Dos Equis Special Lager - Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Ratings: 2,033 | Reviews: 526 | Display Reviews Only:
2.3/5 rDev -15.8%
Pours a clear yellow with a foamy beige head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Small dots of lace slowly drip into the remaining beer on the drink down. Smell is of grain, sugar, and some metallic aromas. Taste is the same but there is also an off flavor that I can’t put my finger on that is almost medicinal. There is a very light bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a lower level of carbonation with a slightly crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a pretty poor beer that is somewhat undrinkable, especially with the off flavor I am getting.
05-15-2012 00:43:17 | More by UCLABrewN84
2.03/5 rDev -25.6%
Reviewed from notes.
Poured into a pint glass. The color is golden with a slight white head that diminishes rapidly. The nose and taste can be described together as I don't think there's much of a difference and, frankly, there's really not much to them. There's a bit of light grain and that's about it. Some mild bitterness in the taste and feel, but even that is hard to pick out. Not a fan of this and prefer the amber version.
11-14-2010 05:25:09 | More by Thorpe429
2.68/5 rDev -1.8%
A: The beer is clear yellow in color and has a light to moderate amount of visible carbonation. It poured with a thin bright white head that quickly died down and left lacing on the surface and a thin ring of bubbles around the edge of the glass.
S: There are aromas of adjunct malts in the nose—corn seems to stand out in particular—as well as grainy malts.
T: Like the smell, the taste has flavors of corn and grainy malts along with a light amount of bitterness.
M: It feels light-bodied and a little watery on the palate with a moderate amount of carbonation.
O: This beer isn’t horrible but the taste is relatively bland and uninteresting.
08-04-2012 19:55:27 | More by metter98
2.38/5 rDev -12.8%
Textbook amber, perhaps a half-shade lighter. The bleached bone white head is the best part of the appearance. It has a rumpled, pitted upper surface and is a better than average lace generator. For the style, this isn't a bad looking beer.
The nose isn't so wonderful. Although it isn't offensive, it's heavy on the adjuncts and is recognizable as a macro lager with even a passing sniff. There's a mild amount of musty hoppiness and a lot of corn.
The flavor is the aroma in liquid form. Dos Equis Special Lager is a bland and watery version of a bland and watery style. I can't decide if that's a good thing or a bad thing given what the more bold macro lagers taste like.
There might be more corn here than barley (which, I'm sure, makes it cheaper to brew). The beer is lightly sweet, there's almost no hoppiness or body... do I need to continue? DESL is a more desirable beer than Corona in the same way that having one's nose hairs pulled out is a more desirable form of torture than having one's fingernails pulled out.
The mouthfeel doesn't measure up. Although each mouthful doesn't start out thin and watery, it arrives there in fairly short order. There isn't even a decent amount of carbonation to liven things up.
Dos Equis Special is a poor man's Dos Equis Amber. That's probably an unfair comparison since the latter is a Vienna lager and almost certainly contains higher quality ingredients. Other than color, the bottles and labels are identical, so make sure to buy the average one (Amber) rather than the lousy one (Special). Better yet, grab a sixer of Bohemia instead. You're welcome.
05-21-2006 12:41:50 | More by BuckeyeNation
1.63/5 rDev -40.3%
Draft: Poured a golden yellow color lager with a medium white foamy head with average retention and some light lacing. Aroma of overly sweet adjunct is quite gross. Taste is also dominated by loads of gross sweet adjunct notes with a bland aftertaste. Body is light with light oily notes. Overly sweet bland lager.
01-10-2013 19:37:45 | More by Phyl21ca
2.75/5 rDev +0.7%
A standard beach-beer. Why are there no good beers sold at the beach? Anyhow, this one, albeit grainy and bite-ey has a cleanliness and crispness with it. Sweetness is low in the aromas and flavors. Again, the malt profile included adjunct grains and contribute a vegetable flavor. Flavors fade leaving a light medicinal flavor remaining. More bite-ey toward the finish. A little dry. Still a thirst quincher, but not for serious beer tasting.
05-06-2006 03:10:38 | More by BEERchitect
2.6/5 rDev -4.8%
Oh what the heck, when in Rome. So I quickly ran out of what I brought with me and was forced to start looking at the local taps. Could not bring myself to go for some of the bottles, but what can you do. Served ice cold in a frozen mug, this one was consumed on 08/08/2010.
A decent light amber color comes forward, as with the previous few the golden straw color dominating them. Small head of white fades leaving a bare top with some frozen lacing on the sides, and that was about it. Aroma is light malts, bready, hints of light caramel if I am really trying to stretch it and tons of corn and grains. Not much changes as you take a sip. Very clean and crisp as all these lagers tend to be, the problem is the rather uninteresting nature of them. You could drink yourself silly when its cold, but other then that it is just not worth it. Little to no aftertaste and it was gone in a flash.
Again a little bit different here, and there was a bit more of a flavor profile, but still, nothing terribly shocking here.
08-12-2010 00:10:45 | More by mikesgroove
2.98/5 rDev +9.2%
Enjoyed with my cheap tacos last night.
A: The pour is a light golden yellow color with a finger of airy white foam.
S: The nose is sweet and grainy with some hints of sweet apples and corn syrup. Not exactly great, but not offensive like many other beers of the style.
T: The flavor profile is what you would expect. Lots of grain and corn sweetness without much at all in the way of bitterness. The flavor is quite light, as you would expect.
M: A thin and watery body with a high level of carbonation.
D: Like the other beers of the style, easy to drink, just not necessarily all that flavorful. Good for enjoying with a Mexican meal, but not something I'd sit down and drink.
