1. American Craft Beer Fest returns to Boston on May 29 & 30, featuring 640+ beers from 140+ brewers. Tickets are on sale now.

Dos Equis Special Lager - Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.

Not Rated.
Dos Equis Special LagerDos Equis Special Lager

Educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
64
poor

2,280 Ratings
THE BROS
63
poor

(view ratings)
Ratings: 2,280
Reviews: 547
rAvg: 2.74
pDev: 23.36%
Wants: 16
Gots: 317 | FT: 0
Brewed by:
Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V. visit their website
Mexico

Style | ABV
American Adjunct Lager |  4.30% ABV

Availability: Year-round

Notes & Commercial Description:
Beer added by: Todd on 11-02-2001

No notes at this time.
View: Beers (36) | Events
Beer: Ratings & Reviews
Sort by:  Recent | Likes | High | Low | Top Raters | Read the Alström Bros Beer Reviews and Beer Ratings of Dos Equis Special Lager Alström Bros
Ratings: 2,280 | Reviews: 547 | Display Reviews Only:
Photo of jiggahertz
3.05/5  rDev +11.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

A: Translucent golden yellow beer with a minimal head after an agressive pour, quickly dissipates until nothing. Reminds me of the head of a cider, non-existant.

S: Hard to pick up anything of substance here. A little bit of esters, some faint hops.

T: Some malt up front, very little hops, not much finish at all, got a little bit of citrus in there somewhere. I remember this having more taste than the typical american adjuct. I guess I was wrong.

M: low carbonation, low body

D: not a bad beer for what it is, just doesn't stand out at all. Doesn't have a "bad" taste as I've had with some other beers of this quality. Is do-able for a bbq or with some mexican food.

Photo of legatovibrato24
2.83/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

A - Clear golden color with a minimal head.

S - Similar to Corona and many American macro brew lagers, which places it slightly below average.

T - Drank with a Quesadilla, and the flavors of the food seemed to easily trump those of the beer, but slight notes of hops were able to shine through.

M - Thin, no serious body.

D - With other beers available in this category, such as Modelo Especial and Negra Modelo, One would wonder why Dos Equis would be chosen over them.

Photo of civilizedpsycho
2.63/5  rDev -4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Poured bottle into pint glass.

Appearance: Pours a pale golden color that is perfectly clear. Had no head even with a fairly vigorous pour.

Smell: Has a bit of a spice in the smell that while isn't repulsive, isn't exactly inviting either.

Taste: On the whole, this is a little bland. It tastes almost watered down, although it does have a fair hop kick in the aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Pretty thin. The carbonation gives in a little texture in the mouth, but not much.

Drinkability: It's okay. It's not the worst thing ever, but there are better beers: in general, and in the particular style.

Photo of Dodo2step
2.63/5  rDev -4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

P- Pittsburgh friend--thanks Ray

A- a light clear urine yellow color with lil or no head.

S- grain, wheat, corn, typical macro American lager smell

T- grain and corn. nothing special in the flavor. Sweet though.

M- smooth and crisp

D- easy to throw back and something i would have for dinner in a restaurant if nothing else special was on tap. Higher than the bmc beers in my book but lower than sam adams

Photo of Mosstrooper
2.45/5  rDev -10.6%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5

Poured from 24oz bottle into 19oz pilsner glass.

Appearance: Light, clear straw color with a medium sized white head that dissipates very quickly and leaves no lacing behind.

Smell: Sweetness and grain, with hints of corn and slight grassy hops.

Taste: Sweet grain and corn, finishing with very slight hops.

Mouthfeel: Thin, crisp, and refreshing.

Drinkability: Quite drinkable and refreshing, but little else to offer. Does fit in well when eating out at Mexican restaurants, though.

Photo of kaseydad
2.71/5  rDev -1.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Had this in a restaurant and it was brought out with a Pilsner glass....so....pilsner glass pour and am greeted with a pale yellow brew and a small white head which quickly dissolves to nothing.

Aroma is nothing special. Nothing of note to separate it from any other adjunct lager.

Clean and crisp taste with a little funk on the swallow.

Carbonated nicely.

Multiples are very easy if you like this style but there are much better (imo) Mexican beers out there.

Photo of kshankar
3.15/5  rDev +15%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4

Pours a pale yellow/gold with no head to speak of

Aroma is grainy. Corn too.

Taste is fairly unoffensive, even though I've had some skunky specimens of this thing. On this tasting though..all is fine. Its not spectacular, but it works

Mouthfeel is light, carbonation is okay, and overall its watery

Drinkability is high. Thats really what this beer is meant for.

Overall, in terms of style, its much better than most of the beers it competes with.

