  rDev +39.2%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25

On a recent fishing trip I had occasion to taste a lot of different beers. Honestly, one of the best I had was a pint of this on tap. Not normally a fan of Mexican beers but this was an exception. (196 characters)

Photo of Lahoi
2.75/5  rDev -11%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75

Not a bad beer. Call me cheap, but it all depends on the $$$. I've been to bars, grills, restaurants and even package liquor stores that seem to think that this is a premium beer, thus they price it accordingly. If that's the case, this beer sucks. But put it down there with the other cheaply made lagers and I think this is a nice, drinkable beer. (349 characters)

Photo of BrewUSA
2.98/5  rDev -3.6%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.5

Look 6/10
Smell 12/20
Taste 30/40
Feel 5/10
Drinkability 18/20

Overall 71/100 (171 characters)

Photo of DevAJ
3.5/5  rDev +13.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

I had no clue this was considered a Vienna until I came to this site. This is by far my favorite "Vienna", but then again I don't have a whole lot of exposure to the category as the only others I've had were Samuel Adams and Abita Amber. If Samuel Adams and Abita Amber are classic interpretations of the style then the classic Vienna isn't for me, but the Dos Equis interpretation is pretty good in my opinion and it's the only beer I get when I go to a Mexican restaurant and I always get it on draft. (505 characters)

Photo of RyanK252
3/5  rDev -2.9%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Bottle poured into a BarrelHouse Brewing Co pint glass

A: Pours red orange amber with a frothy off white head that settles and lightly laces.

S: Bready malt, maybe a hint of floral notes, and a little sweetness.

T: Bready malt, some sweetness, very light fruity notes, and that's pretty much about it. Can be a bit watery on the back end.

M: Fairly light body, moderate carbonation.

O: Generally inoffensive, but I can't say I plan on drinking this again. Just nothing special about it. (495 characters)

Photo of Jsteez
3.18/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Decent Mexican amber lager. It is labeled as a Vienna style lager, but it seems like a premium adjunct lager, IMO. However, it is refreshing alongside Ensenada style fish tacos. (177 characters)

Photo of JeffBlue
2.5/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

(Draft, revisited) at Canyon Club in Agoura Hills. Wheaty and plain but refreshing; 3/8/15.

Others:
Bohemia (favorable)
Indio (favorable)
Dos Equis Special Lager (neutral)
Sol (unfavorable)
Tecate (unfavorable) (211 characters)

Photo of eddiefontaine13
3.75/5  rDev +21.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

Best when really icy cold, very drinkable with spicy food, chili relanno's...this beer brings down the heat, clean finish, good with lime wedge, this beer is much better in draft form than in a bottle every time I have drank it (227 characters)

Photo of Foyle
3.98/5  rDev +28.8%
look: 5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4

Poured from 12oz bottle into pint glass.

Appearance: pours a 1" off white head that drops quickly with very minimal lacing. Color is a clear, deep amber with some moderate streaming carbonation.
Aroma: very mild -- a bit of corn, a hint of caramel
Mouthfeel: light, quite frothy, with a easy dry finish.
Flavor: nice combination of caramel, a bit of nuttiness, whole wheat bread, with a small hop bitterness in the back end.
Overall: very pleasant, easy drinking. Pairs terrifically with spicy Mexican cuisine. (512 characters)

Photo of baumaxx1
2.82/5  rDev -8.7%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Appearance -
1 cm off-white head, clear dark amber/gold colour, moderate carbonation. Moderate lacing. Head dissipates to a thin film.

Smell -
Malts, yeast, citrus, cherries and sugar syrup. Nothing really too offensive, but there's not much to smell.

Taste -
Bread, a hint of lemon and lime, caramel malts, almond, but on the whole on the plain side. Pretty drinkable, but not the most flavoursome beer you can get - a bit on the watery side and slightly metallic.

Mouthfeel -
Mostly watery, mild fizz, fairly refreshing. Standard.

Overall -
Can't complain too much. A decent mass-produced beer at a reasonable price, and there are far worse lagers on the Australian market than this. Nothing special and it's a bit bland like most beers for the mass-market, but quite drinkable. (784 characters)

Photo of mchegash
3.66/5  rDev +18.4%

Date: 8/30/14

Appearance - 3.9/5
Pours an orange-amber-brown color. A little bit of head retention. Fairly clear. Lots of carbonation seen rising to the top.

Smell - 4/5
Was surprised by the smell. Maltly sweetness, accompanied by smells of cherries, tart apples, and alcohol.

Taste - 3.75/5
A traditional lager taste mixed with significant fruitiness and malty sweetness. Makes for a nice taste. Nicer than a was expecting, given the brand.

Mouthfeel - 3.5/5
Fairly smooth, light to medium in body. A small carbonation kick on the tongue. Moderately crisp.