03-10-2010 17:10:23 | More by womencantsail
2.65/5 rDev -2.9%
12 ounce bottle - $1.49 at Hop City in Atlanta, Georgia.
Appearance: Pours out a simple-looking, clear, yellow body with a puny, small-sized, white head.
Smell: Well, it's definitely lackluster in the aroma department. Sparsely sweet-scented grains and corn cobs. Perhaps it'll fare better when it comes to taste.
Taste: Modestly sweetish, lightly grainy malts with a rounding out of unctuous corn. Small trace of spicy hops deliver an equally small hint of bitterness. Finishes quick and dry.
Mouthfeel: Light-bodied. Medium carbonation. Decidedly watery mouthfeel.
Drinkability: If you thrill for swill, then Dos Equis Special Lager is a good bet. Otherwise, it comes across as being bland and adjunct-y. Their Amber was tolerable, not so much with this one.
04-17-2010 22:57:07 | More by ChainGangGuy
2.23/5 rDev -18.3%
Had a bottle of this at the Texas Roadhouse 5-26-2008. The pour was a typical pale yellow. The head faded rather quickly. Had a little bit of a skunky smell to it. Taste was a little hoppy but not much at all. Some light grains and malts shine through. This type of beer is so common that it's hard to say much different about it.
03-22-2011 02:51:04 | More by Knapp85
3.05/5 rDev +11.7%
Served from the bottle at Chipotle.
Nothing like knocking back a nice brew with some tasty Chipotle, baby! This one pours a clear very pale straw topped by a finger of short-lived white froth. The nose comprises corn, wheat, hard water, and corn syrup. The taste doesn't deviate from this plan too far, save for a light hint of lemon spice. The body is quite light, with a lightly fizzy carbonation and a watery feel. Overall, nothing close to special, but good enough to douse the spice from the delicious steak.
11-19-2010 07:15:42 | More by TMoney2591
2.45/5 rDev -10.3%
Washed down some Guatemalan tamales with this, I don't recommend drinking it for any other purpose.
Poured a very pale golden yellow. Light fizzy foam instantly disappeared in the chilled mug. It very much resembled apple juice without much carbonation.
Kid's apple juicebox was the only thing I could smell.
Papery malt and an apple taste from the yeast, a slightly abrasive bitterness on the back end. Very thin and watery, with a gaseous end that isn't too pleasant. I threw back the rest to spare any further introspection.
Drink Dos Equis Amber instead!
01-19-2008 01:17:47 | More by emerge077
2.75/5 rDev +0.7%
Had at a local mexican joint. No lime wedge.
A - Poured out a clear, highly carbonated straw yellow color with a small, bubbly, white head. Very little head retention and no lacing.
S - It smelled of corn, grains and some light caramel malt.
T - It tasted fairly sweet. It had an okay corn and grain flavor. Slightly bitter.
M - It was very crisp and sharp. A light bodied beer.
D - Not very flavorful but drinkable. Goes great with some spicy Mexican salsa.
07-18-2008 20:26:13 | More by zeff80
2.95/5 rDev +8.1%
355ml bottle. Upon seeking out the most recommended Mexican restaurant in downtown Toronto, this seemed like an appropriate enough choice for my first patio experience of the year.
This beer pours a clear medium golden yellow hue, with one finger of loosely foamy, and mostly fizzy dirty white head, which leaves some sandstone mesa cliff lace around the glass as things quickly sink away.
It smells of a very, very light grain/corn sweetness, some hard water flintiness, and a bit of fruity weediness. The taste is soft, bready corn grain, and an earthy, slightly vegetal hop essence. It really is rather weak, not bad, just well, low-key all-around.
The carbonation is moderate, just a simple frothiness, the body medium-light in weight, and bordering on thin in its innocuous smoothness. It finishes off-dry, the weak-ass malt carrying on, and surprisingly, weirdly crisp.
A barely adequate lager chaser for the chips and none-too-spicy salsa...better than yer average BMC, sure, mostly through its plainness, in the same way that this 'Mexican' food is better than Taco Bell.
03-23-2010 21:52:42 | More by biboergosum
2.7/5 rDev -1.1%
Hundreds of tiny bubbles streaming through its crystal-clear yellow-gold body support a creamy white head that holds well and leaves some craggy and spotty lace about the glass. The nose is 'generic beer' with a distinct note of dimethyl sulfite and some mild skunkiness remaining from what little hops were there to begin with. It's lightly crisp and then somewhat creamy in the mouth as it warms across the palate. The flavor delivers all that might be expected, which is little. It's sweetish, adjunct-laden and DMS laced malt is held in check by a sublime bitterness; and it finishes short and dry with a light note of refreshing hop spice and some short lingering malt sugar.
11-11-2003 21:31:44 | More by NeroFiddled
2.85/5 rDev +4.4%
On-tap and served in a 12oz. cup. Typically I like to review beers that are served in a glass, but I don’t think it would have made much difference with this one.
A: The beer is a light gold color, with a medium-sized foamy white head that fades quickly and leaves a thick lace.
S: The smell is of barley, malt, grain, almost no hops and it is a bit metallic.
T: The taste contains flavors of grain, corn, malt, faint hops. The metallic quality that I picked up in the smell comes out in the after-taste.
M: Crisp but not very smooth, light-to-medium body, medium-to-heavy carbonation, clean & dry finish.
D: Easy to drink, not very filling, it went well with my quesadilla but the beer itself was not very tasty.
03-08-2007 05:29:58 | More by TheManiacalOne
Dos Equis Special Lager from Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
64 out of 100 based on 2,033 ratings.