Photo of rfabian
2.8/5  rDev +2.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3

Poured into a tumbler it produces a 1 inch head that leaves some lacing. The appearance is straw yellow and clear. The aroma is of light hops with a noticable adjunct smell. It has the standard American Adjunct Lager taste, pleasant and not taxing. Light feel and moderate carbonation. Very drinkable.

Photo of jrallen34
3.02/5  rDev +10.2%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3.5

I drank this from a bottle into a chalice.

It pours a light gold with a light tan white, decent retention and lacing.

The aroma is a little hops with a slight skunk.

The taste is what you would expect nothing special.

Decent mouthfeel and drinkability.

Photo of John_M
1.65/5  rDev -39.8%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5

Tis the season and all that. Was at a kareoke bar in Prescott Arizona (of all places) and this was as "good" as anything they had.

The beer pours a pale gold color with minimal head retention and lacing. Alas, the beer smelled worse then it looked, with a lot of moderately sweet corn, a touch of seltzer water, and nothing else. Flavors on the palate replicate the nose on this light, very bland tasting beer. This beer is quite watery with very little flavor. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and given the lack of flavor, drinkability sucks. I was absolutely delighted when my beer was finally gone and I could call it a night.

Note to self. Never order this crap again.

Photo of TLove
1.84/5  rDev -32.8%
look: 2.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1

This beer was the best of my mix 6 pack light lager test. While kicking myself in the head for even bothering with a light lager test, this beer wasn't atrocious, which is a start. Though on any other list it would have been rock bottom.

Got this for free at the Capitol Food Fight event in DC last night.

Corn malt body with a bleached white barley and weathered grainy notes in the smell and taste. Color is a darker, fuller, saison-type yellow with a bit of syrupyness in the color, but not in the taste. I much prefer this to Heineken, which is the other option at this event.

The finish is moderately balanced, with a very dry, acrid acidity and a pungent alcohol taste. Surprisingly kolschy in the mouth, but doesn't really have the body for it.

Photo of wknight167
2.77/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3

Apearance - Pours a crystal clear pale starw yellow with minimal head.

Nose- Grainy with a hint of citrus, lime?

Palate- Crisp, sweet refreshing, but not a whole lot else.

Mouthfeel- Light bodied with a somewhat low carbonation.

Drinkability- Pretty high, but uninteresting. I prefer it to other adjunct lagers.

Photo of BBri
2.89/5  rDev +5.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75

Not a bad beer at all. Peppery flavor with a nice bite. Smells sweet with hints of citrus and grain. Pale yellow that's darker than it's Mexican counterparts. If I'm out for Mexican food, I'd order this over Corona or Tecate. Although not spectacular, they really put some work into brewing it. Not bad at all.

Photo of srandycarter
2.85/5  rDev +4%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3.5

A - Clear light straw, not head. Not much ring either.

S - Corny, grainy.

T - Maiz beer. Good with tamales, no doubt. Not much malt richness, no hops to speak of. I am in Mexico, and this is a standard 'just drinking' suds beer.

M - Thin, carbed, bitter in not a good way at finish.

D - Oh, geez, con Tamales, es muy bien!

Photo of originalsin
2.6/5  rDev -5.1%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

This is NOT the most interesting beer in the world. Need I say more?

Light maltiness, a bit sweet, boring on the nose, boring in the mouth, a bit too carbonated, no head off the pour, piss yellow. At least drinkability is alright. Mouthfeel is light and crisp. I'd rather be drinking the other dos equis though, the amber that is.

Photo of Spineypanda
2.53/5  rDev -7.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5

Dos Equis is what I have come to expect Mexican Lagers to taste like. It is refreshing, don't get me wrong... but has just about nothing to make me purchase it with my own money.

It's appearance is light golden and clear; it has a woody citrus scent to it. It tastes like a bowl of soggy grains. This beer is once again, something I will drink, but only if free. I have had far worse.

Photo of imanidiot777
4/5  rDev +46%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.5

A: Pours a light gold/yellow, very clear, not too much head and very little lacing.

S: I can't really pick out anything in particular in this one.

T: Barely any hops, a tad malty and a tad sweet. Something good about it though.

M: Feels really refined and is easy on the mouth.

D: Goes down really smooth, I could drink a ton of these too not too heavy at all.

Photo of BeerSingh
2.75/5  rDev +0.4%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Poured from bottle into a Guinness Glass (had nothing else available at that time). Poured a pale yellow colour with a half inch head that went off in a jiffy. Smelt like grain liquid with a slight malt essence. The taste was like what Kellogs flavoured water would be. Mouthfeel was thin with good amount of carbonation. I would rate this high on drinkability, good refreshing beer, definitely more body than Corona.