Overall - 3.5/5
I could see this being a nice beer on a hot summer day. Not really my favorite style, but I don't have a lot of major complaints either.

Weighting: Appearance 15%, Smell 15%, Taste 35%, Mouthfeel 15%, Overall 20% (792 characters)

Photo of Doctor_Bogenbroom
2.92/5  rDev -5.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Dos Equis Amber is best on tap, with a lime on the edge of the glass. The beer is not great, but it definitely passes the time with some good old Tex Mex. The color is a deep copper, with a golden hue in the right kind of light. The head is rather small, about a finger's width, and it lingers. Its aroma is of corn, not overly strong. It tastes of grain, a bit watery actually. It has a dry after effect. Not bad. Not good either, but overall, this is a beer you can have with dinner, and it won't ruin your evening at all. (532 characters)

Photo of StoneTSR
2.5/5  rDev -19.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 2.5

APPEARANCE: This is a surprisingly good looking beer. Deep copper in color, transparent, with thousands of lively bubbles darting up towards the strong, two fingers of white, fluffy head. The head forms a small crown that reaches above the rim of this pint glass after being poured from a 12-ounce bottle. The retention is excellent and ten minutes after the pour there is still a good quarter-inch of head left. The lacing is superb as well, with layering that almost look like a Nitro Milk Stout.

SMELL: There is nothing offensive here, but then again there isn't much of anything here at all. There is basically zero aroma, despite the big, fluffy, pretty head. Maybe there is a trace of sugary malt, but that's it.

TASTE: Indicative of the copper color, there is a fair amount of caramel flavor present along with a slightly burnt toast breadiness. Underneath the malt and yeast is a relatively heavy corn-like taste. A hint of hop bitterness squeaks in at the end as well.

MOUTHFEEL: Slightly sweet to start with a drying finish. The body is actually bigger than expected, I'd say light to medium...but leaning light.

OVERALL: This is not a terrible beer. It is not a great one either, but in a pinch, this will do. (1,241 characters)

Photo of IronLover
3.25/5  rDev +5.2%

Reddish orange in color with excellent clarity. Poured with a short off-white foam that quickly reduced to thin wisps. Buttery, toasted malt and burnt caramel aromas with hints of herbal hops. Medium bodied with a slightly watery feel up front that transitions to light, tangy, crispness through the middle to the end. Burnt caramel malt and light toasted malt flavors with herbal hops through the middle and clean finish. Flavors are generally subdued with dominant burnt caramel character. (492 characters)

Photo of The-Adjunct-Hippie
3.96/5  rDev +28.2%

$1.23 special.

Serving style : 12 oz bottle poured for appearance.

Appearance (4) : The head seems to just stick to itself like some kind of sci-fi film. It was cool to watch. There's a giant bubble on top about the size of a 50 cent piece. Not sure what that's about. Oops, it popped. 1 finger oatmeal-colored head that leaves an impressionable amount of lacing on the sides of the glass. It sits on top of a dark fiery amber hue, at an impressive 80% opacity only showing the shadow of my hand on the other side when held up to the light. I was expecting much less for this beer. A solid 4.

Smell (3.5) : A familiar smell. Maybe Amber Bock-ish? Maybe Blue Moon Seasonal...ish. Anyways, it's spiced, some coriander, has plenty of barley malt,with supplements of oatmeal, wheat, and corn. Maybe some rice. If this is all true to my nose we've got a lot of adjuncts. But perhaps I'm confused. Some faint faint citrus notes but I would call them fruity, not hoppy.

Taste (4.25) : Yeasty, bready, delicious. This was a good pick. The finish has a great yeasty bread dough flavor to it and some buttered bread. Wow, I like this a lot. Lots of malt character with graininess and fresh bread. Ends smooth and clean.

Mouthfeel (3.75) : Crisp, smooth, dry, clean.

Overall (3.96) : I'm a chatterbox tonight. Sorry for the long review. This is one of my top ambers now. Next time I see it for a good price I'll pick up a six or twelve. I was not expecting this as I typically don't like mexican style beers. But this one somehow rises above. Lovely yeasty bread dough with a slight sour malt character. Bravo (in every sense of the word)! (1,636 characters)

Photo of FLima
2.59/5  rDev -16.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Amber copper color with a thin head with short retention.
Light sweet aroma of caramels, not much more than that.
Sweet flavor with predominant notes of corn syrup (karo) and caramels. Hints of oxidized apples. Dry aftertaste with a mild bitterness.
Light body with medium carbonation.
Overly sweet Vienna Lager, not that bad, but I will pass next time. (353 characters)

Photo of TheBrewo
2.53/5  rDev -18.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