Photo of y2jrock60
3.21/5  rDev +17.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4.5

A- Straw yellow, very clear, highly carbonated, creamy white head that dissipates quickly

S- (My nose was clogged) Zero hop aroma, not very impressed

T- No hop flavor, taste is light, semi-sweet and malty

M- Light bodied and watery

D- Could easily drink a 6-pack, but not very enjoyable

Photo of rootbeerman
1.9/5  rDev -30.7%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

poured into glass
A: pours straw yellow, very short lasting one finger head
S: grainy corn, barely a hop in the nose
T: um corn water with barely noticeable hops. tastes better when drunk out of the bottle imo.
M: medium carbonation, watery
D: goes down easy

reminds me a bit of coors light

Photo of biegaman
2.48/5  rDev -9.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5

Dos Equis doesn't exactly look like Aztec gold but the appearance is decent. The colour is a little drab and toneless but otherwise the clarity is immaculate, the bubbles are entertaining and the head... wait, where did it go? There were some white bubbles here a minute ago. Looks like 'decent' needs to be knocked down a peg. We'll consider it "presentable".

I understand that corn is revered in Mexican culture but I think it's better left to tortillas. Using corn as an adjunct may lead to more consistent beers but I'll tell ya, it certainly does not lead to more fragrant ones - and least not more *pleasantly* fragrant ones anyhow. This has a pretty bold smell alright, it just isn't a very appetizing one.

Neither does corn make for a more tasteful beer. If this isn't the poster boy for high-fructose corn syrup I don't know what is. Best case scenario: corn makes for a more neutral (less distinguished, less flavoured) tasting beer. Worst case scenario: it makes something so repugnant just the thought of it gracing your lips makes your liver quiver.

I'd say Dos Equis is somewhere in the middle, highly uninteresting but not too distasteful. That being said, the fact that I can't remember how long this bottle has been in my fridge and I still have another 10 months before the posted date of expiry doesn't exactly sit well with my liver either. Who knows what else they put in these beers?

Well, we do know they put very little actual ingredients; no hops and a little, tinee-tiny bit of malt leads to a very light-bodied, unnoteworthy, unsatisfying, entirely characterless beer. They do, however, pump in plenty of money. Cue the advertising. The Dos Equis mascot is 'the most interesting man in the world' because this beer certainly is not.

And effective advertising it is. Hey, if those (brilliant) little 15 second vignettes can convince people that this beer has any story or character at all, then by god maybe this company does deserve the sale. But let's be clear about one thing: Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma is far, far better at making commercials than they are at making beer.

Photo of AgentZero
1.92/5  rDev -29.9%
look: 1.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 3

I was making tacos for a date and she said she'd bring the beer. Unfrotunately this is what she brought.

A - Clear, yellow, can see bubbles.

S - Corn and other assorted grains. A little malty. Maybe it's the green bottle, but this smells like Heineken.

T - Tastes like Heineken, in that I can't stand it. Tastes more like a pilsner than a lager, and a bad one at that.

M - Watery, feels like the taste is floating above the water somehow.

D - Well, it is easy to get down, assuming you can get by the taste.

I hate this beer would have to be really thirsty to have it.

Photo of alovesupreme
3.08/5  rDev +12.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4

Freshness date was in code so I dont know how fresh the beer is.
Poured aggressively yielded a 1 finger white head. Dissipated quickly with bubbles on the side of the glass.
A little corny.
Very little hop presence with a slight malt finish. Thats about it.
Bubbly with a thin body.
An ok beer that I would choose over other adjunct lagers but not much else.

Photo of twiggamortis420
1.76/5  rDev -35.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1 | overall: 2

Surely the most interesting man in the world prefers something better than this? Pours a clear, very light yellow color with a decent white head that has better than average retention but no lacing.

Nose is biscuity malts that remind me of ritz crackers and salty peanut shells. Not much hops, but there does seem to be a bit of a dirty lime skin characteristic.

This beer is extremely watery feeling, slides down the throat without even the slightest retention of flavor. There is just a bit of citric and malt presence in the back of the throat. Highly carbonated and thin. This is one of my least favorite Mexican lagers, I cant think of a single other one I would pick this over.

Photo of allergictomacros
2.3/5  rDev -16.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Clear straw and a typical fizzy head. Nose is slightly grassy with hints of lemon/citrus. Flavour is bland, with some husky grain and the bare hint of hops. Vegetal, light body with an every so slightly bitter finish. Watery. Blandest of the bland but not actively gross.

Dos Equis Special Lager from Cervecería Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma, S.A. de C.V.
64 out of 100 based on 2,280 ratings.