This brew was served on tap at Mezcal Cantina in Worcester, Massachusetts. It arrived in an overly thick dos equis pint glass, with green colored glass festively rimming the top half inch of the glass. It showed a golden amber coloring, holding a half finger tall white head that retained rather poorly. There was no haze or sediment, and carbonation appeared to be light. The aroma gave notes of matted sweaty dog fur, rain water, wet paper towel, cardboard, lime rind, rice krispies cereal graininess, salt lick, heavy aluminum and mineral, generic lager yeastiness, and chalked pale maltiness. The flavor followed with white flour and drying corn tortilla grain and grit, white sugar, bronze, baked bready yeastiness, pale, lightly amber, and adjuncty malt toast, cloying apple juice, and lactic sourness rounded things off. The body was light, and the carbonation was medium to high. The mouth was left with a metallic sheen, but otherwise no real coating, cream, froth, or smack to go around. Drinkability was okay.

Overall, this was a beer had in desperation. We had flown into Boston on an evening flight for a friend’s wedding. After the hour long drive to Worcester we found ourselves with a hankering for some sauce at about 11pm. It was a Friday and the beginning of a wedding weekend. Highly understandable. We drove around Worcester for an hour looking in every Walgreens, CVS, and sketchy corner store we could find, looking for a pack of local beverages to bring back to the hotel and relax with. Alas, to our surprise, we found no such thing. Frustrated and defeated we turned back towards the hotel, and were happy to find an alcohol-slinging establishment a mere half mile from our temporary abode. This was the only beer available, aside from Pacifico, so we really just flipped a coin here. The “amber lager” is a standard Mexican adjunct lager, giving cheap grain through the nose and mouth, with little to rest upon for feel or sustenance. We drank the swill quickly, and it served its purpose, but after this we rapidly moved on to sampling the beverages for which this cantina was named. (2,136 characters)

Photo of ordybill
3.73/5  rDev +20.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75

Poured from 12oz bottle into pint glass.
Aroma- Smells of corn and maybe some grain and malt, stronger than Coors Light less than Heineken.
Appearance- The beer is a dark amber with a small white head.
Taste- Has a nice mild flavor, it definitely a micro, but it does have character.
Palate- a medium bodied brew with moderate carbonation. Has a dry finish and minimal aftertaste.
Overall- A pretty good beer, I definitely choose this when I am eating Mexican food. (466 characters)

Photo of Samldc
2.22/5  rDev -28.2%
look: 4 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2

S-120z bottle into pint glass

A-golden brown with visible carbonation, looks great, one finger head quickly disappears, ok lacing

S-very little aroma, nothing comes to mind

T-rusty carbonation with metallic aftertaste

M-high carbonation and metal

O- very disappointed, haven't had one these in a few years and for some reason remembered it as tasting much better, will not buy again (387 characters)

Photo of leantom
3.37/5  rDev +9.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

Had this at a local Mexican restaurant. Decent and comparable to Yuengling (my favorite mass-produced beer). Here goes:

A: OK, not good or bad. Beer pours a dark brown with a one inch head that quickly dissipates. Very little lacing, too, but not bad.

S: Not that much going on here. Caramel malt is present but it's very light (hardly detectable). No hops or yeast.

T: Good. Presence of burnt caramel malt imparts toasty characteristics. It tastes like a watered-down Yuengling. As I was drinking it I was wishing it was Yuengling instead.

M: Light-bodied; lighter than Yuengling. Slight bready character makes up for the light body somewhat, though. Not bad.

O: OK beer. Would rather have a Yuengling, but not bad. (721 characters)

Photo of jaredtp
3.05/5  rDev -1.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25

This beer was okay. I enjoyed the barley that was in it, and I enjoyed the malt of this beer. I liked the hops that this beer has as well. Ir was not too heavy at all. And for a fairly cheap beer it was a decent beer. I have only had this beer in a bottle, I would like to try it on tap and see wich one taste better. (317 characters)

Photo of mthomp081
2.4/5  rDev -22.3%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

A - very small head, amber, brown, copper color

S - hops, malt, barley -all extremely mild and almost difficult to detect

T - metallic, slightly bitter from the hops but you can kind of taste the malt, kind of a traditional amber lager, watery

M - crisp, drinkable, medium bodied

O - A below average lager. Tastes very underwhelming, as expected from macro. Its watery and metallic, and the standard lager characteristics are so downplayed. I find this drinkable because well it is easily drinkable with its underwhelming tastes, but nothing really here to note. (566 characters)

Photo of jgiordano88
3.85/5  rDev +24.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4.25

One of my favorite lagers and much better than the special lager. Goes down easy and has a rich taste and feel to it. Very refreshing. Has the dark brown color I expect from a lager and isn't anything fancy or expensive. (220 characters)

first ← prev | 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75  | nextlast
Dos Equis Amber Lager from Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
72 out of 100 based on 711 ratings.